Healthcare Professionals and In-Flight Medical Emergencies: Resources, Responsibilities, Goals, and Legalities as a Good Samaritan.

Common in-flight emergencies include syncope, respiratory symptoms, nausea/vomiting, cardiac symptoms, and seizures. Flight conditions, such as changes in air pressure and humidity, can exacerbate existing chronic medical conditions. In 2017, US airlines carried 849.3 million passengers. Undoubtedly, there were many requests for in-flight medical assistance. Whenever a medical event occurs, it is standard procedure that an announcement be made by a flight attendant, requesting medical personnel to identify themselves. The 1998 Aviation Medical Assistance Act provides liability protection for a healthcare professional (HCP) acting as a good Samaritan. Nevertheless, HCPs may initially experience trepidation providing care in an aircraft. They may be unaware that a first aid kit, a emergency medical kit, and an automatic external defibrillator are on every plane. Flight crews have been trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and a support system, including a ground-based consultation service, is available to provide radio assistance from an on-call physician. When multiple HCPs volunteer, the most experienced should assume leadership of care. After evaluating the ill passenger, the HCP communicates the assessment to the crew and, when necessary, to the ground-based physician. The goal of in-flight care is to medically stabilize the ill passenger and facilitate the individual's arrival at the scheduled destination for continued medical care. When unable to stabilize the passenger's condition, the decision to divert the plane rests with the flight's captain. Our article helps HCPs to best understand their resources, structured support, liability, and role during an in-flight medical event. With this knowledge of resources, a good Samaritan can confidently attend to an ill airline passenger in flight.

Discussing Advance Care Planning and Directives in the General Population.

The concept of end-of-life planning, along with medical and legal issues, has been discussed and has evolved over several years. The 1990 Patient Self-Determination Act and individual states' Department of Health Advance Directive forms helped overcome past problems. Patients with terminal and chronic illness are now able to have their wishes recognized for their future care. Any healthy individual's decision during an advance care planning (ACP) discussion can be adversely affected by various factors; however, multiple barriers-religion, culture, education, and family dynamics-can influence the process. Healthcare professionals' reluctance to initiate the conversation may result from limited training during medical school and residency programs. These limitations hinder both the initiation and productiveness of an ACP conversation. We explored ACP issues to provide guidance to healthcare professionals on how best to address this planning process with a healthy adult.

Advance directives and HIV: a current trend in the inner city.

Throughout the 1980's, HIV antiretroviral therapy was non-existent or insufficient, and patients admitted to hospitals were frequently terminal. In 1988 we evaluated the HIV related hospitalizations at the Lutheran Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, and found that only 1.3 % of the patients had an advanced directive/living will. Fifty percent of the patients expired during their hospitalization. To assist health care professionals during this serious illness, medical decisions were needed from the patients and, at other times, from family members and/or significant others. Subsequently, patients were approached to discuss advance directives (AD). With the introduction of the Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy, medical management has decreased HIV mortality. Patients may have started having different perceptions on the need for an AD. The study design was submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and the IRB granted a HIPPA waiver because this was a retrospective study which delinked the study data from any identification of the patient. The chart reviews were conducted to ascertain the existence of an AD for all patients admitted at the Lutheran Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY from 2004 to 2011. One hundred eighty-two patients were identified from their discharge codes for HIV or AIDS. The median age was 47 years (range 22-85 years). Median time since HIV diagnosis was 9.5 years (range 0-28 years). Ninety-two percent lacked an AD on admission. From the thirty patients that were older than 54 years of age, only four of them had an AD prior to admission. During hospitalization only 11 patients out of 187 enacted a new AD, which decreased the overall percentage of patients lacking an AD to 86.3 % (pre and during admission). The majority of HIV infected patients hospitalized lacked an AD. Our data did not indicate a greater predominance of ADs from a private practice or clinic setting. ADs did not increase with increasing age. Moreover, with longer years with an HIV diagnosis, the number of ADs did not increase. Our results would indicate that a different approach is necessary to adequately address ADs with this specific population, especially as their longevity increases.

Provider insights about palliative care barriers and facilitators: results of a rapid ethnographic assessment.

Palliative care remains underutilized in the United States. This may represent failure of translation of research into practice (diffusion of innovation). Qualitative methods can identify barriers to and facilitators of diffusion of innovation. The aim is to identify potential barriers to and facilitators of inpatient palliative care utilization at a large urban hospital, as articulated by health professionals. Rapid ethnographic assessment methods were used among health professionals with subsequent extraction of predominant themes illuminating factors influencing adoption of palliative care services. In all, 3 stakeholder categories and 7 major themes emerged. Analysis revealed consistent need for organized, cross-disciplinary education/training services and a clearly-defined team approach. Denial at all stakeholder levels and in most themes was a barrier to implementation of palliative care. Consistent, defined educational, policymaking, and procedural standards were requirements for best adoption of palliative care. Denial was a striking obstruction to diffusion of innovation.

Severe headache, neck pain, intermittent cough · Dx?

A 32-year-old Chinese woman sought care from our family medicine clinic because she had a headache, neck pain, and an intermittent cough that had produced white sputum for 7 days. She described the headache as severe and pressure-like, and said that it had progressively worsened over the previous 3 weeks, coinciding with her first trip outside of China to the United States. The patient indicated that she also had occasional vomiting, dizziness, a low-grade fever, chills, night sweats, and increasing fatigue.

Two Cases of Rhabdomyolysis (Haff Disease) After Eating Carp Fish.

Unexplained rhabdomyolysis after eating fish is a rare condition caused by an unidentified toxin. Most of the incidences in the United States have been linked to consuming buffalo fish or crawfish. We present 2 cases of Haff disease in which the patients consumed grass carp as opposed to the usual suspects of buffalo fish or crawfish.