Antimicrobial prescription in patients dying from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite rising antimicrobial resistance, treatment guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are frequently ignored. Patients with terminal conditions are often prescribed antimicrobials despite the goal of care to reduce burdensome treatments. The appropriate use of antimicrobials in patients who die from an exacerbation of COPD is unknown. AIM: To review antimicrobial prescription during the final admission in patients who died from an acute exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: A retrospective medical record audit was performed for 475 patients who died over 12 years (2004-2015). Patients were analysed within three groups: Group 1 - pneumonia on chest radiograph, Group 2 - infective exacerbation of COPD +/- raised inflammatory markers (white cell count, C-reactive protein) and Group 3 - non-infective exacerbation of COPD. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients died from COPD. The median age was 80 years, and 136 (60%) were male. Median respiratory function: forced expiratory volume in 1 s 0.8 L (41.0%), forced vital capacity 2.0 L (74.0%) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 8 (40.5%). A total of 109 (49.3%) patients used home oxygen and 156 (70.6%) were ex-smokers. Of the cohort, 90.5% received antimicrobials. In Groups 1, 2 and 3, 68 (94.4%), 108 (92.3%) and 24 (75.0%) patients received antimicrobials respectively. Guideline-concordant therapy was administered to 31.7% of patients (Group 1: 79.2%, Group 2: 4.3%, Group 3: 25.0%), 60.2% of patients received ceftriaxone and 44.8% received azithromycin. The median duration of therapy was 4 days and 27.1% received antimicrobials at the time of death. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobials are overprescribed, and non-guideline antimicrobials are overused in patients who die from COPD. Further education of medical staff, regular medication reviews and the use of disease severity scores or clinical pathways may improve antimicrobial stewardship.

Cost comparison of heart transplant vs. left ventricular assist device therapy at one year.

With the worldwide shortage of donor organs, use of ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy is rapidly increasing in both the bridge to transplant and destination therapy settings. However, the high cost of VADs and VAD care is a cause for concern for policy makers who have relied on the limited supply of donor hearts to naturally cap health expenditure on heart transplantation (HTx). We sought to compare costs of the first 12 months of care of VADs vs. HTx. Single center retrospective study utilizing real generated costs over a three yr span from 2010-2012. Only patients with 12 months of costing data were included. Costs of 28 HTx patients and 24 VAD patients were analyzed. Index admission costs were more than double in the VAD group compared to the HTx group and this was driven by the procurement costs and length of stay which increased almost all aspects of in hospital care costs. Subsequent costs were six times higher in the HTx group and this was driven largely by pharmaceuticals. VAD therapy remains a very expensive treatment option for end stage heart failure patients. Device prices need to reduce substantially to make this a more widely applicable and cost effective treatment option.