RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment for patients with refractory chronic pain. Despite its efficacy, rates of reoperation after initial implantation of SCS remain high. While revision rates after index SCS surgeries are well reported, less is known about rates and risk factors associated with repeat reoperations. We sought to evaluate patient, clinical, and surgical characteristics associated with repeat reoperation among patients who underwent an initial SCS revision procedure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent SCS revision surgery performed at a single institution between 2008 and 2022. Patients were stratified by whether they underwent a single revision (SR) or multiple revision (MR) surgeries. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine risk factors associated with repeat SCS revision. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare rates of devices requiring revision across groups. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients underwent an initial SCS revision. Of these, 15 (28%) underwent a second revision. The most common indication for revision surgery was lead migration (65%). No significant differences were observed in age, body mass index, comorbidities, lead type, and revision indication among the SR and MR groups. On multivariate adjusted analysis, only cervical lead position was significantly associated with repeat reoperation (OR 7.10, 95% CI [1.14, 44.3], p = 0.036). Time to reoperation after a single and MR SCS surgeries did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who undergo SCS reoperation, a substantial portion requires additional revisions. Cervical lead placement may be associated with a higher risk of repeat revision surgery compared to thoracic lead positioning. Consideration of lead positioning in the decision to perform and undergo reoperation may therefore result in lower revision rates and improved clinical outcomes among SCS patients with MRs.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Complex epilepsy networks with multifocal onset zones that overlap with eloquent cortex may benefit from combined surgical approaches. However, limited data exist on outcomes associated with performing these therapies in tandem. In this case series, we report on 6 patients who underwent combination surgery with either resection or laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and neuromodulation with responsive neurostimulation (RNS) or deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of adult patients with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent staged combination epilepsy surgeries during the same admission at our institution. Six cases treated between 2019 and 2023 were identified. All patients underwent a presurgical work-up including invasive intracranial monitoring and underwent a combined approach with either surgical resection, LITT, RNS, or DBS. We extracted data on demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics. The primary outcome was change in seizure frequency from baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 42.7 years old (4 female). All patients had at least one epileptogenic zone in the temporal lobe, two in extratemporal neocortex, two in periventricular nodular heterotopia. For the staged combination approach, 3 patients underwent LITT followed by RNS, two underwent resection and RNS, and one received LITT and DBS. The mean reduction in seizure frequency per month at last follow-up was 90%. Postoperatively, 1 patient experienced superior visual field deficits related to LITT, and another had postoperative deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSION: All patients experienced at least an 83% reduction in seizures. This case series demonstrates the potential benefits of a combined surgical approach in patients with multifocal seizures and at least one lesion that can be safely resected or ablated. Future prospective studies are warranted.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Advancements in MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) technology have led to the successful treatment of select movement disorders. Based on the comparative success between ablation and deep brain stimulation, interest arises in focused ultrasound (FUS) as a promising treatment modality for psychiatric illnesses. In this systematic review, the authors examined current applications of FUS for psychiatric conditions and explored its potential opportunities and challenges. METHODS: The authors performed a comprehensive review using the PRISMA guidelines of studies investigating psychiatric applications for FUS. Articles indexed on PubMed between 2014 to 2024 were included. The authors synthesized the psychiatric conditions treated, neural targets, outcomes, study design, and sonication parameters, and they reviewed important considerations for the treatment of psychiatric disorders with FUS. They also discussed active clinical trials in this research domain. RESULTS: Of 250 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria. Eight articles investigated the clinical, safety, and imaging correlates of MRgFUS in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), whereas 3 examined treatment-resistant depression. Bilateral anterior capsulotomy resulted in a full responder rate of 67% (≥ 35% reduction in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score) and 33% (≥ 50% reduction in the score on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) in OCD and treatment-resistant depression, respectively. Sonications ranged from 8 to 36 with targeted lesional temperatures of 51°C-56°C. Lesions in the anterodorsal aspect of the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC) and increased functional connectivity to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex significantly predicted reduction in symptoms among patients with OCD, with decreases in beta-band activity in the frontocentral and temporal regions associated with reductions in depression and anxiety. Treatment of the nucleus accumbens with low-intensity FUS (LIFU) in patients with opioid-use disorders resulted in significant reductions in cue-reactive cravings, lasting up to 90 days. No serious adverse events were reported, including cognitive decline. Side effects were generally mild and transient, consisting of headaches, pin-site swelling, and nausea. Fourteen active clinical trials were identified, primarily targeting depression with LIFU. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, FUS for psychiatric conditions is centered on OCD, with early pilot studies demonstrating promising safety and efficacy. Further research expanding on defining optimal patient selection, study design, intensity, and sonication parameters is warranted, particularly as FUS expands to other psychiatric illnesses and incorporates LIFU paradigms. Ethical considerations such as patient consent and equitable access also remain paramount.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico por imagem , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/terapia , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Advancements in deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices provide a unique opportunity to record local field potentials longitudinally to improve the efficacy of treatment for intractable facial pain. We aimed to identify potential electrophysiological biomarkers of pain in the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) of the thalamus and periaqueductal gray (PAG) using a long-term sensing DBS system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed power spectra of ambulatory pain-related events from one patient implanted with a long-term sensing generator, representing different pain intensities (pain >7, pain >9) and pain qualities (no pain, burning, stabbing, and shocking pain). Power spectra were parametrized to separate oscillatory and aperiodic features and compared across the different pain states. RESULTS: Overall, 96 events were marked during a 16-month follow-up. Parameterization of spectra revealed a total of 62 oscillatory peaks with most in the VPM (77.4%). The pain-free condition did not show any oscillations. In contrast, ß peaks were observed in the VPM during all episodes (100%) associated with pain >9, 56% of episodes with pain >7, and 50% of burning pain events (center frequencies: 28.4 Hz, 17.8 Hz, and 20.7 Hz, respectively). Episodes of pain >9 indicated the highest relative ß band power in the VPM and decreased aperiodic exponents (denoting the slope of the power spectra) in both the VPM and PAG. CONCLUSIONS: For this patient, an increase in ß band activity in the sensory thalamus was associated with severe facial pain, opening the possibility for closed-loop DBS in facial pain.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) is an increasingly utilized method for identifying electrophysiological processes underlying sensorimotor, cognitive, and emotional behaviors. In this review, the authors outline current research using sEEG to investigate the neural activity underlying emotional and psychiatric behaviors. Understanding the current structure of intracranial research using sEEG will inform future studies of psychiatric disease and therapeutics for effective neuromodulation. METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review of studies according to PRISMA guidelines to investigate behaviors related to psychiatric conditions in patients with epilepsy undergoing monitoring with sEEG. Articles indexed on PubMed between 2010 and 2022 were included if they studied emotions or affective behaviors or met the National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria positive and negative valence domains. Data extracted from articles included study sample size, paradigms and behavioral tasks employed, cortical and subcortical targets, EEG analysis methods, and identified electrophysiological activity underlying the studied behavior. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess bias risk. RESULTS: Thirty-two primary articles met inclusion criteria. Study populations ranged from 3 to 39 patients. The most common structures investigated were the amygdala, insula, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), hippocampus, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Paradigms, stimuli, and behavioral tasks widely varied. Time-frequency analyses were the most common, followed by connectivity analyses. Multiple oscillations encoded a variety of behaviors related to emotional and psychiatric conditions. High gamma activity was observed in the amygdala and anterior insula in response to aversive audiovisual stimuli and in the OFC in response to reward processing. ACC beta band power increases and hippocampal-amygdala beta coherence variations were predictive of worsening mood states. Insular and amygdalar theta oscillations encoded social pain and fear learning, respectively. Most studies performed passing recordings, allowing for the decoding of affective states and depression symptoms, while other studies utilized direct stimulation, such as in the OFC to improve mood symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic EEG in epilepsy has identified multiple corticolimbic structures with specific oscillatory and synchronization activity underlying a diverse range of behaviors related to emotions and affective conditions. Given the heterogeneity of psychiatric conditions, sEEG provides an opportunity to study these neural correlates to develop personalized effective neuromodulatory treatments. Future studies should focus on optimizing paradigms and tasks to investigate a broad range of behavioral phenotypes that overlap across psychiatric conditions.
Assuntos
Emoções , Epilepsia , Humanos , Emoções/fisiologia , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Epilepsia/cirurgia , Córtex Pré-Frontal , MedoRESUMO
Background Intraoperative MRI has been shown to improve gross-total resection of high-grade glioma. However, to the knowledge of the authors, the cost-effectiveness of intraoperative MRI has not been established. Purpose To construct a clinical decision analysis model for assessing intraoperative MRI in the treatment of high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods An integrated five-state microsimulation model was constructed to follow patients with high-grade glioma. One-hundred-thousand patients treated with intraoperative MRI were compared with 100 000 patients who were treated without intraoperative MRI from initial resection and debulking until death (median age at initial resection, 55 years). After the operation and treatment of complications, patients existed in one of three health states: progression-free survival (PFS), progressive disease, or dead. Patients with recurrence were offered up to two repeated resections. PFS, valuation of health states (utility values), probabilities, and costs were obtained from randomized controlled trials whenever possible. Otherwise, national databases, registries, and nonrandomized trials were used. Uncertainty in model inputs was assessed by using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. A health care perspective was used for this analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was used to determine cost efficacy. Results Intraoperative MRI yielded an incremental benefit of 0.18 QALYs (1.34 QALYs with intraoperative MRI vs 1.16 QALYs without) at an incremental cost of $13 447 ($176 460 with intraoperative MRI vs $163 013 without) in microsimulation modeling, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $76 442 per QALY. Because of parameter distributions, probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that intraoperative MRI had a 99.5% chance of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY. Conclusion Intraoperative MRI is likely to be a cost-effective modality in the treatment of high-grade glioma. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Glioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/economia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/economia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Encefálicas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Glioma/economia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-volume hospitals are associated with improved outcomes in glioblastoma (GBM). However, the impact of travel burden to high-volume centers is poorly understood. We examined post-operative outcomes between GBM patients that underwent treatment at local, low-volume hospitals with those that traveled long distances to high-volume hospitals. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for GBM patients that underwent surgery (2010-2014). We established two cohorts: patients in the lowest quartile of travel distance and volume (Short-travel/Low-Volume: STLV) and patients in the highest quartile of travel and volume (Long-travel/High-Volume: LTHV). Outcomes analyzed were 30-day, 90-day mortality, overall survival, 30-day readmission, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Of 35,529 cases, STLV patients (n = 3414) traveled a median of 3 miles (Interquartile range [IQR] 1.8-4.2) to low-volume centers (5 [3-7] annual cases) and LTHV patients (n = 3808) traveled a median of 62 miles [44.1-111.3] to high-volume centers (48 [42-71]). LTHV patients were younger, had lower Charlson scores, largely received care at academic centers (84.4% vs 11.9%), were less likely to be minorities (8.1% vs 17.1%) or underinsured (6.9% vs 12.1), and were more likely to receive trimodality therapy (75.6% vs 69.2%; all p < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, LTHV predicted improved overall survival (HR 0.87, p = 0.002), decreased 90-day mortality (OR 0.72, p = 0.019), lower 30-day readmission (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), and shorter hospitalizations (RR 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Glioblastoma patients who travel farther to high-volume centers have superior post-operative outcomes compared to patients who receive treatment locally at low-volume centers. Strategies that facilitate patient travel to high-volume hospitals may improve outcomes.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Idoso , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Viagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Safety-net hospitals (SNHs) provide disproportionate care for underserved patients. Prior studies have identified poor outcomes, increased costs, and reduced access to certain complex, elective surgeries at SNHs. However, it is unknown whether similar patterns exist for the management of glioblastoma (GBM). We sought to determine if patients treated at HBHs receive equitable care for GBM, and if safety-net burden status impacts post-treatment survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for GBM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015. Safety-net burden was defined as the proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patients treated at each hospital, and stratified as low (LBH), medium (MBH), and high-burden (HBH) hospitals. The impact of safety-net burden on the receipt of any treatment, trimodality therapy, gross total resection (GTR), radiation, or chemotherapy was investigated. Secondary outcomes included post-treatment 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Overall, 40,082 GBM patients at 1202 hospitals (352 LBHs, 553 MBHs, and 297 HBHs) were identified. Patients treated at HBHs were significantly less likely to receive trimodality therapy (OR = 0.75, p < 0.001), GTR (OR = 0.84, p < 0.001), radiation (OR = 0.73, p < 0.001), and chemotherapy (OR = 0.78, p < 0.001) than those treated at LBHs. Patients treated at HBHs had significantly increased 30-day (OR = 1.25, p = 0.031) and 90-day mortality (OR = 1.24, p = 0.001), and reduced overall survival (HR = 1.05, p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: GBM patients treated at SNHs are less likely to receive standard-of-care therapies and have increased short- and long-term mortality. Additional research is needed to evaluate barriers to providing equitable care for GBM patients at SNHs.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/terapia , Glioblastoma/terapia , Hospitais , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Feminino , Glioblastoma/mortalidade , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE Preoperative embolization of meningiomas can facilitate their resection when they are difficult to remove. The optimal use and timing of such a procedure remains controversial given the risk of embolization-linked morbidity in select clinical settings. In this work, the authors used a large national database to study the impact of immediate preoperative embolization on the immediate outcomes of meningioma resection. METHODS Meningioma patients who had undergone elective resection were identified in the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the period 2002-2014. Patients who had undergone preoperative embolization were propensity score matched to those who had not, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Associations between preoperative embolization and morbidity, mortality, and nonroutine discharge were investigated. RESULTS Overall, 27,008 admissions met the inclusion criteria, and 633 patients (2.34%) had undergone preoperative embolization and 26,375 (97.66%) had not. The embolization group was younger (55.17 vs 57.69 years, p < 0.001) with a lower proportion of females (63.5% vs 69.1%, p = 0.003), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.002), and higher disease severity (p < 0.001). Propensity score matching retained 413 embolization and 413 nonembolization patients. In the matched cohort, preoperative embolization was associated with increased rates of cerebral edema (25.2% vs 17.7%, p = 0.009), posthemorrhagic anemia or transfusion (21.8% vs 13.8%, p = 0.003), and nonroutine discharge (42.8% vs 35.7%, p = 0.039). There was no difference in mortality (≤ 2.4% vs ≤ 2.4%, p = 0.82). Among the embolization patients, the mean interval from embolization to resection was 1.49 days. On multivariate analysis, a longer interval was significantly associated with nonroutine discharge (OR 1.33, p = 0.004) but not with complications or mortality. CONCLUSIONS Relative to meningioma patients who do not undergo preoperative embolization in the same admission, those who do have higher rates of cerebral edema and nonroutine discharge but not higher rates of stroke or death. Thus, meningiomas requiring preoperative embolization represent a distinct clinical entity that requires prolonged, more complex care. Further, among embolization patients, the timing of resection did not affect the risk of in-hospital complications, suggesting that the timing of surgery can be determined according to surgeon discretion.
Assuntos
Tempo de Internação , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Meningioma/cirurgia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Whether obesity is associated with meningioma and the impact of obesity by gender has been debated. The primary objective of this study was to investigate differences in BMI between male and female patients undergoing craniotomy for meningioma and compare those with patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. The secondary objective was to compare meningioma location and progression-free survival (PFS) between obese and nonobese patients in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: National data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Male and female patients were analyzed separately. Patients undergoing craniotomies for meningioma were compared with patients of the same sex undergoing craniotomies for other intracranial tumors. Institutional data from two academic centers were collected for all male and an equivalent number of female meningioma patients undergoing meningioma resection. Multivariate regression controlling for age was used to determine differences in meningioma location. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were computed to investigate differences in PFS. RESULTS: From NSQIP, 4163 male meningioma patients were compared with 24,266 controls, and 9372 female meningioma patients were compared with 21,538 controls. Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection were more likely to be overweight or obese compared with patients undergoing craniotomy for other tumors, with the odds ratio increasing with increasing weight class (all p < 0.0001). In the multi-institutional cohort, meningiomas were more common along the skull base in male patients (p = 0.0123), but not in female patients (p = 0.1246). There was no difference in PFS between obese and nonobese male (p = 0.4104) or female (p = 0.5504) patients. Obesity was associated with increased risk of pulmonary embolism in both male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection (p = 0.0043). CONCLUSIONS: Male and female patients undergoing meningioma resection are more likely to be obese than patients undergoing craniotomy for other intracranial tumors. Obese males are more likely to have meningiomas in the skull base compared with other locations, but this association was not found in females. There was no significant difference in PFS among obese patients. The mechanism by which obesity increases meningioma incidence remains to be determined.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Obesidade , Humanos , Meningioma/cirurgia , Meningioma/epidemiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Obesidade/complicações , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Craniotomia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Fatores Sexuais , Intervalo Livre de ProgressãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Steroids are used ubiquitously in the preoperative management of patients with brain tumor. The rate of improvement in focal deficits with steroids and the prognostic value of such a response are not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate at which focal neurological deficits respond to preoperative corticosteroids in patients with brain metastases and whether such an improvement could predict long-term recovery of neurological function after surgery. METHODS: Patients with brain metastases and related deficits in language, visual field, or motor domains who received corticosteroids before surgery were identified. Characteristics between steroid responders and nonresponders were compared. RESULTS: Ninety six patients demonstrated a visual field (13 patients), language (19), or motor (64) deficit and received dexamethasone in the week before surgery (average cumulative dose 43 mg; average duration 2.7 days). 38.5% of patients' deficits improved with steroids before surgery, while 82.3% of patients improved by follow-up. Motor deficits were more likely to improve both preoperatively ( P = .014) and postoperatively ( P = .010). All 37 responders remained improved at follow-up whereas 42 of 59 (71%) of nonresponders ultimately improved ( P < .001). All other clinical characteristics, including dose and duration, were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A response to steroids before surgery is highly predictive of long-term improvement postoperatively in brain metastasis patients with focal neurological deficits. Lack of a response portends a somewhat less favorable prognosis. Duration and intensity of therapy do not seem to affect the likelihood of response.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicações , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Período Pós-Operatório , Dexametasona/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports the effectiveness of venous sinus stenting (VSS) with favorable outcomes, safety, and expenses compared with shunting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Yet, no evidence is available regarding optimal postoperative recovery, which has increasing importance with the burdens on health care imposed by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We examined adverse events and costs after VSS and propose an optimal recovery pathway to maximize patient safety and reduce stress on health care resources. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of elective VSS operations performed from May 2008 to August 2021 at a single institution. Primary data included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, adverse events, need for ICU interventions, and hospital costs. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (98.1% female) met the inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 51 (96.2%) were discharged on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2 patients were discharged on POD 2. Both patients discharged on POD 2 remained because of groin hematomas from femoral artery access. There were no major complications or care that required an ICU. Eight patients (15.1%) were lateralized to other ICUs or remained in a postanesthesia care unit because the neurosciences ICU was above capacity. Total estimated cost for initial recovery day in a neurosciences ICU room was $2361 versus $882 for a neurosurgery/neurology ward room. In our cohort, ward convalescence would save an estimated $79,866 for bed placement alone and increase ICU bed availability. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reaffirm the safety of VSS. These patients should recover on a neurosurgery/neurology ward, which would save health care costs and increase ICU bed availability.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pseudotumor Cerebral , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pseudotumor Cerebral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Atenção à Saúde , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The "Volume Pledge" aims to centralize carotid artery stenting (CAS) to hospitals and surgeons performing ≥10 and ≥5 procedures annually, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes after CAS between hospitals and surgeons meeting or not meeting the Volume Pledge thresholds. METHODS: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample for CAS admissions. Hospitals and surgeons were categorized as low volume and high volume (HV) based on the Volume Pledge. Multivariable hierarchical regression models were used to examine the impact of hospital volume (2005-2011) and surgeon volume (2005-2009) on perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2011, 22 215 patients were identified. Most patients underwent CAS by HV hospitals (86.4%). No differences in poor outcome (composite endpoint of in-hospital mortality, postoperative neurological or cardiac complications) were observed by hospital volume but HV hospitals did decrease the likelihood of other complications, nonroutine discharge, and prolonged hospitalization. From 2005 to 2009, 9454 CAS admissions were associated with physician identifiers. Most patients received CAS by HV surgeons (79.2%). On multivariable analysis, hospital volume was not associated with improved outcomes but HV surgeons decreased odds of poor outcome (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.97; P = .028), complications (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.71, P < .001), nonroutine discharge (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.87; P = .001), and prolonged hospitalization (OR 0.52, 95% 0.44-0.61, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Most patients receive CAS by hospitals and providers meeting the Volume Pledge threshold for CAS. Surgeons but not hospitals who met the policy's volume standards were associated with superior outcomes across all measured outcomes.
Assuntos
Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/tendências , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/tendências , Stents/tendências , Cirurgiões/tendências , Idoso , Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/epidemiologia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/efeitos adversos , Cirurgiões/normasRESUMO
We aim to evaluate the association between family income and mock multiple mini interview (MMI) performance for prospective medical school applicants. Each applicant participated in a three-station mock MMI and were scored on four items, each on a sevenpoint scale. Of the 48 prospective applicants participating, 29 (60% survey response rate) completed the survey. Hispanic applicants were significantly more likely to have a family income of less than or equal to $20,000 versus more than $20,000 (p<.05). The adjusted analysis suggested mock MMI total score was significantly lower for prospective medical school applicants with family incomes of less than or equal to $20,000 versus more than $20,000 (ß coefficient 5.37, 95% CI 0.05-10.69, p = .048). The mock MMI performance of prospective applicants with lower family incomes indicates the need for further interview skill preparation or new interview scoring protocols.
Assuntos
Entrevistas como Assunto , Critérios de Admissão Escolar , Faculdades de Medicina , Classe Social , California , Etnicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most Americans consult the Internet to address their health concerns. Limited health literacy among the public highlights the need for patient education Web sites to deliver understandable health information. We assessed the understandability and actionability of online neurosurgical patient education materials (PEMs) provided by the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and MedlinePlus. METHODS: Articles on neurosurgical conditions and treatments listed on both the AANS site and MedlinePlus were analyzed. Two reviewers scored articles using 2 validated health literacy tools, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index (CCI) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). These tools evaluate the quality of written health information and assess for content, organization, and actionability of PEMs. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight articles were evaluated from the AANS (n = 61) and MedlinePlus (n = 77). The median CCI score for MedlinePlus and AANS articles was 68.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 62.5-81.3) and 56.3 [IQR, 46.7-73.7], respectively (P < 0.001). Only 1 article scored ≥90%, which is the CCI threshold for PEMs to be considered easy to read. Although the AANS and Medline performed similarly on the understandability component of the PEMAT (66.7 [IQR, 53.8-69.2] vs. 69.2 [IQR, 66.7-83.3], respectively; P < 0.001), significant differences were observed for the actionability section of the PEMAT (Medline 60 [IQR, 60-60] vs. AANS 0 [IQR, 0-60]; P < 0.001). Less than 13% of articles provided summaries, visual aids, and tangible tools to aid patient action. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical online PEMs may be difficult to understand and potentially act as barriers for patients' engagement with health systems. There is a need to deliver patient-centered health information that effectively informs patients, aiding in meaningful health decision making.
Assuntos
Compreensão , Internet , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/educação , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Materiais de Ensino/normas , Letramento em Saúde/normas , HumanosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Safety-net hospitals deliver care to a substantial share of vulnerable patient populations and are disproportionately impacted by hospital payment reform policies. Complex elective procedures performed at safety-net facilities are associated with worse outcomes and higher costs. The effects of hospital safety-net burden on highly specialized, emergent, and resource-intensive conditions are poorly understood. The authors examined the effects of hospital safety-net burden on outcomes and costs after emergent neurosurgical intervention for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2002 to 2011. Patients ≥ 18 years old who underwent emergent surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were included. Safety-net burden was defined as the proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patients treated at each hospital included in the NIS database. Hospitals that performed clipping and coiling were stratified as low-burden (LBH), medium-burden (MBH), and high-burden (HBH) hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 34,647 patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms underwent clipping and 23,687 underwent coiling. Compared to LBHs, HBHs were more likely to treat black, Hispanic, Medicaid, and uninsured patients (p < 0.001). HBHs were also more likely to be associated with teaching hospitals (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed among the burden groups in the severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, treatment at an HBH did not predict in-hospital mortality, poor outcome, length of stay, costs, or likelihood of a hospital-acquired condition. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their financial burden, safety-net hospitals provide equitable care after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms and do not incur higher hospital costs. Safety-net hospitals may have the capacity to provide equitable surgical care for highly specialized emergent neurosurgical conditions.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, yet its global surgical burden has yet to be characterized. The authors sought to compile the most current epidemiological data to quantify global prevalence and incidence, and estimate global surgically treatable epilepsy. Understanding regional and global epilepsy trends and potential surgical volume is crucial for future policy efforts and resource allocation. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to determine the global incidence, lifetime prevalence, and active prevalence of epilepsy; to estimate surgically treatable epilepsy volume; and to evaluate regional trends by WHO regions and World Bank income levels. Data were extracted from all population-based studies with prespecified methodological quality across all countries and demographics, performed between 1990 and 2016 and indexed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The current and annual new case volumes for surgically treatable epilepsy were derived from global epilepsy prevalence and incidence. RESULTS: This systematic review yielded 167 articles, across all WHO regions and income levels. Meta-analysis showed a raw global prevalence of lifetime epilepsy of 1099 per 100,000 people, whereas active epilepsy prevalence is slightly lower at 690 per 100,000 people. Global incidence was found to be 62 cases per 100,000 person-years. The meta-analysis predicted 4.6 million new cases of epilepsy annually worldwide, a prevalence of 51.7 million active epilepsy cases, and 82.3 million people with any lifetime epilepsy diagnosis. Differences across WHO regions and country incomes were significant. The authors estimate that currently 10.1 million patients with epilepsy may be surgical treatment candidates, and 1.4 million new surgically treatable epilepsy cases arise annually. The highest prevalences are found in Africa and Latin America, although the highest incidences are reported in the Middle East and Latin America. These regions are primarily low- and middle-income countries; as expected, the highest disease burden falls disproportionately on regions with the fewest healthcare resources. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of the global epilepsy burden has evolved as more regions have been studied. This up-to-date worldwide analysis provides the first estimate of surgical epilepsy volume and an updated comprehensive overview of current epidemiological trends. The disproportionate burden of epilepsy on low- and middle-income countries will require targeted diagnostic and treatment efforts to reduce the global disparities in care and cost. Quantifying global epilepsy provides the first step toward restructuring the allocation of healthcare resources as part of global healthcare system strengthening.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is a key surgical quality metric associated with financial penalties and greater healthcare costs. We examined the clinical risk factors and postoperative complications associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmissions after cranial neurosurgery. METHODS: We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2016 for adult patients who had undergone a cranial neurosurgical procedure. Multivariable logistic regression with backward model selection was used to determine the predictors associated with 30-day unplanned hospital readmission. RESULTS: Of 40,802 cranial neurosurgical cases, 4147 (10.2%) required an unplanned readmission. Postoperative complications were greater in the readmission cohort (18.5% vs. 9.9%; P < 0.001). On adjusted analysis, the clinical factors predictive of unplanned readmission included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, coagulopathy, chronic steroid use, and preoperative anemia, hyponatremia, and hypoalbuminemia (P ≤ 0.01 for all). Higher American Society of Anesthesiology class (III to V), operative time >216 minutes, and unplanned reoperation were also associated with an increased likelihood of readmission (P ≤ 0.001 for all). The postoperative complications predictive of unplanned readmissions were wound infection (odds ratio [OR], 4.90; P < 0.001), pulmonary embolus (OR, 3.94; P < 0.001), myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest (OR, 2.37; P < 0.001), sepsis (OR, 1.73; P < 0.001), deep venous thrombosis (OR, 1.50; P = 0.002), and urinary tract infection (OR, 1.45; P = 0.002). Female sex, transfer status, and postoperative pulmonary complications were protective of readmission (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Unplanned hospital readmission after cranial neurosurgery is a common event. The identification of high-risk patients who undergo cranial procedures might allow hospitals to reduce unplanned readmissions and their associated healthcare costs.