Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin-A in renal transplantation: 7-year observational results.

The European Tacrolimus versus Ciclosporin-A Microemulsion (CsA-ME) Renal Transplantation Study demonstrated that tacrolimus decreased acute rejection rates at 6 months. Primary endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational 7-year follow-up study were acute rejection rates, patient and graft survival rates, and a composite endpoint (BPAR, graft loss, and patient death). We analyzed data from the original intent-to-treat population (n = 557; 286 tacrolimus, 271 CsA-ME). A total of 237 tacrolimus and 208 CsA-ME patients provided data. At 7 years, Kaplan-Meier estimated rates of patients free from BPAR were 77.1% in the tacrolimus arm and 59.9% in the CsA-ME arm, graft survival rates amounted to 82.6% and 80.6%, and patient survival rates to 89.9% and 88.1%. Estimated combined endpoint-free survival rates were 60.2% in the tacrolimus arm and 47.0% in the CsA-ME arm (P = <0.0001). A higher number of patients from the CsA-ME arm crossed over to tacrolimus during 7 year follow-up: 19.7% vs. 7.9% (P = <0.002). More patients in the tacrolimus group stopped steroids and received immunosuppressive monotherapy. Significantly, more CsA-ME patients received lipid-lowering medication and experienced cosmetic and cardiovascular adverse events. Tacrolimus-treated renal transplant recipients had significantly higher combined endpoint-free survival rates mainly driven by lower acute rejection rates despite less immunosuppressive medication at 7 years.

Belatacept treatment for two yr after liver transplantation is not associated with operational tolerance.

Belatacept was recently evaluated in liver transplantation (LT) in a phase II multicenter trial, which was terminated prematurely. Patients were more than two yr post-LT at the time. As high rates of spontaneous tolerance after LT have been reported and as belatacept has marked immunomodulatory effects, we decided to maintain the belatacept patients enrolled at our center (n = 4) on MMF monotherapy. All belatacept patients on MMF monotherapy developed graft dysfunction consistent with acute rejection after a mean period of 10.3 (7-14) wk. Patients were therefore switched to triple therapy with CNI, MMF, and corticosteroids. Graft dysfunction resolved within 1-3 wk after switch. At the time of belatacept discontinuation, mean eGFR was 105.1 mL/min/1.73 m² (92.1-118.9) in belatacept patients compared to 58 mL/min/1.73 m² (36.1-98.2) in controls (p = 0.022). One yr after the switch to CNI therapy, eGFR had declined by 27.4 mL (19.2-39.3; p = 0.008). Thus, LT patients treated with belatacept show superior kidney function that declines upon institution of CNIs. MMF monotherapy following withdrawal of belatacept is associated with a high incidence of graft dysfunction. Belatacept has no obvious immunomodulatory effects in LT recipients that would be sufficient to allow drug withdrawal with a high rate of success.

Long-term outcome of belatacept therapy in de novo kidney transplant recipients - a case-match analysis.

While belatacept has shown favorable short- and midterm results in kidney transplant recipients, only projections exist regarding its potential impact on long-term outcome. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case-match analysis of the 14 belatacept patients originally enrolled in the phase II multicenter trial at our center. Fifty six cyclosporine (CyA)-treated patients were matched according to age at transplantation, first/retransplant, and donor type. Ten years after kidney transplantation, kidney function remained superior in belatacept-treated patients compared with the CyA control group. Moreover, none of the belatacept-treated patients had donor-specific antibodies ≥10 years post-transplantation compared with 38.5% of tested CyA-treated subject (0/10 vs. 5/13; P = 0.045). Notably, however, patient and graft survival was virtually identical in both groups (71.4% vs. 71.3%; P = 0.976). In the present single-center study population, patients treated with belatacept demonstrated a patient and graft survival at 10 years post-transplant which was comparable to that of similarly selected CNI-treated patients. Larger studies with sufficient statistical power are necessary to definitively determine long-term graft survival with belatacept.

Abdominal drainage after liver transplantation from deceased donors.

PURPOSE: Traditionally, abdominal drainage (AD) is routinely inserted in patients after liver transplantation (LT) to drain ascites and to detect postoperative hemorrhage and bile leakage. However, the benefit of this surgical practice remains a matter of debate regarding potential drainage-associated morbidities. METHODS: In a retrospective pair-matched analysis in a 1:1 ratio, 116 patients after LT were assessed with regards to benefits and risks of abdominal drainage under immunosuppression, respecting model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), age, and gender. RESULTS: The indications for LT were comparable between the drain and the no-drain group. There was an increased rate of early bile leakage in patients with abdominal drainage (13.8 vs. 1.7%, p = 0.032). In addition, a significantly higher incidence of infections requiring antibiotic therapy was observed in the drain group (63.8 vs. 39.7%, p = 0.015). The contribution of drains as a diagnostic tool was marginal, as in the drain group, other diagnostic tools than the drain itself confirmed 50% of all early bile leakages and 60% of postoperative hemorrhages. Overall, there was no difference regarding the incidence of incisional hernia after LT (8.6 vs. 10.3%, p = 1.000), length of hospital stay (22.9 ± 18.7 vs. 18.6 ± 18.6 days, p = 0.215), and 1- and 5-year patient (p = 0.981) and graft survival (p = 0.092). CONCLUSIONS: Equal results can be achieved with or without an abdominal drain in recipients with whole-liver grafts in spite of an increased risk of postoperative infection and biliary leakage in the former group. A benefit of AD as a diagnostic tool could not be demonstrated.

The efficacy and safety of cyclosporine reduction in de novo renal allograft patients receiving sirolimus and corticosteroids: results from an open-label comparative study.

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a sirolimus, corticosteroid, and cyclosporine reduction regimen in an open-label, 12-month trial of 420 de novo renal allograft recipients at 49 European transplant centers. One month post-transplantation, 357 patients were randomized to receive standard-dose cyclosporine (sCsA, n = 179) or reduced-dose cyclosporine (rCsA, n = 178). All patients also received sirolimus and corticosteroids. The primary end points were the rate of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) and renal function, as measured by serum creatinine. Baseline demographic and donor characteristics were similar between groups. BCAR rates at 12 months were not significantly different: 11.2% for rCsA patients and 16.2% for sCsA patients. Mean serum creatinine (±SEM) was significantly lower (1.75 ± 0.10 vs. 1.97 ± 0.07 mg/dl, P < 0.001), and creatinine clearance (±SEM; Nankivell method) was significantly higher (57.8 ± 1.78 vs. 49.5 ± 2.46 ml/min, P < 0.001) in patients receiving rCsA versus sCsA at 1 year, respectively. Patient and graft survival exceeded 98% in both groups. No significant differences in infection or malignancy were noted between groups. The rCsA with sirolimus and corticosteroid regimen resulted in excellent 12-month patient and graft survival, a low incidence of BCAR, and improved renal function in renal allograft recipients. Sirolimus administered with rCsA and corticosteroids provided adequate immunosuppression while reducing the potential for the nephrotoxic effects of cyclosporine. These findings may help to improve long-term renal allograft outcomes.

Gender has no influence on VUR rates after renal transplantation.

The influence of recipient gender on urological complications including vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after renal transplantation has not yet been established. In this study, post-transplantation voiding cystourethrography and ultrasonography were used to evaluate the upper and lower urinary tract in 598 consecutive renal transplant recipients. Our cohort included 209 females and 389 males, respectively. Gender-specific urological complications and potential confounders were analyzed in relation to long-term allograft outcomes. Postoperative urinary retention occurred more frequently in men (P = 0.004). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were diagnosed more frequently in women after transplantation (P = 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, gender was not a risk factor for VUR [HR, 1.35 (CI, 0.90-1.96); P = 0.14]. VUR rates were influenced by the surgeon's experience level at the time of transplantation [HR, 0.59 (CI, 0.40-0.87); P = 0.008]. No gender-specific differences were seen for ureteral stenosis, leakage, hydronephrosis, death-censored graft or patient survival, and long-term allograft function. Donor/recipient gender mismatch had no impact on postoperative complication rates. In conclusion, male transplant recipients are at risk for developing postoperative urinary retention, whereas female patients more likely develop UTIs. Surgeon's experience level is a risk factor for developing VUR.

Solid phase detection of C4d-fixing HLA antibodies to predict rejection in high immunological risk kidney transplant recipients.

Protocols for recipient desensitization may allow for successful kidney transplantation across major immunological barriers. Desensitized recipients, however, still face a considerable risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which underscores the need for risk stratification tools to individually tailor treatment. Here, we investigated whether solid phase detection of complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has the potential to improve AMR prediction in high-risk transplants. The study included 68 sensitized recipients of deceased donor kidney allografts who underwent peritransplant immunoadsorption for alloantibody depletion (median cytotoxic panel reactivity: 73%; crossmatch conversion: n = 21). Pre and post-transplant sera were subjected to detection of DSA-triggered C4d deposition ([C4d]DSA) applying single-antigen bead (SAB) technology. While standard crossmatch and [IgG]SAB testing failed to predict outcomes in our desensitized patients, detection of preformed [C4d]DSA (n = 44) was tightly associated with C4d-positive AMR [36% vs. 8%, P = 0.01; binary logistic regression: odds ratio: 10.1 (95% confidence interval: 1.6-64.2), P = 0.01]. Moreover, long-term death-censored graft survival tended to be worse among [C4d]DSA-positive recipients (P = 0.07). There were no associations with C4d-negative AMR or cellular rejection. [C4d]DSA detected 6 months post-transplantation were not related to clinical outcomes. Our data suggest that pretransplant SAB-based detection of complement-fixing DSA may be a valuable tool for risk stratification.

Early basal insulin therapy decreases new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation.

No effective interventions to reduce risk for new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), a condition associated with postoperative hyperglycemia and reduced patient and graft survival, have been established. In this 1-year, proof-of-concept clinical trial, we randomly assigned 50 renal transplant recipients to immediate-postoperative isophane insulin for evening blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl (treatment group) or short-acting insulin and/or oral antidiabetic agents for blood glucose ≥180-250 mg/dl (standard-of-care control group). We included only patients without a history of diabetes who received tacrolimus. By the third postoperative evening, all patients in the treatment group had blood glucose ≥140 mg/dl and were subsequently treated with basal insulin; during the first 3 weeks after transplantation, the mean ± SD daily insulin dosage was 17±11 IU/d. Among controls, 23 (92%) of 25 had blood glucose ≥200 mg/dl and 18 (72%) of 25 received standard-of-care antihyperglycemic treatment. Asymptomatic hypoglycemia occurred five times in the treatment group and once in the control group. Throughout follow-up, the treatment group had 73% lower odds of NODAT (odds ratio, 0.27) than the control group, and hemoglobin A1c was on average 0.38% lower in the treatment group than the control group. Twelve months after transplantation, all patients in the treatment group were insulin-independent, whereas 7 (28%) of 25 controls required antidiabetic agents. The groups did not differ for insulin sensitivity, but the treatment group showed better ß-cell function throughout the 1-year follow-up. In conclusion, this study suggests regimens that include basal insulin significantly reduce the odds for NODAT after renal transplantation, presumably via insulin-mediated protection of ß cells.

[Surgical aspects of peritoneal dialysis]. / Chirurgische Aspekte der Peritonealdialyse.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has wide clinical range since die 70ies. Clinical data report a significantly higher 2 year survival rate for PD compared to patients treated with hemodialysis. Nevertheless, currently only about 10 % of patients suffering from end-stage renal disease are treated with PD. Long-term function of the catheter is based on patient's compliance as well as optimal surgical catheter implantation. Beside the classic "open" surgical approach by mini laparotomy new minimal invasive techniques of catheter implantation were developed during the last years. Advantages of laparoscopic techniques are the possibility for combined intraperitoneal procedures and optimal placement of the catheter. Most of surgery-related complications are caused by leakage or migration, infection is very rare. Several studies did not find an advantage of minimal invasive procedures regarding complications.This review should give an overview on currently established surgical techniques for PD-catheter implantation.

The effect of steroid pretreatment of deceased organ donors on liver allograft function: a blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Brain death-associated inflammatory response contributes to increased risk of impaired early liver allograft function, which might be counterbalanced by steroid pretreatment of the organ donor. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to elucidate whether steroid pretreatment of liver donors improves early liver allograft function, prevents rejection and prolongs survival. METHODS: A placebo-controlled blinded randomized clinical trial was performed in three different centers in Austria and Hungary between 2006 and 2008. Ninety deceased organ donors received either 1000 mg of methylprednisolone or placebo 6h before recovery of organs. The primary end point was the concentration slope of transaminases within the first week. The secondary end point included survival and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) within 3 years after transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 90 randomized donors, 83 recipients were eligible for study. The trajectories of ALT and AST were not different between treatments (p=0.40 and p=0.13, respectively). Eight subjects died in the steroid and 13 in the placebo group within 3 years after engraftment (RR=0.63 95% CI [0.29,1.36], p=0.31). Eleven recipients experienced biopsy-confirmed rejection (BCAR) in the steroid and 11 in the placebo group (RR=1.02 95% CI [0.50,2.10], p=1.00). No effect modification could be identified in the predefined strata of donor age, sex, cold ischemic time, and cause of donor death. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid pretreatment of organ donors did not improve outcomes after liver transplantation.

The cutting (w)edge--comparative evaluation of renal baseline biopsies obtained by two different methods.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of donor-derived damage of transplanted kidneys might be instrumental for estimating donor organ quality and for predicting short- and long-term organ outcome. In the present study, we report a new standardized method for obtaining pre-transplant kidney biopsy specimens. Instead of taking wedge biopsies (WBs), a skin punch biopsy (PB) tool was utilized to obtain standardized biopsy samples that also represented deeper cortical zones. METHODS: We compared 147 PB specimens and 114 WBs with respect to the number of glomeruli and arterial vessels they contained. The performance of the two biopsy methods in detecting glomerular damage, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and arteriosclerosis was determined by evaluation of subsequent transplant core biopsies of the patients. Statistical comparison employed Kruskal-Wallis and kappa (κ) tests. RESULTS: Significantly more PB samples (89%) than WBs (66%) were diagnostically adequate according to the Banff criteria. Despite a higher number of glomeruli in WBs (34.6 versus 21.7 in punch biopsies), arteries were present in only 68% of WBs but could be found in 93% of punch biopsies. The comparison of findings in pre-transplant biopsies with lesions in corresponding post-transplant core biopsies revealed a superior diagnostic concordance for IF/TA and arteriosclerosis for punch biopsies than for WBs, reaching kappa values of 0.823 versus 0.729 and 0.661 versus 0.516, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of skin PB tools for obtaining baseline biopsies from transplanted kidneys is a safe and effective method for assessment of donor-derived damage of the organ.

Dynamic changes in MELD score not only predict survival on the waiting list but also overall survival after liver transplantation.

The predictive value of MELD score for post-transplant survival has been under constant debate since its implementation in 2001. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of alterations in MELD score throughout waiting time (WT) on post-transplant survival. A single-centre retrospective analysis of 1125 consecutive patients listed for liver transplantation between 1997 and 2009 was performed. The impact of MELD score and dynamic changes in MELD score (DeltaMELD), as well as age, sex, year of listing and WT were evaluated on waiting list mortality and post-transplant survival. In this cohort, 539 (60%) patients were transplanted, 223 (25%) died on list and 142 (15%) were removed from the waiting list during WT. One-, three- and five-year survival after liver transplantation were 83%, 78% and 76% respectively. DeltaMELD as a continuous variable proved to be the only significant risk factor for overall survival after liver transplantation (hazard ratio (HR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.1, P = 0.013). The highest risk of post-transplant death could be defined for patients with a DeltaMELD > 10 (HR: 4.87, 95% CI 2.09-11.35, P < 0.0001). In addition, DeltaMELD as well as MELD at listing showed a significant impact on waiting list mortality. DeltaMELD may provide an easy evaluation tool to identify patients on the liver transplant waiting list with a high mortality risk after transplantation in the current setting. Temporarily withholding and re-evaluating these patients might improve overall outcome after liver transplantation.

Effect of intraportal infusion of tacrolimus on ischaemic reperfusion injury in orthotopic liver transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.

The increased use of older and/or marginal donor organs in liver transplantation over the last decade calls for strategies to minimize ischaemic reperfusion (I/R) injury to prevent early graft failure. Tacrolimus, a very potent and effective calcineurin inhibitor, was selected because of its ability to ameliorate I/R injury. A randomized, blinded, controlled single-centre trial of 26 liver transplant recipients was performed between February 2008 and December 2009. Donor organs were randomized to be perfused intraportally during liver transplantation with 1.5 l 5% albumin infusion containing either 20 ng/ml tacrolimus or placebo. The primary end point was liver function as assessed by aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) levels 6 days after transplantation. Treatment effectiveness was tested by transcriptome-wide analysis of biopsies. There was no difference in the primary end point, i.e. AST (IU/l) and ALT (IU/l) at day 6 after transplantation between groups. Furthermore, choleastatic parameters as well as parameters of liver synthesis were not different between groups. However, tacrolimus treatment suppressed inflammation and immune response in the transplanted liver on a genome-wide basis. Intrahepatic administration of tacrolimus did not result in a reduction of AST and ALT within the first week after transplantation.

Five-year safety and efficacy of belatacept in renal transplantation.

Belatacept is a first-in-class co-stimulation blocker in development for primary maintenance immunosuppression. A Phase II study comparing belatacept with cyclosporine (CsA) for prevention of acute rejection and protection of renal function in kidney transplant recipients demonstrated similar efficacy and significantly higher measured GFR at 1 year for belatacept, but the incidence of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was higher. Here, we present the results for the extension of this trial, which aimed to assess long-term safety and efficacy of belatacept. Seventy-eight of 102 patients who were receiving belatacept and the 16 of 26 who were receiving CsA completed the long-term extension period. GFR remained stable in patients who were receiving belatacept for 5 years, and the incidences of death/graft loss or acute rejection were low. The frequencies of serious infections were 16% for belatacept and 27% for CsA, and neoplasms occurred in 12% of each group. No patients who were treated with belatacept and one patient who was treated with CsA developed posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder during the follow-up period. Serious gastrointestinal disorders occurred more frequently with belatacept (12% belatacept versus 8% CsA), and serious cardiac disorders occurred more frequently with CsA (2% belatacept versus 12% CsA). Pharmacokinetic analyses showed consistent exposure to belatacept over time. CD86 receptor saturation was higher in patients who were receiving belatacept every 4 weeks (74%) compared with every 8 weeks (56%). In conclusion, this study demonstrated high patient persistence with intravenous belatacept, stable renal function, predictable pharmacokinetics, and good safety with belatacept over 5 years.

Identification of Non-HLA antigens targeted by alloreactive antibodies in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis.

The only treatment of end-stage renal disease patients undergoing chronic dialysis is kidney transplantation. However, about half of graft recipients encounter organ loss within ten years after renal transplantation. There is emerging evidence that the presence of alloreactive antibodies against non-HLA antigens in the serum of the recipient prior transplantation is associated with higher incidence of chronic rejection. However, the molecular identity of these antigens is largely unknown. To determine the most common non-HLA antigens, we tested lymphocytic extracts from 20 healthy volunteers with sera of 28 patients on the transplantation waiting list by Western blotting. There was a group of five proteins that was recognized by most sera. Using patient's own lymphocytes revealed that autoimmunity plays a minor role in this recognition. Two-dimensional Western blotting experiments followed by mass spectrometry identified the antigens as tubulin beta chain, vimentin, lamin-B1, and Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2. A detailed analysis of vimentin expression revealed that the antigenic 60 kDa isoform is underrepresented in patient's lymphocytes in comparison to those of healthy volunteers. The study revealed that preformed alloreactive antibodies are directed against a small number of specific protein isoforms. Our findings could provide a basis for future improvement of donor-recipient matching.

Vienna experience of ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation is a promising strategy for enlargement of living-donor pools. In recent years, recipient desensitization by blood group antigen-specific immunoadsorption, together with rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin, has allowed excellent graft performance after ABO-incompatible transplantation. Adopting this protocol, originally described by Tydén and coworkers, we performed four living-donor renal transplants across the ABO barrier (A1-->0, A1-->B, B-->A1, A2-->0) between July 2007 and August 2008. Recipients were aged 25-66 years, donors 49-69 years. A protocol of on-demand immunoadsorption was followed, based on serial post-transplant antibody monitoring. Substantial and sustained decrease of blood group antibody levels was achieved in all four recipients, therefore post-transplant immunoadsorption was not needed. Graft and patient survival after 4-18 months' follow-up was 100%. Current serum creatinine was 1.3-2.0 mg/dl. Two grafts showed C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries in the complete absence of typical morphological features of antibody-mediated rejection. One recipient experienced early graft dysfunction, diagnosed as Banff borderline lesion, which responded well to steroid pulse therapy. The same recipient developed de novo interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and arteriolar hyalinosis, presumably the result of suboptimal control of blood pressure and/or calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Two of the four recipients developed lymphoceles necessitating surgical revision. Apart from urinary tract infection in three patients and subclinical CMV in one, no major infectious complications were reported. Notably, two stable recipients developed polyoma BK viremia without clinical or morphological manifestations of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. The results obtained in our small series support the earlier reported high efficiency of desensitization based on antigen-specific immunoadsorption. Nevertheless, the lack of long-term data will necessitate continuous and prudent consideration of the benefits and risks of this strategy.

Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin A in renal transplantation: three-year observational results.

BACKGROUND: The European tacrolimus versus ciclosporin A microemulsion (CsA-ME) renal transplantation study showed that tacrolimus was significantly more effective in preventing acute rejection and had a superior cardiovascular risk profile at 6 months. METHODS: The endpoints of this investigator-initiated, observational, 36-month follow-up were acute rejection incidence rates, rates of patient and graft survival and renal function. An additional analysis was performed using the combined endpoints BPAR, graft loss and patient death. Data available from the original ITT population (557 patients; 286 tacrolimus and 271 CsA-ME) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 231 tacrolimus and 217 CsA-ME patients participated. At 36 months, Kaplan-Meier-estimated BPAR-free survival rates were 78.8% in the tacrolimus group and 60.6% in the CsA-ME group, graft survival rates were 88.0% and 86.9% and patient survival rates were 96.6% and 96.7%, respectively. The estimated combined endpoint-free survival rate was 71.4% with tacrolimus and 55.4% with CsA-ME (P 6 mmol/L (26.3% versus 12.6%, P

3-month and 12-month mortality after first liver transplant in adults in Europe: predictive models for outcome.

BACKGROUND: Mortality after liver transplantation depends on heterogeneous recipient and donor factors. Our aim was to assess risk of death and to develop models to help predict mortality after liver transplantation. METHODS: We analysed data from 34,664 first adult liver transplants from the European Liver Transplant Registry to identify factors associated with mortality at 3-months (n=21,605 in training dataset) and 12-months (n=18,852 in training dataset) after transplantation. We used multivariable logistic regression models to generate mortality scores for each individual, and assessed model discrimination and calibration on an independent validation dataset (n=9489 for 3-month model and n=8313 for 12-month model). FINDINGS: 2540 of 21,605 (12%) individuals in the 3-month training sample had died by 3 months. Compared with those transplanted in 2000-03, those transplanted earlier had a higher risk of death. Increased mortality at 3-months post-transplantation was associated with acute liver failure (adjusted odds ratio 1.61), donor age older than 60 years (1.16), compatible (1.22) or incompatible (2.07) donor-recipient blood group, older recipient age (1.12 per 5 years), split or reduced graft (1.96), total ischaemia time of longer than 13 h (1.38), and low United Network for Organ Sharing score (score 1: 2.43; score 2: 1.67). However, cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma, alcohol cirrhosis, hepatitis C or primary biliary cirrhosis, donor age 40 years or younger, or less, hepatitis B, and larger size of transplant centre (> or = 70 transplants per year) were associated with improved early outcomes. The 3-month mortality score discriminated well between those who did and did not die in the validation sample (C statistic=0.688). We noted similar findings for 12-month mortality, although deaths were generally underestimated at this timepoint. INTERPRETATION: The 3-month and 12-month mortality models can be effectively used to assess outcomes both within and between centres. Furthermore, the models provide a means of assessing the risk of post-transplantation mortality, giving clinicians important data on which to base strategic decisions about transplant policy in particular individuals or groups.

Genetic detection of lymph node micrometastases: a selection criterion for liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases after colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer was abandoned in 1994 on account of high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the genetic detection of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of the primary colon cancer could be applied to select patients for liver transplantation. METHODS: We analyzed 21 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone liver transplantation between 1983 and 1994 for liver metastases. Eleven patients were histologically lymph node negative at the time of surgery; ten patients with lymph node metastases served as control group. DNA sequencing was used to screen tumor material for p53 and K-ras mutations. Mutant allele-specific amplification (MASA) was then used to search for micrometastases in DNA from regional lymph nodes of the primary colorectal cancer. RESULTS: p53 and K-ras mutations were detected in 12 (57%) and 3 (14%) of 21 patients in the colorectal cancer, respectively. The mutations were confirmed in the corresponding liver metastases. Of 11 patients with histologically negative lymph nodes, nine were eligible for MASA due to presence of p53 or K-ras mutation. MASA revealed six of nine patients to be genetically positive for micrometastases. Three patients were both genetically and histologically negative. These three patients showed a significantly longer overall survival (P = 0.011) of 4, 5, and 20 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the genetic detection of micrometastases by MASA could be a powerful prognostic indicator for selecting patients with colorectal liver metastases who could benefit from liver transplantation.