What is the real morbidity after emergency colectomy for Crohn's disease? A propensity score matched study.

BACKGROUND: In the inflammatory bowel disease literature, emergency surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is associated with worse postoperative outcomes as compared to elective surgery. Previous studies have compared heterogeneous groups only. We hypothesized that this association would be lost after matched analysis. We aimed to compare matched CD patients undergoing elective vs emergency surgery. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement database (01/2005-12/2019) was utilized to identify adult CD surgical patients. Univariate and conditional logistic regression models were used to analyze unmatched and matched cohorts. Propensity-score matching was performed to match emergency to non-emergency patients 1:1. Our primary outcome was a composite of any complication. Our secondary endpoints were hospital readmission, unplanned reoperation and 30-day morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: In the unmatched analyses (n = 12,181/95.28% elective and n = 603/4.72% emergency) of Crohn's patients undergoing colectomy, 20% of elective and 42% of emergency patients experienced a complication (p < 0.001). Over 20 outcomes measured including length of stay (LOS), readmission, infections and respiratory, cardiovascular and renal complications, were worse in the emergency cohort. In the matched analyses (n = 400 emergency/400 elective patients) only the categories of any complication (OR 1.44, 1.06-1.96 95% CI, p = 0.02), any surgical site infection (SSI, OR 1.53, 1.07-2.19 95% CI, p = 0.02), superficial SSI (OR 2.25, 1.14-4.44 95% CI, p = 0.02), organ space SSI (1.58 OR 1.04-2.4 95% CI, p = 0.03), unplanned intubation (OR 5.0, 1.45-17.27 95% CI, p = 0.01), ventilation > 48 h (OR 9.0, 1.4-38.79 95% CI, p = 0.003) and septic shock (OR 4.5, 1.86-10.9 95% CI, p < 0.001) were higher in the emergency cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Matching CD patients resulted in a loss of the observed increase in cardiovascular and renal complications, reoperation and LOS following emergency surgery; however, SSIs and respiratory complications remained increased despite matching.

Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

PURPOSE: The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure. RESULTS: Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% (n = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% (n = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group (p = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01-16.57, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.

Getting the most out of MRI in perianal fistula: update on surgical techniques and radiological features that define surgical options.

Perianal fistulas affect approximately 2 in 10,000 people, causing symptoms such as pain and discharge, which can have a debilitating effect on a patient's quality of life. Surgical treatment, which can offer a potential cure or palliation of symptoms, must be considered carefully in cases with extensive sphincter involvement. In complex cases, the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can help to determine the best course of operative action. This review describes common and contemporary surgical procedures for perianal fistula, highlighting technical features, as well as important surgical considerations associated with each method and how these can be assessed radiologically. We focus on the anatomical features and MRI findings that take procedural elements into account and help determine the most appropriate method of treatment. The aim of this article is to provide a basis for informed and focused discussion between surgeons and radiologists to ensure the most appropriate procedure is selected for each case, with the ultimate aim of obtaining the most favourable outcomes for patients.

Surveillance pouchoscopy for dysplasia: Cleveland Clinic Ileoanal Pouch Anastomosis Database.

BACKGROUND: No formal guidelines exist for surveillance pouchoscopy following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: All adults who had previously had IPAA for ulcerative colitis, and underwent a pouchoscopy between 1 January 2010 and 1 January 2020, were included. RESULTS: A total of 9398 pouchoscopy procedures were performed in 3672 patients. The majority of the examinations were diagnostic (8082, 86·0 per cent; 3260 patients) and the remainder were for routine surveillance (1316, 14·0 per cent; 412 patients). Thirteen patients (0·14 per cent of procedures) were found to have biopsy-proven neoplasia at the time of pouchoscopy; seven had low-grade dysplasia (LGD) (0·07 per cent; all located in the anal transition zone), none had high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and six (0·06 per cent) had invasive adenocarcinoma (4 in anal transition zone and 6 in pouch). Of the six patients with adenocarcinoma, four had neoplasia at the time of proctocolectomy (2 adenocarcinoma, 1 LGD, 1 HGD); all six were symptomatic with anal bleeding or pelvic pain at the time of pouchoscopy, had a negative surveillance pouchoscopy examination within 2 years of diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, had palpable masses on digital rectal examination, and had visible lesions at the time of pouchoscopy. CONCLUSION: Surveillance pouchoscopy is not recommended in asymptomatic patients because significant neoplasia following IPAA for ulcerative colitis is rare.

ANTECEDENTES: No existen unas recomendaciones formales para vigilancia endoscópica en pacientes a los que se les ha realizado un reservorio ileoanal (ileal pouch anal anastomosis, IPAA) por una colitis ulcerosa (ulcerative colitis, UC). MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes adultos a los que se les había realizado previamente un IPAA por UC y se sometieron a una endoscopia del reservorio. RESULTADOS: Se realizaron un total de 9.398 procedimientos endoscópicos en 3.672 pacientes entre el 1/1/2010 y el 1/1/2020. La mayoría de las exploraciones fueron diagnósticas (n = 8.082; 86%; 3.260 pacientes) y el resto fueron de seguimiento (n = 1.316; 14%; 412 pacientes). Se descubrió que 13 pacientes tenían una neoplasia demostrada por biopsia (0,14%) en el momento de la endoscopia; siete pacientes tenían displasia de bajo grado (low-grade displasia, LGD) (0,074%; localizada en todos los casos en la zona de transición anal), ninguno tenía displasia de alto grado (high-grade displasia, HGD) y seis (0,064%) tenían un adenocarcinoma invasivo (cuatro en la zona de transición anal) y dos en el reservorio). De los seis pacientes con adenocarcinoma, 4 tenían neoplasia en el momento de la proctocolectomía (2 adenocarcinoma, uno LGD, uno HGD). Todos estos pacientes tenían síntomas de hemorragia anal o dolor pélvico en el momento de la endoscopia, se les había practicado una endoscopia previa reciente del reservorio en los dos años anteriores, presentaban una masa palpable en la exploración digital rectal, así como lesiones visibles en la endoscopia del reservorio. CONCLUSIÓN: La vigilancia endoscópica del reservorio no se recomienda en pacientes asintomáticos porque es raro que aparezca una neoplasia después del IPAA por UC.

Excisional haemorrhoidectomy: is it safe in patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis?

AIM: Excisional haemorrhoidectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), especially those undergoing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), remains controversial. The aim of our study was to determine the safety of excisional haemorrhoidectomy in UC patients with and without an IPAA. METHOD: A retrospective review of all adult UC patients undergoing excisional haemorrhoidectomy between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2019 at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centre was performed. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical characteristics of UC, prior surgical intervention for UC (colectomy, IPAA) and complications after haemorrhoidectomy. RESULTS: Forty-one adult patients [50% male; median age 52 (range 25-79) years] with UC underwent excisional haemorrhoidectomy between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2019. The majority (n = 23) had not previously undergone surgery for UC. However, eight had already undergone construction of an IPAA at the time of haemorrhoidectomy, seven had IPAA at the time of haemorrhoidectomy and three had an IPAA constructed subsequent to haemorrhoidectomy. Two (4.9%) patients need to go back to theatre for postoperative bleeding. There were no further 30-day complications or long-term nonhealing of the surgical site. There were no pouch complications in those who had haemorrhoidectomy at the time of IPAA construction or in the presence of an IPAA. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that excisional haemorrhoidectomy may be performed safely in carefully selected UC patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids with or without IPAA and even at the time of IPAA construction.

Perianal fistula and the ileoanal pouch - different aetiologies require distinct evaluation.

AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy has been widely adopted as the procedure of choice for restoring gastrointestinal continuity following proctocolectomy. It is often associated with improved quality of life and high patient satisfaction; however, the development of a pouch anal fistula can cause significant morbidity. Pouch fistulas are notoriously difficult to treat and there is great heterogeneity in the management reported of these fistulas. A lack of classification, and the assumption that fistulas originating from completely different aetiologies will behave and respond similarly to a particular treatment strategy, precludes meaningful comparison of management outcomes. We aim to introduce consistency in the reporting of pouch fistulas using a novel classification system. METHODS: A consensus process involving clinicians experienced in the management of pouch fistulas from two high volume tertiary centres was performed. RESULTS: We propose that pouch anal fistulas should be classified into four distinct groups according to their aetiology: group 1, anastomotic related; group 2, inflammatory bowel disease related, with sub-classifications Crohn's (type A) and non-Crohn's (type B) in origin; group 3, cryptoglandular related; and group 4, malignancy related. CONCLUSION: Classification of pouch fistulas according to their aetiology will provide consistency in the literature and improve the quality of prospective evidence for the management of pouch fistulas.

Mesenchymal stem cells in perianal Crohn's disease.

The use of mesenchymal stem cells has resulted in a breakthrough for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease. This novel treatment is associated with a minimally invasive surgical technique that can be well defined. However, our previous experience has taught us that neglecting any of the critical steps in the operation can result in frequent treatment failure. We have put together a comprehensive guide, a stepwise algorithm, for our minimally invasive approach to identify common pitfalls and reduce treatment failures. Using data we have collected over the past 15 years from drug development, execution of clinical trials, and enacting an advanced educational training program, we spelt out each stage of the minimally invasive surgical intervention for stem cell delivery for perianal Crohn's disease. In this article, we provide 21 tips for a correct approach during the five major phases of the surgical procedure. To optimize the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells for perianal Crohn's disease, a standardized minimally invasive technique including a reliable and reproducible series of key steps should be utilized.

Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia is a distinct cause of chronic colon ischaemia.

AIM: Colon ischaemia (CI) is most commonly an acute and reversible manifestation of a transient, non-occlusive decrease of blood flow in the colonic microvasculature. Irreversible complications are uncommon and the progression to chronic CI remains controversial. Our objective was to identify cases of chronic CI and assess for distinct clinicopathological features. METHOD: A retrospective review was performed of CI patients having symptom chronicity of ≥ 1 month and ischaemic histology at our institution from 1994 to 2015. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, radiological, pathological and outcome variables were abstracted. Histological evaluation was performed by two gastrointestinal pathologists. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (n = 9; 67% men) with a median age of 65 years (range 22-88) were identified. The most common presenting symptoms were diarrhoea and abdominal pain (n = 6, 86%; n = 5, 71%, respectively). The typical endoscopic appearance was segmental ulceration of the sigmoid colon (n = 6, 75%). Vascular imaging showed patent mesenteric vessels in all patients. Histopathological evaluation revealed venous intimal hyperplasia consistent with idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins (IMHMV) in eight patients; the remainder showed non-specific ulceration and fibrosis. Surgical resection was performed in seven IMHMV patients, resulting in symptom resolution. On re-review of pre-resection biopsies, all IMHMV patients had characteristic changes of hyperplastic, thick-walled, hyalinized vessels in the lamina propria. CONCLUSIONS: IMHMV is a unique histopathological entity causing chronic CI. The small vessel histological changes in IMHMV are distinctive in colonic resections and undetectable by routine vascular imaging. Preoperative diagnosis of IMHMV is possible with endoscopic biopsy and segmental colon resection is curative.

Does external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis portend worse ileal pouch outcomes? An international multi-institution collaborative study.

AIM: Short-term morbidity and long-term functional outcome of patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) exposed to pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) remains unknown. We report the largest series to date regarding the effects of pelvic EBRT on: (i) 30-day postoperative outcomes; and (ii) long-term functional outcome following IPAA. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who received EBRT before or after IPAA between 1980 and 2017 across three international inflammatory bowel disease referral centres. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Indications for EBRT were rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 13), prostate adenocarcinoma (n = 4) or anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) (n = 2). EBRT was given prior to IPAA in 12 (63%) patients and after IPAA in seven (37%). In EBRT before IPAA, patients had a median of 5 (range: 4-8) daytime bowel movements, 1 (range: 0-5) night-time bowel movement, no daytime incontinence, and only one patient used pads at a median follow up of 25 (range: 11-163) months; one patient underwent pouch excision 15 months after IPAA. In EBRT after IPAA, patients reported a median of 8 (range: 5-10) daytime and 2 (range: 0-5) night-time bowel movements, 80% had either daytime or night-time incontinence and 80% used pads at a median follow up of 90 (range: 25-315) months. CONCLUSION: Pelvic EBRT administered prior to IPAA is associated with acceptable long-term function outcome. However, when pelvic EBRT is given to an IPAA in situ, most patients experience poor long-term pouch function without pouch failure.

Short-term postoperative outcomes following robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are equivalent.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive approaches have become the standard of care for ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA). There are few reports comparing outcomes following a laparoscopic versus robotic approach. Our aim was to determine if there were any differences in the 30-day postoperative outcomes following IPAA performed laparoscopically versus robotically. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all laparoscopic and robotic IPAA performed between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2018 was carried out. Patients included were adult patients who underwent a proctectomy and IPAA utilizing either a laparoscopic or robotic approach. Data collected included patient demographics, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients had a minimally invasive IPAA; 58 were performed laparoscopically and 74 robotically. Less than half the patients were female (n = 55; 41.7%) with a median age of 37 years (range 18-68 years). The majority of patients had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (n = 103; 78.0%) with medically refractory disease (n = 87; 65.9%). A greater proportion of patients in the laparoscopic cohort had a prolonged length of stay (n = 27; 46.6% versus n = 18; 24.3%; p < 0.001) and a two-stage approach (n = 56; 96.6% versus n = 37; 50%; p < 0.001), but there were no differences in the rates between the laparoscopic versus robotic cohorts of superficial surgical site infection (6.9% versus 6.8%; p = 0.99), peripouch abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), anastomotic leak (6.9% versus 2.7%; p = 0.21), pelvic abscess (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), and pelvic sepsis (15.5% versus 6.8%; p = 0.11), readmission (24.1% versus 17.6%; p = 0.35) or reoperation (6.9% versus 5.4%; p = 0.72). On multivariable analysis, only male sex remained predictive of prolonged length of stay, and a robotic approach trended toward a decreased rate of prolonged length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and robotic IPAA have equivalent postoperative morbidity underscoring the safety of the continued expansion of the robotic platform for pouch surgery.

A systematic review of minimally invasive surgery for retrorectal tumors.

Retrorectal tumors are rare tumors that require resection for symptoms, malignancy and potential malignant transformation. Traditional approaches have included laparotomy, perineal excision or a combination. Multiple minimally invasive techniques are available which have the potential to minimize morbidity and enhance recovery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the feasibility and surgical outcomes of retrorectal tumors approached using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Publications in which adult patients (≥ 18 years) had a minimally invasive approach (laparoscopic or robotic) for resection of a primary retrorectal tumor were included. Data were collected on approach, preoperative investigation, size and sacral level of the tumor, operating time, length of stay, perioperative complications, margins and recurrence. Thirty-five articles which included a total of 82 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were female (n = 65; 79.2%), with a mean age of 41.7 years (range 18-89 years). Seventy-three patients (89.0%) underwent laparoscopic or combined laparoscopic-perineal resection, and 9 (10.8%) had a robotic approach. The conversion rate was 5.5%. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 15.7%, including 1 intraoperative rectal injury (1.2%). Ninety-five percent (n = 78) of the retrorectal tumors were benign. Median length of stay was 4 days for both laparoscopic and robotic groups, with ranges of 1-8 and 2-10 days, respectively. No tumor recurrence was noted during follow-up [median 28 months (range 5-71 months)]. A minimally invasive approach for the resection of retrorectal tumors is feasible in selected patients. Careful patient selection is necessary to avoid incomplete resection and higher morbidity than traditional approaches.

Pouch excision: indications and outcomes.

AIM: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis is the procedure of choice for ulcerative colitis. Unfortunately, up to 10% of pouches will fail, requiring either reconstruction or excision. While several series have reported on the aetiology of pouch failure, no study to date has focused on the postoperative complications associated with pouch excision. METHODS: Patients who had excision of ileoanal reservoir with ileostomy (CPT code 45136) were included. Data abstracted included preoperative, operative and postoperative variables. A Kaplan-Meier curve of pouch survival was performed. RESULTS: In all, 147 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. The median age of patients was 47 years (73 women), and 132 had a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis at the time of colectomy. The most common indications for pouch excision were sepsis (n = 46; 31%) and Crohn's disease (n = 37; 25%). 84 (57%) patients experienced short-term (< 30 days) postoperative complications, the most common of which was a surgical site infection (n = 32; 21%); 55 (37%) patients had long-term complications (> 30 days) postoperatively, the most common of which was a return to the operating room (n = 19; 13%) largely for perineal wounds. Thirty-day mortality was zero. 4.8%, 47.6%, 65.3% and 84.4% of patients had undergone pouch excision by 1, 5, 10 and 20 years from the time of pouch construction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pouch excision has a high rate of both short- and long-term postoperative complications. Patients should be appropriately counselled to set expectations accordingly. In view of these findings we suggest that this operation should ideally be performed at a high volume centre with the availability of a multidisciplinary surgical team.

Clostridium difficile infection after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis.

AIM: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) of the ileal pouch following restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) is becoming increasingly recognized. We aimed to understand better (i) the associated risk factors, (ii) treatment practices and (iii) the pouch diversion and failure rate in patients who developed CDI of the pouch after RPC for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHOD: Patients who tested positive for C. difficile of the pouch between 2007 and 2010 were included in the analysis. Data collected included patient demographics, time from RPC to documented CDI, the treatment of CDI and rate of excision of the pouch. RESULTS: Of 2785 patients recorded in the hospital CDI database, 15 had had an RPC with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. The median age was 44 years and the median interval from RPC to first documented episode of CDI was 3 years. Thirteen (81%) patients had had multiple episodes of pouchitis before and after CDI infection, and all were symptomatic at the time of testing for CDI. Within 30 days of the diagnosis of CDI, six (40%) patients were taking immunosuppressive medication, seven (47%) were taking a proton pump inhibitor and 12 (80%) had received antibiotics. Five patients required hospitalization for CDI and four had severe infections characterized by a serum creatinine more than 1.5 times baseline (n = 3) and a white cell count above 15 000 (n = 1). Six patients who underwent endoscopy had severe inflammation of the pouch including the presence of a pseudomembrane in one case. Ten patients were treated with metronidazole alone and five with vancomycin. Two patients had recurrent CDI of the pouch during a median follow-up period of 2.9 years and one had CDI refractory to medical management. This patient required diversion of the pouch with an ileostomy for refractory CDI but no patient required excision of the pouch. CONCLUSION: All 15 patients developing CDI of the pouch were successfully treated with antibiotics and only one required surgery in the form of an ileostomy.

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes in 588 patients undergoing minimally invasive ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: A laparoscopic approach to proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis has grown in popularity secondary to reports of small series demonstrating short-term patient benefits. Limited data exist in large numbers of patients undergoing laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (L-IPAA). We aimed to analyze surgical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing L-IPAA. METHODS: From a prospectively maintained surgical database, 30-day surgical outcome data were reviewed for all L-IPAA performed for chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis from 1999 to 2012. Demographics, operative approach, and operative and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 588 L-IPAA ileal pouch-anal anastomoses were performed predominantly for chronic ulcerative colitis (93.9 %). The mean age was 36.2 years, and 54.3 % were male, with a mean BMI of 24.1 kg/m(2). Three-stage operations were performed in 17.7 %. The mean operating time of the patients excluding 3-stage operation was 269.4 min. Minimally invasive techniques included hand-assist in 55 % and straight laparoscopy in 45 %. Conversion to open occurred in 8.8 %. Median length of stay was 5 days. There was no mortality. Complications occurred in 36.9 % of patients: Clavien grade I (17.5 %), grade II (72.8 %), and grade III (9.7 %). Analysis of the grouped data over time demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in operative time (p < 0.001) and an increase in the ratio of hand-assisted over straight laparoscopy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive IPAA performed using either a laparoscopic or hand-assisted technique is safe, can be performed with low conversion rates, and confers beneficial perioperative outcomes.

Short-term outcomes and healthcare resource utilization following incisional hernia repair with synthetic mesh in patients with Crohn's disease.

PURPOSE: While the use of synthetic mesh for incisional hernia repair reduces recurrence rates, little evidence exists regarding the impact of this practice on the disease burden of a Crohn's patient. We aimed to describe the post-operative outcomes and healthcare resource utilization following incisional hernia repair with synthetic mesh in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients with Crohn's disease who underwent elective open incisional hernia repair with extra-peritoneal synthetic mesh from 2014 to 2018 at a single large academic hospital with surgeons specializing in hernia repair was conducted. Primary outcomes included 30-day post-operative complications and long-term rates of fistula formation and hernia recurrence. The secondary outcome compared healthcare resource utilization during a standardized fourteen-month period before and after hernia repair. RESULTS: Among the 40 patients included, six (15%) required readmission, 4 (10%) developed a surgical site occurrence, 3 (7.5%) developed a surgical site infection, and one (2.5%) required reoperation within the first 30 days. The overall median follow-up time was 42 months (IQR = 33-56), during which time one (2.5%) patient developed an enterocutaneous fistula and eight (20%) experienced hernia recurrence. Healthcare resource utilization remained unchanged or decreased across every category following repair. CONCLUSION: The use of extra-peritoneal synthetic mesh during incisional hernia repair in patients with Crohn's disease was not associated with a prohibitively high rate of post-operative complications or an increase in healthcare resource utilization to suggest worsening disease during the first 4 years after repair. Future studies exploring the long-term outcomes of this technique are needed.

Postoperative outcomes in vedolizumab-treated Crohn's disease patients undergoing major abdominal operations.

BACKGROUND: Up to 80% of patients with Crohn's disease require an abdominal operation in their lifetime. As the use of vedolizumab is increasing for the treatment of Crohn's disease, it is important to understand its potential association with post-operative complications. AIM: We sought to compare 30-day postoperative infectious complication rate among vedolizumab-treated Crohn's disease patients vs those who had received TNFα inhibitors or no biologic therapy. METHODS: A retrospective review of all Crohn's disease patients who received vedolizumab within 12 weeks of a major abdominal or pelvic operation was performed. Two control cohorts consisted of Crohn's disease patients treated with TNFα inhibitors or no biologic therapy. RESULTS: One hundred Crohn's disease patients received vedolizumab within 12 weeks of an abdominal operation. Vedolizumab-treated patients underwent an equivalent rate of laparoscopic surgery (P = .25), had fewer anastomoses performed (P = .0002), and had equally frequent diversion in the setting of anastomoses (P = .47). Thirty-two vedolizumab-treated patients experienced postoperative infectious complications (32%), 26 of which were surgical site infections (26%). The vedolizumab-treated group experienced no difference in nonsurgical site infections (6% vs 5% anti-TNFα and 2% nonbiologic; P = .34), but significantly higher rates of surgical site infections (26% vs 8% and 11%; P < .001). On univariate and multivariate analysis, exposure to vedolizumab remained a significant predictor of postoperative surgical site infection (P < .001 and P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-six per cent of Crohn's disease patients who received vedolizumab within 12 weeks prior to a major abdominal operation experienced a 30-day postoperative surgical site infection, significantly higher than that of patients receiving TNFα inhibitors or no biologic therapy. Vedolizumab within 12 weeks of surgery remained a predictor of 30-day postoperative surgical site infection on multivariable analysis. While vedolizumab-treated Crohn's disease patients may be a sicker cohort of patients, it is important to consider these findings with regard to preoperative counselling, operative timing and primary closure of wounds.

Effects of vedolizumab, adalimumab and infliximab on biliary inflammation in individuals with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, progressive cholestatic biliary disease associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with no known cure. AIM: To evaluate the effect of biological therapies on PSC progression in IBD patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 88 cases (75 unique patients with 12 patients treated >1 biologics) of IBD (48 ulcerative colitis, 24 Crohn's disease and 3 indeterminate colitis) with concomitant PSC who received biological therapy (42 infliximab, 19 adalimumab, 27 vedolizumab) between June 2002 and October 2017. Hepatic biochemistries were compared using the paired t-test (patients served as their own controls) ≤3 months before and 6-8 and 12-14 months after biological initiation. Radiographic information of biliary stenosis and liver fibrosis were obtained via abdominal ultrasound, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance elastography. RESULTS: Use of adalimumab was associated with a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) after 6-8 months (P = 0.03; mean change -70 U/L, standard deviation [SD] 88 U/L) compared to vedolizumab (mean change +50 U/L, SD 142 U/L) or infliximab (mean change +37 U/L, SD 183 U/L) but the change was not significant after 12-14 months (P = 0.24). No significant decreases were observed with AST, ALT, total or direct bilirubin, elastography score or radiographic imaging of biliary tree dilation/strictures with any biological therapy after 6-8 or 12-14 months. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that biological therapies used for the treatment of IBD are not effective treatments for PSC. Further study is needed to elucidate any potential beneficial effect of adalimumab on PSC.