How do patient reported outcome measures affect treatment intensification and patient satisfaction in the management of psoriatic arthritis? A cross sectional study of 503 patients.

OBJECTIVES: The ASSIST study investigated prescribing in routine psoriatic arthritis (PsA) care and whether the patient reported outcome: PsA Impact of Disease questionnaire (PsAID-12), impacted treatment. This study also assessed a range of patient and clinician factors and their relationship to PsAID-12 scoring and treatment modification. METHODS: Patients with PsA were selected across the UK and Europe between July 2021-March 2022. Patients completed the PsAID questionnaire, with the results shared with their physician. Patient characteristics, disease activity, current treatment methods, treatment strategies, medication changes and patient satisfaction scores were recorded. RESULTS: 503 patients recruited. 36.2% had changes made to treatment, 88.8% of this had treatment escalation. Overall, the mean PsAID-12 score was higher for patients with treatment escalation; the PsAID-12 score was associated with odds of treatment escalation (OR: 1.58; p< 0.0001). However, most clinicians reported PsAID-12 did not impact their decision to escalate treatment, instead supporting treatment reduction decisions. Physician's assessment of disease activity had the most statistically significant effect on likelihood of treatment escalation, (OR = 2.68, per 1-point score increase). Escalation was more likely in patients not treated with biologic therapies. Additional factors associated with treatment escalation included: patient characteristics, physician characteristics, disease activity and disease impact. CONCLUSION: This study highlights multiple factors impacting treatment decision making for individuals with PsA. PsAID-12 scoring correlates with multiple measures of disease severity and odds of treatment escalation. However, most clinicians reported the PsAID-12 did not influence treatment escalation decisions. PsAID scoring could be used to increase confidence in treatment de-escalation.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Composite Indices of Remission in Male and Female Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study of Longitudinal Cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the sex differences in sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratio of the outcome indices minimal disease activity (MDA), Disease Activity Score for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) with respect to clinical remission, evaluated from both the physician and patient perspective, in a multicenter cohort of patients with PsA. METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts, all patients with PsA consecutively attending our rheumatology units were considered potentially eligible for the study. In all patients, a complete clinical examination was carried out. The DAPSA was calculated for each patient (DAPSA values ≤ 4 were considered as remission) and MDA was also evaluated. Patient and physician global assessment values ≤ 1 were considered as a surrogate of remission from the patient and physician perspective, respectively. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-two patients with PsA were enrolled (mean age 55.7 [SD 12.4]; 141 male, 131 female). In both sexes, MDA had good sensitivity and specificity toward remission as assessed by the rheumatologist. Remission according to DAPSA had excellent values of specificity but lacks sensitivity in both sexes. PsAID ≤ 4 had excellent values of sensitivity but lacked specificity in both sexes. Remission defined by DAPSA values was found to be more sensitive and specific in female patients (45.4% and 100%, respectively) than in male patients (33.3% and 84.2%, respectively) with respect to physician-judged remission. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate for the first time, to our knowledge, that some differences between the 2 sexes on the different outcome indices are possible. This could be important in the clinical management of patients with PsA.

Difficult-to-Treat Concept in Psoriatic Arthritis: Analysis of 2 Potential Definitions in a Large Group of Patients. A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of 2 proposed criteria for difficult-to-treat (D2T) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a group of patients and to evaluate the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2 longitudinal cohorts of patients with PsA fulfilling the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), with at least 1 year of follow-up. A detailed medical history was collected and a physical examination was performed for all recruited patients. The proposed criteria for patients with D2T PsA were applied in our group. To test the performance of the 2 sets of criteria, we used an external validator (absence of patient acceptable symptom state + physician global assessment ≥ 6 cm). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria was assessed. RESULTS: We evaluated 378 patients with PsA (219 male/159 female), with a mean age (range) of 58 (19-75) years. Seventy-five (19.8%) patients fulfilled the D2T criteria proposed by Perrotta et al and 58 (15.3%) the D2T criteria proposed by Kumthekar et al. Both criteria showed comparable performance, with low sensitivity (Perrotta: 37.8%, Kumthekar: 29.7%) but good specificity (Perrotta: 82.1%, Kumthekar: 86.2%). Finally, the agreement between the 2 sets of criteria is substantial (Fleiss [Formula: see text] 0.72), suggesting that both criteria identify nearly the same group of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study compared 2 published sets of criteria showing comparable performance and substantial agreement. This study may pave the way for further research in this field.

The assessment of the drug retention rate of secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis in a real-life multicentre cohort.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the drug retention rate (DRR) of secukinumab, an anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a real-life cohort, and to assess the impact of comorbidities and patient clinical characteristics on the DRR of secukinumab. METHODS: A retrospective study of prospective followed-up patients was performed to evaluate the DRR of secukinumab on patients with PsA attending the recruiting centres between January 2016 and June 2022. RESULTS: In 207 patients with PsA, a 60-month DRR of secukinumab of 57.0% was estimated (mean time of administration of 21.5±17.1 months). Male gender, age ≥65 years, disease duration ≥5 years and ≥10 years did not influence the DRR of secukinumab. The presence of comorbidities, considering any concomitant disorder, did not affect the DRR of secukinumab. In patients with cardiometabolic multimorbidity, a trend toward a better DRR of secukinumab was recorded. In fact, patients with high blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, and type 2 diabetes showed a trend toward an improved DRR of secukinumab. Furthermore, the presence of obesity did not influence the DRR of secukinumab. Different dosages, previous bDMARDs, and concomitant therapy with csDMARDs did not influence the DRR of secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: A cumulative 60-month DRR of secukinumab of 57.0% in patients with PsA was retrieved. The presence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity could be associated with an improved DRR of secukinumab, whereas obesity did not affect this feature in our cohort. Previous bDMARDs, concomitant csDMARDs, and different drug dosages could not influence the DRR of secukinumab over time.

Male Fertility in Spondyloarthritis: from Clinical Issues to Cytokines Milieu. A Narrative Review.

PURPOSEOF REVIEW: Male fertility is an emergent issue that should be considered in clinical practice, when dealing with chronic inflammatory diseases in young men. As it is known, the chronic inflammation is the main pathophysiologic mechanism in some rheumatological conditions such as spondyloarthritis (SpA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). Therefore, it is paramount to be aware if these diseases could impair male fertility, both due to the inflammation or to the treatments needed: we reviewed the literature on the most relevant and recent evidence on male fertility in patients affected by SpA, AS and PsA. RECENT FINDINGS: Rheumatological inflammatory diseases (included SpA, AS and PsA) could impair the family planning in man life, especially when diagnosed at young age. Moreover, focusing on sperm quality, it seems that a link between sperm quality impairment and a higher disease activity exist. Focusing on therapies, Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors showed a safety profile on human male fertility in clinical studies. Recently, a prospective study and two double-blind placebo-controlled trials assessed the impact of methotrexate and Filgotinib on semen parameters, respectively, showing a safety profile of these drugs on human semen quality. However, there are no clinical data on the impact of Interleukin (IL)17 inhibitors(i), IL12-23i and IL23i. Concerning male fertility in SpA, AS and PsA, an unmet clinical need is still present and new studies are needed to understand the association between these diseases and male fertility, and the implication of the therapies used for these diseases. This narrative review provides an overview of the available data on male fertility in patients affected by SpA, AS and PsA.

An international multi-centre analysis of current prescribing practices and shared decision-making in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Shared decision-making (SDM) is advocated to improve patient outcomes in Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We analysed current prescribing practices and the extent of SDM in PsA across Europe. METHODS: The ASSIST study was a cross-sectional observational study of PsA patients aged ≥18 years attending face-to-face appointments between July 2021-March 2022. Patient demographics, current treatment and treatment decisions were recorded. SDM was measured by the clinician's effort to collaborate (CollaboRATE questionnaire) and patient communication confidence (PEPPI-5 tool). RESULTS: 503 patients were included from 24 centres across the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Physician- and patient-reported measures of disease activity were highest in the UK. Conventional synthetic DMARDs constituted a higher percentage of current PsA treatment in UK than continental Europe (66.4% vs 44.9%), which differed from biologic DMARDs (36.4% vs 64.4%). Implementing treatment escalation was most common in the UK. CollaboRATE and PEPPI-5 scores were high across centres. Of 31 patients with low CollaboRATE scores (<4.5), no patients with low PsAID-12 scores (<5) had treatment escalation. However, of 465 patients with CollaboRATE scores ≥4.5, 59 patients with low PsAID-12 scores received treatment escalation. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of treatment escalation seen in the UK may be explained by higher disease activity and a younger cohort. High levels of collaboration in face-to-face PsA consultations suggests effective implementation of the SDM approach. Our data indicate that, in patients with mild disease activity, only those with higher perceived collaboration underwent treatment escalation. Prospective studies should examine the impact of SDM on PsA patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05171270.

Cardiovascular comorbidities in psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology and risk factors in two different European populations.

OBJECTIVES: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, frequently associated with cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities. Our aim was to compare the prevalence of CV comorbidities between two groups of PsA patients from different European countries: Belgium and Italy. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of two longitudinal cohorts in which 803 PsA patients were enrolled (463 from Belgium and 340 from Italy). All enrolled patients were ≥18 years old and fulfilled the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR criteria). For each patient, demographics, clinical assessments, smoking habits, the presence of arterial hypertension (AH), obesity (BMI ≥30), type 2 diabetes (T2D), CV diseases (acute myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischaemic attack), dyslipidaemia (Italy only) and hypercholesterolaemia (Belgium only) were collected. RESULTS: The most prevalent comorbidities among Italian patients with PsA were: AH (45.1%), dyslipidaemia (38.6%) and obesity (30.8%), and among Belgian patients were: hypercholesterolaemia (30.9%), obesity (27%) and AH (26.4%). Moreover, the prevalence of T2D and CV diseases was respectively 14.2% and 7.1% among Italian patients and 7.6% and 3.5% among Belgian patients. When comparing the two groups, AH, T2D and CV diseases were significantly more prevalent in Italian PsA patients. After controlling for different confounders, Italian patients, regardless of age, sex, smoking habits, PsA duration, other CV comorbidities, therapy, disease activity and function, had a higher risk to be hypertensive (OR 2.00, p=0.007). Instead of the country in which patients lived was not a predictor for the risk of T2D and CV diseases. Obesity prevalence was not different between the two groups. The lipid profile was unfavourable in both populations (even if not comparable between the two groups, due to the different way of collection), as is often the case in PsA. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of AH, T2D and CV diseases were higher in Italian patients rather than Belgians. Moreover, among patients with PsA, the risk of AH was higher in the Italian cohort compared to the Belgian cohort. These results suggest that further research is needed to evaluate potential extrinsic factors (geography and sociocultural aspects) that may contribute to CV risk.

Paradoxical psoriatic arthritis in a patient with psoriasis treated with guselkumab.

Paradoxical psoriatic arthritis (PPsA) may be associated with guselkumab treatment. We describe a patient in whom PPsA required a change from guselkumab to ixekizumab. The pathophysiology of this paradoxical reaction is most likely a cytokine imbalance.

Novel Approaches in Molecular Imaging and Neuroimaging of Fibromyalgia.

Fibromyalgia (FM) represents a condition that is still controversial in its entity, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. The aim of this review is to focus on imaging aspects of FM, especially on novel approaches in molecular imaging, with a special focus on neuroimaging. Novel functional and molecular imaging findings may represent, eventually, future biomarkers both in research settings and in terms of clinical practice. Several imaging techniques have already been tested in clinical trials in the FM field, including functional MRI, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 18F-FDG in FM, PET imaging of the dopaminergic system, PET imaging of the GABAergic system, PET imaging with neuroinflammation and neuroimmune parameters, PET imaging of the opioid system and H215O-PET activation studies. Therefore, the potential role in the FM field of fMRI and different PET tracers has been discussed in different settings, serving as a comprehensive guide of novel imaging options both in research and in the clinical field.

Prevalence of Type 2 and Type 1 Diabetes in Psoriatic Arthritis: An Italian Study.

OBJECTIVE: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is burdened by an increased susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases. Comorbid diabetes may represent one of the key factors contributing to this risk. The aim of our medical records review study was to investigate the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) in an Italian PsA cohort. METHODS: The clinical records of all patients consecutively seen at our clinic with a diagnosis of PsA during a 12-month period were reviewed to identify comorbid T2D or T1D. For comparison, a 1:1 age- and sex-matched group of individuals with noninflammatory diseases was recruited. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised 408 patients. The prevalence of T2D was 7.8% (95% confidence interval, 5.6-10.8) in PsA and 4.4% in controls (95% confidence interval, 2.8-6.9; p = 0.04). Two cases (0.49%) of T1D were identified in the PsA cohort, whereas no cases were observed in controls. In a multivariate logistic regression model including age, disease duration, and body mass index (BMI) as covariates, increasing age (odds ratio [OR], 1.079; p = 0.006) and BMI (OR, 1.188; p = 0.011) but not PsA duration predicted being classified as having T2D. In a similar model accounting for age and BMI, average disease activity score including 28 joints and C-reactive protein showed a trend toward significance (OR, 1.639; p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our data provide further support to the emerging evidence of an increased risk of T2D in PsA patients. Cardiometabolic comorbidity represents a significant aspect of integrated arthritis management to improve long-term cardiovascular outcomes and to provide a comprehensive treatment.

What influences patients' opinion of remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis? Principal component analysis of an international study.

OBJECTIVE: In PsA, the treatment objective is remission or low disease activity (LDA), but patients' perception of remission is poorly studied. This analysis aimed to identify factors associated with patient-defined remission. METHODS: This analysis uses ReFlaP data, an international PsA study, with remission defined as 'At this time, is your psoriatic arthritis in remission, if this means: you feel your disease is as good as gone?'. Variables associated with, first, patient-defined remission and, second, LDA were identified using multivariable logistic regression and principal component analysis (PCA) to explore correlated variables. RESULTS: Of 424 patients (50.2% male, mean age 52 years) with established disease, 94 (22.2%) reported themselves as being in remission and 191 (45.0%) as LDA alone. In multivariable analysis pain, psoriasis, impact of disease, physician opinion of symptoms from joint damage and Groll comorbidity index were independent predictors of remission. For LDA, results were similar. Using PCA, variance explained was 74% by five components for men and 80% by six components for women. The key component from PCA for remission was, for both sex, disease impact (Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease, pain and HAQ) explaining 22.2-27.5% of variance. Other factors included musculoskeletal disease activity, chronicity/joint damage, psoriasis, enthesitis and CRP. For LDA, similar factors were identified but the variance explained was lower (64-68%). CONCLUSION: Many factors impact on patients' opinion of remission, dominated by disease impact. Disease activity in multiple domains, chronicity/age, comorbidities and symptoms due to other conditions contribute to a robust model highlighting that patient-defined remission is multifaceted. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03119805.

Comparing patient-perceived and physician-perceived remission and low disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: an analysis of 410 patients from 14 countries.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare different definitions of remission and low disease activity (LDA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), based on both patients' and physicians' perspectives. METHODS: In ReFlap (Remission/Flare in PsA; NCT03119805), adults with physician-confirmed PsA and >2 years of disease duration in 14 countries were included. Remission was defined as very low disease activity (VLDA), Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) ≤4, and physician-perceived and patient-perceived remission (specific question yes/no), and LDA as minimal disease activity (MDA), DAPSA <14, and physician-perceived and patient-perceived LDA. Frequencies of these definitions, their agreement (prevalence-adjusted kappa), and sensitivity and specificity versus patient-defined status were assessed cross-sectionally. RESULTS: Of 410 patients, the mean age (SD) was 53.9 (12.5) years, 50.7% were male, disease duration was 11.2 (8.2) years, 56.8% were on biologics, and remission/LDA was frequently attained: respectively, for remission from 12.4% (VLDA) to 36.1% (physician-perceived remission), and for LDA from 25.4% (MDA) to 43.9% (patient-perceived LDA). Thus, patient-perceived remission/LDA was frequent (65.4%). Agreement between patient-perceived remission/LDA and composite scores was moderate to good (kappa range, 0.12-0.65). When patient-perceived remission or LDA status is used as reference, DAPSA-defined remission/LDA and VLDA/MDA had a sensitivity of 73.1% and 51.5%, respectively, and a specificity of 76.8% and 88.0%, respectively. Physician-perceived remission/LDA using a single question was frequent (67.6%) but performed poorly against other definitions. CONCLUSION: In this unselected population, remission/LDA was frequently attained. VLDA/MDA was a more stringent definition than DAPSA-based remission/LDA. DAPSA-based remission/LDA performed better than VLDA/MDA to detect patient-defined remission or remission/LDA. Further studies of long-term outcomes are needed.

Clinical implications of peripheral new bone formation in psoriatic arthritis: a literature-based review.

While the destructive changes of peripheral articular damage of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are extensively studied, the productive modifications have been somewhat neglected. This literature-based study focuses on the clinically relevant aspects of peripheral bone proliferation in PsA. New bone proliferation frequently occurs as juxta-articular and entheseal apposition in PsA patients but also in psoriatic patients without arthritis, the Psoriatic Arthritis Ratingen Score is the only radiographic method to evaluate peri-articular new bone formation, numerous ultrasound systems to score entheseal changes have been proposed, several serum biomarkers of bone-turnover have been associated with PsA and psoriasis but they do not have clinical relevance. The effects of the biologics on peripheral new bone formation remains to be elucidated as well as the contribution of peripheral bone apposition to disability. Many aspects of peripheral osteoproliferation in PsA have not yet been properly addressed and represent clinical unmet needs of this rheumatic disorder.

Assessment of bone morphogenic protein 2 and interleukin-17A in patients with axial spondyloarthritis and their potential role in the new bone formation: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: Several molecules are involved in the pathogenesis of new bone formation in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the serum levels of BMP-2 and IL-17A in patients with axSpA and their possible correlations with radiographic damage, disease activity, and function. METHODS: AxSpA patients fulfilled the ASAS criteria and with at least New York grade 2 bilateral sacroiliitis and healthy matched controls were enrolled for this study. BASDAI, ASDAS-CRP, BASMI, BASFI and CRP were evaluated as measures of disease activity and function. Spinal damage was assessed using the mSASSS on radiographs performed within 3 months from baseline. Serum concentrations of BMP-2 and IL-17A were assessed using ELISA kit. RESULTS: Sixty patients and 30 healthy subjects satisfying the inclusion criteria were enrolled. In our axSpA group, serum BMP-2 levels [median (25th-75th percentile) of 589.2 (430.24-1017.1) pg/ml] did not statistically differ from controls [518.34 (450.2-1028.2) pg/ml]. However, significant correlations were found between serum BMP-2 levels and radiographic damage assessed by mSASSS, and BMP-2 levels were found to be higher in patients with grade 4 sacroiliitis when compared to patients with lower grade of sacroiliitis. Of note, serum BMP-2 levels significantly inversely correlate with IL-17A levels and CRP, and were found to be lower in patients with higher disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study may confirm a possible role of BMP-2 in the pathogenesis of new bone formation in axSpA patients. Furthermore, a link between inflammation and BMP-2 was found.

Validation of the Italian version of proposed GRAPPA flare questionnaire for patients with psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to validate an Italian version of the GRAPPA flare instrument to identify patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with a possible disease flare. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study enrolling consecutively PsA patients classified with CASPAR criteria. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years and stable treatment (at least six months of follow-up) with conventional synthetic or biological DMARDs. The flare questionnaire was administered at baseline and within a two-week interval. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Construct validity of flare questionnaire was assessed using the correlation between flare score and disease activity indices, HAQ and serum C-reactive protein. Cohen's κ was performed to assess the agreement level between the patient's perception of flare and the score of the questionnaire. Finally, test-retest was performed to assess the reliability of the instrument. RESULTS: 46 PsA patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 30.4% reported a status of flare of their disease. The questionnaire was internally consistent (alpha=0.81). Moreover, the questionnaire score correlated with the main disease activity indices (Spearman Rho ranging from 0.30 to 0.66; p<0.01). The score of flare questionnaire showed a moderate agreement with the perception of flare from the patients (Cohen's κ=0.54). Test-retest reliability showed a good intra-class correlation. CONCLUSIONS: This initial validation of the Italian version of the GRAPPA flare instrument was favourable. Our results confirm the utility of this questionnaire in the assessment of flare in PsA.

Radiologist-rheumatologist multidisciplinary approach in the management of axial spondyloarthritis: a Delphi consensus statement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a Delphi consensus statement between rheumatologists and radiologists for the diagnosis and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis (axial-SpA). METHODS: Following an extensive literature search to identify unmet needs and potential goals for a multidisciplinary approach, a scientific board comprising 28 Italian hospital-based rheumatologists (n=19) and radiologists (n=9) identified 8 "starting points", resulting in the development of 23 consensus statements covering issues from current practice guidelines to specific MRI protocols for the assessment of axial-SpA. Each participant anonymously expressed a level of agreement for each statement using a 5-point Likert scale (1="strongly disagree"; 5="strongly agree") via an online Delphi method.Total cumulative agreement (TCA) was defined as the sum of the percentage of response to items 4 ("agree") and 5 ("absolutely agree"). Consensus was defined as ≥80% total cumulative agreement for each statement. RESULTS: After the first round of voting (28 participants), positive consensus was reached for 28/31 (90.3%) statements. Statements without consensus (n=3) were discussed in a face-to-face plenary session prior to the second vote (28 participants). After the second round voting, positive consensus was attained for all 31 statements, with mean final TCA of 95.5% (range 82.1-100%). CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi consensus statement provides an aid to rheumatologists and radiologists for the diagnosis and monitoring of axial-SpA.

Dose adjustments and discontinuation in TNF inhibitors treated patients: when and how. A systematic review of literature.

Objectives: To review the available evidence concerning the possibility of discontinuing and/or tapering the dosage of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in RA patients experiencing clinical remission or low disease activity. Methods: A systematic review of the literature concerning the low dosage and discontinuation of TNFi in disease-controlled RA patients was performed by evaluation of reports published in indexed international journals (Medline via PubMed, EMBASE), in the time frame from 8 April 2013 to 15 January 2016. Results: We analysed the literature evaluating the efficacy and the safety of two different strategies using TNFi, decreasing dosage or discontinuation, in patients experiencing clinical remission or low disease activity. After the analysis of online databases, 25 references were considered potentially relevant and 16 references were selected. The majority of data concerned etanercept and adalimumab. Results suggested the induction of stable clinical remission or low disease activity by using TNFi followed by a dosage tapering and/or discontinuation of such drugs may be associated with the maintenance of a good clinical response in a subset of patients affected by early disease. Conclusion: RA patients treated early with TNFi and achieving their therapeutic clinical targets seem to maintain their clinical response after tapering or discontinuing TNFi. These data may allow physicians a more dynamic and tailored management of RA patients.

Clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

It is currently recognised that remission can be an achievable target for several rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients by a treat-to-target approach. For RA different remission criteria have been proposed, depending on the disease activity scores used, on the importance given to the inclusion of patients' perspective into the definition of remission, and on their applicability in clinical practice, that generate highly different remission rates. Conversely, for PsA, remission is still insufficiently defined and represents a partially unmet need. For both conditions, several first- and second-line treatment strategies are now available - disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) of synthetic and biologic origin - that make the achievement of remission or at least low/minimal disease activity a realistic goal. This paper is a narrative review of the different criteria of remission, in the light of the available treatment strategies for RA and PsA, and in the attempt to provide rheumatologists an opportunity to improve the outcome to the greatest extent possible in their clinical practice.

Standardization of red flags for referral to rheumatologists and ophthalmologists in patients with rheumatic diseases and ocular involvement: a consensus statement.

Ocular involvement is a common manifestation of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, often requiring a multidisciplinary collaboration between rheumatologists and ophthalmologists. The aim of this study was to standardize "red flags" for referral for rheumatologists and ophthalmologists using a Delphi consensus for the management of rheumatic diseases with ocular involvement. The scientific board comprised 11 Italian hospital-based rheumatologists (N = 6) and ophthalmologists (N = 5). A systematic review identified potential red flags for referral. The panel developed 19 statements consisting of (a) referral from ophthalmologist to rheumatologist (b) referral from rheumatologist to ophthalmologist and (c) overarching principles relating to multidisciplinary roles/goals and management. Voting was performed anonymously using an online Delphi method. Each participant expressed a level of agreement on each statement using a 5-point scale (1="strongly disagree"; 5="strongly agree"). Total cumulative agreement was defined as the sum of the percentage of response to items 4 ("agree") and 5 ("absolutely agree"), consensus defined as ≥ 80% cumulative agreement for each statement. Positive consensus among 11 participants was reached for 15/19 (78.9%) statements. Statements not reaching consensus were discussed in a face-to-face meeting prior to the second vote (10 participants). Positive consensus was reached for all 19 statements, with final total cumulative agreement of 90-100%. This is the first Delphi consensus undertaken to standardize red flags for referral to rheumatologists and ophthalmologists for patients with rheumatic diseases and ocular involvement.