Clozapine-Associated Agranulocytosis: A Systematic Review. Is It Really So Frighteningly Common?

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is a very effective therapeutic option for schizophrenic disorders that have been refractory to most other therapies. This extremely positive aspect clashes easily with an adverse effect of the drug that is deemed to be a very dangerous one: agranulocytosis. We asked whether the mandatory strict hematological follow-up prescribed in the black box warning of clozapine's label is proportioned to the actual incidence of agranulocytosis, considering that is the main reason that such a drug is often used only late in the treatment course. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of reports examining clozapine administration and agranulocytosis incidence. We specifically selected those where mild and moderate neutropenia was not used as a trigger to stop administration of clozapine, to better estimate the sheer incidence of agranulocytosis when clozapine was continued even with mild hematological effect, where detected. We used PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases to identify clinical studies conducted between January 1975 and April 2023. RESULTS: We included 14 studies, mostly retrospective ones, that examined the incidence of hematological adverse effects in patients using clozapine. A total of 2354 subjects were included. The mean age of the subjects was 33.5 years. The mean duration of observation of subjects who took clozapine was 800 days, with a mean daily dose of 319.5 mg per day. Of the 2354 subjects examined, we found that 11 of them experienced agranulocytosis (0.47%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the evidence of a lower incidence of agranulocytosis than previously estimated and are in line with more recent meta-analyses. We may therefore think that clinical practice may demand a revision of the approach that both psychiatrists and supervising organizations often take when talking about clozapine.

Comparison of immediate and sustained release formulations of lithium salts.

Lithium salts are widely used clinically, mainly for treatment of bipolar disorder, in which it is highly effective. Various preparations have been developed and tested, including older immediate-release (IR) forms of lithium carbonate and other salts and formulations with slow-release (SR) properties, developed in hopes of increasing the tolerability of lithium treatment, adherence to its use, and possibly its efficacy. Systematic reviews of head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical properties of such preparations are lacking. Accordingly, we systematically reviewed clinical studies of both IR and SR formulations of lithium salts, seeking to compare their pharmacokinetic properties, adverse effects, clinical tolerability, and clinical effectiveness. Very few such comparative studies were identified and they are highly heterogeneous in design and findings. In 11 included reports, SR formulations appeared to be better tolerated and possibly to be associated with greater adherence to treatment. Studies of comparative clinical efficacy are lacking. Despite decades of use of various lithium salts, systematic comparisons of the pharmacological and clinical properties of IR vs. SR preparations remain rare and to be deepened, though with suggestive superiority of SR salts.

Risk of Depression Associated With Finasteride Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Finasteride is one of several inhibitors of the 5α-reductase that converts testosterone to dihydrotestosterone used to treat hair loss and benign prostatic enlargement. Emerging clinical observations indicate that such treatment may be associated with depression, anxiety, and possibly increased suicidal risks, in addition to sexual dysfunction, even after its discontinuation. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review of reports pertaining to association of finasteride treatment with clinical depression or other adverse psychiatric effects. We analyzed reported risks of depression by pooling of rates and by meta-analysis of comparisons of subjects treated with finasteride or not. FINDINGS: Crude pooled rates of depressive symptoms with versus without finasteride were 3.33% (confidence interval, 3.22%-3.44%) versus 2.54% (2.44%-2.64%); random-effects meta-analysis yielded an odds ratio of 2.14 (1.40-3.27) (both P < 0.0001). In addition, risk of suicidal ideation or behavior was greater with versus without finasteride (21.2% [21.0%-21.5%] vs 14.0% [13.8%-14.2%], P < 0.0001), and risk of sustained sexual dysfunction was high (60.1% [37.3%-82.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support a growing impression that finasteride is associated with adverse psychiatric effects that can persist in association with sexual dysfunction after discontinuing finasteride treatment.

Aripiprazole for treating delirium: A systematic review-Is it a valid yet understudied treatment?

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a neuropsychiatric condition that commonly occurs in medical settings, especially among older individuals. Despite the lack of strong evidence in the literature, haloperidol is considered the first-line pharmacological intervention. Unfortunately, its adverse effects can be severe, and psychiatrists are considering the use of alternative drugs targeting dopamine and serotonin domains (atypical antipsychotics). Among them, aripiprazole is considered to have one of the safest pharmacological profiles. AIMS: The purpose of this study is to examine the studies on aripiprazole as a pharmacological treatment of delirium present in today's literature. METHODS: We carried out systematic research of MedLine, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and ScienceDirect examining articles written between January 2002 and September 2023, including experimental studies published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: The 6 final included studies examined a total of 130 patients, showing a delirium resolution in a 7-day span of 73.8% of patients treated with aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the limited data currently available, we can assert that aripiprazole is at least as efficient as haloperidol, the true point is that it has a far better tolerability and safety profile. Nonetheless, further studies are necessary to provide more compelling data, together with a more precise indication regarding minimum efficient dose, as the main limitations of our review are the very small sample size, the small percentage of subjects with preexisting dementia, and the fact that most studies used scales with low specificity for the examined condition.