CITED1 as a marker of favourable outcome in anti-endocrine treated, estrogen-receptor positive, lymph-node negative breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate CITED1 as a potential biomarker of anti-endocrine response and breast cancer recurrence, given its previously determined role in mediating estrogen-dependant transcription. The study is a continuation of earlier work establishing the role of CITED1 in mammary gland development. RESULTS: CITED1 mRNA is associated with estrogen-receptor positivity and selectively expressed in the GOBO dataset of cell lines and tumours representing the luminal-molecular subtype. In patients treated with tamoxifen, higher CITED1 correlated with better outcome, suggesting a role in anti-estrogen response. The effect was particularly evident in the subset of estrogen-receptor positive, lymph-node negative (ER+/LN-) patients although noticeable divergence of the groups was apparent only after five years. Tissue microarray (TMA) analysis further validated the association of CITED1 protein, by immunohistochemistry, with favourable outcome in ER+, tamoxifen-treated patients. Although we also found a favourable response to anti-endocrine treatment in a larger TCGA dataset, the tamoxifen-specific effect was not replicated. Finally, MCF7 cells overexpressing CITED1 showed selective amplification of AREG but not TGFα suggesting that maintenance of specific ERα-CITED1 mediated transcription is important for the long-term response to anti-endocrine therapy. These findings together confirm the proposed mechanism of action of CITED1 and support its potential use as a prognostic biomarker.

Discordance of PD-L1 status between primary and metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is predictive for benefit from immunotherapy in several human malignancies including triple negative breast cancer. Lower positivity rates but a larger relative benefit from atezolizumab has been implied when PD-L1 status is assessed at metastatic sites. We aimed to study the discordance of PD-L1 expression between primary tumor and metastasis in breast cancer due to its potential clinical utility. METHODS: Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline and Web of science were searched for studies reporting on PD-L1 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer, followed by data extraction. Outcomes included pooled PD-L1 positivity rates in tumor cells, immune cells or both in primary tumor and metastasis, PD-L1 discordance between matched primary tumors and metastasis and direction of discordance. RESULTS: Of 2552 identified entries following de-duplication, 20 studies fulfilled the predefined inclusion criteria. Pooled PD-L1 positivity rate was higher in primary tumors compared to metastasis when assessed in immune cells (51.2% vs 37.1% p < 0.001) and tumor/immune cells (30.1% vs 14.6% p < 0.001), but not in tumor cells (18.7% vs 17.8% p = 0.65). PD-L1 positivity was lowest when assessed in bone metastases (12%) and highest in lymph nodes (60%). Discordance between primary tumors and metastasis was bidirectional, with higher pooled discordance rates when PD-L1 expression was assessed in immune compared to tumor cells (39.5% vs 13.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The observed considerable discordance between PD-L1 status in primary and metastatic breast cancer emphasizes the importance of appropriate tissue sampling when selecting patients for immunotherapy.