Primary surgical management of anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior compartment prolapse is the most common pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with a range of surgical treatment options available. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical treatments for the repair of anterior POP. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing surgical treatments for women with POP. Network meta-analysis was possible for anterior POP, same-site recurrence outcome. A Markov model was used to compare the cost-utility of surgical treatments for the primary repair of anterior POP from a UK National Health Service perspective. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 27 eligible trials for the network meta-analysis involving eight surgical treatments tested on 3194 women. Synthetic mesh was the most effective in preventing recurrence at the same site. There was no evidence to suggest a difference between synthetic non-absorbable mesh, synthetic partially absorbable mesh, and biological mesh. The cost-utility analysis, which incorporated effectiveness, complications and cost data, found non-mesh repair to have the highest probability of being cost-effective. The conclusions were robust to model inputs including effectiveness, costs and utility values. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior colporrhaphy augmented with mesh appeared to be cost-ineffective in women requiring primary repair of anterior POP. There is a need for further research on long-term effectiveness and the safety of mesh products to establish their relative cost-effectiveness with a greater certainty. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: New study finds mesh cost-ineffective in women with anterior pelvic organ prolapse.

Management of mesh complications following surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Mesh surgery for stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse can result in complications such as mesh exposure, mesh extrusion, voiding dysfunction, dyspareunia, and pain. There is limited knowledge or guidance on the effective management for mesh-related complications. OBJECTIVE: To determine the best management of mesh complications; a systematic review was conducted as part of the national clinical guideline 'Urinary incontinence (update) and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management'. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search strategies were developed for each indication for referral. SELECTION CRITERIA: Relevant interventions included complete or partial mesh removal, mesh division, and non-surgical treatments such as vaginal estrogen. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Characteristics and outcome data were extracted, and as a result of the heterogeneous nature of the data a narrative synthesis was conducted. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included; five provided comparative data and four studies stated the indication for referral. Reported outcomes (including pain, dyspareunia, satisfaction, quality of life, incontinence, mesh exposure, and recurrence) and the reported incidences of these varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence base is limited in quantity and quality and does not permit firm recommendations to be made on the most effective management for mesh-related complications. Robust data are needed so that mesh complications can be managed effectively in the future. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Systematic review demonstrates that the outcomes following mesh revision surgery are highly variable.

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer: updated analysis of 93 randomized patients - control survival is much better than previously assumed.

AIM: Lung metastases from colorectal cancer are resected in selected patients in the belief that this confers a significant survival advantage. It is generally assumed that the 5-year survival of these patients would be near zero without metastasectomy. We tested the clinical effectiveness of this practice in Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC), a randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. METHOD: Multidisciplinary teams in 14 hospitals recruited patients with resectable lung metastases into a two-arm trial. Randomization was remote and stratified according to site, with minimization for age, sex, primary cancer stage, interval since primary resection, prior liver involvement, number of metastases and carcinoembryonic antigen level. The trial management group was blind to patient allocation until after intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2016, 93 participants were randomized. These patients were 35-86 years of age and had between one and six lung metastases at a median of 2.7 years after colorectal cancer resection; 29% had prior liver metastasectomy. The patient groups were well matched and the characteristics of these groups were similar to those of observational studies. The median survival after metastasectomy was 3.5 (95% CI: 3.1-6.6) years compared with 3.8 (95% CI: 3.1-4.6) years for controls. The estimated unadjusted hazard ratio for death within 5 years, comparing the metastasectomy group with the control group, was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.56-1.56). Use of chemotherapy or local ablation was infrequent and similar in each group. CONCLUSION: Patients in the control group (who did not undergo lung metastasectomy) have better survival than is assumed. Survival in the metastasectomy group is comparable with the many single-arm follow-up studies. The groups were well matched with features similar to those reported in case series.

Meta-analysis of colorectal cancer follow-up after potentially curative resection.

BACKGROUND: After potentially curative resection of primary colorectal cancer, patients may be monitored by measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen and/or CT to detect asymptomatic metastatic disease earlier. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to find evidence for the clinical effectiveness of monitoring in advancing the diagnosis of recurrence and its effect on survival. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and other databases were searched for randomized comparisons of increased intensity monitoring compared with a contemporary standard policy after resection of primary colorectal cancer. RESULTS: There were 16 randomized comparisons, 11 with published survival data. More intensive monitoring advanced the diagnosis of recurrence by a median of 10 (i.q.r. 5-24) months. In ten of 11 studies the authors reported no demonstrable difference in overall survival. Seven RCTs, published from 1995 to 2016, randomly assigned 3325 patients to a monitoring protocol made more intensive by introducing new methods or increasing the frequency of existing follow-up protocols versus less invasive monitoring. No detectable difference in overall survival was associated with more intensive monitoring protocols (hazard ratio 0·98, 95 per cent c.i. 0·87 to 1·11). CONCLUSION: Based on pooled data from randomized trials published from 1995 to 2016, the anticipated survival benefit from surgical treatment resulting from earlier detection of metastases has not been achieved.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Disease: Great Enthusiasm but Scant Evidence.

The prospective study Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (N = 391) showed that expert selection was made on known prognostic features - number of metastases, tumour markers, liver involvement, interval - and patient performance and outcomes replicated follow-up studies. In the nested controlled trial all factors were well balanced and no survival difference remained.

Hard choices: a qualitative study of influences on the treatment decisions made by advanced lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an incurable, advanced disease, and treatment decisions may be hard. This study explored the factors that influence patients' choice of treatment during the oncologist-patient consultation. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews conducted within 1 month of a consultation with an oncologist. PARTICIPANTS: Five patients newly diagnosed with incurable NSCLC and facing a treatment decision following a consultation with an oncologist. SETTING: A regional oncology unit in the UK. RESULTS: Some of the participants who opted for chemotherapy had made a decision before seeing the oncologist, presented with fewer symptoms, had been more active in seeking information before the consultation, and were willing to accept the risk of side effects. Participants opting for radiotherapy were not willing to accept the risk of side effects for the possibility of a small survival gain and instead focused on symptom relief. CONCLUSION: Some participants sought information before the consultation from various formal and informal sources. This may undermine the oncologist-patient consultation as the information may be incomplete or inaccurate. Patients vary in their willingness to accept risks for small potential gains. More research is required into methods to communicate the extent of the risks of treatment. The Clinical Nurse Specialist performed a valuable role for the patients and was seen as a trusted source of information.

Antithrombotic therapy and survival in patients with malignant disease.

A broad range of studies suggest a two-way relationship between cancer and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients with cancer have consistently been shown to be at elevated risk for VTE; this risk is partly driven by an intrinsic hypercoagulable state elicited by the tumour itself. Conversely, thromboembolic events in patients without obvious risk factors are often the first clinical manifestation of an undiagnosed malignancy. The relationship between VTE and cancer is further supported by a number of trials and meta-analyses which, when taken together, strongly suggest that antithrombotic therapy can extend survival in patients with cancer by a mechanism that extends beyond its effect in preventing VTE. Moreover, accumulating evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies has shown that tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis are governed, in part, by elements of the coagulation system. On 22 May 2009, a group of health-care providers based in the United Kingdom met in London, England, to examine recent advances in cancer-associated thrombosis and its implications for UK clinical practice. As part of the discussion, attendees evaluated evidence for and against an effect of antithrombotic therapy on survival in cancer. This paper includes a summary of the data presented at the meeting and explores potential mechanisms by which antithrombotic agents might exert antitumour effects. The summary is followed by a consensus statement developed by the group.

Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs.

BACKGROUND: Patients often do not get the information they require from doctors and nurses. To address this problem, interventions directed at patients to help them gather information in their healthcare consultations have been proposed and tested. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on patients, clinicians and the healthcare system of interventions which are delivered before consultations, and which have been designed to help patients (and/or their representatives) address their information needs within consultations. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library (issue 3 2006); MEDLINE (1966 to September 2006); EMBASE (1980 to September 2006); PsycINFO (1985 to September 2006); and other databases, with no language restriction. We also searched reference lists of articles and related reviews, and handsearched Patient Education and Counseling (1986 to September 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of interventions before consultations designed to encourage question asking and information gathering by the patient. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two researchers assessed the search output independently to identify potentially-relevant studies, selected studies for inclusion, and extracted data. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included trials, and meta-analyses of five outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 33 randomised controlled trials, from 6 countries and in a range of settings. A total of 8244 patients was randomised and entered into studies. The most common interventions were question checklists and patient coaching. Most interventions were delivered immediately before the consultations.Commonly-occurring outcomes were: question asking, patient participation, patient anxiety, knowledge, satisfaction and consultation length. A minority of studies showed positive effects for these outcomes. Meta-analyses, however, showed small and statistically significant increases for question asking (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.27 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.36)) and patient satisfaction (SMD 0.09 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.16)). There was a notable but not statistically significant decrease in patient anxiety before consultations (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.56 (95% CI -7.10 to 3.97)). There were small and not statistically significant changes in patient anxiety after consultations (reduced) (SMD -0.08 (95%CI -0.22 to 0.06)), patient knowledge (reduced) (SMD -0.34 (95% CI -0.94 to 0.25)), and consultation length (increased) (SMD 0.10 (95% CI -0.05 to 0.25)). Further analyses showed that both coaching and written materials produced similar effects on question asking but that coaching produced a smaller increase in consultation length and a larger increase in patient satisfaction. Interventions immediately before consultations led to a small and statistically significant increase in consultation length, whereas those implemented some time before the consultation had no effect. Both interventions immediately before the consultation and those some time before it led to small increases in patient satisfaction, but this was only statistically significant for those immediately before the consultation. There appear to be no clear benefits from clinician training in addition to patient interventions, although the evidence is limited. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Interventions before consultations designed to help patients address their information needs within consultations produce limited benefits to patients. Further research could explore whether the quality of questions is increased, whether anxiety before consultations is reduced, the effects on other outcomes and the impact of training and the timing of interventions. More studies need to consider the timing of interventions and possibly the type of training provided to clinicians.

Palliative radiotherapy regimens for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Palliative radiotherapy to the chest is often used in patients with lung cancer, but radiotherapy regimens are more often based on tradition than research results. OBJECTIVES: To discover the most effective and least toxic regimens of palliative radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, and whether higher doses increase survival. SEARCH STRATEGY: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different regimens of palliative radiotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Fourteen randomised trials were reviewed. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, the patient characteristics and the outcome measures. Because of this heterogeneity no meta-analysis was attempted. MAIN RESULTS: There is no strong evidence that any regimen gives greater palliation. Higher dose regimens give more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis. There is evidence for a modest increase in survival (5% at 1 year and 3% at 2 years) in patients with better performance status (PS) given higher dose radiotherapy. Some regimens are associated with an increased risk of radiation myelitis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients should be treated with short courses of palliative radiotherapy, of 1 or 2 fractions. Care should be taken with the dose to the spinal cord. The use of high dose palliative regimens should be considered for and discussed with selected patients with good performance status. More research is needed into reducing the acute toxicity of large fraction regimens and into the role of radical compared to high dose palliative radiotherapy. In the future, large trials comparing different RT regimens may be difficult to set up because of the increasing use of systemic chemotherapy. Trials looking at how best to integrate these two modalities, particularly in good PS patients, need to be carried out.

Small cell lung cancer treated in southeast Wales.

AIMS: In small cell lung cancer (SCLC), consolidation thoracic irradiation (CTI) increases 3-year absolute survival by 5.4% in patients with limited disease and a complete response to chemotherapy. Early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy has been shown to improve local control and prolong survival compared with CTI in some trials. The standard management of patients with SCLC in southeast Wales is CTI in individuals with limited disease and a complete response to chemotherapy. A review of patients with SCLC was carried out to establish whether survival locally is comparable with that reported in published studies, and if patients given CTI have survival comparable with that reported in studies where early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy was used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2002, 303 patients were registered with SCLC in southeast Wales. One hundred and fifteen (47%) patients had limited disease and 60/115 (52%) received CTI. RESULTS: Patients with limited disease receiving CTI had a median survival of 17.7 months (95% confidence interval: 15-27.9 months). The 2- and 5-year survivals were 38 and 13%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results compare favourably with previously published studies on SCLC. There are no plans to change our current treatment policy for SCLC in southeast Wales.

Cisplatin combination chemotherapy versus chlorambucil in advanced ovarian carcinoma: mature results of a randomized trial.

A randomized study to compare the efficacy of combination chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide: PACe) with chlorambucil (CB) in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV ovarian carcinoma was conducted between May 1979 and October 1983. Patients failing initial CB were subsequently eligible for treatment with PACe. Eighty-nine patients were randomized and 85 were eligible for analysis; as of date, 72 of these patients have died. The majority of patients in this study had bulky residual disease after their initial laparotomy (76%). Complete response (CR) was documented by a second laparotomy after five cycles of combination therapy or 6 to 12 months alkylating agent therapy. The overall response rate (CR plus partial response [PR]) for the combination (PACe, 68%) was significantly higher (P = .0004) than that for the chlorambucil (CB, 26%). However, the median survival was not improved (PACe, 13 months; CB, 11 months) and the survival curves were not significantly different (log rank test P = .25). The results of this study are comparable to preliminary data reported from other similar randomized studies. PACe, as administered in this study, is not indicated as routine therapy in patients with bulky residual ovarian carcinoma.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation for preventing brain metastases in patients undergoing radical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is a relatively high incidence of brain metastases following radical treatment. At present, the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in this group of patients is not clear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether PCI has a role in the management of patients with NSCLC treated with radical intent. SEARCH STRATEGY: The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cancerlit, along with handsearching of journals, relevant books, and review articles used to identify potentially eligible trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCI with no PCI in NSCLC patients treated with radical intent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Four RCTs were reviewed. Due to the small patient numbers, and variations in radiotherapy (RT) dose, no meta-analysis was attempted. MAIN RESULTS: PCI may reduce the incidence of brain metastases, but there is no evidence of a survival benefit. There is no evidence that any regimen is superior, and the effect of PCI on quality of life (QOL) is not known. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of PCI in clinical practice. Where possible, patients should be offered entry into a clinical trial.