Minimally invasive surgery for intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a 9-year, single-center, retrospective study of a standardized technique using a 2-point distractor.

BACKGROUND: A fracture of the calcaneus can be a painful and disabling injury. Treatment modalities may be conservative or operative. Surgical treatment strategies include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques, as well as a variety of minimally invasive methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment options and post-treatment complication rates for intra-articular calcaneal fractures at the Traumacenter Linz over a 9-year period. METHODS: All patients with calcaneal fractures treated at the Traumacenter Linz between 2007 and 2015 were included in this study. The patients records were retrospectively reviewed, and the data, including demographic parameters, cause of injury, and the time between injury and operative treatment were analyzed. The number of secondary operative interventions due to soft-tissue complications, hardware removal, and the long-term arthrodesis rate were evaluated. RESULTS: A minimally invasive 2-point-distractor method was used in 85.8% (n = 182) of all operatively managed calcaneal fractures (n = 212) in our department. The majority of the operations (88.7%) were performed within 2 days after the accident. The secondary operation rate resulting from wound complications was 2.7% in the 2-point distractor group and 16.7% in the ORIF group. A secondary arthrodesis was performed in 4.7% (n = 9) of the subtalar joints in the entire study population. CONCLUSIONS: Our data supported the assumption that severe wound complications would be less likely to occur after minimally invasive treatment compared to ORIF treatment. The rate of secondary arthrodesis in the study cohort was comparable to that in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Return-to-sports after minimally invasive stabilization of intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of different factors in patient quality of life after minimally invasive stabilization of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, including the return-to-sports rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with minimally invasive stabilization of intra-articular calcaneal fractures were collected from the database of a Level I trauma center and evaluated in a retrospective and explorative way. The clinical and radiological examination have been done immediately after the operation, after 2 and 6 weeks postoperative and after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical and radiological examination was performed by applying the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot scale score (AOFAS), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Tegner Activity Scale, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and with a questionnaire about pre- and postoperative engagement in sport and recreational activities. RESULTS: Fourty-nine patients with an isolated uni-lateral fracture of the calcaneus who fulfilled all inclusion criteria were assessed. Fourty-two of them were male and 24 were under the age of 50 years. No statistically significant differences were noted between Sanders I/II and Sanders III/IV in terms of SF-36, AOFAS, FAOS or Tegner-scale. A less satisfying result was noticed in Sanders III/IV patients. General health, pain in FAOS, physical functioning and pain in SF-36 were strongly dependent on Tegner score values. Twenty-nine percent of our study population changed sport activities after injury, whereas 22 percent stopped all kinds of sports. Consequently, our overall return-to-sport rate was 78 percent. CONCLUSION: Clinical results including different scores and quality of life parameters in our study population were satisfying. About 80 percent of patients could return to sports, but there are still many patients that were not able to perform sports and physical activities on the same level as before.