Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Hong Kong Med J ; 24(5): 521-526, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30318477

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer is the commonest cancer in Hong Kong. The Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening was established in 2002 under the Cancer Coordinating Committee to review local and international scientific evidence, assess and formulate local recommendations on cancer prevention and screening. At present, the Cancer Expert Working Group recommends that average-risk individuals aged 50 to 75 years and without significant family history consult their doctors to consider screening by: (1) annual or biennial faecal occult blood test, (2) sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, or (3) colonoscopy every 10 years. Increased-risk individuals with significant family history such as those with a first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer at age ≤60 years; those who have more than one first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer irrespective of age at diagnosis; or carriers of genetic mutations associated with familial adenomatous polyposis or Lynch syndrome should start colonoscopy screening earlier in life and repeat it at shorter intervals.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sangue Oculto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
2.
Hong Kong Med J ; 24(3): 298-306, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926793

RESUMO

In Hong Kong, breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and poses a significant health care burden. The Cancer Expert Working Group on Cancer Prevention and Screening (CEWG) was set up in 2002 by the Cancer Coordinating Committee to review and assess local and international scientific evidence, and to formulate recommendations for cancer prevention and screening. After considering the local epidemiology, emerging scientific evidence, and local and overseas screening practices, the CEWG concluded that it was unclear whether population-based breast cancer screening did more harm than good in local asymptomatic women at average risk. The CEWG considers that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against population-based mammography screening for such individuals. Women who consider breast cancer screening should be adequately informed about the benefits and harms. The CEWG recommends that all women adopt primary preventive measures, be breast aware, and seek timely medical attention for suspicious symptoms. For women at high risk of breast cancer, such as carriers of confirmed BRCA1/2 deleterious mutations and those with a family history of breast cancer, the CEWG recommends that they seek doctor's advice for annual mammography screening and the age at which the process should commence. Additional annual screening by magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation carriers or women who have undergone radiation therapy to the chest between the age of 10 and 30 years. Women at moderate risk of breast cancer should discuss with doctors the pros and cons of breast cancer screening before making an informed decision about mammography screening every 2 to 3 years.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/ética , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Fatores Etários , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Heterozigoto , Hong Kong , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/ética , Mamografia/ética , Medição de Risco , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica
3.
Hong Kong Med J ; 23(6): 594-8, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28798282

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Temozolomide is the first chemotherapeutic agent proven effective for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The drug is well tolerated for its low toxicity. The current standard practice is concomitant chemoradiotherapy for 6 weeks followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Some Caucasian studies have suggested that patients might benefit from extended adjuvant cycles of temozolomide (>6 cycles) to lengthen both progression-free survival and overall survival. In the present study, we compared differences in survival and toxicity profile between patients who received conventional 6-cycle temozolomide and those who received more than 6 cycles of temozolomide. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without progressive disease and completed concomitant chemoradiotherapy during a 4-year period were studied. Progression-free survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. t Test, U test, and correlation were chosen accordingly to examine the impact of age, extent of resection, MGMT promoter methylation status and adjuvant cycles on progression-free survival. For factors with a P value of <0.05 in univariate analyses, Cox regression hazard model was adopted to determine the strongest factors related to progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 17.0 months for patients who received 6 cycles of temozolomide (n=7) and 43.4 months for those who received more than 6 cycles (n=7) [P=0.007, log-rank test]. Two patients in the former group and one in the latter group encountered grade 1 toxicity and recovered following dose adjustment. Cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were correlated with progression-free survival (P=0.016, hazard ratio=0.68). CONCLUSION: Extended cycles of temozolomide are safe and feasible for Chinese patients with disease responsive to temozolomide.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Quimiorradioterapia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Dacarbazina/administração & dosagem , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Temozolomida
4.
Hong Kong Med J ; 23(2): 134-9, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27909268

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection used to be the mainstay of treatment for glioma. In the last decade, however, opinion has changed about the goal of surgical resection in treating glioma. Ample evidence shows that maximum safe resection in glioblastoma improves survival. Neurosurgeons have therefore revised their objective of surgery from diagnostic biopsy or limited debulking to maximum safe resection. Given these changes in the management of glioma, we compared the survival of local Chinese patients with glioblastoma multiforme over a period of 10 years. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of the brain tumour registry of the CUHK Otto Wong Brain Tumour Centre in Hong Kong. Data of patients with glioblastoma multiforme were reviewed for two periods, during 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 and 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. Overall survival during these two periods of time was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Risk factors including age, type and extent of resection, use of chemotherapy, and methylation status of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase were also assessed. RESULTS: There were 26 patients with glioblastoma multiforme with a mean age of 52.2 years during 2003 to 2005, and 42 patients with a mean age of 55.1 years during 2010 to 2012. The mean overall survival during these two periods was 7.4 months and 12.7 months, respectively (P<0.001). The proportion of patients who underwent surgical resection was similar: 69.2% in 2003 to 2005 versus 78.6% in 2010 to 2012 (P=0.404). There was a higher proportion of patients in whom surgery achieved total removal in 2010 to 2012 than in 2003 to 2005 (35.7% and 7.7%, respectively; P=0.015). During 2010 to 2012, patients who were given concomitant chemoradiotherapy showed definitively longer survival than those who were not (17.9 months vs 4.5 months; P=0.001). The proportion of patients who survived 2 years after surgery increased from 11.5% in 2003 to 2005 to 21.4% in 2010 to 2012. CONCLUSIONS: Hong Kong has made substantial improvements in the management of glioblastoma multiforme over the last decade with corresponding improved survival outcomes. The combination of an aggressive surgical strategy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy are probably the driving force for the improvement.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Glioblastoma/terapia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Metilação de DNA , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Glioblastoma/genética , Hong Kong , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , O(6)-Metilguanina-DNA Metiltransferase/genética , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Hong Kong Med J ; 24(3): 316, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29926797
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA