Hydration shells of molecules in molecular association: A mechanism for biomolecular recognition.

It has become clear that water should not be treated as an inert environment, but rather as an integral and active component of molecules. Here, we consider molecules and their hydration shells together as single entities. We show that: (1) the rate of association of molecules should be determined by the energetic barriers arising from interactions between their hydration shells; (2) replacing non-polar atoms of molecular surfaces with polar atoms increases these barriers; (3) reduction of the hydration shells during molecular association is the driving force for association not only of non-polar, but of polar molecules as well; (4) in most cases the dehydration of polar atoms during molecular association thermodynamically counteracts association; (5) on balance the thermodynamic stability of associated complexes is basically determined by the action of these two opposing factors: reduction of the hydration shells and dehydration of polar atoms; (6) molecular crowding reduces the energetic barriers counteracting association and changes the thermodynamic stability of associated complexes. These results lead to a mechanism for biomolecular recognition in the context of which the formation of unique structures is provided by rapidly forming kinetic traps with a biologically necessary lifetime but with a marginal thermodynamic stability. The mechanism gives definitive answers to questions concerning the heart of specific interactions between biomolecules, their folding and intracellular organization. Predictions are given that can be subjected to direct experimental tests.

Analysis of recognition of transfer-messenger RNA by the ribosomal decoding center.

Bacterial ribosomes stalled on defective mRNAs are rescued by tmRNA that functions as both tRNA and mRNA. The first ribosomal elongation cycle on tmRNA where tmRNA functions as tRNA is highly unusual: occupation of the ribosomal A site by tmRNA occurs without codon:anticodon pairing. Our analysis shows that in this case the role of a codon:anticodon duplex should be accomplished by a single unpaired triplet. In order that tmRNA could participate in the ribosomal elongation cycle, a triplet preceding the mRNA portion of tmRNA (the -1triplet) should be in the A-form and this form should be recognized by the ribosomal decoding center. A rule is derived that determines what triplets cannot be used as the -1triplet. The rule was tested with the -1triplets of all known 414 tmRNA species. All 23 observed -1triplets follow the formulated rule. The rule is also supported by the available data on base substitutions within the -1triplet.

Ribosomal elongation cycle: energetic, kinetic and stereochemical aspects.

As a preface to an analysis of the ribosomal elongation cycle, we examine the energetics of macromolecular structural transformations. We show that the kinetic barriers and changes of the energetic levels during these transformations are essentially determined by disruption of hydrogen and cation-ligand bonds, and by uncompensated losses of these bonds (ULBs). The disruption of a hydrogen or cation-ligand bond increases the heights of kinetic barriers by the energy of these bonds. The association and dissociation of macromolecules, and conformational transitions within macromolecules, can change the numbers of ULBs but cannot completely eliminate them. Two important general conclusions are drawn from this analysis. First, occupation of enzyme active centers by substrates should be accompanied by a reduction in the number of ULBs. This reduction decreases the activation barriers in enzyme reactions, and is a major contributor to catalysis. Second, the enzymic reactions of the ribosomal cycle (structural changes caused by transpeptidation and by GTP hydrolyses in EF-Tu and EF-G) disrupt kinetic traps that prevent tRNAs from dissociating into solution during their motion within the ribosome and are necessary for progression of the cycle. These results are general purpose structural-functional blocks for building a molecular model of the ribosomal elongation cycle. Here, we demonstrate the utility of these blocks for analysis of acceptance of cognate tRNAs into the ribosomal elongation cycle.

How does tmRNA move through the ribosome?

To test the structure of tmRNA in solution, cross-linking experiments were performed which showed two sets of cross-links in two different domains of tmRNA. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to search for tmRNA nucleotide bases that might form a functional analogue of a codon-anticodon duplex to be recognized by the ribosomal A-site. We demonstrate that nucleotide residues U85 and A86 from tmRNA are significant for tmRNA function and propose that they are involved in formation of a tmRNA element playing a central role in A-site recognition. These data are discussed in the frame of a hypothetical model that suggests a general scheme for the interaction of tmRNA with the ribosome and explains how it moves through the ribosome.

The crucial role of conserved intermolecular H-bonds inaccessible to the solvent in formation and stabilization of the TL5.5 SrRNA complex.

Analysis of the structures of two complexes of 5 S rRNA with homologous ribosomal proteins, Escherichia coli L25 and Thermus thermophilus TL5, revealed that amino acid residues interacting with RNA can be divided into two different groups. The first group consists of non-conserved residues, which form intermolecular hydrogen bonds accessible to solvent. The second group, comprised of strongly conserved residues, form intermolecular hydrogen bonds that are shielded from solvent. Site-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce mutations into the RNA-binding site of protein TL5. We found that replacement of residues of the first group does not influence the stability of the TL5.5 S rRNA complex, whereas replacement of residues of the second group leads to destabilization or disruption of the complex. Stereochemical analysis shows that the replacements of residues of the second group always create complexes with uncompensated losses of intermolecular hydrogen bonds. We suggest that these shielded intermolecular hydrogen bonds are responsible for the recognition between the protein and RNA.