RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to synthesize evidence in the literature to determine the diagnostic accuracy of Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) for detection of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hemorrhage types, including intraparenchymal (IPH), subarachnoid (SAH), and intraventricular (IVH). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Our protocol was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO-CRD42021261915). Systematic searches were last performed on April 30, 2024 in EMBASE, PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Studies reporting diagnostic metrics of CBCT for ICH; (2) Studies using a reference standard to determine ICH. Exclusion criteria were: (1) Case reports, abstracts, reviews; (2) Studies without patient-level data. Pooled-estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for diagnostic Odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity using random-effects and common-effects models. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to evaluate risk-of-bias. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis yielding 466 patients. Mean/median age ranged from 54-75 years. Females represented 51.4% (222/432) in reported studies. Multidetector-CT was the reference standard in all studies. DOR, pooled-sensitivity, and pooled-specificity for ICH were 5.28 (95%CI:4.11-6.46), 0.88 (95%CI:0.79-0.97), and 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). Pooled-sensitivity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.98 (95%CI:0.95-1.0), 0.82 (95%CI:0.57-1.0), and 0.78 (95%CI:0.55-1.0). Pooled-specificity for IPH, SAH, and IVH were 0.99 (95%CI:0.98-1.0), 0.99 (95%CI:0.97-1.0), and 1.0 (95%CI:0.98-1.0). DISCUSSION: CBCT had moderate DOR and high pooled-specificity for ICH and hemorrhage types. However, pooled-sensitivity varied by hemorrhage type, with the highest sensitivity for IPH, followed by SAH and IVH.