RESUMO
Background: People living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face an increased risk of severe outcomes such as hospitalization or death from COVID-19. COVID-19 vaccination is a vital approach to mitigate the risk and severity of infection in patients with CKD. Limited information exists regarding the factors that shape COVID-19 vaccine uptake, including health information-seeking behavior and perceptions, within the CKD population. Objective: The objectives were to describe among CKD patients, (1) health information-seeking behavior on COVID-19, (2) their capacity to comprehend and trust COVID-19 information from different sources, and (3) their perceptions concerning COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Design/Setting: Cross-sectional web-based survey administered in British Columbia and Ontario from February 17, 2023, to April 17, 2023. Participants: Chronic kidney disease G3b-5D patients and kidney transplant recipients (CKD G1T-5T) enrolled in a longitudinal COVID-19 vaccine serology study. Methods and Measurements: The survey consisted of a questionnaire that included demographic and clinical data, perceived susceptibility of contracting COVID-19, the ability to collect, understand, and trust information on COVID-19, as well as perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Descriptive statistics were used to present the data with values expressed as count (%) and chi square tests were performed with a significance level set at P ≤ .05. A content analysis was performed on one open-ended response regarding respondents' questions surrounding COVID-19 infection and vaccination. Results: Among the 902 patients who received the survey via email, 201 completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 22%. The median age was 64 years old (IQR 53-74), 48% were male, 51% were university educated, 32% were on kidney replacement therapies, and 57% had received ≥5 COVID-19 vaccine doses. 65% of respondents reported that they had sought out COVID-19-related information in the last 12 months, with 91% and 84% expressing having understood and trusted the information they received, respectively. Those with a higher number of COVID-19 vaccine doses were associated with having sought out (P =.017), comprehended (P < .001), and trusted (P =. 005) COVID-19-related information. Female sex was associated with expressing more concern about contracting COVID-19 (P = .011). Most respondents strongly agreed to statements regarding the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination. Respondents' questions about COVID-19 infection and vaccination centered on 4 major themes: COVID-19 vaccination strategy, vaccine effectiveness, vaccine safety, and the impact of COVID-19 infection and vaccination on kidney health. Limitations: This survey was administered within the Canadian health care context to patients with CKD who had at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Race/ethnicity of participants was not captured. Conclusions: In this survey of individuals with CKD, COVID-19 information-seeking behavior was high and almost all respondents understood and trusted the information they received. Perceptions toward the COVID-19 vaccine and booster were mostly favorable.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: Traditionally, peer review was a closed process conducted only by individuals working in the research field. To establish a more integrated and patient-centered approach, one of Canada's largest kidney research networks (Can-SOLVE CKD) has created a Research Operations Committee (ROC) that includes patients as key members. The ROC represents one way for achieving meaningful patient-oriented research (POR). SOURCE OF INFORMATION: Can-SOLVE CKD, a network created as part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR). METHODS: The ROC consists of patients, physicians, scientists, Indigenous partners, experts in research methodology, and a member of Can-SOLVE CKD's operational team. On an annual basis, Can-SOLVE CKD's research teams provide the ROC with a review package, which incorporates information from patient engagement check-in calls and surveys, the project's knowledge translation plan and products, and a progress report written by the project team. The ROC evaluates the review package and provides feedback and recommendations accordingly. KEY FINDINGS: The transparent nature of the process, regular feedback and review, along with an overt accountability and scoring system, has been embraced by both patients and researchers. As a result of the ROC process, the number of patient leads for each project has grown over a 3-year period and more researchers have received POR and cultural sensitivity training. LIMITATIONS: While anecdotal evidence suggests this approach is beneficial for achieving POR, formal mechanisms of evaluation are currently lacking. IMPLICATIONS: This ROC framework ensures patients are active contributors throughout the research process and could be adopted by other organizations to achieve a more patient-centered approach to research.
OBJECTIF DU PROGRAM: L'évaluation par les pairs consiste habituellement en un processus fermé et mené uniquement par des personnes travaillant dans le domaine de la recherche. Pour développer une approche plus intégrée et davantage axée sur les patients, un des plus importants réseaux canadiens de recherche sur les maladies rénales (Can-SOLVE CKD) a créé un comité de gestion de la recherche (CGR) où les patients sont des membres à part entière. Une approche qui vise la conduite d'activités de recherches significatives et davantage orientées vers le patient. SOURCE: Can-SOLVE CKD, un réseau créé dans le cadre de la Stratégie de recherche axée sur le patient (SRAP) des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le CGR rassemble des patients, des médecins, des chercheurs, des partenaires autochtones, des experts en méthodologie de recherche et un membre de l'équipe d'intervention de Can-SOLVE CKD. Une fois par année, l'équipe de recherche de Can-SOLVE CKD fournit au CGR un dossier d'examen. Ce dossier contient les informations recueillies lors d'appels ou de sondages vérifiant l'engagement des patients, le plan d'application des connaissances du projet et ses résultats, de même qu'un rapport périodique rédigé par l'équipe responsable du projet. Le CGR évalue ce dossier et émet ses commentaires et recommandations. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: La transparence du processus, la rétroaction et la révision sur une base régulière, de même que les systèmes de responsabilité et de notation ouverts ont été adoptés tant par les patients que par les chercheurs. Grâce à ce processus, le nombre de patients candidats pour chaque projet a augmenté sur une période de trois ans, et davantage de chercheurs ont reçu une formation sur les réalités culturelles et la pratique d'activités de recherche axées sur le patient. LIMITES: Bien que des preuves anecdotiques suggèrent que cette approche soit bénéfique à la conduite de recherches axées sur le patient, des mécanismes formels pour son évaluation manquent toujours. CONCLUSION: Le cadre proposé par le CGR assure une contribution active des patients tout au long du processus de recherche. Ce program pourrait être adopté par d'autres organizations et permettre la réalisation d'activités de recherche davantage axées sur le patient.
RESUMO
The purpose of this research was to uncover the structure of the lived experience of living with changing expectations from the perspectives of women with high-risk pregnancies. The researchers' nursing theoretical perspective is the humanbecoming theory and the Parse research method was used. For the participants, living with changing expectations is foreboding disquietude arising with arduous restrictions, while envisioning the yearned-for with mitigating nurturing engagements. Findings enhance the theory of humanbecoming as well as enhance understanding of the experience of living with changing expectations. Recommendations for future research and practice are discussed.