Gadoxetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: pearls and pitfalls.

Gadoxetic disodium (Primovist) is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent with increasing popularity with its unique dual dynamic and excretory properties in focal liver lesion detection and characterisation. In-depth knowledge of its diagnostic utility and pitfalls in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases is crucial in facilitating clinical management. The current article reviews the pearls and pitfalls in these aspects with highlights from the latest research evidence. Pearls for common usage of Primovist in HCC includes detection of precursor cancer lesions in cirrhotic patients. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity precedes arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without APHE can represent early or progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and high-grade dysplastic nodules. In addition, Primovist is useful to differentiate HCC from pseudolesions. Pitfalls in diagnosing HCC include transient tachypnoea in the arterial phase, rare hepatobiliary phase hyperintense HCC, and decompensated liver cirrhosis compromising image quality. Primovist is currently the most sensitive technique in diagnosing liver metastases before curative hepatic resection. Other patterns of enhancement of liver metastases, "disappearing" liver metastases are important pitfalls. Radiologists should be aware of the diagnostic utility, limitations, and potential pitfalls for the common usage of hepatobiliary specific contrast agent in liver MRI.

The ins and outs of male breast and anterior chest wall lesions from childhood to adulthood.

Physiological and pathological processes arising from the breast and anterior chest wall may share similar clinical presentations because of the small volume of male breasts. Therefore, imaging is frequently required to localise and characterise the lesion and guide biopsy when radiological findings are equivocal or suspicious. Mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and ultrasound are the mainstays of breast imaging work-up. Other imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron-emission tomography (PET) can sometimes augment the investigation and aid treatment planning. This article reviews the key imaging features of a wide spectrum of benign and malignant conditions that involve the male breast and anterior chest wall across various age groups. Familiarisation with the salient radiological findings is essential for reaching an accurate diagnosis and optimising management.

An appraisal of timely magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing spinal cord compression.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord compression is a very debilitating condition and could be secondary to many causes. Urgent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the spine is crucial in making the diagnosis and guiding further management. Our objectives were to assess the nature of MR imaging requests, the diagnostic yield, and the subsequent management according to relevant MR imaging findings. METHODS: We focused on all the urgent MR imagings of the spine conducted from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. Clinical data, including the demographical information, presenting symptoms, radiological diagnosis, waiting time for MR imaging and treatment, was reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 33 cases of urgent MR imaging of the spine were performed. Patients were aged 29-85 years, with 18 males and 15 females. Most of them (84.8 percent) presented with neurological symptoms. 84 percent of the MR imaging was performed within 24 hours. 76 percent of the examinations yielded significant cord compression, of which 56 percent were due to vertebral metastasis, while others were due to epidural haematoma (12 percent), infective spondylodiscitis (8 percent), vertebral fracture (8 percent) and disc herniation (16 percent). Of the vertebral metastasis patients, 43 percent had one region imaged. 64 percent of the cord compression patients received surgical treatment or radiotherapy, with a mean waiting time of 1.7 days. CONCLUSION: The urgent MR imaging spine service was able to react promptly with a high diagnostic yield. One-third of the patients with vertebral metastasis had multiple levels involved, and imaging of the whole spine would be useful.