Late mucosal ulcers in dose-escalated adaptive dose-painting treatments for head-and-neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: To identify predictive factors for the development of late grade 4 mucosal ulcers in adaptive dose-escalated treatments for head-and-neck cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patient data of four dose-escalated three-phase adaptive dose-painting by numbers (DPBN) clinical trials were analyzed in this study. Correlations between the development of late grade 4 ulcers and factors related with the treatment, disease characteristics and the patient were investigated. Dosimetrical thresholds were searched among the highest doses received by 1.75 cm3 (D1.75cc) of the primary gross tumor volume (GTVT) and the corresponding normalized isoeffective dose (NID21.75cc, with a reference dose of 2Gy/fraction and α/ß of 3 Gy). RESULTS: From 39 studied patients, nine developed late grade 4 mucosal ulcers. The continuation to either smoke or drink alcohol after therapy was the factor that showed a strong (eight out of nine patients) association with the occurrence of grade 4 ulcers. Six of the patients who continued to smoke or/and drink had D1.75cc and NID21.75cc above 84 Gy and 95.5 Gy, respectively. Seven of the patients with grade 4 had the dose levels above these thresholds, but even if the D1.75cc threshold was significant in the prediction of late grade 4 ulcers, it could not be considered as the only contributing factor. CONCLUSIONS: The search for patterns provided strong reasons to apply a dosimetrical threshold for the peak-dose volume of 1.75 cm3 as a preventive measure for late grade 4 mucosal ulcers. Also, patients that continue to smoke or drink alcohol after therapy have increased risk to develop late mucosal ulcers.

Highly Accelerated Irradiation in 5 Fractions (HAI-5): Feasibility in Elderly Women With Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate, in a prospective phase 1 to 2 trial, the safety and feasibility of delivering external beam radiation therapy in 5 fractions to the breast or thoracic wall, including boost and/or lymph nodes if needed, to women aged ≥65 years with breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ninety-five patients aged ≥65 years, referred for adjuvant radiation therapy, were treated in 5 fractions over 12 days with a total dose of 28.5 Gy/5.7 Gy to the breast or thoracic wall and, if indicated, 27 Gy/5.4 Gy to the lymph node regions and 32.5 Gy/6.5 Gy to 34.5 Gy/6.9 Gy to the tumor bed. The primary endpoint was clinically relevant dermatitis (grade ≥2). RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 5.6 months, and mean age was 73.6 years. Clinically relevant dermatitis was observed in 11.6% of patients and only occurred in breast irradiation with boost (17.5% grade 2-3 vs 0% in the no-boost group). Although doses were high, treatment delivery with intensity modulated radiation therapy was swift, except for complex treatments, including lymph nodes for which single-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy was needed to reduce beam-on time. CONCLUSION: Accelerated radiation therapy in 5 fractions was technically feasible and resulted in low acute toxicity. Clinically relevant erythema was only observed in patients receiving a boost, but still at an acceptable rate. Although the follow-up is still short, the results on acute toxicity after accelerated radiation therapy were encouraging. A 5-fraction schedule is well tolerated in the elderly and may lower the threshold for radiation therapy in this population.

Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the implementation of a new intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) class solution in comparison to a 6-static beam step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy (s-IMRT) for three-phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET-voxel-based dose-painting-by-numbers (DPBN) for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS: We developed (18)F-FDG-PET-voxel intensity-based IMAT employing multiple arcs and compared it to clinically used s-IMRT DPBN. Three IMAT plans using (18)F-FDG-PET/CT acquired before treatment (phase I), after 8 fractions (phase II) and CT acquired after 18 fractions (phase III) were generated for each of 10 patients treated with 3 s-IMRT plans based on the same image sets. Based on deformable image registration (ABAS, version 0.41, Elekta CMS Software, Maryland Heights, MO), doses of the 3 plans were summed on the pretreatment CT using validated in-house developed software. Dosimetric indices in targets and organs-at-risk (OARs), biologic conformity of treatment plans set at ≤5 %, treatment quality and efficiency were compared between IMAT and s-IMRT for the whole group and for individual patients. RESULTS: Doses to most organs-at-risk (OARs) were significantly better in IMAT plans, while target levels were similar for both types of plans. On average, IMAT ipsilateral and contralateral parotid mean doses were 14.0 % (p = 0.001) and 12.7 % (p < 0.001) lower, respectively. Pharyngeal constrictors D50% levels were similar or reduced with up to 54.9 % for IMAT compared to s-IMRT for individual patient cases. IMAT significantly improved biologic conformity by 2.1 % for treatment phases I and II. 3D phantom measurements reported an agreement of ≥95 % for 3 % and 3 mm criteria for both treatment modalities. IMAT delivery time was significantly shortened on average by 41.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: IMAT implementation significantly improved the biologic conformity as compared to s-IMRT in adaptive dose-escalated DPBN treatments. The better OAR sparing and faster delivery highly improved the treatment efficiency.