RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine which MR imaging sequences are necessary to assess for spinal metastases. METHODS: Hypothetical MR imaging interpretations and management plans were made prospectively for consecutive adult cases acquired retrospectively. Standardized MR imaging protocols were independently interpreted by 2 neuroradiologists. MR imaging protocol types varied: 1) T1-weighted images only; 2) T1-weighted and T2-weighted images; 3) T1-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted images; and 4) T1- and T2-weighted images and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Hypothetical management plans were created by 2 radiation oncologists. Logit model was used to investigate the effect of MR imaging protocol type on the probability of recommending radiation therapy (RT). Mixed effect models were used to investigate whether median spinal level or total number of spinal levels of planned RT was associated with MR imaging protocol type. RESULTS: Thirty-one subjects were evaluated, each with multiple scan interpretations. Logit model showed that neither MR imaging protocol type nor neuroradiologist reader affected the probability that the oncologist would recommend RT (all P > .50). Mixed models showed that neither ML nor NL was affected by MR imaging protocol type or by neuroradiologist reader (all P > .12). CONCLUSION: Although MR imaging is known to be the most useful diagnostic test in suspected spinal cord compression, which particular MR images are necessary remain unclear. Compared with T1-weighted images alone, the additional use of T2-weighted and/or postcontrast T1-weighted sequences did not significantly affect the probability that RT would be recommended or the levels that would be chosen for RT in our study. Our data suggest that unenhanced T1-weighted images may be sufficient for evaluation of possible cord compression.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Compressão da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Doses de Radiação , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Coluna Vertebral/patologiaRESUMO
To predict the consequences of cholesterol screening among elderly Americans who do not have symptoms of heart disease, we explore the cost implications of a cholesterol screening program, evaluate evidence linking hypercholesterolemia to coronary heart disease and mortality in the elderly, and describe the likely effects of therapy of hypercholesterolemia. According to our calculations, if all Americans 65 years of age and older adhered to a cholesterol screening program similar to the one proposed by the National Cholesterol Education Program, minimum annual expenditures for screening and treatment would be between $1.6 billion and $16.8 billion, depending on the effectiveness of diet and the cost of the medications used to treat hypercholesterolemia. There is no direct evidence that this program would lessen overall morbidity or extend the lives of elderly Americans.
Assuntos
Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias/prevenção & controle , Hipercolesterolemia/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Idoso , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados UnidosRESUMO
An elderly man with chronic renal failure and radiologic evidence of vascular calcification was found to have severe pseudohypertension mimicking hypertensive crisis. Pathologic examination of his artery revealed severe medical calcification. The syndrome of pseudohypertension is reviewed.
Assuntos
Calcinose/complicações , Hipertensão Maligna/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Doenças Vasculares/complicações , Idoso , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
Three strategies regarding hepatitis B virus vaccination were compared by decision analysis: no vaccination, immediate vaccination, and vaccination after two years. The potential advantage of waiting two years is to learn whether serious side effects of the vaccine will become evident. For example, it was found that immediate hepatitis B vaccination of 100,000 surgical house officers with a 5 percent annual attack rate for five years would, compared with no vaccination, prevent 4,092 cases of icteric hepatitis, 335 cases of chronic active hepatitis, and 15 deaths from fulminant hepatitis. For a strategy of waiting two years, the number of cases prevented would decrease by about 40 percent. Persons in groups with an annual attack rate lower than 5 percent appear to benefit from vaccination. The known health risks of hepatitis B virus vaccination are low, and the hypothesized risks would have to be frequent to justify delay in vaccination. From an individual perspective, even persons at low risk of hepatitis B virus infection should seriously consider immediate vaccination.
Assuntos
Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/efeitos adversos , Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/etiologia , Tomada de Decisões , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Hepatite B/mortalidade , Vacinas contra Hepatite B , Humanos , Risco , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although routine testing of hospitalized patients with diarrhea for Clostridium difficile cytotoxin has been advocated as a high-yield procedure, the rationale for this practice has been questioned. To target a low-yield subgroup for whom routine testing could be deferred, we derived a clinical decision rule for predicting results of the C difficile cytotoxin assay in hospitalized adults with diarrhea. METHODS: We hypothesized a priori that two variables, antibiotic use (within 30 days prior to testing) and history of significant diarrhea (new onset of > 3 partially formed or watery stools per 24 hour period), would be highly predictive of cytotoxin results, and obtained these data on 480 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic testing for C difficile at a university hospital and affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. For more detailed modelling, we recorded symptoms, signs, comorbidity, and other potential causes of diarrhea for 68 test positive patients (cases) and 265 randomly selected test negative patients (controls) within the study cohort. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of positive cytotoxin assays was 14%. Prior antibiotic therapy (OR = 9.0, 95% CI 2.1-38.4), significant diarrhea (OR = 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.7), and abdominal pain (OR = 1.9, 95% CI 0.96-3.7) were independent predictors of cytotoxin assay results. The model discriminated patients with positive and negative assays with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area of 0.68; observed and predicted probabilities of a positive cytotoxin assay were well correlated over the entire range of observed probabilities (r2 = 0.86). A decision rule (defined as positive if prior antibiotic use and either significant diarrhea or abdominal pain are present) demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 45%. When applied to the entire dataset (N = 480), a simplified a priori rule, defined as positive if both prior antibiotic use and history of significant diarrhea are present, demonstrated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 80, 45, 18 and 94%, respectively (6% of those predicted to be cytotoxin-negative actually tested positive). Use of this rule would have averted 39% of cytotoxin assays in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients without prior antibiotic use and either significant diarrhea or abdominal pain are unlikely to have positive C difficile cytotoxin assay results, and may not routinely require cytotoxin testing.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Citotoxinas/análise , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Células Cultivadas , Clostridioides difficile/metabolismo , Citotoxinas/biossíntese , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Diarreia/etiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/induzido quimicamente , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes de Neutralização , Razão de Chances , Probabilidade , Prognóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive structured review of the literature, analyzing 940 citations from 1966 through September 1993 and completed a narrative review. We also attempted quantitative synthesis of the accuracy of SPECT evaluation of low back pain. RESULTS: We found thirteen reports on accuracy. Only three provided a reasonable gold standard reference test and allowed the calculation of sensitivity and specificity. There is weak evidence that SPECT is useful in: (a) detecting pseudarthroses after failed spinal fusion, (b) evaluating young patients with back pain and (c) distinguishing benign from malignant lesions in cancer patients. SPECT has not been sufficiently studied in any other setting. We found no reports on the clinical outcome of SPECT or its cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The decision to use SPECT in most patients with low back pain cannot be supported by clinical trials. Its effect on clinical management and cost-effectiveness are unknown. The medical community should mount a large-scale, prospective evaluation of SPECT in low back pain.
Assuntos
Dor Lombar/diagnóstico por imagem , Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/economiaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that patients with COPD can use dyspnea ratings obtained from a prior graded exercise test as a target to reliably produce specific exercise intensities. DESIGN: Four visits over a 7-week period. SETTING: Pulmonary function and cardiorespiratory exercise laboratory at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifteen symptomatic patients with stable COPD. Age was 68 +/- 7 (mean +/- SD) years. FEV1 was 1.12 +/- 0.22 L (45 +/- 8% predicted). INTERVENTIONS: At each visit, patients estimated the heaviness of weights to evaluate their magnitude estimation of a nonrespiratory task; after pulmonary function testing was completed, patients were tested on the cycle ergometer. At estimation trial 1 (day 0), patients estimated the intensity of dyspnea using the 0 to 10 category-ratio scale during an incremental exercise test. Estimation trial 2 (day 5 to 7) was the same as the previous trial. At production trials 1 (day 10 to 14) and 2 (day 40 to 44), patients were instructed to produce specific intensities of dyspnea (ie, dyspnea targets) at 50% and at anaerobic threshold (AT) or 80% of peak oxygen consumption (Vo2) as calculated from results at estimation trial 2. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Lung function was stable at all visits. Dyspnea ratings were 1.8 +/- 0.9 (range, 1 to 3) at 50% of peak Vo2 and 5.5 +/- 1.5 (range, 4 to 8) at AT/80% of peak Vo2 (17.0 +/- 3.4 mL/kg/min) at estimation trial 2. The individual percent changes in Vo2 at the lower dyspnea target were 12 +/- 19% and 11 +/- 19% for production trials 1 and 2, respectively, compared with estimation trial 2. At the higher dyspnea target, the corresponding individual percent changes in Vo2 were -4 +/- 9% and -7 +/- 11%, respectively. For all 15 patients, there were borderline statistical differences for the Vo2 values at the lower (p = 0.04 and p = 0.07) and at the higher (p = 0.04 for each production trial) dyspnea targets for production trials 1 and 2 compared with estimation trial 2. Two patients showed 50% or greater variability in the calculated exponent for magnitude estimation of weights. In a subgroup analysis of the 13 patients with reproducible magnitude estimation of the heaviness of weights, there were no significant differences in Vo2 for the two production trials compared with estimation trial 2 at both exercise intensities. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspnea ratings obtained from an incremental exercise test can be used as a target for patients with COPD to regulate/monitor the intensity of exercise training. The ability of patients with COPD to achieve a desired Vo2 based on an individual dyspnea target was generally more accurate at the higher exercise level (AT/80% of peak Vo2) compared with the lower intensity (50% of peak Vo2). Acceptable accuracy was maintained over a 5-week time period.
Assuntos
Dispneia/etiologia , Terapia por Exercício , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/reabilitação , Idoso , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/complicações , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Capacidade VitalRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of CT for detecting brain lesions in patients with lung cancer without clinical evidence of metastases. DESIGN: Decision analysis model comparing two different strategies for detecting brain metastases: brain CT routinely (CT-first) or brain CT only when patients develop neurologic signs and/or symptoms (CT-deferred). PATIENTS: Hypothetical cohort of patients with lung cancer with an unremarkable screening clinical evaluation for metastases. MEASUREMENTS: Net costs are calculated as the difference in costs between the two limbs of the decision tree. Net benefits are expressed as the difference in calculated years of life expectancy between the two strategies. Net costs are divided by net benefits, yielding the marginal cost per quality adjusted year of added life expectancy (C/QALY) for the CT-first strategy. RESULTS: In the baseline analysis, the C/QALY for the CT-first strategy is about $70,000. Improving the clinical evaluation as a screen for detecting brain metastases markedly increases the C/QALY. Increasing the cost of brain CT magnifies this effect. More effective treatment for asymptomatic brain metastases and better accuracy of CT for identifying resectable and unresectable brain metastases lower C/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Although a threshold cost-effectiveness has not been defined for identifying "cost-effective" diagnostic procedures, the marginal C/QALY of the CT-first strategy is substantially higher than many accepted medical interventions. At current costs, the routine use of brain CT is not warranted in patients with lung cancer who have normal findings on a standardized clinical evaluation for metastases.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A panel was convened by the Health and Science Policy Committee of the American College of Chest Physicians to develop a clinical practice guideline on the medical and surgical treatment of parapneumonic effusions (PPE) using evidence-based methods. OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES CONSIDERED: Based on consensus of clinical opinion, the expert panel developed an annotated table for evaluating the risk for poor outcome in patients with PPE. Estimates of the risk for poor outcome were based on the clinical judgment that, without adequate drainage of the pleural space, the patient with PPE would be likely to have any or all of the following: prolonged hospitalization, prolonged evidence of systemic toxicity, increased morbidity from any drainage procedure, increased risk for residual ventilatory impairment, increased risk for local spread of the inflammatory reaction, and increased mortality. Three variables, pleural space anatomy, pleural fluid bacteriology, and pleural fluid chemistry, were used in this annotated table to categorize patients into four separate risk levels for poor outcome: categories 1 (very low risk), 2 (low risk), 3 (moderate risk), and 4 (high risk). The panel's consensus opinion supported drainage for patients with moderate (category 3) or high (category 4) risk for a poor outcome, but not for patients with very low (category 1) or low (category 2) risk for a poor outcome. The medical literature was reviewed to evaluate the effectiveness of medical and surgical management approaches for patients with PPE at moderate or high risk for poor outcome. The panel grouped PPE management approaches into six categories: no drainage performed, therapeutic thoracentesis, tube thoracostomy, fibrinolytics, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and surgery (including thoracotoiny with or without decortication and rib resection). The fibrinolytic approach required tube thoracostomy for administration of drug, and VATS included post-procedure tube thoracostomy. Surgery may have included concomitant lung resection and always included postoperative tube thoracostomy. All management approaches included appropriate treatment of the underlying pneumonia, including systemic antibiotics. Criteria for including articles in the panel review were adequate data provided for >/=20 adult patients with PPE to allow evaluation of at least one relevant outcome (death or need for a second intervention to manage the PPE); reasonable assurance provided that drainage was clinically appropriate (patients receiving drainage were either category 3 or category 4) and drainage procedure was adequately described; and original data were presented. The strength of panel recommendations on management of PPE was based on the following approach: level A, randomized, controlled trials with consistent results or individual randomized, controlled trial with narrow confidence interval (CI); level B, controlled cohort and case control series; level C, historically controlled series and case series; and level D, expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal or based on physiology, bench research, or "first principles." EVIDENCE: The literature review revealed 24 articles eligible for full review by the panel, 19 of which dealt with the primary management approach to PPE and 5 with a rescue approach after a previous approach had failed. Of the 19 involving the primary management approach to PPE, there were 3 randomized, controlled trials, 2 historically controlled series, and 14 case series. The number of patients included in the randomized controlled trials was small; methodologic weaknesses were found in the 19 articles describing the results of primary management approaches to PPE. The proportion and 95% CI of patients suffering each of the two relevant outcomes (death and need for a second intervention to manage the PPE) were calculated for the pooled data for each management approach from the 19 articles on the primary management approach. (ABST
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada/administração & dosagem , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Derrame Pleural/terapia , Sucção , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida , Toracostomia , Adulto , Vias de Administração de Medicamentos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Sucção/normas , Cirurgia Torácica Vídeoassistida/normas , Toracostomia/normasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify independent risk factors for enteric carriage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) in hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile toxin. DESIGN: Retrospective case-cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 215 adult inpatients who had stool tested for C difficile between January 29 and February 25, 1996. RESULTS: 41 (19%) of 215 patients had enteric carriage of VREE Five independent risk factors for enteric VREF were identified: history of prior C difficile (odds ratio [OR], 15.21; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 3.30-70.10; P < .001), parenteral treatment with vancomycin for > or = 5 days (OR, 4.06; CI95, 1.54-10.73; P = .005), treatment with antimicrobials effective against gram-negative organisms (OR, 3.44; CI95, 1.20-9.87; P = .021), admission from another institution (OR, 2.95; CI95, 1.21-7.18; P =.017), and age > 60 years (OR 2.57; CI95, 1.13-5.82; P = .024). These risk factors for enteric VREF were independent of the patient's current C difficile status. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial exposures are the most important modifiable independent risk factors for enteric carriage of VREF in hospitalized patients tested for C difficile.
Assuntos
Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Enterococcus faecium/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Resistência a Vancomicina , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Reservatórios de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estatística como AssuntoRESUMO
Staphylococcus epidermidis is among the most common organisms isolated from blood cultures. Conversely, it is rarely a well-documented cause of natural-valve endocarditis. However, several authors have reported series of patients with the clinical picture of endocarditis and S. epidermidis bacteremia. Most of these cases have not been confirmed by examination of the valve. The authors present a case of natural-valve endocarditis caused by S. epidermidis with pathologic documentation of the offending agent.
Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/patologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/patologia , Valva Mitral/patologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Staphylococcus epidermidisRESUMO
This study summarizes the diagnostic accuracy data for dipstick nitrite and/or leukocyte esterase tests (the index tests) as predictors of bacterial urinary tract infection as defined by quantitative culture (the reference test). On-line search of the literature using the MEDLARS database identified 1,017 citations, 51 of which were relevant and contained sufficient data for further analysis. From each citation, 2 x 2 tables of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative results were extracted. Four categories of index test were assessed: nitrite only, leukocyte esterase only, disjunctive pairing (dipstick positive if nitrite, leukocyte esterase, or both were positive), and conjunctive pairing (dipstick positive only if both nitrite and leukocyte esterase were positive). The true- and false-positive rates were calculated from each 2 x 2 table. Plots of true-positive rates versus false-positive rates demonstrated widely scattered points, indicating heterogeneity. A receiver-operating characteristic curve was fitted to the data using logistic transforms and weighted linear regression. This analysis revealed that the disjunctive pair is the most accurate index test. However, in many clinical settings, the posterior probability of urinary tract infection given a negative dipstick is too high to exclude it. Within most clinically relevant ranges of true- and false-positive rates, a negative urine dipstick test cannot exclude the diagnosis of urinary tract infection in patients with high prior probabilities of contracting this infection. For lower prior probabilities, the clinical efficacy of these rapid tests would best be determined by decision analysis, for which these receiver-operating characteristic functions would serve as valuable analytical tools.
Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Humanos , Métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Concern about the safety of the allogeneic blood supply has made preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) routine before major noncardiac operations. However, the costs and benefits of PAD in elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are not well established. We used decision analysis to (1) calculate the cost-effectiveness of PAD in CABG, expressed as cost per year of life saved, and (2) compare the health benefits of reducing allogeneic transfusions with the potential risks of autologous blood donation by patients with coronary artery disease. A prospective study of 18 institutions provided data on transfusion practice and blood product costs in CABG. On average, PAD in CABG costs $508,000 to $909,000 per quality-adjusted year of life saved, depending on the number of units donated. Preoperative autologous blood donation is more cost-effective (as low as $518,000 per year of life saved) when targeted to younger patients undergoing CABG at centers with high transfusion rates. The cost-effectiveness of PAD is strongly dependent on estimates of posttransfusion hepatitis incidence, but less so on plausible estimates of the current risk of human immunodeficiency virus transmission. Although the actual risk of PAD is uncertain, even a small fatality risk (> 1 per 101,000 donations) associated with blood donation by patients awaiting CABG negates all life expectancy benefits of PAD. At current costs, PAD by patients awaiting CABG is not cost-effective, producing small health benefits at high societal cost. For the individual patient, the risk of donating blood before CABG may well outweigh the benefits associated with fewer allogeneic transfusions.
Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Análise Custo-Benefício , Árvores de Decisões , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND DESIGN: Patient preferences for health outcomes can be explicitly assessed and expressed in quantitative terms known as utilities. Three standard methods for utility assessment have been used to quantify patient preferences, but these methods have not previously been applied to skin disease. Eighty-seven patients with psoriasis from a tertiary medical center were interviewed, using an interactive, computer-based utility assessment questionnaire, U-Titer. Utilities for three categories of psoriasis severity and potential adverse outcomes of methotrexate therapy were assessed by the vertical rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. RESULTS: Patients assigned a broad range of utilities for each of the health states. Utilities obtained by the vertical rating scale did not correlate well with utilities obtained by standard gamble or time trade-off methods. However, utilities assessed by standard gamble and time trade-off were not significantly different. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, and education were not correlated with utility and did not explain the variation. Indicators of the patients' disease severity were not predictive of utilities for the assessed health states. The relatively high utility for liver biopsy suggests that there is less patient aversion to the procedure than suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Utilities, or quantitative measures of patient preferences for health states, are measurable and vary widely for mild, moderate, and severe psoriasis and possible adverse outcomes of methotrexate treatment. The process of elucidating individual patient utilities for various health outcomes can be used to incorporate patient preferences into the process of clinical decision making. Guidelines that are based solely on severity of symptoms, without input from patients on how they value such symptoms, must be questioned.
Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Biópsia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Previsões , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatopatias/patologia , Masculino , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The author defines the concepts medical technology and technology assessment and presents a paradigm for the evaluation of medical technologies. He proposes a hierarchical assessment scheme in which level I, biologic plausibility, compares the technology's proposed mode of action with current biologic information and theory. Level II, technical feasibility, determines whether the technology can be delivered to the target population. Level III, intermediate outcomes, assesses whether the technology has a short-term impact on the biologic or physiologic process that is diseased. Level IV, patient outcomes, investigates the overall medical, psychologic, and financial impacts of the technology upon the patient, including unintended side effects and long-term morbidity and mortality. Level V, societal outcomes, measures the cost of the technology to society in terms of resource use, ethical issues, and social and political hazards. As an example, the author employs this scheme to analyze the use of screening tests for hypercholesterolemia.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos , Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas , Estudos de Viabilidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Morbidade , Mortalidade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Medição de Risco , Valores Sociais , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/classificação , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Although theophylline is a widely used drug for the treatment of acute childhood asthma, its efficacy has not been clearly established. This study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials of theophylline in children hospitalized with acute asthma. We conducted a search of English language MEDLINE citations from 1966 to 1995 and analyzed the methods of each report meeting study criteria. We pooled similar clinical measures across studies if a test for homogeneity of effect size was non-significant. The six methodologically acceptable randomized clinical trials included a total of 164 children less than 18 years of age. Incomplete reporting of measures and variances was common. No study included children in intensive care settings. Using pooled results, pulmonary function parameters [forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced expired flow (FEF)] appeared better at 24 hours in the theophylline group, but the results did not reach statistical significance (mean effect difference, + 3.9% predicted values; pooled effect size, + 1.6 SDS; P = 0.25). A mean of 2.1 more albuterol treatments were administered in the theophylline group (pooled effect size, - 0.18 SDS; P = 0.02), and the mean hospital stay was slightly longer (mean effect difference, - 0.31 days; pooled effect size, - 0.18 SDS; P = 0.03). We conclude that currently available data do not indicate a significant beneficial effect of theophylline in children hospitalized with acute asthma. There is evidence for weak detrimental effects. Theophylline efficacy in intensive care unit settings remains unstudied.
Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Teofilina/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare the reduction in quality of life due to visual impairment and angina using patient preferences (utilities). METHODS: Using a standard time tradeoff method, we obtained utilities for current vision, monocular and binocular blindness, current angina, and moderate angina in 60 patients with both vision problems and angina pectoris who sought care at the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Naval Medical Center, or Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Patients were characterized clinically based on visual acuity and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Patients also completed a seven-item version of the NEI Visual Functioning Questionnaire and the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients had a median visual acuity of 20/100 in the worst eye, 20/40 in the better eye, and a median DASI of 24.2 (0 = severe functional limitations due to anginal symptoms, 58.2 = no limitations). There was substantial variation in utilities among patients. The average utility for current vision (relative to ideal vision [= 1.0] and death [= 0.0]) was 0.82; the average utility for current angina (relative to no angina symptoms [= 1.0] and death [ = 0.0]) was 0.89. Among 26 patients with both visual impairment and recent anginal symptoms, the decrement in utility (on a scale ranging from ideal health [= 1.0] to death [= 0.0]) imposed by current visual impairment was greater than that imposed by current angina symptoms (0.146 versus 0.072, p=0.08, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The decrement in utility associated with binocular blindness was greater than the decrement associated with the symptoms of moderate angina (0.477 versus 0.039, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical status is not a surrogate for patient preferences regarding vision impairment or angina. There is substantial variation in utilities within the study population for both experienced and theoretical impairment states which is not explained by variations in clinical status. Some states of visual impairment may pose a greater quality of life burden than anginal symptoms. Because patient preferences for vision vary greatly, individual assessment is warranted for consideration in therapeutic decision making.
Assuntos
Angina Pectoris/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos da Visão/epidemiologia , Idoso , Cegueira/epidemiologia , Medidas em Epidemiologia , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Missouri/epidemiologia , Morbidade , Satisfação do Paciente , Acuidade VisualRESUMO
Methods of meta-analysis, a technique for the combination of data from multiple sources, were applied to analyze 106 reports of the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Two years or less after primary internal fixation of a displaced fracture of the femoral neck, a non-union had developed in 33 per cent of the patients and avascular necrosis, in 16 per cent. The rate of performance of a second operation within two years ranged from 20 to 36 per cent after internal fixation and from 6 to 18 per cent after hemiarthroplasty (relative risk, 2.6; 95 per cent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.6). Conversion to an arthroplasty was the most common reoperation after internal fixation and accounted for about two-thirds of these procedures. The remaining one-third of the reoperations were for removal of the implant or revision of the internal fixation. For the patients who had had a hemiarthroplasty, the most common reoperations were conversion to a total hip replacement, removal or revision of the prosthesis, and débridement of the wound. Although we observed an increase in the rate of mortality at thirty days after primary hemiarthroplasty compared with that after primary internal fixation, the difference was not significant (p = 0.22) and did not persist beyond three months. The absolute difference in perioperative mortality between the two groups was small. An anterior operative approach for arthroplasty consistently was associated with a lower rate of mortality at two months than was a posterior approach. Some reports showed promising results after total hip replacement for displaced fractures of the femoral neck; however, randomized clinical trials are still needed to establish the value of this treatment.
Assuntos
Fraturas do Colo Femoral/terapia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Artroplastia/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia/mortalidade , Intervalos de Confiança , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/mortalidade , Fraturas não Consolidadas/epidemiologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/etiologia , Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Prótese de Quadril/mortalidade , Humanos , Incidência , Osteonecrose/epidemiologia , Osteonecrose/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Reoperação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We reviewed the literature to determine the clinical outcomes of the treatment of closed fractures of the tibial shaft with immobilization in a cast, open reduction with internal fixation, or fixation with an intramedullary rod. We reviewed 2372 reports of comparative trials and uncontrolled studies of series of patients published between 1966 and 1993. Nineteen reports, involving six controlled trials and twenty-seven groups of patients, met our inclusion criteria. A structured questionnaire was used to assess the quality of the literature in terms of the experimental design and the method of assessment of outcome. Outcomes from controlled trials were summarized with odds ratios and risk differences, and outcomes from case series were summarized by the medians of the reported results. The studies that were reviewed generally had few subjects and were poorly designed. The comparative trials showed treatment with a cast to be associated with a lower rate of superficial infection than open reduction and internal fixation (mean difference, -5.81 per cent; p = 0.02) and open reduction and internal fixation to be associated with a higher rate of union by twenty weeks than treatment with a cast (mean difference, -18.07 per cent; p = 0.008). There were no other significant associations. There were insufficient data for us to evaluate any aspect of functional status, level of pain, or other patient-reported outcomes of any of the methods of treatment. The results of the present review suggest that the data from the published literature are inadequate for decision-making with regard to the treatment of closed fractures of the tibia.
Assuntos
Moldes Cirúrgicos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas Fechadas/terapia , Fraturas da Tíbia/terapia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas Fechadas/cirurgia , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Reoperação , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Reports of diagnostic accuracy often differ. The authors present a method to summarize disparate reports that uses a logistic transformation and linear regression to produce a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The curve is useful for summarizing a body of diagnostic accuracy literature, comparing technologies, detecting outliers, and finding the optimum operating point of the test. Examples from clinical chemistry and diagnostic radiology are provided. By extending the logic of meta-analysis to diagnostic testing, the method provides a new tool for technology assessment.