Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuroimmunomodulation ; 22(6): 358-64, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25871298

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of short- and long-term administration of melatonin on central brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in rats with acute and chronic inflammatory pain. METHODS: The animals were allocated to one of two experiments: experiment 1 or experiment 2. In experiment 1, all animals were injected with complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) to induce inflammation and were randomly allocated to receiving melatonin (60 mg/kg) or vehicle. Injections were administered 1 h after CFA and once daily for 2 more days (for a total of 3 days of melatonin administration). In experiment 2, fifteen days after CFA injection, the animals were treated with melatonin (50 mg/kg) or vehicle for 8 days. The animals were killed by decapitation 24 h after the last melatonin or vehicle administration, and an ELISA assay was performed to detect BDNF expression in the spinal cord, brainstem, and prefrontal cortex of the rats in both groups. Data were analyzed using Student's t test and the results are expressed as means ± SEM. RESULTS: In the first experiment, the BDNF levels of the melatonin group were reduced in the prefrontal cortex (Student's t test, p = 0.01) and increased in the spinal cord (Student's t test, p = 0.04). In experiment 2, BDNF levels were similar in both groups for all structures (Student's t test, p > 0.00 for all). A two-way ANOVA reveled a significant effect of structures (p = 0.0001) but not of treatment (p > 0.05). The prefrontal cortex presented higher BDNF levels than other structures (ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls test, p = 0.0001). Considering the relationship between BDNF levels in all three structures, we found an effect of central nervous system structures (p = 0.01) and an interaction between treatment and structures (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The high spinal cord BDNF levels and the low prefrontal cortical BDNF levels observed in rats with acute CFA-induced inflammation following short-term melatonin administration may be related to the pain-modulating and neuroprotective effects of this protein. Long-term melatonin administration did not alter BDNF levels in chronic inflammation.


Assuntos
Antioxidantes/uso terapêutico , Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo/metabolismo , Sistema Nervoso Central/metabolismo , Inflamação/complicações , Melatonina/uso terapêutico , Dor , Análise de Variância , Animais , Sistema Nervoso Central/efeitos dos fármacos , Doença Crônica , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Adjuvante de Freund/toxicidade , Inflamação/induzido quimicamente , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Dor/metabolismo , Ratos , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 16: 992742, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36504629

RESUMO

Background: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a promising approach to improving fibromyalgia (FM) symptoms, including cognitive impairment. So, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of home-based tDCS in treating cognitive impairment. Besides, we explored if the severity of dysfunction of the Descendant Pain Modulation System (DPMS) predicts the tDCS effect and if its effect is linked to changes in neuroplasticity as measured by the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Methods: This randomized, double-blind, parallel, sham-controlled clinical trial, single-center, included 36 women with FM, aged from 30 to 65 years old, assigned 2:1 to receive a-tDCS (n = 24) and s-tDCS (n = 12). The primary outcome was the Trail Making Test's assessment of executive attention, divided attention, working memory (WM), and cognitive flexibility (TMT-B-A). The secondary outcomes were the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), the WM by Digits subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III), and quality of life. Twenty-minute daily sessions of home-based tDCS for 4 weeks (total of 20 sessions), 2 mA anodal-left (F3) and cathodal-right (F4) prefrontal stimulation with 35 cm2 carbon electrodes. Results: GLM showed a main effect for treatment in the TMT-B-A [Wald χ2 = 6.176; Df = 1; P = 0.03]. The a-tDCS improved cognitive performance. The effect size estimated by Cohen's d at treatment end in the TMT-B-A scores was large [-1.48, confidence interval (CI) 95% = -2.07 to-0.90]. Likewise, the a-tDCS effects compared to s-tDCS improved performance in the WM, verbal and phonemic fluency, and quality-of-life scale. The impact of a-tDCS on the cognitive tests was positively correlated with the reduction in serum BDNF from baseline to treatment end. Besides, the decrease in the serum BDNF was positively associated with improving the quality of life due to FM symptoms. Conclusion: These findings revealed that daily treatment with a home-based tDCS device over l-DLPFC compared to sham stimulation over 4 weeks improved the cognitive impairment in FM. The a-tDCS at home was well-tolerated, underlining its potential as an alternative treatment for cognitive dysfunction. Besides, the a-tDCS effect is related to the severity of DPMS dysfunction and changes in neuroplasticity state. Clinical trial registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03843203].

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA