A qualitative study of improving megavoltage computed tomography image quality and maintaining dose accuracy using cycleGAN-based image synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Due to inconsistent positioning, tumor shrinking, and weight loss during fractionated treatment, the initial plan was no longer appropriate after a few fractional treatments, and the patient will require adaptive helical tomotherapy (HT) to overcome the issue. Patients are scanned with megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) before each fractional treatment, which is utilized for patient setup and provides information for dose reconstruction. However, the low contrast and high noise of MVCT make it challenging to delineate treatment targets and organs at risk (OAR). PURPOSE: This study developed a deep-learning-based approach to generate high-quality synthetic kilovoltage computed tomography (skVCT) from MVCT and meet clinical dose requirements. METHODS: Data from 41 head and neck cancer patients were collected; 25 (2995 slices) were used for training, and 16 (1898 slices) for testing. A cycle generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) based on attention gate and residual blocks was used to generate MVCT-based skVCT. For the 16 patients, kVCT-based plans were transferred to skVCT images and electron density profile-corrected MVCT images to recalculate the dose. The quantitative indices and clinically relevant dosimetric metrics, including the mean absolute error (MAE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), gamma passing rates, and dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters (Dmax , Dmean , Dmin ), were used to assess the skVCT images. RESULTS: The MAE, PSNR, and SSIM of MVCT were 109.6 ± 12.3 HU, 27.5 ± 1.1 dB, and 91.9% ± 1.7%, respectively, while those of skVCT were 60.6 ± 9.0 HU, 34.0 ± 1.9 dB, and 96.5% ± 1.1%. The image quality and contrast were enhanced, and the noise was reduced. The gamma passing rates improved from 98.31% ± 1.11% to 99.71% ± 0.20% (2 mm/2%) and 99.77% ± 0.18% to 99.98% ± 0.02% (3 mm/3%). No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in DVH parameters between kVCT and skVCT. CONCLUSION: With training on a small data set (2995 slices), the model successfully generated skVCT with improved image quality, and the dose calculation accuracy was similar to that of MVCT. MVCT-based skVCT can increase treatment accuracy and offer the possibility of implementing adaptive radiotherapy.

A generalization performance study on the boosting radiotherapy dose calculation engine based on super-resolution.

PURPOSE: During the radiation treatment planning process, one of the time-consuming procedures is the final high-resolution dose calculation, which obstacles the wide application of the emerging online adaptive radiotherapy techniques (OLART). There is an urgent desire for highly accurate and efficient dose calculation methods. This study aims to develop a dose super resolution-based deep learning model for fast and accurate dose prediction in clinical practice. METHOD: A Multi-stage Dose Super-Resolution Network (MDSR Net) architecture with sparse masks module and multi-stage progressive dose distribution restoration method were developed to predict high-resolution dose distribution using low-resolution data. A total of 340 VMAT plans from different disease sites were used, among which 240 randomly selected nasopharyngeal, lung, and cervix cases were used for model training, and the remaining 60 cases from the same sites for model benchmark testing, and additional 40 cases from the unseen site (breast and rectum) was used for model generalizability evaluation. The clinical calculated dose with a grid size of 2 mm was used as baseline dose distribution. The input included the dose distribution with 4 mm grid size and CT images. The model performance was compared with HD U-Net and cubic interpolation methods using Dose-volume histograms (DVH) metrics and global gamma analysis with 1%/1 mm and 10% low dose threshold. The correlation between the prediction error and the dose, dose gradient, and CT values was also evaluated. RESULTS: The prediction errors of MDSR were 0.06-0.84% of Dmean indices, and the gamma passing rate was 83.1-91.0% on the benchmark testing dataset, and 0.02-1.03% and 71.3-90.3% for the generalization dataset respectively. The model performance was significantly higher than the HD U-Net and interpolation methods (p < 0.05). The mean errors of the MDSR model decreased (monotonously by 0.03-0.004%) with dose and increased (by 0.01-0.73%) with the dose gradient. There was no correlation between prediction errors and the CT values. CONCLUSION: The proposed MDSR model achieved good agreement with the baseline high-resolution dose distribution, with small prediction errors for DVH indices and high gamma passing rate for both seen and unseen sites, indicating a robust and generalizable dose prediction model. The model can provide fast and accurate high-resolution dose distribution for clinical dose calculation, particularly for the routine practice of OLART.

Tissues margin-based analytical anisotropic algorithm boosting method via deep learning attention mechanism with cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Speed and accuracy are two critical factors in dose calculation for radiotherapy. Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) is a rapid dose calculation algorithm but has dose errors in tissue margin area. Acuros XB (AXB) has high accuracy but takes long time to calculate. To improve the dose accuracy on the tissue margin area for AAA, we proposed a novel deep learning-based dose accuracy improvement method using Margin-Net combined with Margin-Loss. METHODS: A novel model 'Margin-Net' was designed with a Margin Attention Mechanism to generate special margin-related features. Margin-Loss was introduced to consider the dose errors and dose gradients in tissues margin area. Ninety-five VMAT cervical cancer cases with paired AAA and AXB dose were enrolled in our study: 76 cases for training and 19 cases for testing. Tissues Margin Masks were generated from RT contours with 6 mm extension. Tissues Margin Mask, AAA dose and CTs were input data; AXB dose was used as reference dose for model training and evaluation. Comparison experiments were performed to evaluated effectiveness of Margin-Net and Margin-Loss. RESULTS: Compared to AXB dose, the 3D gamma passing rate (1%/1 mm, 10% threshold) for 19 test cases 95.75 ± 1.05% using Margin-Net with Margin-Loss, which was significantly higher than the original AAA dose (73.64 ± 3.46%). The passing rate reduced to 94.07 ± 1.16% without Margin-Loss and 87.3 ± 1.18% if Margin-Net key structure 'MAM' was also removed. CONCLUSION: The proposed novel tissues margin-based dose conversion method can significantly improve the dose accuracy of Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm to be comparable to AXB algorithm. It can potentially improve the efficiency of treatment planning process with low demanding of computation resources.

Commissioning dose computation model for proton source in pencil beam scanning therapy by convolution neural networks.

Objective. Proton source model commissioning (PSMC) is critical for ensuring accurate dose calculation in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. PSMC aims to match the calculated dose to the delivered dose. However, commissioning the 'nominal energy' and 'energy spread' parameters in PSMC can be challenging, as these parameters cannot be directly obtained from solving equations. To efficiently and accurately commission the nominal energy and energy spread in a proton source model, we developed a convolution neural network (CNN) named 'PSMC-Net.'Methods. The PSMC-Net was trained separately for 33 energies (E, 70-225 MeV with a step of 5 MeV plus 226.09 MeV). For eachE, a dataset was generated consisting of 150 source model parameters (15 nominal energies ∈ [E,E+ 1.5 MeV], ten spreads ∈ [0, 1]) and the corresponding 150 MC integrated depth doses (IDDs). Of these 150 data pairs, 130 were used for training the network, 10 for validation, and 10 for testing.Results. The source model, built by 33 measured IDDs and 33 PSMC-Nets (cost 0.01 s), was used to compute the MC IDDs. The gamma passing rate (GPRs, 1 mm/1%) between MC and measured IDDs was 99.91 ± 0.12%. However, when no commissioning was made, the corresponding GPR was reduced to 54.11 ± 22.36%, highlighting the tremendous significance of our CNN commissioning method. Furthermore, the MC doses of a spread-out Bragg peak and 20 patient PBS plans were also calculated, and average 3D GPRs (2 mm/2% with a 10% threshold) were 99.89% and 99.96 ± 0.06%, respectively.Significance. We proposed a nova commissioning method of the proton source model using CNNs, which made the PSMC process easy, efficient, and accurate.

Accuracy Improvement Method Based on Characteristic Database Classification for IMRT Dose Prediction in Cervical Cancer: Scientifically Training Data Selection.

Purpose: Consistent training and testing datasets can lead to good performance for deep learning (DL) models. However, a large high-quality training dataset for unusual clinical scenarios is usually not easy to collect. The work aims to find optimal training data collection strategies for DL-based dose prediction models. Materials and Methods: A total of 325 clinically approved cervical IMRT plans were utilized. We designed comparison experiments to investigate the impact of (1) beam angles, (2) the number of beams, and (3) patient position for DL dose prediction models. In addition, a novel geometry-based beam mask generation method was proposed to provide beam setting information in the model training process. What is more, we proposed a new training strategy named "full-database pre-trained strategy". Results: The model trained with a homogeneous dataset with the same beam settings achieved the best performance [mean prediction errors of planning target volume (PTV), bladder, and rectum: 0.29 ± 0.15%, 3.1 ± 2.55%, and 3.15 ± 1.69%] compared with that trained with large mixed beam setting plans (mean errors of PTV, bladder, and rectum: 0.8 ± 0.14%, 5.03 ± 2.2%, and 4.45 ± 1.4%). A homogeneous dataset is more accessible to train an accurate dose prediction model (mean errors of PTV, bladder and rectum: 2.2 ± 0.15%, 5 ± 2.1%, and 3.23 ± 1.53%) than a non-homogeneous one (mean errors of PTV, bladder and rectum: 2.55 ± 0.12%, 6.33 ± 2.46%, and 4.76 ± 2.91%) without other processing approaches. The added beam mask can constantly improve the model performance, especially for datasets with different beam settings (mean errors of PTV, bladder, and rectum improved from 0.8 ± 0.14%, 5.03 ± 2.2%, and 4.45 ± 1.4% to 0.29 ± 0.15%, 3.1 ± 2.55%, and 3.15 ± 1.69%). Conclusions: A consistent dataset is recommended to form a patient-specific IMRT dose prediction model. When a consistent dataset is not accessible to collect, a large dataset with different beam angles and a training model with beam information can also get a relatively good model. The full-database pre-trained strategies can rapidly form an accuracy model from a pre-trained model. The proposed beam mask can effectively improve the model performance. Our study may be helpful for further dose prediction studies in terms of training strategies or database establishment.

Dose Prediction Using a Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study focused on predicting 3D dose distribution at high precision and generated the prediction methods for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (NPC) treated with Tomotherapy based on the patient-specific gap between organs at risk (OARs) and planning target volumes (PTVs). METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) is trained using the CT and contour masks as the input and dose distributions as output. The CNN is based on the "3D Dense-U-Net", which combines the U-Net and the Dense-Net. To evaluate the model, we retrospectively used 124 NPC patients treated with Tomotherapy, in which 96 and 28 patients were randomly split and used for model training and test, respectively. We performed comparison studies using different training matrix shapes and dimensions for the CNN models, i.e., 128 ×128 ×48 (for Model I), 128 ×128 ×16 (for Model II), and 2D Dense U-Net (for Model III). The performance of these models was quantitatively evaluated using clinically relevant metrics and statistical analysis. RESULTS: We found a more considerable height of the training patch size yields a better model outcome. The study calculated the corresponding errors by comparing the predicted dose with the ground truth. The mean deviations from the mean and maximum doses of PTVs and OARs were 2.42 and 2.93%. Error for the maximum dose of right optic nerves in Model I was 4.87 ± 6.88%, compared with 7.9 ± 6.8% in Model II (p=0.08) and 13.85 ± 10.97% in Model III (p<0.01); the Model I performed the best. The gamma passing rates of PTV60 for 3%/3 mm criteria was 83.6 ± 5.2% in Model I, compared with 75.9 ± 5.5% in Model II (p<0.001) and 77.2 ± 7.3% in Model III (p<0.01); the Model I also gave the best outcome. The prediction error of D95 for PTV60 was 0.64 ± 0.68% in Model I, compared with 2.04 ± 1.38% in Model II (p<0.01) and 1.05 ± 0.96% in Model III (p=0.01); the Model I was also the best one. CONCLUSIONS: It is significant to train the dose prediction model by exploiting deep-learning techniques with various clinical logic concepts. Increasing the height (Y direction) of training patch size can improve the dose prediction accuracy of tiny OARs and the whole body. Our dose prediction network model provides a clinically acceptable result and a training strategy for a dose prediction model. It should be helpful to build automatic Tomotherapy planning.