RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe patients' experiences and perceived causes of persisting discomfort following day surgery. Earlier research has mainly covered symptoms and signs during a recovery period of up to one month, and not dealt with patients' perceptions of what causes persisting, longer-term discomfort. METHODS: This study is a part from a study carried out during the period May 2006 to May 2007 with a total of 298 day surgery patients. Answers were completed by 118 patients at 48 hours, 110 at seven days and 46 at three months to one open-ended question related to discomfort after day surgery constructed as follows: If you are still experiencing discomfort related to the surgery, what is the reason, in your opinion? Data was processed, quantitatively and qualitatively. Descriptive, inferential, correlation and content analyses were performed. RESULTS: The results suggest that patients suffer from remaining discomfort e.g. pain and wound problem, with effects on daily life following day surgery up to three months. Among patients' perceptions of factors leading to discomfort may be wrongful or suboptimal treatment, type of surgery or insufficient access to provider/information. CONCLUSIONS: The results have important implications for preventing and managing discomfort at home following day surgery, and for nursing interventions to help patients handle the recovery period better.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe new parents' choice of the type of maternity care they wanted to receive, the family suite (FS) or an early discharge (ED), and to gain a better understanding of parents' experiences of different postnatal care alternatives. DESIGN: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analysed by content analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven couples and one mother, including both first-time and experienced parents. Six families received care at a FS while the others chose an ED within 24 hours after birth. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The postpartum period was experienced as an unpredictable time for new parents, when the need for safety, participation in decision-making, and 'bonding' was felt to be central and decisive to their choice of care. The type of care that the parents felt best met their needs varied according to the mother's assessment of her own and the baby's health status, the parents' requirements and experience and the way in which they, as parents, handled the opportunities and demands of different environments. However, the opportunities for the parents to choose the form of care they considered best for their family were limited. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: To best fulfil parents' wishes and needs in postnatal care alternative care forms are needed. Also, a way to treat the family as a whole on an individual family basis must be found and parents of newborn babies should be allowed to choose the form of care they consider best.
Assuntos
Pais/psicologia , Alta do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Adulto , Anedotas como Assunto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Bem-Estar Materno , Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente , Pesquisa Metodológica em Enfermagem , Unidade Hospitalar de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Autonomia Pessoal , Cuidado Pós-Natal/psicologia , Cuidado Pós-Natal/normas , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , SuéciaRESUMO
AIMS: To describe prevalence, metabolic control, and complications of diabetes mellitus in a county in Northern Sweden, in order to improve diabetes care and guide decision makers. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional, retrospective study of medical records of all registered persons with diabetes mellitus (n = 5251) in the area. Assessments and examinations concerning metabolic control and complications were studied over a period of 15 months. RESULTS: Of the 5143 patients included, 13% had Type 1, 86% Type 2, and 1% other types of diabetes. An annual check-up was performed in 84% of patients. Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was assessed in 88%, and had a mean value of 7.3% (sd 1.3%). Metabolic control was good in 33% and acceptable in another 26%. Risk factors for complications were found in 64%; in 35% body mass index was > 30; 50% had hypertension; 22% were smokers; 51% had macro- and/or microvascular complications; ischaemic heart disease 26%; a cerebrovascular lesion 13%; amputation 1.8%; proteinuria 7.9%; microalbuminuria 2.6%; peripheral neuropathy 30%; impaired peripheral circulation 29%; and retinopathy 37%. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with diabetes in the study area attended an annual check-up, had acceptable metabolic control and severe complications were uncommon. Nevertheless, the number of undocumented examinations was high, 40% of the patients had unacceptable metabolic control and more than 50% had macrovascular risk factors. These findings emphasize the importance in diabetes care of smoking cessation and intensive treatment of high blood pressure.