RESUMO
Background: Health examination surveys (HESs) provide valuable data on health and its determinants at the population level. Comparison of HES results within and between countries and over time requires measurements which are free of bias due to differences in or adherence to measurement procedures and/or measurement devices. Methods: In the European HES (EHES) Pilot Project, 12 countries conducted a pilot HES in 2010-11 using standardized measurement protocols and centralized training. External evaluation visits (site visits) were performed by the EHES Reference Centre staff to evaluate the success of standardization and quality of data collection. Results: In general, standardized EHES protocols were followed adequately in all the pilot surveys. Small deviations were observed in the posture of participants during the blood pressure and height measurement; in the use of a tourniquet when drawing blood samples; and in the calibration of measurement devices. Occasionally, problems with disturbing noise from outside or people coming into the room during the measurements were observed. In countries with an ongoing national HES or a long tradition of conducting national HESs at regular intervals, it was more difficult to modify national protocols to fulfil EHES requirements. Conclusions: The EHES protocols to standardize HES measurements and procedures for collection of blood samples are feasible in cross-country settings. The prerequisite for successful standardization is adequate training. External and internal evaluation activities during the survey fieldwork are also needed to monitor compliance to standards.
Assuntos
Guias como Assunto , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos/normas , Exame Físico/normas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Projetos PilotoRESUMO
The population of foreign origin in Finland is a heterogenic group, diverse for example with respect to reasons for and age at migration. While migration to Finland is a recent phenomenon, the size of the population of foreign origin has grown rapidly and will continue to increase. Changes in the population structure need to be taken into account in health promotion. For example lifestyle, health status, functional capacity, mental health, infectious diseases and reproductive health differ in foreign origin population compared with the general Finnish population. These differences may provide opportunities but also create challenges for service provision and health promotion planning.