Meniscal allograft transplantation improves patient-reported outcomes in both minimal and moderate knee osteoarthritis at 1 and 2 years postoperatively.

PURPOSE: Severe cartilage damage and advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA) might be associated with poor outcomes of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to explore MAT survivorship and patient satisfaction among young patients with symptomatic meniscal deficiency and radiological OA of different Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive MAT patients were prospectively followed up for 2 years. The lateral meniscus was replaced in 29 patients and the medial meniscus in 6 patients. Outcomes were assessed using the KOOS4 composite score, KOOS subscales, Lysholm knee score, and OA K-L grade progression from weight-bearing knee radiographs. For the outcome analysis, patients were categorized into two groups: 19 in Group A (K-L classification 0-1) and 16 in Group B (K-L classification 2). RESULTS: In terms of KOOS4 and Lysholm scores, the patients showed a clinically significant improvement from baseline to the 1-year follow-up (22.2 points, 95% CI 16.6-27.8 for KOOS4 and 16.8 points, 95% CI 8.9-24.6 for Lysholm), and the improvement remained at 2 years (20.6 points, 95% CI 13.2-28.1 for KOOS4 and 21.5, 95% CI 12.5-30.7 for Lysholm). At the 6-month follow-up, this improvement was not yet observed. Minor between-group differences were observed in the KOOS4 and Lysholm scores for the K-L 0-1 and K-L 2 OA groups, but the estimates were imprecise with wide confidence intervals. A clinically relevant difference between these two study groups could not be found at any timepoint. The reoperation rate was higher in the K-L 2 group than in the K-L 0-1 group (31% vs. 11%). CONCLUSIONS: MAT yielded improved patient-reported outcomes and subjective satisfaction at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The differences from baseline exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) at all timepoints. The severity of cartilage damage and knee OA in terms of the K-L grade at the time of surgery did not affect the KOOS and Lysholm scores after the MAT procedure. Knee OA progression in terms of K-L grade worsening was not observed in any patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Treatment of medial-sided injuries in patients with early bicruciate ligament reconstruction for knee dislocation.

PURPOSE: In knee dislocation with bicruciate ligament and medial side injury (KDIIIM), treatment method of medial side injuries is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of non-operative treatment of proximal and midsubstance and operative treatment of distal avulsion medial collateral ligament (MCL) ruptures in patients with early bicruciate reconstruction. METHODS: One-hundred and forty-seven patients with a knee dislocation and bicruciate ligament injury (KDII-KDV) were identified. Sixty-two patients had KDIIIM injury. Of these, 24 patients were excluded and 13 were lost to follow-up. With a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, IKDC2000 (subjective and objective), Lysholm and Tegner scores and stress radiographs were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were available for follow-up: 18 had a proximal or midsubstance grade-III MCL rupture (proximal MCL group) and 7 had a distal MCL avulsion (distal MCL group). In the proximal MCL and distal MCL groups, respectively, median IKDC2000 subjective scores were 80 (range 57-99) and 62 (range 39-87), and median Lysholm scores were 88 (range 57-99) and 75 (range 40-100). The median medial opening (side-to-side difference) was 2.4 mm (range 0.1-9.2) in the proximal MCL group and 2.5 mm (range 0.2-4.8) in the distal MCL group. CONCLUSION: We found acceptable recorded outcomes in patients who underwent non-operative treatment of proximal and midsubstance grade-III MCL rupture and operative treatment of distal MCL avulsion with early bicruciate ligament reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Structural validity of the Finnish Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) using the Rasch model.

BACKGROUND: The 16-item patient-reported Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) with subscales of pain, social interactions, and walking/standing has been claimed for strongest scientific evidence in measuring foot and ankle complaints. This study tests the validity of the Finnish MOXFQ for orthopaedic foot and ankle population using the Rasch analysis. METHODS: We translated the MOXFQ into Finnish and used that translation in our study. MOXFQ scores were obtained from 183 patients. Response category distribution, item fit, coverage, targeting, item dependency, ability to measure latent trait (unidimensionality), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and person separation index (PSI) were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen of the items had ordered response categories and/or sufficient fit statistics. The subscales provided coverage and targeting. Some residual correlation was noted. Removing one item in the pain subscale led to a unidimensional structure. Alphas and PSIs ranged between 0.68-0.90 and 0.67-0.92, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some infractions of the Rasch model, the instrument functioned well. The subscales of the MOXFQ are meaningful for assessing patient-reported complaints and outcomes in orthopaedic foot and ankle population.

Validity of five foot and ankle specific electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) instruments in patients undergoing elective orthopedic foot or ankle surgery.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are widely accepted measures for evaluating outcomes of surgical interventions. As patient-reported information is stored in electronic health records, it is essential that there are valid electronic PRO (ePRO) instruments available for clinicians and researchers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of electronic versions of five widely used foot and ankle specific PRO instruments. METHODS: Altogether 111 consecutive elective foot/ankle surgery patients were invited face-to-face to participate in this study. Patients completed electronic versions of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the modified Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) on the day of elective foot and/or ankle surgery. Construct validity, coverage, and targeting of the scales were assessed. RESULTS: Based on general and predefined thresholds, construct validity, coverage, and targeting of the ePRO versions of the FAAM, the FAOS, the MOXFQ, and the VAS-FA were acceptable. Major issues arose with score distribution and convergent validity of the modified LEFS instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The ePRO versions of the FAAM, the FAOS, the MOXFQ, and the VAS-FA provide valid scores for foot and ankle patients. However, our findings do not support the use of the modified LEFS as an electronic outcome measure for patients with orthopedic foot and/or ankle pathologies.

Fibular head avulsion fractures accompanying operative treated medial tibial plateau fractures.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this work are to determine how frequently medial tibial plateau fractures are accompanied by fibular head avulsion fractures and evaluate the sensitivity of radiographs detecting them, and also to assess if the presence of fibular fracture is correlated with long-term functional outcome and peroneal nerve damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of operated patients with medial tibial plateau fractures at level I trauma center during 2002-2008 was performed. From 63 patients imaged preoperatively, 59 had CT and radiographs, three had only CT, and one only radiograph. The presence and fragment size of fibular fracture were retrospectively evaluated. Body mass index (BMI) and functional outcome measurements (the Modified Lysholm knee score and WOMAC) were available for 46 patients. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 63 patients (22.2%) had fibular fractures. Of the 59 patients with both CT and radiographs, 12 had fibular fractures, and of these, nine were seen with both modalities and three only in CT. Functional scores were available for ten patients with fibular fracture. Patients with fibular fracture seen on radiographs had a significantly higher score on WOMAC function (26 vs. 7; p = 0.027). The patients with fibular fractures had also higher BMI (p = 0.035). Of the six patients with peroneal nerve damage, 50% had fibular fracture. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with operatively treated medial tibial plateau fracture, the fibular fractures are relatively common. Detecting it is important, as it may be associated with worse functional scores and peroneal nerve paresis. Some fibular fractures may remain undetected on radiographs, hence preoperative CT is recommended.

Reliability and validity of the Finnish version of the Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA).

BACKGROUND: There have previously been no validated foot and ankle-specific patient-reported outcome measures in Finnish. METHODS: The Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) was translated and adapted into Finnish. Thereafter, 165 patients who had undergone foot and ankle surgery completed a questionnaire set on two separate occasions. Analyses included testing of floor-ceiling effect, internal consistency, reproducibility, and validity. RESULTS: Minor linguistic differences emerged during the translation. Some structural adjustments were made. The mean (SD) total VAS-FA score was 74 (23). In the three subscales, maximum scores were noted in 2-5% of the responses, and internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.94. Reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.97). The total VAS-FA score correlated significantly with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (r=0.84) and the 15D Mobility dimension (r=0.79). The VAS-FA loaded on two factors (pain/movement and problems/limitations). CONCLUSIONS: The Finnish version of the VAS-FA has high reliability and strong validity.

[Complications in ankle fracture surgery]. / Nilkkamurtuman leikkaushoidon komplikaatiot.

Ankle fractures are among the most frequently encountered surgically treated fractures. The operative treatment can be associated with several complications such as malreduction and infection. Reinforcing the surgical armamentarium with meticulous preoperative planning together with recognition of common surgical errors are valuable adjuncts in reducing these complications. Furthermore, it is crucial to recognize and address modifiable risk factors for infection so as to minimize this potentially devastating complication. When a deep infection does occur, it is best managed by a multidisciplinary musculosceletal infection team.

The reverse Segond fracture: not associated with knee dislocation and rarely with posterior cruciate ligament tear.

The aims of this study were to assess the incidence of reverse Segond fracture, to examine the associated ligamentous injuries, and to examine how often reverse Segond fracture coexists with a knee dislocation. At a level 1 trauma center, an 11-year period of emergency department multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) examinations for knee trauma was evaluated for reverse Segond and Segond fractures. Surgical findings served as the reference standard for intra-articular injuries. The hospital discharge register was searched for the diagnosis of knee dislocation from August 2000 through the end of August 2011. A total of 1,553 knee MDCT examinations were evaluated. Ten patients with a reverse Segond fracture were found, comprising 0.64 % of emergency room acute knee trauma MDCT examinations. Seven patients who had a reverse Segond fracture were operated: Three had an avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament, one had an avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament, two had a lateral meniscal tear, and two had a medial collateral ligament tear. The ratio of reverse Segond fractures to Segond fractures was 1:4. None of the 71 knee dislocation patients had a reverse Segond fracture. Reverse Segond fracture is a rare finding even in a level 1 trauma center. Cruciate ligament injuries appear to be associated with avulsion fracture, but every patient does not have PCL injury, as previously reported. Our results do not support the association of knee dislocation with reverse Segond fracture.

A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the most common surgical errors resulting in early re-operation following ankle fracture surgery. METHODS: We performed a chart review to determine the most common types of malreductions that led to early re-operation following ankle fracture surgery. From 2002 to 2011, we identified 5,123 consecutive ankle fracture operations in 5,071 patients. Seventy-nine patients (1.6%) which underwent re-operation due to malreduction detected in postoperative radiographs. These patients were compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls which did not need further surgery. RESULTS: The most common indication for re-operation was syndesmotic malreduction (47 of 79 patients, 59%). Four main types of errors related to syndesmotic reduction or fixation were identified, with the most common being fibular malpositioning within the tibiofibular incisura. Other indications for re-operation were fibular shortening and malreduction of the medial malleolus. Fracture dislocation, fracture type, posterior malleolar fracture, associated medial malleolar fracture, duration of index surgery, and fixation of an associated medial malleolar fracture with other than two parallel screws were also associated with re-operation. Correction of the malreduction was successfully achieved in the majority (84%) of cases needing further surgery. CONCLUSION: Early re-operation after ankle fracture surgery was most commonly caused by errors related to syndesmotic reduction or failure to restore fibular length. In the majority of cases, postoperative malreduction was successfully corrected in the acute setting.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction learning curve study - Comparison of the first 50 consecutive patients of five orthopaedic surgeons during a 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The goal of all surgical and orthopaedic training is to ensure necessary education and surgical skills without compromising the quality of operations or patient safety. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common multi-staged orthopaedic surgical procedure with a learning curve. Previous studies focus mainly on learning or the learning curve of one surgeon and tunnel placements. The aims of this study were to define the learning curve in arthroscopic ACLRs, define the number of procedures needed before the surgical "knifetime" plateaus, examine the effect of experience on complications, and identify possible individual differences in the surgical learning curve. METHODS: The study included the first 50 consecutive ACLR operations of five orthopaedic surgeons, thus, a total of 250 patients. For comparison and statistical analysis, patients were arranged into five groups, each comprising 50 patients (=order group). Order group 1 comprised the first 10 patients operated on by each of the five surgeons, group 2 patients 11-20, group 3 patients 21-30, group 4 patients 31-40, and group 5 the last 10 patients. The learning curve was defined with a LOESS curve. Surgical time and complications, including graft failure and postoperative knee instability, were analysed between order groups and between surgeons. RESULTS: Median surgical time was 105 (interquartile range 82-124) min. The learning curve showed the first steep decline in surgical time and started to settle slowly after 20 reconstructions. Surgical time was significantly longer when order group 1 was compared with order group 2 (p = 0.031), and when order group 1 was compared separately with order groups 3, 4, and 5 (p < 0.001). Operation order alone explained only 17.1% of the alteration in surgical time. No significant difference emerged in graft failure rate between the order groups or the surgeons. Objective instability of the knee showed a significant difference when order group 1 was compared separately with order group 3 and with order group 4 (p = 0.004). Surgical time differed between surgeons (p < 0.001), and the shape of the learning curve showed great individual variability. CONCLUSION: In the first 10 to 20 ACLR operations, the surgical time was longer and the complication rate higher, but thereafter both started to settle down. We recommend that first 10-20 ACLR operations should be supervised.

Prediction of fracture nonunion leading to secondary surgery in patients with distal femur fractures.

Aims: Several previously identified patient-, injury-, and treatment-related factors are associated with the development of nonunion in distal femur fractures. However, the predictive value of these factors is not well defined. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of previously identified risk factors in the development of nonunion leading to secondary surgery in distal femur fractures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with traumatic distal femur fracture treated with lateral locking plate between 2009 and 2018. The patients who underwent secondary surgery due to fracture healing problem or plate failure were considered having nonunion. Background knowledge of risk factors of distal femur fracture nonunion based on previous literature was used to form an initial set of variables. A logistic regression model was used with previously identified patient- and injury-related variables (age, sex, BMI, diabetes, smoking, periprosthetic fracture, open fracture, trauma energy, fracture zone length, fracture comminution, medial side comminution) in the first analysis and with treatment-related variables (different surgeon-controlled factors, e.g. plate length, screw placement, and proximal fixation) in the second analysis to predict the nonunion leading to secondary surgery in distal femur fractures. Results: We were able to include 299 fractures in 291 patients. Altogether, 31/299 fractures (10%) developed nonunion. In the first analysis, pseudo-R2 was 0.27 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.81. BMI was the most important variable in the prediction. In the second analysis, pseudo-R2 was 0.06 and AUC was 0.67. Plate length was the most important variable in the prediction. Conclusion: The model including patient- and injury-related factors had moderate fit and predictive ability in the prediction of distal femur fracture nonunion leading to secondary surgery. BMI was the most important variable in prediction of nonunion. Surgeon-controlled factors had a minor role in prediction of nonunion.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs. high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis (UNIKORN): a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common health problem resulting in knee pain and limiting patients' physical activity. After failed conservative treatment, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are possible surgical treatment options for this condition. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence in the literature comparing objective and subjective outcomes of these procedures. Also, there is no common agreement on whether these procedures provide comparable results in late-stage medial knee OA patients. METHODS: We will perform a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing HTO and UKA in patients with late-stage medial knee OA. 100 patients with isolated medial knee OA (KL III-IV) are assigned to either UKA (n = 50) or HTO (n = 50) procedure in patients 45-65 years of age. Our primary outcome will be KOOS5 at one year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include OARSI physical assessment, length of stay, wearable activity watch, radiographs (OA progression according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification), patient-reported outcomes (KOOS subscales, pain visual analog scale [VAS], Lysholm, and Oxford knee scores), and adverse events (conversion to total knee arthroplasty, surgery-related complications, need for revision surgery) outcomes. Our hypothesis is that neither of the interventions is superior as measured with KOOS5 at 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District has approved the protocol. We will disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov/TooloH NCT05442242. Registered on 7/1/2022.

Intra-articular distal tibial fractures cause a major burden to individual patients and also stresses the public health care system.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intra-articular distal tibial fractures are most commonly caused by high-energy trauma. Additional difficulties are related to accompanying soft-tissue injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the consequences of different types of distal tibial fractures to the individual patient and to the public health care system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 126 patients with operatively treated intra-articular distal tibial fracture were identified between 2012 and 2016. Thirty-one (25%) were open fractures. Acute treatment, timing of definitive surgery, total number of surgical procedures, complications, need for soft-tissue reconstructions, hospital stay, and number of follow-up visits were recorded related to AO/OTA fracture types. RESULTS: 112 patients (89%) were treated with a staged treatment protocol. Of these patients, 74 first received an external fixation device. The definitive fracture fixation was performed on average 8 days after the trauma. Soft-tissue flap reconstruction was needed in 19 patients (15%). Additionally, 7 patients required split-thickness skin grafting. Total hospital stay ranged from 2 to 87 days (median 14 days). The median ward treatment period was 12 days in B2-3 group, 13 days in C1-2 group, and 18 days in C3 group. The median of 2 (range 1-13) surgical procedures were performed. INTERPRETATION: Intra-articular distal tibial fractures cause a major burden to individual patients and stresses the public health care system due to a frequent need for several surgical procedures because of soft-tissue injuries and complications. AO/OTA type C3 fractures had the greatest burden, as patients required several consecutive operations and prolonged hospital stays.

Segond fracture combined with tibial plateau fracture.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to examine the coexistence of Segond fracture in tibial plateau fractures and to assess the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and meniscal tear when those fractures coexist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center. A total of 1203 emergency department knee trauma MDCT examinations were evaluated. Surgical findings served as the reference standard for intraarticular injuries. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with a Segond fracture were found. Of these patients, 10 had isolated Segond fractures (surgery, n = 7) and 23 patients (surgery, n = 20) had a Segond fracture associated with a tibial plateau fracture. Patients with both fractures had significantly fewer anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures (20% vs 71%, p = 0.023) and more avulsion fractures of the ACL (50% vs 0%, p = 0.026) than patients with isolated Segond fractures. For meniscal injuries, the corresponding numbers were 25% and 57% (p = 0.175), respectively. In approximately one of every 32 tibial plateau fractures, a Segond fracture also coexists. CONCLUSION: Patients with a Segond fracture combined with a tibial plateau fracture have a high risk of avulsion fracture of the ACL.

Knee dislocation in overweight patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, cause, injury patterns, and MRI findings in knee dislocation in patients with normal and increased body mass index and to determine whether obesity interferes with knee MRI examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of the period from 2000 to 2007 (90 months) was performed at a level 1 trauma center, finding a total of 24 patients who had sustained a knee dislocation. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the 24 patients underwent surgery and 19 patients had an MRI examination of diagnostic quality before surgery. Of the 24 patients, 11 had a body mass index greater than 25 and had knee dislocation due to low-energy trauma (nine due to a simple fall, two to a noncontact sport). Two of these 11 patients were morbidly obese (body mass index>40). These patients had no injuries to the popliteal tendon and they had no irreversible peroneal nerve injuries. Otherwise, the patients' injuries were in agreement with previous knee dislocation studies. Obesity did not interfere with knee MRI examinations. On the basis of the population served by our trauma center, the annual incidence of knee dislocation due to low-energy trauma in overweight patients is about 1.0 per million. CONCLUSION: The annual incidence in obese patients of knee dislocation due to low-energy trauma is not insignificant at a level 1 trauma center. As the prevalence of obesity increases, the injury patterns seen in emergency departments may change. The radiologist should be aware that even after a simple fall, overweight patients may have a knee dislocation.

The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in acute multi-ligament injuries.

This study compares MRI with examination under anaesthesia to surgical findings in evaluating soft tissue injuries in acute multi-ligament knee trauma. Pre-operative MRI was done for 44 patients who underwent surgery for grade III ACL and grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury. In 21 cases both ACL and MCL were treated surgically, but in 23 only ACL. Intra-operative and MRI findings were compared. Accuracy of MRI for medial meniscal tears was 88.6%, sensitivity 80%, and specificity 91.2%; accuracy for lateral meniscal tears was 72.7%, sensitivity 55% and specificity 87.5%. Accuracy and sensitivity for severity of ACL tear was 93.2% and of MCL tear 86.4%. In 88.6% of the knees, bone bruises were visible, with anterolateral femoral and posterolateral tibial bone bruise being the most common. MRI revealed no chondral lesion, but arthroscopy revealed 11. In combined ACL-MCL ruptures, the incidence of concomitant injuries is high and the injuries are best detected with MRI.

Three-dimensional printed surgical templates for fresh cadaveric osteochondral allograft surgery with dimension verification by multivariate computed tomography analysis.

BACKGROUND: The fit of the allograft is a particular concern in fresh cadaveric osteochondral allograft (FOCA) surgery. Digital design and fabrication were utilized in conjunction with traditional surgery to enable efficient discovery and reproduction of appropriately dimensioned allograft. METHODS: A patient with large osteochondral defects in the lateral femoral condyle was to undergo FOCA surgery. A digital virtual operation was performed, based on computed tomography (CT) images of the patient. Polyamide saw templates were manufactured using a selective laser sintering process, and gypsum powder was used to manufacture preoperative and intraoperative medical models with binder jetting process. The design dimensions were verified numerically by determining the intactness of the section surface and allograft volume based on four independent measurements of the initial design, and an automated design optimization strategy was postulated. For the surgery, a lateral longitudinal approach was employed. RESULTS: The virtual operation allowed an efficient design of the saw templates. Their shape and dimensions were verified with a numerical CT analysis method. The allograft dimensions (medial-lateral/superior-inferior/anterior-posterior) were approximately 40/28.5/24 mm, respectively, with the anterosuperior corner diagonally removed, yielding a section volume of approximately 16.5 cm3. These manually chosen dimensions were reminiscent of the corresponding computationally optimized values. CONCLUSIONS: Use of computer-aided design in virtual operation planning and three-dimensional printing in the fabrication of designed templates allowed for an efficient FOCA procedure and accurate allograft fitting. The numerical optimization method allowed for a semiautomated design process, which could in turn be realized also with surgical navigation or robotic surgery methods.

MRI of acute meniscal injury associated with tibial plateau fractures: prevalence, type, and location.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, type, and location of meniscal injuries, particularly to assess the prevalence of unstable meniscal tears in acute knee trauma with tibial plateau fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 78 menisci were evaluated in 39 patients who had undergone knee MDCT and MRI. Meniscal tears were classified as horizontal, vertical (subdivided into longitudinal and radial), flap, bucket-handle, or complex. The presence of meniscal contusion was documented. The anterior horn, body, and posterior horn were assessed separately for both menisci. Knee arthroscopy was performed on 28 patients. RESULTS: Of the 39 patients in the study, 24 had detectable abnormal menisci, for a total of 33 abnormal menisci (42%). Among the 33 meniscal abnormalities were 11 longitudinal tears (33%), 17 contusions (52%), four flap tears (12%), six horizontal tears (18%), and six radial tears (18%). Among the 16 patients with meniscal tears (41% of the 39), 14 patients had an unstable tear. No significant correlation was found between degree of articular depression and site or morphologic features of the meniscal injury. Correspondingly, no statistical correlation was evident between normal menisci and degree of articular depression, nor was a significant correlation found between differing fracture groups and meniscal findings. CONCLUSION: A high percentage of patients (36%) with a tibial plateau fracture had an unstable meniscal tear. If a meniscal tear is detected preoperatively, meniscal surgery can be combined with fracture fixation, and reoperation can be avoided. A large number of meniscal contusions were found. Awareness of this abnormality can help radiologists increase specificity by avoiding false-positive findings of meniscal tear.

Predictors of osteoarthritis following operative treatment of medial tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: To determine factors influencing the development of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) following medial tibial plateau fractures and to evaluate concomitant injuries associated with these fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A chart review of patients with operatively treated medial tibial plateau fractures admitted to our Level I trauma centre from 2002 to 2008 was performed. Of 63 patients, 41 participated in a clinical and radiographic examination. The mean age was 47 years (range 16-78) and the mean follow-up time was 7.6 (range 4.7-11.7) years. All patients had preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and postoperative radiographs. At the end of follow-up, standing radiographs, mechanical axis, and CT scans were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients, 24 had no or mild (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 0-2) OA and 17 had severe (grade 3-4) OA. Initial articular depression measured from preoperative CT scans was a significant predictor of OA (median 1.8mm vs 4.5mm, p=0.009). Fracture line extension to the lateral plateau (p=0.68) or fracture comminution (p=0.21) had no effect on the development of posttraumatic OA, nor did articular depression at the end of follow-up (p=0.68) measured from CT scans. Mechanical axis >4° of varus and ≥2mm articular depression or step-off were associated with worse WOMAC pain scores, but did not affect other functional outcome scores. Six patients (10%) had permanent peroneal nerve dysfunction. Ten patients (16%) required LCL reconstruction and nine (14%) ACL avulsions were treated at the time of fracture stabilisation. CONCLUSIONS: The amount of articular depression measured from preoperative CT scans seems to predict the development of posttraumatic OA, probably reflecting the severity of chondral injury at the time of fracture. Restoration of mechanical axis and articular congruence are important in achieving a good clinical outcome.