Assuntos
Fosfatases de Especificidade Dupla/genética , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/genética , Fosfatases da Proteína Quinase Ativada por Mitógeno/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Proteínas Supressoras de Tumor/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico , Biópsia , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/mortalidade , Linfoma Anaplásico de Células Grandes/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/análise , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptores Proteína Tirosina Quinases/análise , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs) requires plasma cell (PC) identification or purification strategies to optimize results. We compared the efficacy of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin FISH (cIg-FISH) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting FISH (FACS-FISH) in a clinical laboratory setting. METHODS: The FISH analysis results of 14,855 samples from individuals with a suspected PCN subjected to cytogenetic evaluation between 2019 and 2022 with cIg-FISH (n = 6917) or FACS-FISH (n = 7938) testing were analyzed. RESULTS: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH increased the detection rate of abnormalities in comparison with cIg-FISH, with abnormal results documented in 54% vs 50% of cases, respectively (P < .001). It improved the detection of IGH::CCND1 (P < .001), IGH::MAF (P < .001), IGH::MAFB (P < .001), other IGH rearrangements (P < .001), and gains/amplifications of 1q (P < .001), whereas the detection rates of IGH::FGFR3 fusions (P = .3), loss of 17p (P = .3), and other abnormalities, including hyperdiploidy (P = .5), were similar. Insufficient PC yield for FISH analysis was decreased between cIg-FISH and FACS-FISH (22% and 3% respectively, P < .001). Flow cytometry allowed establishment of ploidy status in 91% of cases. In addition, FACS-FISH decreased analysis times, workload efforts, and operating costs. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescence-activated cell sorting-FISH is an efficient PC purification strategy that affords significant improvement in diagnostic yield and decreases workflow requirements in comparison with cIg-FISH.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo , Neoplasias de Plasmócitos , Humanos , Plasmócitos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Anticorpos , Aberrações CromossômicasRESUMO
T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) is usually diagnosed based on the presence of immature lymphoid marker terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), and T-cell specific markers, specifically CD3, by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining on bone marrow and/or extramedullary tissue. We present a novel, TdT and CD3 negative, aggressive early T-cell precursor LBL (ETP-LBL) initially misdiagnosed as a high grade B-cell lymphoma due to expression of CD79a and the erroneous detection of BCL2/IGH fusion. The patient was eventually evaluated using molecular diagnostic techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next generation sequencing (NGS) assays that demonstrated PICALM-MLLT10 fusion and a NOTCH1 mutation in the absence of BCL2/IGH fusion. The use of NGS, specifically mate-pair sequencing (MPseq), subsequently confirmed an in-frame PICALM-MLLT10 fusion. Our retrospective analysis showed that PICALM-MLLT10 fusion has no association with CD3/TdT negativity, as 6/49 T-ALL/LBL cases from Mayo Clinic database (01/1998-09/2018), including this case, were noted to have PICALM-MLLT10 fusion; however, none of the other cases were associated with CD3/TdT negativity. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive hematopathologic evaluation including multiple molecular studies for the appropriate interrogation and classification of a difficult acute leukemia diagnosis, and to prevent potential diagnostic errors of clinical significance.