RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The treatment of complicated pleural infection (CPI) is controversial. Clinical guidelines recommend drainage, but with the lowest grade of evidence. Recent reports have observed good outcomes with antibiotics alone. We retrospectively compared the outcomes in two consecutive cohorts treated with different policies: the first treated according to pleural fluid charactersitics (2005-2009, interventional-prone, group 1) and the second according to clinical assessment (2010-2013, conservative-prone, group 2). METHODS: The clinical records of all children treated for CPI in our hospital between 2005 and 2013 were thoroughly reviewed. Primary outcomes were the proportion of children drained and the length of hospital stay (LHS). RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients (64 group 1 and 45 group 2) were analyzed. A chest tube was placed in 83% of patients in group 1 and 47% in group 2 (P<0.001). The mean LHS was 11.4 days for patients in group 1 and 12.3 for patients in group 2 (P=0.45); no differences were observed in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our results add to few recent observations reporting good outcomes in many children treated with antibiotics alone and challenge the need to drain most children with CPI. Clinical trials are now needed to identify when a drainage procedure would be useful.
Assuntos
Drenagem , Pneumopatias/terapia , Derrame Pleural/terapia , Tubos Torácicos , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A liveborn female with a 69,XXX karyotype and clinical features of triploidy syndrome is reported. Main phenotypical features are: intrauterine growth retardation, hypotonicity, micrognathism, low-set ears, ocular anomalies, syndactyly and atrophy of the cerebral cortex and corpus callosum. Study of chromosomal heteromorphisms revealed that triploidy might have arisen through fertilization of a diploid ovum by a haploid sperm (diginy).