Current advances in targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer - Clinical translation and future directions.

The last two decades have witnessed major breakthroughs in the development of targeted therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), an achievement which stems largely from advances in translational research. Precision medicine is now widely practiced in routine oncological care, where systemic therapy is individualized based on clinical factors such as primary tumor sidedness, location and number of metastases, as well as molecular factors such as the RAS and BRAF mutation status, mismatch repair / microsatellite status and presence of other actionable genomic alterations in the tumor. The optimal selection of patients with RAS and BRAF-wild type (WT), left-sided primary tumor for treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and chemotherapy (chemo) has markedly improved survival in the first-line setting. The pivotal trials of cetuximab in combination with BRAF/ MEK inhibitor for BRAF V600E mutant mCRC, and panitumumab with KRAS G12C inhibitor in KRAS(G12C)-mutant mCRC have been practice-changing. Anti-HER2 small molecular inhibitor, antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates have significantly improved the treatment outcome of patients with HER2 amplified mCRC. Anti-angiogenesis agents are now used across all lines of treatment and novel combinations with immune-checkpoint inhibitors are under active investigation in MSS mCRC. The non-invasive monitoring of molecular resistance to targeted therapies using Next Generation Sequencing analysis of circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) and captured sequencing of tumors have improved patient selection for targeted therapies. This review will focus on how latest advances, challenges and future directions in the development of targeted therapies in mCRC.

Radiologic extranodal extension for nodal staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Extranodal extension (ENE) has the potential to add value to the current nodal staging system (N8th) for predicting outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to incorporate ENE, as well as cervical nodal necrosis (CNN) to the current stage N3 and evaluated their impact on outcome prediction. The findings were validated on an external cohort. METHODS & MATERIALS: Pre-treatment MRI of 750 patients from the internal cohort were retrospectively reviewed. Predictive values of six modified nodal staging systems that incorporated four patterns of ENE and two patterns of CNN to the current stage N3 for disease-free survival (DFS) were compared with that of N8th using multivariate cox-regression and concordance statistics in the internal cohort. Performance of stage N3 for predicting disease recurrence was calculated. An external cohort of 179 patients was used to validate the findings. RESULTS: Incorporation of advanced ENE, which infiltrates into adjacent muscle/skin/salivary glands outperformed the other five modifications for predicting outcomes (p < 0.01) and achieved a significantly higher c-index for 5-year DFS (0.69 vs 0.72) (p < 0.01) when compared with that of N8th staging system. By adding advanced ENE to the current N3 increased the sensitivity for predicting disease recurrence from 22.4 % to 47.1 %. The finding was validated in the external cohort (5-year DFS 0.65 vs. 0.72, p < 0.01; sensitivity of stage N3 increased from 14.0 % to 41.9 % for disease recurrence). CONCLUSION: Results from two centre cohorts confirmed that the radiological advanced ENE should be considered as a criterion for stage N3 disease in NPC.

Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: performance of a short contrast-free screening magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Although contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detects early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) not detected by endoscopic-guided biopsy (EGB), a short contrast-free screening MRI would be desirable for NPC screening programs. This study evaluated a screening MRI in a plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA NPC screening program. METHODS: EBV-DNA-screen-positive patients underwent endoscopy, and endoscopy-positive patients underwent EGB. EGB was negative if the biopsy was negative or was not performed. Patients also underwent a screening MRI. Diagnostic performance was based on histologic confirmation of NPC in the initial study or during a follow-up period of at least 2 years. RESULTS: The study prospectively recruited 354 patients for MRI and endoscopy; 40/354 (11.3%) endoscopy-positive patients underwent EGB. Eighteen had NPC (5.1%), and 336 without NPC (94.9%) were followed up for a median of 44.8 months. MRI detected additional NPCs in 3/18 (16.7%) endoscopy-negative and 2/18 (11.1%) EGB-negative patients (stage I/II, n = 4; stage III, n = 1). None of the 24 EGB-negative patients who were MRI-negative had NPC. MRI missed NPC in 2/18 (11.1%), one of which was also endoscopy-negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of MRI, endoscopy, and EGB were 88.9%, 91.1%, 34.8%, 99.4%, and 91.0%; 77.8%, 92.3%, 35.0%, 98.7%, and 91.5%; and 66.7%, 92.3%, 31.6%, 98.1%, and 91.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A quick contrast-free screening MRI complements endoscopy in NPC screening programs. In EBV-screen-positive patients, MRI enables early detection of NPC that is endoscopically occult or negative on EGB and increases confidence that NPC has not been missed.

Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA and Risk of Future Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We previously conducted a prospective study to show that nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) screening with circulating Epstein­Barr virus (EBV) DNA analysis can improve survival. However, the long-term significance of positive results in individuals without cancer was unclear. METHODS: We conducted a second-round screening at a median of 43 months after the initial screening. Participants with detectable plasma EBV DNA were retested in 4 weeks, and those with persistently positive results were investigated with nasal endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Of the 20,174 volunteers who participated in the first-round screening, 17,838 (88.6%) were rescreened. Among them, 423 (2.37%) had persistently detectable plasma EBV DNA. Twenty-four patients were identified as having NPC. A significantly higher proportion of patients had stage I/II cancer than in a historical cohort (67% vs. 20%; chi-square test, P<0.001), and they had superior 3-year progression-free survival (100% vs. 78.8%). Compared with participants with undetectable plasma EBV DNA in the first round of screening, participants with transiently and persistently positive results in the first round were more likely to have a cancer identified in the second round, with relative risks of 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 15.0) and 16.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.7 to 49.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with detectable plasma EBV DNA but without an immediately identifiable NPC were more likely to have the cancer identified in another round of screening performed 3 to 5 years later. (Funded by Kadoorie Charitable Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02063399.)