Hepatocellular carcinoma reduced, HBsAg loss increased, and survival improved after finite therapy in hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (Nuc) treatment can reduce HCC in patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis (HBV-LC). Earlier small cohort studies showed a comparable 5-year incidence of HCC in HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped and those continued Nuc therapy. This study aimed to validate these findings using a large cohort with 10-year follow-up. APPROACH AND RESULTS: From 2 centers, 494 HBeAg-negative patients with HBV-LC who stopped (finite group) and 593 who continued (continuous group) Nuc therapy were recruited. HCC, HBsAg loss, liver-related mortality/transplantation, and overall survival rates were compared between 2 groups with 1:1 propensity score matching of sex, treatment history, types of Nuc, age, transaminases, platelet count, and HBsAg levels at end of therapy in finite group or 3-year on-therapy in continuous groups. During a median follow-up of 6.2 (3.4-8.9) years, the annual and 10-year HCC incidence were lower in finite group (1.6 vs. 3.3%/y and 10-y 15.7% vs. 26.8%, respectively; log-rank test, p <0.0001). The finite group showed greater HBsAg decline/year (-0.116 vs. -0.095 log 10 IU/mL, p =0.0026) and 7.6 times higher 10-year incidence of HBsAg loss (22.7% vs. 3%, p <0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression showed finite therapy an independent factor for HBsAg loss (adjusted HR: 11.79) but protective against HCC (adjusted HR: 0.593), liver-related mortality/transplantation (adjusted HR: 0.312), and overall mortality (adjusted HR: 0.382). CONCLUSIONS: Finite Nuc therapy in HBeAg-negative HBV-LC may reduce HCC incidence, increase HBsAg loss, and improve survival. Greater HBsAg decline/loss may reflect enhanced immunity and contribute to the reduction of hepatic carcinogenesis.

The Role of Off-Therapy Viral Kinetics in the Timing and Severity of Flares in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis B flare occurs earlier and is more severe in patients stopping tenofovir (TDF) compared with entecavir (ETV). This study investigated relationship between hepatitis B virus (HBV) kinetics, onset timing, and the severity of flares. METHODS: Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who developed off-ETV or off-TDF hepatitis flare were recruited. Their HBV kinetics and the severity of flares were compared between patients with early (<6 months) and late (between 6 and 24 months) flares. Propensity score matching was performed at 1:1 adjusting for age, sex, cirrhosis, and end-of-treatment (EOT) hepatitis B surface antigen between off-ETV and off-TDF flares. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 76% and 15% of each 107 off-TDF and off-ETV patients, respectively, developed early flare. A much steeper HBV DNA upsurge (ΔHBV DNA/month) was observed in off-TDF than off-ETV flares (2.12 vs 0.73 log10 IU/mL; P < .01). Greater ΔHBV DNA/month correlated with earlier timing and higher peak alanine aminotransferase levels of flares. ΔHBV DNA/month ≥2.5 log10 IU/mL was an independent factor for severe off-TDF flare, and ≥1 log10 IU/mL was a predictor for severe off-ETV flares. CONCLUSIONS: Greater HBV DNA upsurge rate (ΔHBV DNA/month) ≥1 log10 IU/mL is a key factor for an earlier onset and more severe flare. More frequent ΔHBV DNA/month ≥1 log10 IU/mL in off-TDF than off-ETV flares may explain why off-TDF flare mostly occurred early and was more severe. More stringent monitoring in those with ΔHBV DNA/month ≥1 log10 IU/mL at flare, especially ≥2.5 log10 IU/mL in early off-TDF flares, is important for timely retreatment to prevent decompensation.

Off-tenofovir hepatitis flares in HBeAg-negative patients occur earlier, more frequent and severe than those off-entecavir therapies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Clinical relapse occurs much earlier and more frequently in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after stopping tenofovir (TDF) therapy than those off-entecavir (ETV). Clinical relapse may subside or progress to hepatitis flare which poses a safety concern. This study compared the incidence, timing and severity of hepatitis flares after stopping TDF and ETV. METHODS: HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had stopped ETV or TDF were included in the study. Off-therapy hepatitis flare patterns were compared between off-ETV and off-TDF patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: The off-therapy hepatitis flares occurred more frequently (2-year: 58% vs 38%, P < .001) and much earlier (12 vs. 38 weeks, P < .001) in TDF group, with higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (after PSM: 536 vs. 419 U/L, P = .020) and two times rate of hepatic decompensation (4.0% vs. 2.1%, P = .322). The cirrhotic status [aHR: 20.531 (2.645-159.365), P = .004] and off-TDF [aHR: 5.530 (1.728-17.694), P = .004] were two independent predictors for hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis flare occurred more frequently, earlier, and more severe in off-TDF than off-ETV patients. More stringent off-therapy monitoring within 6 months off-TDF is mandatory whereas more attention is needed after 6 months off-ETV.

Robust antiviral responses in severe hepatitis flare persist after early retreatment cessation and lead toward hepatitis B surface antigen loss: A proof-of-concept study.

AIM: Hepatitis B flare has been interpreted as result of immune response against upsurging hepatitis B virus (HBV) and its antigen(s) that may lead to HBV decline/clearance spontaneously. It has been speculated that antiviral therapy could halt the effective immune response with viral persistent as a consequence. A proof-of-concept study was conducted to investigate this issue. METHODS: Serial biochemical, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) assays were performed in four patients with severe hepatitis flare who had achieved precipitous HBsAg decline within 4 weeks of antiviral therapy. RESULTS: TNF-α and IFN-γ were found to be elevated in parallel to upsurging HBV DNA and HBsAg levels in all patients. Higher levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ and levels relative to qHBsAg were observed during and after early termination of therapy within 4 weeks in two patients and were followed by further HBsAg decline to <5 IU/ml and even achieved HBsAg loss in one patient. The patient who had stopped therapy on day 44 showed minimal HBsAg decline afterward and the patient who continued therapy showed a 10-fold rebound of qHBsAg from its nadir. The subsequent IFN-γ and TNF-α activity of these two patients was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that patients with severe hepatitis flare who achieved precipitous HBsAg decline may have robust immune response to clear the virus, and early termination of antiviral therapy may allow the protective immune response to continue and accelerate HBV decline toward HBsAg loss.

A switch from tenofovir to entecavir prior to hepatitis B treatment cessation is associated with a reduced risk of off-therapy relapse: An observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, clinical relapse (CR) occurs more frequently, much earlier and often more severely after stopping tenofovir (TDF) and other nucleos(t)ide analogues (Nucs) than after stopping entecavir (ETV). It is unknown whether off-Nuc hepatitis flare can be alleviated by switching from one Nuc to another. METHODS: HBeAg-negative CHB patients who had stopped Nuc according to the APASL stopping rule and had been followed-up for > 48 weeks after Nuc cessation were recruited. Patients were classified as four groups: ETV monotherapy (mono-ETV), TDF monotherapy (mono-TDF), switched to ETV (switch-ETV), and switched to TDF (switch-TDF). Both switch groups had switched to the replacement Nuc > 12 weeks prior to end of therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize confounders among groups. Cox regression analysis was used to identify risks factors for off-Nuc CR and flares. RESULTS: A total of 1309 patients (1022 mono-ETV, 219 mono-TDF, 40 switch-ETV and 28 switch-TDF) were enrolled. The median time to CR was 39, 13, 38 and 14 weeks in mono-ETV, mono-TDF, switch-ETV and switch-TDF respectively (P < 0.001). After PSM, the mono-ETV (adjusted HR: 0.39, P < 0.001) and switch-ETV patients (adjusted HR: 0.41, P = 0.003) had both significantly later occurrence and lower rates of CR and flare. CONCLUSION: In summary, the incidence and timing of CR was determined by ETV or TDF in the last 3 months prior to end of treatment. Patients treated with non-ETV-Nuc switched to ETV > 12 weeks before end of the original Nuc therapy may reduce/defer CR.

Hepatitis B Flare in Hepatitis B e Antigen-Negative Patients: A Complicated Cascade of Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses.

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a dynamic process involving interactions among HBV, hepatocytes, and the host immune system. The natural course of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is divided into four chronological phases, including the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative phases. During HBV flare, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels abruptly rise to >5× the upper limit of normal; this is thought to occur due to the immune response against an upsurge in serum HBV DNA and antigen levels. Hepatitis flares may occur spontaneously, during or after antiviral therapy, or upon immunosuppression or chemotherapy in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. The clinical spectrum of HBV flares varies from asymptomatic to hepatic decompensation or failure. HBeAg seroconversion with ≥ 1 year of consolidation therapy is accepted as an endpoint of oral antiviral therapy in HBeAg-positive patients, but recommendations for treating HBeAg-negative patients differ. Thus, the management of HBeAg-negative patients has attracted increasing interest. In the current review, we summarize various types of HBV flares and the associated complex cascade of innate and adaptive immune responses, with a focus on HBeAg-negative CHB patients. Hopefully, this review will provide insight into immunopathogenesis to improve the management of HBV flares in HBeAg-negative CHB patients.

Finite Antiviral Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients with Cirrhosis.

Antiviral therapy has greatly improved the survival and reduced the incidence of adverse liver events such as hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis (hepatitis B virus [HBV]-cirrhosis). However, hepatitis B surface antigen loss, regarded as the ultimate goal of therapy or functional cure, was rarely achieved during long-term indefinite nucleos(t)ide analogues (Nuc) treatment. Emerging issues such as medication adherence and loss-to-follow-up may lead to increased risk of hepatic decompensation, even catastrophic life-threatening events. Studies have shown that finite therapy is feasible and reasonably safe, even in patients with HBV-cirrhosis. This review critically assesses the scientific evidence of the pros and cons for finite Nuc therapy in HBV-cirrhosis and proposes how to stop Nuc therapy and monitor the off-therapy patients. It also proposes the perspective and unsolved issues to be investigated in the future.

Highly significant differences in HBsAg kinetics among patients with two types of hepatitis B flare, with and without retreatment.

BACKGROUND: Off-therapy hepatitis flare may be detrimental or, conversely, facilitate hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline. Retreatment decisions are crucial. METHODS: HBsAg was quantified before and during flares, at peak/retreatment start and at Months 6 and 12 in 336 entecavir/tenofovir-retreated and 105 non-retreated hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients. Increasing HBsAg during ALT flare defined a 'virus-dominating flare' and decreasing HBsAg a 'host-dominating flare'. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-eight retreated patients with a virus-dominating flare showed greater 1 year HBsAg decline (-1.0 versus -0.01 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001), more frequent rapid decline (69.8% versus 8.3%; P < 0001) and higher 3 year incidence of HBsAg < 100 IU/mL (32% versus 12%; P = 0.026) than 48 patients with a host-dominating flare, of whom 16 (33.3%) showed 3.8-fold (2 to 52-fold) HBsAg rebound on retreatment (versus 2/288; P < 0.0001). Compared with non-retreated controls, 1 year HBsAg decline was greater (-1.0 versus -0.47 log10 IU/mL; P < 0.0001) and faster (69.8% versus 42.5%; P < 0.0001) in patients with a virus-dominating flare, whereas 1 year HBsAg decline (-0.01 versus -0.16 log10 IU/mL) and 3 year HBsAg loss rate (0% versus 21%; P = 0.009) were lower in patients with a host-dominating flare. CONCLUSIONS: Entecavir/tenofovir retreatment effectively decreases HBsAg level in patients with a virus-dominating flare but is ineffective/worse in patients with a host-dominating flare. These results support the use of combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics for the decision to retreat patients with a virus-dominating flare and withhold retreatment for patients with a host-dominating flare.

The impact of hepatitis flare on HBeAg loss was effective mainly in the first year of Nucleot(s)ide therapy in chronic hepatitis B.

HBeAg loss during nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy is significantly higher in patients with hepatitis flare (ALT ≥ 5-times upper limited of normal). It is not clear whether ALT level higher above the hepatitis flare leads to greater HBeAg loss rate nor its durability. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pretherapy ALT level on HBeAg loss in each year of Nuc treatment. Entecavir or Tenofovir treated HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were recruited consecutively. Patients with prior treatment history that experienced HBeAg seroconversion and reversion were excluded. Pretherapy age, gender, cirrhosis, genotype, ALT, HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were analysed. The hazard function was calculated for the probability of HBeAg loss in each year. Of the 290 patients, the 3-year cumulative HBeAg loss rate was 58.1%, higher in patients with hepatitis flare than those without (67.6% vs. 39.6%, P < 0.001). The HBeAg loss rate in the first year correlated positively with higher ALT levels at a stepwise fashion. The hazard function in patients with hepatitis flare was 0.74 at half year, then dropped to 0.33 by the first year and was lower thereafter to a rate closer to that of the patients without hepatitis flare. In conclusion, the impact of pretherapy ALT levels on HBeAg loss rate was not long-lasting and was effective mainly in the first year of Nuc therapy. Strategies such as adding an immune-modulating agent may help enhance HBeAg loss rate after the first year of Nuc therapy for those who remained HBeAg positive. Word count: 249 (<250).

Hepatitis Flares Are Associated With Better Outcomes Than No Flare in Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the effects of baseline hepatitis flares (level of alanine aminotransferase ≥5-fold above the upper limit of normal) on the outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with decompensated cirrhosis treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues. We aimed to investigate these effects. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 511 consecutive patients (78.1% men; 58.7% with flares at baseline) with chronic HBV infection and decompensated cirrhosis who were treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues as soon as decompensation was noted. Patients were enrolled from January 2002 to March 2018 at a tertiary care center in Taiwan and followed up for 16 years. RESULTS: Patients with hepatitis flares had higher mean baseline levels of HBV DNA (6.44 ± 1.52 vs 6.08 ± 1.46 log10 IU/mL; P = .003), hepatitis B surface antigen, and total bilirubin; prolonged prothrombin time; higher platelet counts (108.0 ± 42.9 vs 83.6 ± 44.7 103/µL; P < .001); and a higher proportion were infected with HBV genotype B, compared with patients without flares. Patients with flares had lower ratios of neutrophils to lymphocytes than patients with flares (6.14 ± 9.18 vs 9.12 ± 1.36; P = .019); were less likely than patients without flares to be positive for hepatitis B e antigen, ascites, esophageal varices, or splenomegaly; and a lower proportion died or underwent liver transplantation (46.5% vs 73.2% of patients without flares; P < .001), even though the patients without flares had similar short-term (<3 mo) outcomes. Factors associated independently with baseline flares were esophageal varices (odds ratio [OR], 0.165; 95% CI, 0.067-0.406), ascites (OR, 0.415; 95% CI, 0.178-0.969), levels of total bilirubin (OR, 1.158; 95% CI, 1.041-1.269), prolonged prothrombin time (OR, 1.095; 95% CI, 1.033-1.168), and higher platelet counts (OR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.00-1.018). After we used propensity score matching to match patients with and without baseline flares, factors associated with the cumulative incidence of death or liver transplantation were flares (hazard ratio [HR], 0.491; 95% CI, 0.317-0.76), ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (HR, 1.278; 95% CI, 1.027-1.591), and prolonged prothrombin time (HR, 1.223; 95% CI, 1.052-1.423). CONCLUSIONS: In a 16-year study of patients with chronic HBV infection and decompensated cirrhosis treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues, a baseline flare of hepatitis was associated independently with better long-term (≥3 mo) outcomes than no flare.

Re-treatment for severe hepatitis flare in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: An appraisal with combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics.

To test the concept that off-therapy hepatitis flares with increasing qHBsAg require immediate re-treatment whereas re-treatment can be held or not necessary for those with decreasing qHBsAg, pre-retreatment combined HBsAg/ALT kinetics were classified in 22 patients with severe hepatitis flare (ALT > 30X ULN) and checked against their clinical response and qHBsAg changes during entecavir re-treatment. Timely re-treatment in 16 patients with increasing qHBsAg during hepatitis flare (Pattern I HBV/ALT kinetics) not only improved hepatitis and rescued impending/ensuring hepatic decompensation but also led to 'rapid HBsAg decline' with 14 patients showing HBsAg decline >1-4 log10  IU/mL within 12 months. In contrast, re-treatment in 6 patients with decreasing qHBsAg (Pattern II) resulted in small HBsAg decline in one patient and initial further HBsAg decline but rebound to pre-retreatment level in 3 patients. Of note, stopping 8-day re-treatment in a patient with pre-retreatment HBsAg decline >1 log10  IU/mL allowed further HBsAg decline to a low level (4 IU/mL) towards HBsAg loss. These findings suggest that immediate re-treatment is appropriate in severe hepatitis flare with Pattern I HBsAg/ALT kinetics but can be held or even not necessary in those with Pattern II HBsAg/ALT kinetics. Serial qHBsAg assays, more frequently during hepatitis flare, are helpful for re-treatment decision and close monitoring is mandatory to start, to hold or to stop re-treatment in patients with hepatitis flare.

Off-therapy precipitous HBsAg decline predicts HBsAg loss after finite entecavir therapy in HBeAg-negative patients.

Cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogue (Nuc) therapy in HBeAg-negative patients may increase HBsAg loss rate in patients with sustained remission (SR) and non-retreated clinical relapsers (CR). To investigate and compare the HBsAg kinetics from end of treatment (EOT) to HBsAg loss in these patients, serial serum samples after EOT from 36 SR and 12 CR with HBsAg loss (study group) and an 1:1 matched control who remained HBsAg-seropositive (control group) were assayed retrospectively for quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg). The results showed that study group SR and CR had comparable EOT features except SR had lower EOT qHBsAg (67.5 vs 350.5 IU/mL; P = 0.02; < 100 IU/mL: 58.3% vs 25%; P = 0.09). All showed gradual qHBsAg decrease then "precipitous HBsAg decline" (>0.5 log10 IU/mL in 1 year) prior to HBsAg loss. Patients with EOT qHBsAg <100 showed earlier (<12 months) "precipitous HBsAg decline" (91.7% vs 58.3%; P = 0.017) and sooner HBsAg loss (5.5 vs 21.9 months; P = 0.026). The control group also showed gradual qHBsAg decrease but less frequent "precipitous HBsAg decline" (39.6% vs 100%; P < 0.001) which occurred later (15.1 vs 5.7 months; P = 0.003) and was less steep (slope -0.6 vs -1.65 log10 IU/mL/year; P < 0.001). HBsAg loss was achieved in 92.9% of the patients with "precipitous HBsAg decline" >0.76 log10 IU/mL in 1 year. In conclusion, both the SR and CR groups showed gradual HBsAg decrease followed by a "precipitous HBsAg decline", which is a prerequisite for HBsAg loss. Lower EOT HBsAg in the SR group and qHBsAg <100 IU/mL may reflect better immune control hence followed by sooner HBsAg loss.

Genetic variation in FCER1A predicts peginterferon alfa-2a-induced hepatitis B surface antigen clearance in East Asian patients with chronic hepatitis B.

In a multicentre, genome-wide association study to identify host genetic factors associated with treatment response in adult chronic hepatitis B patients, genotype data were obtained by microarray analysis from 1669 patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a for ≥ 24 weeks with/without a nucleos(t)ide analog. Treatment response was assessed at least 24 weeks post-treatment, using serological and/or virological endpoints. Thirty-six single-marker analyses and a gene-by-gene analysis were conducted. No single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) achieved genome-wide significance (P < 5 × 10-8 ) in single-marker analyses, but suggestive associations (P < 1 × 10-5 ) were identified for 116 SNPs. In gene-by-gene analyses, one gene, FCER1A (rs7549785), reached genome-wide significance (P = 2.65 × 10-8 ) in East Asian patients for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance, with a moderate effect size (odds ratio = 4.74). Eleven of 44 carriers (25%) of the A allele at rs7549785 achieved HBsAg clearance compared with 69/1051 (7%) noncarriers. FCER1A encodes the alpha subunit of the immunoglobulin E receptor. In a post hoc analysis of a homogenous patient subset, the strongest intragenic association was for rs7712322 (POLR3G, P = 7.21 × 10-7 ). POLR3G encodes the G subunit of the polymerase (RNA) III enzyme, involved in sensing and limiting infection by intracellular bacteria and DNA viruses, and as a DNA sensor in innate immune responses. FCER1A (rs7549785) and possibly POLR3G (rs7712322) are shown to be associated with peginterferon alfa-2a response in adult patients with chronic hepatitis B. Independent confirmation of these findings is warranted (clinicaltrials.gov number NCT01855997).