RESUMO
AIMS: The mitral annulus (MA) saddle shape is complex but vital for a normal functioning mitral apparatus. Although conventional parameters of MA geometry such as area and height are helpful, they fall short of describing its complex regional geometry. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective study, novel parameters of MA curvature and torsion were derived from three-dimensional (3D) transoesophageal echocardiography. These quantitative indices were computed in 15 patients with normal valves (age 53 ± 8 years) and in 15 patients with organic significant mitral regurgitation (MR, age 66 ± 11 years), before and after mitral valve repair (MVR). The MA was traced and modelled in mid- and end-systole. Curvature and torsion were computed at 500 points across the MA to derive regional and global indices. Overall, patients with organic MR presented the smallest global curvature and torsion; this decrease in curvature and torsion reflects a loss of tonicity of the MA tissue. These changes were largely corrected with MVR surgery, to higher values, compared with normals. The regional analysis revealed similar trends. The maximal MA curvature was found to be at the MA 'anterior horn', whereas the MA 'posterior horn' had the lowest curvature values. CONCLUSION: Novel MA parameters of curvature and torsion can be computed from 3D echocardiography and provide quantitative characteristics of dynamic regional MA geometry. In patients with organic MR, the reduced regional and global curvatures improve following surgical MVR. These quantitative parameters may help further refine the quantitative description of MA geometry in various mitral valve pathologies and after MVR.
Assuntos
Ecocardiografia Tridimensional , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of adding dipyridamole or aspirin to warfarin among patients with prosthetic heart valves using meta-analytic techniques. BACKGROUND: Patients with prosthetic heart valves are at increased risk for valve thrombosis and arterial thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulation alone, or the addition of antiplatelet drugs, has been used to minimize this risk. An important issue is the effectiveness and safety of the latter strategy. METHODS: A combined MEDLINE and manual search was made for relevant articles from 1966 to November 1999. Standard meta-analysis techniques were used. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 2,199 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Compared with anticoagulation alone, the addition of an antiplatelet agent reduced the risk of thromboembolic events (odds ratio [OR]: 0.41, p < 0.001) and total mortality (OR: 0.49, p < 0.001). The risk of major bleeding was increased when antiplatelet agents were added (OR: 1.50, p = 0.033). For major bleeding, the comparison of trials performed before and after 1990 (OR: 2.23 and 0.88, respectively) showed that the chi-square test for heterogeneity was significant (p = 0.025). The latter trials used low-dose aspirin, suggesting that the risk of bleeding may be lower with contemporary low-dose (100 mg daily) aspirin. CONCLUSIONS: Adding antiplatelet therapy, especially low-dose aspirin, to warfarin decreases the risk of systemic embolism or death among patients with prosthetic heart valves. The risk of major bleeding is slightly increased with antiplatelet therapy. Nonetheless, the risk of bleeding appears to have diminished with the lower doses of aspirin used in the more recent trials, resulting in a favorable risk-to-benefit profile.
Assuntos
Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Dipiridamol/administração & dosagem , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Dipiridamol/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Varfarina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with prosthetic heart valves are at increased risk for valve thrombosis and arterial thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulation alone, or the addition of antiplatelet drugs, has been used to minimize this risk. An important issue is the effectiveness and safety of the latter strategy. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of adding antiplatelet therapy to standard oral anticoagulation among patients with prosthetic heart valves. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to August 2002), EMBASE (January 1988 to July 2001) and reference lists of individual reports, review articles, meta-analyses, and consensus statements. SELECTION CRITERIA: All reports of randomised controlled trials comparing standard dose oral anticoagulation to standard dose oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with one or more prosthetic heart valves. We included reports published in any language or in abstract form. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently performed the search strategy, assessed trials for inclusion criteria, study quality, and extracted data. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 2,428 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Year of publication ranged from 1971 to 2000. Compared with anticoagulation alone, the addition of an antiplatelet agent reduced the risk of thromboembolic events (odds ratio 0.39 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.56; p<0.00001)) and total mortality (odds ratio 0.55 (95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.77; p=0.0003)). Aspirin and dipyridamole reduced these events similarly. The risk of major bleeding was increased when antiplatelet agents were added to oral anticoagulants (odds ratio 1.66 (95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.34; p=0.003)). For major bleeding, there was no evidence of heterogeneity between aspirin and dipyridamole and in the comparison of trials performed before and after 1990, around the time when anticoagulation standardization with the international normalized ratio was being implemented. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Adding antiplatelet therapy, either dipyridamole or low-dose aspirin, to oral anticoagulation decreases the risk of systemic embolism or death among patients with prosthetic heart valves. The risk of major bleeding is increased with antiplatelet therapy. These results apply to patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or those with biological valves and indicators of high risk such as atrial fibrillation or prior thromboembolic events. The effectiveness and safety of low dose aspirin (100 mg daily) appears to be similar to higher dose aspirin and dipyridamole.