RESUMO
The purpose was to investigate risk factors for postoperative stiffness and long-term outcome following manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). In one of the five Danish regions, all patients in a 4-year period who received MUA following total knee arthroplasty (N=36) were included in two case-control studies. Data on potential risk factors were extracted from the Danish Knee arthroplasty Register and from a postal questionnaire including long-term outcome measures regarding pain, function and quality of life (Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D). Previous knee surgery and a high preoperative Knee Society Function Score were significant risk factors, whereas attending a preoperative information meeting was associated with a significantly decreased risk of postoperative stiffness requiring MUA (P<0.001). The long-term results following MUA (1-5 years) were equivalent to patients without postoperative stiffness.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Articulação do Joelho/patologia , Articulação do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Fibrose/epidemiologia , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Período Pré-Operatório , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with dizziness are severely affected in their daily life. The dizziness may be caused by vestibular neuritis and this condition may be severe and result in hospitalization. Qualified municipal rehabilitation services are warranted for these patients after edischarge from the hospital. However, very few specialized municipal initiatives in Denmark are targeting this patient group. METHODS: This paper reports on the development of a clinically applicable municipality-based vestibular neuritis rehabilitation program and evaluates the acceptability of this initiative. RESULTS: The study recognized the need for a rehabilitation program after hospital discharge. However, the program was not evaluated as acceptable for multiple reasons. The exercise program was applicable and feasible but was experienced as a limitation for the practitioner, when addressing other balance issues was needed. It proved challenging to inform both the administrative staff and the clinicians about the new rehabilitation service to allow for sufficient implementation. CONCLUSION: Although the rehabilitation program was not considered an unequivocal success, there were several derived valuable snowball effects of the program. This paper advocates that focus should not only lie on the success of a single program, but also explore the derived benefits for patients and organizations, as well as the practice-oriented knowledge these programs generate.