Care Coordination Using a Shared Plan of Care Approach: From Model to Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) need, but do not have, adequate care coordination (CC); CC leads to better pediatric care, improved family/professional experience of care, and enhanced population health. Current CC initiatives are promising but lack adherence to emerging definitions/standards. A Lucile Packard Report provides guidelines for using a Shared Plan of Care (SPoC) as a CC approach; studied implementation is needed. PURPOSE: The studied implementation of the Riley Care Coordination Program (RCCP) set out to: 1) illuminate components of family-centered, interdisciplinary, team-based care/coordination and SPoC, use 2) underscore family participation/engagement 3) reveal implementation processes/lessons learned. METHODS: Children (ages 2-10) with neurodevelopmental disabilities were referred by subspecialists; families agreed to participate in RCCP from a children's hospital ambulatory care setting. RCCP team used a five-phase workflow to implement CC: (1) Family Outreach/Engagement 2) Family and Team Pre-Visit Work, 3) Population-Based Teamwork, 4) Planned-Care Visits/SPOC "Co-Production", 5) Ongoing Care Coordination and Community Transfer. Family surveys and SPoC goals informed an evaluation. RESULTS: Children (268) with neurodevelopmental disabilities enrolled/completed the 6-month RCCP; it was a feasible endeavor. The co-produced SPoC supported families/care neighborhood partners to meet goals/unmet needs. Team plan-do-study-act improvement cycles informed RCCP enhancements. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Eliciting/using family goals to drive CC emphasized family priorities; children/families gained interventions, treatments, confidence and navigation skills. Going beyond episodic, reactive care, RCCP achieved better CC with care neighborhood learning partnerships. Investing in this quality care coordination with fidelity to national standards holds promise.

Effects of a Care Coordination Intervention with Children with Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Their Families.

: Care coordination is integral to improving the health of children and families. Using a Shared Plan of Care (SPoC) as a care coordination activity is recommended, but related research on outcomes in pediatric populations with complex medical conditions is scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study explores family outcomes associated with implementation of a care coordination/SPoC intervention with a population of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and their families. METHODS: Children aged 2 to 10 years with a neurodevelopmental disability (autism spectrum disorder: 60.9%; global developmental delay/intellectual disability: 39.1%) were referred by pediatric subspecialty programs for care coordination. The intervention included previsit assessments, planned care visits, SPoC development, and 6-month care coordination. A single-group, repeated-measures design was used to evaluate model feasibility and effects on care coordination access, SPoC use, family/clinician goals and needs met, family-professional partnerships, family empowerment, and worry. Times 1 and 2 survey data were collected from a total of 70 families. RESULTS: Analysis shows significant improvement in care coordination access, SPoC use, goals achieved, needs met, family empowerment, and reduced worry. There was no significant change in family-professional partnerships and reported SPoC use. CONCLUSION: Findings provide preliminary evidence that a care coordination model using a family-centered, goal-oriented SPoC is a feasible and effective approach with a cohort of children with complex neurodevelopmental disorders and is associated with improved family outcomes. Replication studies are warranted and should include a control group, prolonged time period, additional validated outcome measures, and measurement of costs and professional impact.

The effects of methylphenidate on prepulse inhibition during attended and ignored prestimuli among boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated attentional modification of prepulse inhibition of startle among boys with and without attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Two hypotheses were tested: (1) whether ADHD is associated with diminished prepulse inhibition during attended prestimuli, but not ignored prestimuli, and (2) whether methylphenidate selectively increases prepulse inhibition to attended prestimuli among boys with ADHD. METHODS: Participants were 17 boys with ADHD and 14 controls. Participants completed a tone discrimination task in each of two sessions separated by 1 week. ADHD boys were administered methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg) in one session and placebo in the other session in a randomized, double-blind fashion. During each series of 72 tones (75 dB; half 1200-Hz, half 400-Hz), participants were paid to attend to one pitch and ignore the other. Bilateral eyeblink electromyogram startle responses were recorded in response to acoustic probes (50-ms, 102-dB white noise) presented following the onset of two-thirds of tones, and during one-third of intertrial intervals. RESULTS: Relative to controls, boys with ADHD exhibited diminished prepulse inhibition 120 ms after onset of attended but not ignored prestimuli following placebo administration. Methylphenidate selectively increased prepulse inhibition to attended prestimuli at 120 ms among boys with ADHD to a level comparable to that of controls, who did not receive methylphenidate. CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that ADHD involves diminished selective attention and suggest that methylphenidate ameliorates the symptoms of ADHD, at least in part, by altering an early attentional mechanism.