Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 132, 2024 Jul 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075345

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare compliance with the French national guidelines before and after the implementation (in 2018) of a new protocol on acute fracture pain management in the pediatric emergency department of a French university medical center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, before-after study in patients aged below 16 years presenting at the pediatric emergency department with a fracture. We compared pain management before (in 2017) and after (in 2019 and 2020) implementation of the new procedure. The primary endpoint was appropriate pain management, defined as (i) an appropriate initial assessment of pain, (ii) appropriate treatment with analgesic drugs (acetaminophen for mild pain, acetaminophen and ibuprofen for moderate pain, ibuprofen and morphine for severe pain) and (iii) reassessment of the pain intensity. RESULTS: 572 patients were included (mean age: 6.5 years; male: 60%). 190 in 2017 and 382 in 2019-2020. Pain management was appropriate for 40% of the patients in 2017 and 52% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.004). Pain was rated for 98% of patients in 2017 vs. 100% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.04). The frequency of appropriate treatment for mild pain and moderate pain increased significantly from 52 to 76% and from 0 to 44%, respectively. The administration of ibuprofen increased by 26% points (from 3 to 20 patients treated) and the administration of morphine increased by 29% points (from 1 to 17 patients treated). Pain reassessment rose significantly from 21 to 43%. Levels of compliance with the guidelines were similar in 2019 and 2020. Analgesia was significantly more effective in 2019-2020 than in 2017 (in 20% vs. 14% of the patients, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: After the implementation of a new protocol for the management of acute fracture pain, we observed an increase in compliance with the guidelines. Although the use of ibuprofen and morphine rose significantly as did the frequency of pain reassessment, further improvements are required.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fraturas Ósseas , Manejo da Dor , Medição da Dor , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Criança , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Pré-Escolar , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Adolescente , Ibuprofeno/uso terapêutico , Ibuprofeno/administração & dosagem , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Morfina/administração & dosagem , França , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Lactente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem
2.
Int J Emerg Med ; 17(1): 53, 2024 Apr 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The continual increase in patient attendance at the emergency department (ED) is a worldwide health issue. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a secondary prioritization software reduces the patients' median length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric ED. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted over a 30-day period between March 15th and April 23rd 2021 at Lille University Hospital. Work days were randomized to use the patient prioritization software or the pediatric ED's standard dashboard. All time intervals between admission and discharge were recorded prospectively by a physician not involved in patient care during the study period. The study's primary endpoint was the LOS in the pediatric ED, which was expected to be 15 min shorter in the intervention group than in the control group. The secondary endpoints were specific time intervals during the stay in the pediatric ED and levels of staff satisfaction. RESULTS: 1599 patients were included: 798 in the intervention group and 801 in the control group. The median [interquartile range] LOS was 172 min [113-255] in the intervention group and 167 min [108-254) in the control group (p = 0.46). In the intervention group, the time interval between admission to the first medical evaluation for high-priority patients and the time interval between the senior physician's final evaluation and patient discharge were shorter (p < 0.01). The median satisfaction score was 68 [55-80] (average). CONCLUSION: The patients' total LOS was not significantly shorter on days of intervention. However, use of the electronic patient prioritization tool was associated with significant decreases in some important time intervals during care in the pediatric ED. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT05994196 Trial registration number: NCT05994196. Date of registration: August 16th, 2023.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA