Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Molecules ; 24(16)2019 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31408943

RESUMO

A multi-residue method for the determination of 107 pesticide residues in wolfberry has been developed and validated. Similar pretreatment approaches were compared, and the linearity, matrix effect, analysis limits, precision, stability and accuracy were validated, which verifies the satisfactory performance of this new method. The LODs and LOQs were in the range of 0.14-1.91 µg/kg and 0.46-6.37 µg/kg, respectively. The recovery of analytes at three fortification levels (10 µg/kg, 50 µg/kg, 100 µg/kg) ranged from 63.3-123.0%, 72.0-118.6% and 67.0-118.3%, respectively, with relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 15.0%. The proposed method was applied to the analysis of fifty wolfberry samples collected from supermarkets, pharmacies and farmers' markets in different cities of Shandong Province. One hundred percent of the samples analyzed included at least one pesticide, and a total of 26 pesticide residues was detected in fifty samples, which mainly were insecticides and bactericide. Several pesticides with higher detection rates were 96% for acetamiprid, 82% for imidacloprid, 54% for thiophanate-methyl, 50% for blasticidin-S, 42% for carbendazim, 42% for tebuconazole and 36% for difenoconazole in wolfberry samples. This study proved the adaptability of the developed method to the detection of multiple pesticide residues in wolfberry and provided basis for the research on the risks to wolfberry health.


Assuntos
Extração Líquido-Líquido/métodos , Lycium/química , Resíduos de Praguicidas/isolamento & purificação , Benzimidazóis/isolamento & purificação , Carbamatos/isolamento & purificação , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Humanos , Neonicotinoides/isolamento & purificação , Nitrocompostos/isolamento & purificação , Nucleosídeos/isolamento & purificação , Resíduos de Praguicidas/classificação , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Tiofanato/isolamento & purificação , Triazóis/isolamento & purificação
2.
J AOAC Int ; 92(3): 933-40, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19610388

RESUMO

The paper reports the study of gel permeation chromatography (GPC), gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS), and column chromatography tandem MS (LC/MS/MS) for 839 pesticides and chemical contaminants, through which a GPC data bank has been established for 744 pesticides, a GC/MS data bank for 541 pesticides, and an LC/MS/MS data bank for 464 pesticides. On the basis of this study, a new method for quantitative determination of 587 pesticide residues in animal muscles such as beef, mutton, pork, chicken, and rabbit has been established using GPC cleanup followed by GC/MS and LC/MS/MS. In the method, 10 g animal samples were mixed with 20 g sodium sulfate and extracted twice with 35 mL cyclohexane-ethyl acetate (1 + 1) by blender homogenization followed by centrifugation, filtration, and concentration. An equivalent of 5 g sample was injected into a 400 x 25 mm S-X3 GPC column, with cyclohexane-ethyl acetate (1 + 1) as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 5 mL/min. The 22-40 min fraction was collected for subsequent analysis. For the 478 pesticides determined by GC/MS, the portions collected from GPC were concentrated to 0.5 mL and exchanged twice with 5 mL hexane. For the 379 pesticides determined by LC/MS/MS, the portions collected from GPC were dissolved with acetonitrile-water (60 + 40) after taking the extract to dryness with nitrogen gas. At the limit of quantification (LOQ) and 10 LOQ fortification levels of 0.1-16 000 microg/kg, recoveries were within 40-130%, among which 563 pesticide recoveries were between 60 and 130%, accounting for 96% of the compounds; 24 analytes were recovered between 40 and 60%, accounting for 4% of the compounds. The relative standard deviation was below 30% for all 587 pesticides. The limits of detection for the method were 0.1-1600 microg/kg. In comparison with GC/MS, LC/MS/MS increased the detection sensitivity 2-1000 times for 236 pesticides.


Assuntos
Cromatografia em Gel/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Músculos/química , Resíduos de Praguicidas/análise , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Animais
3.
J Agric Food Chem ; 58(17): 9428-53, 2010 Sep 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20712321

RESUMO

The article demonstrates a method of simultaneous determination for 352 pesticide residues in grapes using primary-secondary amine (PSA) matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) cleanup and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-selected ion monitoring (GC-MS-SIM). Grape samples (15 g) were mixed with 6 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 1.5 g of sodium chloride, and then extracted with acetonitrile (15 mL) and cleaned up with 0.3 g of dispersive PSA. The analytes were determined by GC-MS-SIM. Four injections for one sample were acquired to cover a total of 352 pesticides. The limit of detection (LOD) for the method was 0.0017-0.2667 mg kg(-1), depending on the nature of compounds. The linear correlation coefficient (r) was equal to or greater than 0.95; at low, medium, and high fortification levels, recoveries ranged from 45% to 136% for 352 pesticides, among which the recoveries between 60%-120% accounted for 97%. The pesticides for which the relative standard deviations (RSD) were equal to or below 20% accounted for 95%. A positive of nine varieties of grape samples was detected out, one of which was abtained Changli city, Hebei province, China. Pesticides were identified by the retention time, molecule ions, fragment ions, and the abundance ratio of the selected ions. The analytical method was rugged, quick, cheap and effective, and suitable for the determination of a wide scope of 346 pesticides in grapes.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas/métodos , Resíduos de Praguicidas/análise , Vitis/química , Limite de Detecção , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA