Experience with One-Stage Repair of Urethral Strictures Using the Augmented Anastomotic Repair Technique.

INTRODUCTION: We report the results of augmented anastomotic repair (AAR) in the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 71 consecutive patients who had undergone AAR between June 2004 and June 2013. Medical records were reviewed to identify early postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Self-developed standardized questionnaires sent to the patients and referring urologists were used to collect data on late complications (>90) days. Stricture recurrence (SR) was defined as any postoperative endoscopic or open surgical intervention on the urethra. The influence of patient demographics, stricture characteristics, and operative procedure performed on the occurrence of SR was analyzed. RESULTS: Early postoperative complications were rare events (11.3%) with only one severe CDC complication. Late complications were reported in 46.5% cases. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3-114 months), however, 64 patients had no evidence of SR and required no further intervention, giving an overall success rate of 90.1%. Seven patients with SR had a higher body mass index, were older, and had been operated on by less experienced surgeon(s). Most SRs occurred within the first year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: AAR was an effective and safe operative technique that allowed one-stage repair in our patients with anterior urethral strictures who needed resection of the scarred urethra and otherwise were not suitable for primary anastomosis or simple substitution urethroplasty.

[Do concomitant urological injuries in severely injured patients lead to poorer outcomes? : A multivariate risk analysis]. / Führt eine urologische Begleitverletzung beim Schwerstverletzten zu einer Outcomeverschlechterung? : Eine multivariate Risikoanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Severely injured patients with associated genitourinary (GU) injuries have only rarely been investigated in the current literature. If at all, analyses are commonly focussed on renal injuries, marginalising other GU traumas such as ureteral injuries. In this study, we would like to characterise patients with GU injuries and analyse the impact of such injuries on mortality and length of stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The inclusion criteria for this retrospective analysis of TraumaRegister DGU® data were: Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 within the period between 2009 and 2016 with available data on age and length of stay. A descriptive analysis was used to compare patients with and without GU injuries. The impact of GU injuries on mortality and length of hospital stay was evaluated by means of multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: In all, 90,962 patients met the inclusion criteria; 5.9% of them had suffered GU injuries (n = 5345). The prevalence in patients with pelvic fractures was up to 19%. On average, patients with GU trauma were 10 years younger (42.9 vs. 52.2 years) and more severely injured (ISS: 31.8 vs. 26.4). The multivariate analyses demonstrated that GU injuries in severely injured patients are no independent risk factor for mortality. However, particularly bladder and genital injuries result in longer hospitalisation. CONCLUSION: GU injuries do not represent an additional risk factor for mortality. However, after adjusting for established prognosis factors, they can cause prolonged periods of hospitalisation of severely injured patients.