RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prognosis after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is presumed poorer in patients with non-shockable than shockable rhythms, frequently leading to treatment withdrawal. Multimodal outcome prediction is recommended 72 h post-arrest in still comatose patients, not considering initial rhythms. We investigated accuracy of outcome predictors in all comatose OHCA survivors, with a particular focus on shockable vs. non-shockable rhythms. METHODS: In this observational NORCAST sub-study, patients still comatose 72 h post-arrest were stratified by shockable vs. non-shockable rhythms for outcome prediction analyzes. Good outcome was defined as cerebral performance category 1-2 within 6 months. False positive rate (FPR) was used for poor and sensitivity for good outcome prediction accuracy. RESULTS: Overall, 72/128 (56%) patients with shockable and 12/50 (24%) with non-shockable rhythms had good outcome (p < .001). For poor outcome prediction, absent pupillary light reflexes (PLR) and corneal reflexes (clinical predictors) 72 h after sedation withdrawal, PLR 96 h post-arrest, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), all had FPR <0.1% in both groups. Unreactive EEG and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) >60 µg/L 24-72 h post-arrest had better precision in shockable patients. For good outcome, the clinical predictors, SSEP and CT, had 86%-100% sensitivity in both groups. For NSE, sensitivity varied from 22% to 69% 24-72 h post-arrest. The outcome predictors indicated severe brain injury proportionally more often in patients with non-shockable than with shockable rhythms. For all patients, clinical predictors, CT, and SSEP, predicted poor and good outcome with high accuracy. CONCLUSION: Outcome prediction accuracy was comparable for shockable and non-shockable rhythms. PLR and corneal reflexes had best precision 72 h after sedation withdrawal and 96 h post-arrest.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Humanos , Coma/etiologia , Prognóstico , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/complicações , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity and prolonged use of addictive medications are prevalent among older patients, and known to increase the risk of adverse drug events. Yet, the relationship between these two entities has remained understudied. AIMS: This study explored the association between multimorbidity burden and prolonged use of addictive medications in geriatric patients, adjusted for clinically important covariates. Furthermore, we identified comorbidity patterns in prolonged users. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a consecutive sample of 246 patients, aged 65-90 years, admitted to a large public university hospital in Norway. We defined prolonged use of addictive medications as using benzodiazepines, opioids and/or z-hypnotics beyond the duration recommended by clinical guidelines (≥ 4 weeks). Multimorbidity was assessed with the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G), based on diagnoses made by independent physicians. RESULTS: Compared to non-prolonged use, prolonged use was significantly more common among patients who had psychiatric (19/27, 70%), liver (19/22, 86%), upper gastrointestinal tract (21/32, 66%), musculoskeletal (52/96, 54%), or nervous system disorders (46/92, 50%). Patients with prolonged use had a higher multimorbidity burden than those without such use (CIRS-G score, mean = 7.7, SD = 2.7 versus mean = 4.6, SD = 2.2, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression indicated a significant association between multimorbidity burden and prolonged addictive medication use (OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.42-2.08). Predictive margins postestimation showed a systematic increase in the predicted CIRS-G scores when the number of addictive drug used increases. CONCLUSIONS: Multimorbidity is strongly associated with prolonged use of addictive medications. Multiple substance use may aggravate disease burden of older patients.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Multimorbidade , Idoso , Benzodiazepinas , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) diagnose and manage a majority of headache patients seeking health care. With the aim to understand the potential for clinical improvement and educational needs, we performed a study to investigate Norwegian GPs knowledge about headache and its clinical management. METHODS: We invited GPs from a random sample of 130 Norwegian continuous medical education (CME) groups to respond to an anonymous questionnaire survey. RESULTS: 367 GPs responded to the survey (73% of invited CME groups, 7.6% of all GPs in Norway). Mean age was 46 (SD 11) years, with an average of 18 (SD 10) years of clinical experience. In general the national treatment recommendations were followed, while the International Classification of Headache Disorders and other international guidelines were rarely used. Overall, 80% (n = 292) of the GPs suggested adequate prophylactic medication for frequent episodic migraine, while 28% (n = 101) suggested adequate prophylactic medication for chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Half (52%, n = 191)) of the respondents were aware that different types of acute headache medication can lead to medication-overuse headache (MOH), and 59% (n = 217) knew that prophylactic headache medication does not lead to MOH. GPs often used MRI in the diagnostic work-up. GPs reported that lack of good treatment options was a main barrier to more optimized treatment of headache patients. CONCLUSION: The knowledge of management of CTTH and MOH was moderate compared to migraine among Norwegian GPs.
Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários , Transtornos da Cefaleia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/terapia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Central nervous system depressant medications (CNSDs) such as opioid analgesics and sedative-hypnotics are commonly prescribed to older patients for the treatment of chronic pain, anxiety and insomnia. Yet, while many studies reported potential harms, it remains unknown whether persistent use of these medications is beneficial for older patients' self-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study clarified this knowledge gap through comparing HRQoL of hospitalized older patients with versus without using CNSD drugs for ≥4 weeks. Moreover, we explored the relationship between such use and HRQoL, adjusting for the effects of polypharmacy, comorbidity burden and other clinically relevant covariates. METHODS: The study was cross-sectional and included 246 older patients recruited consecutively from somatic departments of a large regional university hospital in Norway. We defined prolonged CNSD use as using opioids, benzodiazepines and/or z-hypnotics for ≥4 weeks. Patients' self-reported HRQoL were measured with scales of the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L instrument. Data analyses were mainly descriptive statistics and regression models. RESULTS: Patients with prolonged use of CNSDs reported lower scores on both EQ-5D index and EQ VAS compared with those without such use (p < 0.001). They had higher odds of having more problems performing usual activities (OR = 3.37, 95% CI: 1.40 to 8.13), pain/discomfort (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.05 to 4.04), and anxiety/depression (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.82 to 7.82). In multivariable regression models, there was no significant association between prolonged CNSD use and HRQoL when including pain as a predictor variable. In models not including pain, CNSD use was strongly associated with HRQoL (adjusted for sociodemographic background, polypharmacy, comorbidity, anxiety and depressive symptoms, regression coefficient - 0.19 (95% CI, - 0.31 to - 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with prolonged CNSD use reported poorer HRQoL. They also had more pain and higher depression scores. Prolonged use of CNSDs was not independently associated with higher HRQoL.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Qualidade de Vida , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Benzodiazepinas , Estudos Transversais , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/efeitos adversos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: During discharge from hospital, older patients and physicians discuss the plan for managing patients' health at home. If not followed at home, it can result in poor medication management, readmissions, or other adverse events. Comorbidities, polypharmacy and cognitive impairment may create challenges for older patients. We assessed discharge conversations between older in-patients and physicians for treatment plan activities and medication information, with emphasis on the role of cognitive function in the ongoing conversation. METHODS: We collected 11 videos of discharge consultations, medication lists, and self-reported demographic information from hospitalised patients ≥65 years at the Geriatric department in a general hospital. Mini Mental State Examination score < 25 was classified as low cognitive function. We used microanalysis of face-to-face dialogue to identify and characterise sequences of interaction focused on and distinguishing the treatment plan activities discussed. In addition to descriptive statistics, we used a paired-sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 85 (range: 71-90);7 were females and 4 males. Median of 17 (range: 7 to 23) treatment plan activities were discussed. The proportions of the activities, grouped from a patient perspective, were: 0.40 my medications, 0.21 something the hospital will do for me, 0.18 someone I visit away from home, 0.12 daily routine and 0.09 someone coming to my home. Patients spoke less (mean 190.9 words, SD 133.9) during treatment plan activities compared to other topics (mean 759 words, SD 480.4), (p = .001). Patients used on average 9.2 (SD 3.1) medications; during the conversations, an average of 4.5 (SD 3.3) were discussed, and side effects discussed on average 1.2 (SD 2.1) times. During treatment plan discussions, patients with lower cognitive function were less responsive and spoke less (mean 116.5 words, SD 40.9), compared to patients with normal cognition (mean 233.4 words, SD 152.4), (p = .089). CONCLUSION: Physicians and geriatric patients discuss many activities during discharge conversations, mostly focusing on medication use without stating side effects. Cognitive function might play a role in how older patients respond. These results may be useful for an intervention to improve communication between physicians and older hospitalised patients.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Médicos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Polimedicação , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In older patients, timely recognition and treatment of medication misuse and dependence are crucial to secure medication safety and to avoid increasing health expenditure. Nonetheless, the detection of this condition remains challenging due to the paucity of screening instruments validated for older people. This study assesses diagnostic accuracy, reliability, validity and the factor structure of the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in detecting medication misuse and dependence among hospitalized older patients, focusing on prescribed central nervous system depressants (CNSDs): opioid analgesics, benzodiazepines and z-hypnotics. METHODS: 246 adults aged 65-90 were recruited consecutively from somatic departments of the Akershus University Hospital, Norway. Among these, 100 patients were identified as prolonged users of CNSDs. Diagnostic accuracy and validity of the SDS were assessed using DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse and dependence as the reference standard. We also performed an exploratory factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (95%CI = 0.79-0.93; p < 0.001). A score of 5.5 was determined as the optimal cutoff for detecting CNSD misuse and dependence among older patients. Cronbach's alpha obtained was satisfactory (α = 0.73). There was a significant positive correlation between the SDS score and DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse and dependence (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.61, p < 0.001). The uni-dimensionality of the SDS was documented. CONCLUSIONS: The SDS is reliable, valid and capable of detecting medication misuse and dependence among hospitalized older patients, with good diagnostic performance. The scale thus holds promise for use in both clinical and research contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03162081 . Registered 3 May 2017.
Assuntos
Hospitalização , Uso Indevido de Medicamentos sob Prescrição/psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Noruega/epidemiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Introduction A relationship between headache and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) has been suggested. This study investigated this association in relation to people with chronic migraine or chronic tension-type headaches. Methods A total of 30,000 persons aged 30-44 from the general population were screened for chronic headache. Those eligible were interviewed by a headache specialist. EDS was defined as Epworth sleepiness scale score >10. Logistic regression models were used. Results Among the 323 eligible participants, 21.1% had EDS. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds ratios (OR) of EDS were not significantly different in people with CM and CTTH. However, high headache frequency was associated with EDS (OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.11-3.73, p = 0.022)) for those with ≥ 80 compared to < 80 headache days/3 months, after adjustment for type of headache, age, and gender. Conclusions Increased EDS was associated with higher headache frequency, but not with specific headache diagnoses.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Sonolência , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Distúrbios do Sono por Sonolência Excessiva/diagnóstico , Distúrbios do Sono por Sonolência Excessiva/epidemiologia , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Vigilância da População/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Menstrual migraine (MM) and premenstrual syndrome (PMS) are two conditions linked to specific phases of the menstrual cycle. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully understood, but both conditions are hypothesized to be triggered by female sex hormones. Co-occurrence of MM and PMS is controversial. The objective of this population-based study was to compare self-assessed symptoms of PMS in female migraineurs with and without MM. A total of 237 women from the general population who self-reported migraine in at least50% of their menstruations in a screening questionnaire were invited to a clinical interview and diagnosed by a neurologist according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders II (ICHD II), including the appendix criteria for MM. All women were asked to complete a self-administered form containing 11 questions about PMS-symptoms adapted from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The number of PMS symptoms was compared among migraineurs with and without MM. In addition, each participant completed the Headache Impact test (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS). FINDINGS: A total of 193 women returned a complete PMS questionnaire, of which 67 women were excluded from the analyses due to current use of hormonal contraception (n = 61) or because they did not fulfil the ICHD-criteria for migraine (n = 6). Among the remaining 126 migraineurs, 78 had MM and 48 non-menstrually related migraine. PMS symptoms were equally frequent in migraineurs with and without MM (5.4 vs. 5.9, p = 0.84). Women with MM reported more migraine days/month, longer lasting migraine attacks and higher HIT-6 scores than those without MM, but MIDAS scores were similar. CONCLUSION: We did not find any difference in number of self-reported PMS-symptoms between migraineurs with and without MM.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/complicações , Síndrome Pré-Menstrual/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Ciclo Menstrual , Noruega , Síndrome Pré-Menstrual/complicações , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação de SintomasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common headache disorder that affects mostly women. In half of these, migraine is menstrually associated, and ranges from completely asymptomatic to frequent pain throughout pregnancy. METHODS: The aim of the study was to define the pattern (frequency, intensity, analgesics use) of migrainous headaches among women with and without menstural migraine (MM) during pregnancy, and define how hormonally-related factors affect its intensity. RESULTS: The analysis was based upon data from 280 women, 18.6% of them having a self-reported MM. Women with MM described a higher headache intensity during early pregnancy and postpartum compared those without MM, but both groups showed improvement during the second half of pregnancy and directly after delivery. Hormonal factors and pre-menstrual syndrome had no effect upon headache frequency, but may affect headache intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Individual treatment plan is necessary for women with migrainous headaches during pregnancy, especially for those suffering highest symptoms load.
Assuntos
Ciclo Menstrual/fisiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Ciclo Menstrual/psicologia , Menstruação/fisiologia , Menstruação/psicologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/psicologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Gravidez , AutorrelatoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary headaches are associated with psychological distress, neuroticism and disability. However, little is known about headache-related disability and psychological distress among people with secondary chronic headaches. METHODS: 30,000 persons aged 30-44 from the general population was screened for headache by a questionnaire. The responder rate was 71%. The International Classification of Headache Disorders with supplementary definitions for chronic rhinosinusitis and cervicogenic headache were used. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 assessed high psychological distress, the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire assessed disability, and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire assessed neuroticism. RESULTS: Ninety-five of the 113 eligible participants (84%) completed the self-reported questionnaire. A total of 38 people had chronic post-traumatic headache, 21 had cervicogenic headache, and 39 had headache attributed to chronic rhinosinusitis, while 9 had co-occurrence of chronic post-traumatic and cervicogenic headache. Six persons had miscellaneous secondary chronic headaches. Overall, 49% of those with secondary chronic headache reported high psychological distress, which is significantly higher than in the general population. A high level of neuroticism was significantly more common in those with secondary chronic headache than in the general population. Severe headache-related disability was reported by 69%. 92 persons were followed up after 3 years. A low headache frequency was the only significant predictor of improvement of ≥ 25% in headache days. Having post-traumatic or cervicogenic headache and not headache attributed to chronic rhinosinusitis predicted an increased risk > 25% worsening of headache days or having a severe disability at 3 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress and neuroticism were more common among people with secondary chronic headache than in the general population. Only a high headache frequency was significantly associated with increased headache disability at baseline and a poor prognosis in the long term.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Transtornos da Cefaleia/psicologia , Neuroticismo , Vigilância da População , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Adulto , Doença Crônica , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Transtornos da Cefaleia/diagnóstico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/psicologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Vigilância da População/métodos , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/diagnóstico , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/epidemiologia , Cefaleia Pós-Traumática/psicologia , Autorrelato , Sinusite/diagnóstico , Sinusite/epidemiologia , Sinusite/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/diagnóstico , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/epidemiologia , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the drug utilization patterns and factors predicting drug use in pregnant women with migraine. This longitudinal drug utilization study aimed to describe patterns of analgesic use in a sample of Norwegian pregnant women according to their migraine history, and to identify predictors for analgesic use among these women. METHODS: Pregnant women giving birth at Akershus University Hospital between 2008 and 2010 were recruited at ultrasound examination in gestational week 17. Data were collected by questionnaires in gestational weeks 17 and 32, and at 8 weeks postpartum, and linked to birth records. Women were grouped into four categories according to migraine history: no migraine history, previous migraine history, recent migraine history (within 1 year prior to pregnancy) and migraine in pregnancy. Patterns of use of analgesics were analyzed descriptively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors predicting analgesic use. RESULTS: Out of 1981 women, 5.0% reported having migraine in pregnancy, 13.2% had a recent history of migraine, 11.5% had a previous history of migraine, and 68.8% reported no history of migraine. Analgesic use declined during pregnancy. Many women switched from triptans and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to paracetamol, which constituted most of the analgesic use. Factors associated with analgesic use included recent migraine history (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2), more severe headache intensity (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.3-1.4), smoking (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3) and multiparity (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Women with migraine stop or switch medications during pregnancy. Analgesic use in pregnancy is affected by migraine characteristics and intensity, and also by socio-demographic factors. Clinicians should bear this in mind when giving advice on adequate management of migraine in pregnancy and safe analgesic use.
Assuntos
Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Analgésicos não Narcóticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Substituição de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Noruega , Gravidez , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Triptaminas/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS, defined as Epworth sleepiness scale score > 10) is a common symptom, with a prevalence of 10-20% in the general population. It is associated with headache and other chronic pain disorders. However, little is known about the prevalence of EDS among people with secondary chronic headaches. FINDINGS: A total of 30,000 persons aged 30-44 from the general population was screened for headache by a questionnaire. The 633 eligible participants with self-reported chronic headache were interviewed and examined by a headache specialist who applied the International Classification of Headache Disorders with supplementary definitions for chronic rhinosinusitis and cervicogenic headache. A total of 93 participants had secondary chronic headache and completed the ESS. A total of 47 participants had chronic post-traumatic headache (CPTH) and/or cervicogenic headache (CEH), 39 participants had headache attributed to chronic rhinosinusitis (HACRS), while 7 had other secondary headaches. 23.3% of those with CPTH, CEH or HACRS reported EDS. In multivariable logistic regression analysis the odds ratios of EDS were not significantly different in people with CPTH/CEH or HACRS. CONCLUSION: Almost one out of four subjects with secondary chronic headache reported EDS with no differences between the various secondary chronic headaches.
Assuntos
Transtornos da Cefaleia/complicações , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Noruega/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Rinite/complicações , Autorrelato , Sinusite/complicações , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is common in the general population. We investigated effectiveness of brief intervention (BI) for achieving drug withdrawal in primary care patients with MOH. METHODS: The study was double-blind, pragmatic and cluster-randomised controlled. A total of 25,486 patients (age 18-50) from 50 general practitioners (GPs) were screened for MOH. GPs defined clusters and were randomised to receive BI training (23 GPs) or to continue business as usual (BAU; 27 GPs). The Severity of Dependence Scale was applied as a part of the BI. BI involved feedback about individual risk of MOH and how to reduce overuse. Primary outcome measures were reduction in medication and headache days/month 3 months after the intervention and were assessed by a blinded clinical investigator. RESULTS: 42% responded to the postal screening questionnaire, and 2.4% screened positive for MOH. A random selection of up to three patients with MOH from each GP were invited (104 patients), 75 patients were randomised and 60 patients included into the study. BI was significantly better than BAU for the primary outcomes (p<0.001). Headache and medication days were reduced by 7.3 and 7.9 (95% CI 3.2 to 11.3 and 3.2 to 12.5) days/month in the BI compared with the BAU group. Chronic headache resolved in 50% of the BI and 6% of the BAU group. CONCLUSIONS: The BI method provides GPs with a simple and effective instrument that reduces medication-overuse and headache frequency in patients with MOH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01314768.
Assuntos
Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Psicoterapia Breve , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this article is to compare the diagnosis of menstrual migraine without aura (MM) from a clinical interview with prospective headache diaries in a population-based study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 237 women with self-reported migraine in at least half of menstruations were interviewed by a neurologist about headache and diagnosed according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders II (ICHD II). Additionally, the MM criteria were expanded to include other types of migraine related to menstruation. Subsequently, all women were asked to complete three month prospective headache diaries. RESULTS: A total of 123 (52%) women completed both clinical interview and diaries. Thirty-eight women were excluded from the analyses: Two had incomplete diaries and 36 women recorded ≤1 menstruation, leaving 85 diaries eligible for analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and Kappa for the diagnosis of MM in clinical interview vs. headache diary were 82%, 83%, 90%, 71% and 0.62 (95% CI 0.45-0.79). Using a broader definition of MM, Kappa was 0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.83). CONCLUSION: A thorough clinical interview is valid for the diagnosis of MM. When this is undertaken, prospective headache diaries should not be mandatory to diagnose MM but may be necessary to exclude a chance association.
Assuntos
Entrevistas como Assunto , Prontuários Médicos , Distúrbios Menstruais/diagnóstico , Enxaqueca sem Aura/diagnóstico , Autorrelato , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Distúrbios Menstruais/complicações , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to compare clinical characteristics of menstrual and non-menstrual attacks of migraine without aura (MO), prospectively recorded in a headache diary, by women with and without a diagnosis of menstrual migraine without aura (MM) according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 237 women from the general population with self-reported migraine in ≥50% of their menstrual periods were interviewed and classified by a physician according to the criteria of the ICHD II. Subsequently, all participants were instructed to complete a prospective headache diary for at least three menstrual cycles. Clinical characteristics of menstrual and non-menstrual attacks of MO were compared by a regression model for repeated measurements. RESULTS: In total, 123 (52%) women completed the diary. In the 56 women who were prospectively diagnosed with MM by diary, the menstrual MO-attacks were longer (on average 10.65 hours, 99% CI 3.17-18.12) and more frequently accompanied by severe nausea (OR 2.14, 99% CI 1.20-3.84) than non-menstrual MO-attacks. No significant differences between menstrual and non-menstrual MO-attacks were found among women with MO, but no MM. CONCLUSION: In women from the general population, menstrual MO-attacks differ from non-menstrual attacks only in women who fulfil the ICHD criteria for MM.
Assuntos
Menstruação , Enxaqueca sem Aura/diagnóstico , Enxaqueca sem Aura/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
AIM: To present data from a population-based epidemiological study on menstrual migraine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Altogether, 5000 women aged 30-34 years were screened for menstrual migraine. Women with self-reported menstrual migraine in at least half of their menstrual cycles were invited to an interview and examination. We expanded the International Classification of Headache Disorders III beta appendix criteria on menstrual migraine to include both migraine without aura and migraine with aura, as well as probable menstrual migraine with aura and migraine without aura. RESULTS: A total of 237 women were included in the study. The prevalence among all women was as follows: any type of menstrual migraine 7.6%; menstrual migraine without aura 6.1%; menstrual migraine with aura 0.6%; probable menstrual migraine without aura 0.6%; probable menstrual migraine with aura 0.3%. The corresponding figures among female migraineurs were: any type of menstrual migraine 22.0%, menstrual migraine without aura 17.6%, menstrual migraine with aura 1.7%, probable menstrual migraine without aura 1.6% and probable menstrual migraine with aura 1.0%. CONCLUSION: More than one of every five female migraineurs aged 30-34 years have migraine in ≥50% of menstruations. The majority has menstrual migraine without aura and one of eight women had migraine with aura in relation to their menstruation. Our results indicate that the ICHD III beta appendix criteria of menstrual migraine are not exhaustive.
Assuntos
Menstruação , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most knowledge on chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) is based on data from selected clinic populations, while data from the general population is sparse. Since pericranial tenderness is found to be the most prominent finding in CTTH, we wanted to explore the relationship between CTTH and pericranial muscle tenderness in a population-based sample. METHODS: An age- and gender-stratified random sample of 30,000 persons aged 30-44 years from the general population received a mailed questionnaire. Those with a self-reported chronic headache were interviewed and examined by neurological residents. The questionnaire response rate was 71% and the interview participation rate was 74%. The International Classification of Headache Disorders II was used. Pericranial muscle tenderness was assessed by a total tenderness score (TTS) involving 8 pairs of muscles and tendon insertions. Cross-sectional data from the Danish general population using the same scoring system were used for comparison. RESULTS: The tenderness scores were significantly higher in women than men in all muscle groups. The TTS was significantly higher in those with co-occurrence of migraine compared with those without; 19.3 vs. 16.8, p = 0.02. Those with bilateral CTTH had a significantly higher TTS than those with unilateral CTTH. The TTS decreased significantly with age. People with CTTH had a significantly higher TTS compared to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: People with CTTH have increased pericranial tenderness. Elevated tenderness scores are associated with co-occurrence of migraine, bilateral headache and low age.Whether the increased muscle tenderness is primary or secondary to the headache should be addressed by future studies.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiopatologia , Mialgia/fisiopatologia , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Noruega/epidemiologia , Medição da Dor , Fatores Sexuais , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Menstrual migraine without aura (MM) affects approximately 20% of female migraineurs in the general population. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of contraception on the attacks of migraine without aura (MO) in women with MM. FINDINGS: 141 women from the general population with a history of MM according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders II (ICHD II) were interviewed by a headache specialist. Of 49 women with a history of MM currently using hormonal contraception, 23 reported amenorrhoea. Significantly more women with amenorrhoea reported no MO- days during the preceding month compared to women without amenorrhoea (OR 16.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-140.4; P = 0.003). A reduction of MO-frequency was more often reported in women with than without amenorrhoea (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.1-11.4; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Amenorrhoea leads to a reduction of MO-frequency in women with MM using hormonal contraceptives. Future prospective studies on MM should focus on contraceptive methods that achieve amenorrhoea.