Novel strategy for improved outcomes of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation as a treatment for refractory post cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in the current era: a refreshing new perspective.

OBJECTIVES: Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock is an infrequent but important cause of death following cardiac surgery. Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation offers the opportunity for temporary cardiovascular support and myocardial rest, with a view to recovery. We examine our results with our recently-implemented management algorithm. METHODS: We report our series of 15 consecutive patients out of 357 patients [4.2%] who required institution of veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation system support as treatment for Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in the current era [January-2017 to January-2020]. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.3 ± 11.6 years (range: 40-82 years); there were 13 males (86.7%). Duration of veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation support was 6.7 ± 1.9 days. Duration of stay on intensive care unit [ICU] was 18.9 ± 17.1 days. Duration of hospital-stay was 28.3 ± 20.8 days. Survival to discharge and at 2.2 ± 0.9 years was 67%. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown clearly that veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation is an important rescue option for patients who develop refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock, with improved survival of 67% at 2.2 ± 0.9 years in those placed on post-cardiotomy veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support, which is superior to that reported hitherto in literature. We have sought to highlight the successes of post cardiotomy veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support, with improved results, based on careful patient selection, as well as diligent management of these critically-ill patients in the postoperative period, prior to establishment of irreversible end-organ dysfunction. Our strategy has also helped us rationalize and optimize the use of this expensive treatment modality.

Use of oxygenator with short-term ventricular assist devices.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) serves as a conventional short-term mechanical circulatory assist to support heart and lung functions. The short-term ventricular assist devices (ST-VAD) can, on the contrary, offer only circulatory support. A combination of VAD and oxygenator (Oxy-VAD) could help overcome this potential disadvantage. This is a retrospective case note study of patients supported on ST-VAD which required adding an oxygenator for extra respiratory support. The oxygenator was introduced in the ST-VAD circuit, either on the left or the right side. Twenty-two patients with the etiology of refractory cardiogenic shock in decompensation were supported on Oxy-VAD between years 2009 and 2019 at tertiary care . All patients were classified into class-I INTERMACS with a mean SOFA Score of 14 ± 2.58. 86.4% of patients were already on mechanical support pre-ST-VAD implant, 80% on VA-ECMO. The BiVAD implant accounted for 63.6%, followed by LVAD and RVAD with 27.3% and 9.1%. Mean duration of the ST-VAD was 8.5 days. The oxygenator was introduced in 14 RVAD and 8 LVAD circuits. The oxygenator was successfully weaned in 54.5% while ST-VAD was explanted in 31.8%. Discharge to home survival was 22.7%. Oxy-VAD proves a viable, and probably, a better option to VA-ECMO in acute cardiorespiratory decompensation. It offers organ-specific tailor-made support to the right and/or left heart and/or lungs. While on Oxy-VAD support, each organ performance can be assessed independently, and the assistance of the specifically improved organ can be weaned off without discontinuing the support for the rest.

Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in DCD and DBD lung transplants: a 2-year single-center experience.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has the potential to expand the lung donor pool. We aimed to assess whether DCD affected the need for perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and perioperative outcomes in lung transplantation (LTx) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). All consecutive LTxs performed between April 2017 and March 2019 at our tertiary center were analyzed. Donor and recipient preoperative characteristics, utilization of ECMO, and perioperative clinical outcomes were compared between DCD and DBD LTx. Multivariate models (frequentist and Bayes) were fitted to evaluate an independent effect of DCD on the intra- and postoperative need for ECMO. Out of 105 enrolled patients, 25 (23.8%) were DCD LTx. Donors' and preoperative recipients' characteristics were comparable between the groups. Intraoperatively, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) was more common in DCD LTx (56.0% vs. 36.2%), but the adjusted difference was minor (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.64-2.12; P = 0.613). MCS duration, and first and second lung ischemia time were longer in the DCD group. Postoperatively, DCD recipients more commonly required ECMO (32.0% vs. 7.5%) and the difference remained considerable after adjustment for the pre- and intraoperative covariates: RR = 4.11 (95% CI 0.95-17.7), P = 0.058, Bayes RR = 4.15 (95% CrI 1.28-13.0). Sensitivity analyses (two DCD-DBD matching procedures) supported a higher risk of postoperative ECMO need in DCD patients. Incidence of delayed chest closure, postoperative chest drainage, and renal replacement therapy was higher in the DCD group. Early postoperative outcomes after DCD LTx appeared generally comparable to those after DBD LTx. DCD was associated with a higher need for postoperative ECMO which could influence clinical outcomes. However, as the DCD group had a significantly higher use of EVLP with more common ECMO preoperatively, this might have contributed to worse outcomes in the DCD group.

Propensity matched post-transplant survival in durable CF-axial pump BTT patients with and without diabetes: A UNOS database analysis.

Diabetes and post-transplant survival have been linked. However, the impact on post-transplant survival of patients supported on Continuous Flow (CF) axial left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as a bridge to transplant (BTT) with diabetes has not been widely studied. This study attempts to assess the impact of diabetes type II (DM type II) as a comorbidity influencing survival patterns in the post-cardiac transplant population supported on LVADs and to test if the presence of a pre- transplant durable LVAD acts as an independent risk factor in long-term post-transplant survival. The UNOS database population from 2004 to 2015 was used to construct the cohorts. A total of 21,032 were transplanted during this period. The transplant data were further queried to extract CF-axial flow pumps BTT (HMII-BTT) patients and patients who did not have VAD support before the transplant. A total of 4224 transplant recipients had HMII at the time of transplant, and 13,131 did not have VAD support. Propensity analysis was performed, and 4107 recipients of similar patient characteristics to those in the BTT group were selected for comparison. The patients with a VAD had significantly reduced survival at 2 years post-transplant (p = 0.00514) but this trend did not persist at 5 years (p = 0.0617) and 10 years post-transplant (p = 0.183). Patients with diabetes and a VAD significantly decreased survival at 2 years (p = 0.00204), 5 years (p = 0.00029), and 10 years (p = 0.00193). The presence of a durable LVAD is not an independent risk factor for long-term survival. Diabetes has a longstanding effect on the posttransplant survival of BTT patients.

Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders in Transplant Waitlist, VAD, and Heart Transplant Patients: A TriNetX Database Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Mental health and substance use disorders (MHDs and SUDs) affect cardiac allograft and VAD recipients and impact their quality of life and compliance. Limited research currently exists on MHDs and SUDs in this population. Methods: This study compares the incidence of MHDs and SUDs in the transplant list, VAD, and post-transplant patients with that in heart failure patients. Study cohorts were derived from the TriNetX database using ICD-10 codes. Differences in incidence were examined using the log-rank test. Adults with MHDs and SUDs before the window of time were excluded. All comparisons were made between propensity-matched cohorts. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Transplant waitlist patients showed a significant increase in the incidence of anxiety, depression, panic, adjustment, mood, alcohol use, and eating disorders. Post-transplant patients showed a significant increase in depression and opioid use. VAD patients showed a significant increase in depression and a decrease in panic disorder and anxiety. These results allow for further investigations on prevention and coping strategies. Conclusions: The deterioration of mental health can significantly impact medication compliance, survival, and quality of life. Opioid use for pain management in the early postoperative period should be further investigated to assess its impact on long-term substance use and addiction.

Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients by Bridge to Transplant Strategy When Using the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System.

The last several years have seen a rise in use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to bridge heart transplant recipients. A controlled hypothermic organ preservation system, the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS), was introduced in 2018 and has grown in utilization with reports of improved posttransplant outcomes. The Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved heArt preservatioN (GUARDIAN)-Heart registry is an international, multicenter registry assessing outcomes after transplant using the SCTS. This analysis examines outcomes in recipients bridged with various MCS devices in the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry. A total of 422 recipients with donor hearts transported using SCTS were included and identified. Durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) were used exclusively in 179 recipients, temporary VADs or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in 197, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 14 recipients. Average ischemic times were over 3.5 hours in all cohorts. Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) posttransplant increased across groups (4.5% VAD, 5.1% temporary support, 21.4% ECMO), whereas intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (18.2 days) and total hospital stay (39.4 days) was longer in the ECMO cohort than the VAD and IABP groups. A comparison of outcomes of MCS bridging in SCTS versus traditional ice revealed significantly lower rates of both moderate/severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and severe PGD in the SCTS cohort; however, upon propensity matching only the reductions in moderate/severe RV dysfunction were statistically significant. Use of SCTS in transplant recipients with various bridging strategies results in excellent outcomes.

Enhanced Left Ventricular Recovery in Treatment of Mitral Regurgitation With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

A 73-year-old male patient presented with shortness of breath at rest resulting from new-onset severe primary mitral regurgitation with a flail posterior leaflet, left ventricular dysfunction, and cardiogenic shock. After initial stabilization in the intensive care unit, multiple treatment options were considered for this patient, all associated with significant mortality. Ultimately, operative mitral valve repair with Impella 5.5 placement was performed for postoperative hemodynamic support. Surgical repair provided elimination of mitral regurgitation. Impella support was maintained for 7 days to provide unloading of the left ventricle. After device removal, the patient had sustained left ventricular recovery with significantly improved ejection fraction. Full left ventricular support and unloading may decrease operative risk and promote left ventricular recovery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction. This case emphasizes the value of ventricular unloading to facilitate the recovery of left ventricular function as a treatment option for patients with challenging cases of severe mitral regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction.

Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement (MSAVR) has been increasingly performed at the authors' institution since October 2003. The study aim was to compare results obtained with MSAVR to those following AVR with conventional sternotomy (SAVR). METHODS: Between 1998 and 2008, a total of 143 consecutive patients (mean age: 67 +/- 12.5 years) underwent AVR at the authors' institution. Of these patients, 82 underwent SAVR, and 61 underwent MSAVR performed through a reversed-L-shaped median sternotomy with a transverse limb at the right fourth intercostal space. Ascending aortic and right atrial cannulation through the mini-sternotomy were employed for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). RESULTS: Typically, the MSAVR patients were slightly younger than SAVR patients (mean age: 67 +/- 16 years and 70 +/- 15 years, respectively; p = 0.037), had a lower incidence of diabetes (3% versus 18%, p = 0.008), and a slightly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (74.5 +/- 12% versus 71 +/- 12%, p = 0.019). There were no other inter-group preoperative differences. As expected, MSAVR required a slightly longer aortic cross-clamp time (49 +/- 19 min) compared to SAVR (44.5 +/- 16 min; p = 0.019), and longer CPB times (77 +/- 31 min versus 60 +/- 26 min; p <0.0001), though the overall operating times were similar (p = 0.38). Postoperatively, MSAVR patients were extubated at 3 +/- 5 h, similar to SAVR patients (4 +/- 5 h) (p = 0.13). The median intensive therapy unit stay was 1 +/- 1 days in both groups. The median hospital stay was comparable between groups (MSAVR, 7 +/- 5 days; SAVR, 8 +/- 4 days; p = 0.48). The MSAVR patients had a higher incidence of delayed pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis (n = 4; p = 0.031), but this did not affect survival. The 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (MSAVR group, n = 1 (1.6%); SAVR group, n = 3 (3.7%); p = 0.64). At five years after surgery, freedom from cardiac-related death was 96 +/- 2.6% in MSAVR patients, and 89 +/- 4.9% in SAVR patients (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Mini-sternotomy AVR is technically challenging with longer CPB and aortic cross-clamp times. However, with increasing surgical experience, it offers results comparable to those achieved with conventional AVR, and with acceptable cosmetic results.

Concomitant lung cancer resection and lung volume reduction surgery.

Patients who are offered concomitant surgery are highly selected and must satisfy the strict criteria set out for both LVRS and cancer surgery. Several evaluative processes have been reported for the selection of suitable patients. These various evaluative processes, together with the physical condition of the patient and the surgeon's experience, help to best select patients suitable for combined surgical resection. Several intraoperative strategies are available for dealing with a patient who has concomitant lung cancer and severe emphysema. The choice of technique depends on the location and size of the tumor, the severity and distribution of the emphysema, and the surgeon's experience and preference. Lung volume reduction surgery in well-selected patients who have severe emphysema results in postoperative improvement of symptoms and measured pulmonary function. The combination of lung cancer resection with LVRS offers selected patients who have concomitant early lung cancer and severe emphysema the opportunity to undergo resection of their cancer with improvement rather than further reduction in their pulmonary function. By traditional criteria these patients would otherwise be considered unsuitable surgical candidates because of the limited pulmonary function.

The role of extracorporeal life support in the management with severe idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension undergoing lung transplantation: are those patients referred too late?

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension (iPAH) is a relatively minor indication for lung transplantation (LTx) with comparatively poorer outcomes. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in various forms is increasingly being used in the management of this entity. However, the data and experience with this therapy remains limited. We evaluated the role of ECLS in the management of severe iPAH patients as a bridge to LTx as well as post LTx support. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of iPAH patients that received LTx between January 2007 and May 2014 was performed. Early- and mid-term outcomes were analyzed for this patient cohort. Also, early and mid-term outcomes after LTx were compared to the control group of patients with other diagnoses using unadjusted analysis and 1:3 propensity score matching. RESULTS: Of 321 LTx performed during the study period in our centre 15 patients had iPAH as a cause of end-stage lung disease. Four iPAH (27%) patients were bridged to LTx utilizing ECLS in the form of veno-arterial ECMO and extra-corporeal CO2 removal device, whereas 9 patients (60%) required ECLS support for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after surgery. Patients with iPAH required more frequently on-pump LTx, both pre and post LTx ECLS, and had significantly lower pO2/FiO2 ratio at 24, 48 and 72 hours after LTx. Also iPAH patients had significantly longer ICU and hospital stay. Whereas the incidence of postoperative bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and rejection was comparable to the control group, overall cumulative survival with up to 6 years follow-up was significantly poorer in the iPAH group. After propensity score matching, the results in terms of postoperative outcomes remained as in the unadjusted analysis. CONCLUSIONS: ECLS is an essential tool in the armamentarium of any lung transplant program treating iPAH with a potential of bridge patients to transplantation and to overcome graft dysfunction after LTx. Despite utilization of ECLS in the management of iPAH, the outcomes in terms of primary graft failure and survival remain poor compared to patients with other diagnoses.

Does furosemide prevent renal dysfunction in high-risk cardiac surgical patients? Results of a double-blinded prospective randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: Renal dysfunction following cardiac surgery is more apparent in high-risk patients with pre-existing renal dysfunction, diabetes and impaired left-ventricular function, and following complicated procedures involving prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this prospectively randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study was to evaluate reno-protective effect of low-dose furosemide infusion in this high-risk group. METHODS: Patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 micromol/l (1.4 mg/dl), left-ventricular ejection fraction <50%, congestive heart failure, diabetes, or procedures involving prolonged CPB were randomised to receive either saline at 2 ml/h (n=21), or furosemide at 4 mg/h (n=21). Infusion was commenced after induction of anaesthesia and continued for 12h postoperatively. Renal dysfunction was defined as >50% increase in serum creatinine postoperatively, or >130 micromol/l (1.4 mg/dl), or requirement for haemodialysis, or all of these. In patients with preoperative serum creatinine >130 micromol/l, >50% increase over preoperative levels was used to define postoperative renal dysfunction. RESULTS: Following cardiac surgery, patients receiving furosemide had a higher urine output (3.4+/-1.2 ml/kg/h in furosemide group and 1.2+/-0.5 ml/kg/h in placebo group; p<0.001), higher postoperative fluid requirement (4631+/-1359 ml in furosemide group and 3714+/-807 ml in placebo group, p=0.011), and lower urinary-creatinine (2+/-1.3 micromol/l in furosemide group and 5.9+/-2.5 micromol/l in placebo group p<0.001). Both groups had significant increase in retinol binding protein/creatinine ratio (7.2+/-6 to 3152+/-1411 in furosemide group; 4.9+/-2.1 to 2809+/-1125 in placebo group; p<0.001) and peak serum creatinine (98+/-33 to 177+/-123 micromol/l in furosemide group; 96+/-20 to 143+/-87 micromol/l in placebo group; p<0.001), and a significant decrease in peak creatinine-clearance (64.3+/-29.4 to 39.1+/-16.6 ml/min in furosemide group; 65.5+/-38.6 to 41.8+/-17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p<0.001) following cardiac surgery, implying significant renal injury following cardiac surgery. Peak creatinine levels (177+/-123 micromol/l in furosemide group and 143+/-87 micromol/l in placebo group; p=0.35) and peak creatinine-clearance (39.1+/-16.6 ml/min in furosemide group and 41.8+/-17.8 ml/min in placebo group; p=0.61) were similar in the two groups. Importantly, there was no difference in incidence of renal dysfunction between the furosemide group (9/21) and the control group (8/21) (relative risk 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.6-2.2; p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our randomised trial did not demonstrate any benefit of furosemide-infusion postoperatively in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. Although urinary output increased with furosemide, there was no decrease in renal injury, and no decrease in incidence of renal dysfunction.

Acute Traumatic Right to Left Cardiac Shunt.

Cardiac injuries after penetrating chest trauma are uncommon but potentially life threatening; these injuries can remain occult during the early stage because of the cardiac reserve of youthful physiology and may present at a later stage as the initial damage progresses or compensatory mechanisms fail. We report a case of unusual penetrating cardiac trauma from a posterior intercostal stab wound that affected both the interatrial septum and the tricuspid valve, leading to a stormy presentation as a result of the development of an acute right-to-left shunt followed by a successful surgical repair.

Cardiac surgery improves survival in advanced left ventricular dysfunction: multivariate analysis of a consecutive series of 4491 patients over an 18-year period.

OBJECTIVES: Risks of cardiac surgery in patients with poor [ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 30%] and very poor left ventricular (LV) function (EF ≤ 20%) may be considered high due to increased mortality. We examine our results in this cohort of patients. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed from 4491 consecutive patients referred for cardiac surgery over 18 years (July 1993-June 2012). Univariate predictors of in-hospital postoperative mortality were analysed by the appropriate tests. Variables with P < 0.1 were entered into multivariable logistic-regression model to identify predictors of in-hospital postoperative mortality, with data presented as odds ratios; P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Data on long-term survival and cardiac-specific mortality were obtained from the UK Office for National Statistics; the date of last follow-up was 13 October 2013 for the alive patients. Univariate predictors influencing cardiac death were determined by log-rank method. Variables with P < 0.1 were entered into multivariable Cox regression model to determine independent predictors of long-term survival, with data presented as hazard ratios; P < 0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Cardiac surgery was performed on 3890 consecutive patients (74.7% male, age 68.7 ± 8.1 years); 601 patients did not undergo surgery. Postoperative hospital mortality was 2.9% (n = 112/3890). Predictors of postoperative hospital mortality included age ≥ 70 years, female sex, hypertension, LVEF < 50%, neurological dysfunction, previous cardiac surgery, early time period 1993-1997, emergency procedures and triple procedures. All patients were followed until the date of last follow-up or date of death, with a median follow-up of 8.1 ± 7.6 years and a total follow-up of 33 208 years. There were 533 (13.7%) postoperative early and late deaths from cardiac causes. Predictors of long-term survival free from cardiac death included LVEF > 50%. Predictors of postoperative cardiac deaths in the long-term follow-up included older age, diabetes, neurological dysfunction, LVEF < 50%, non-coronary artery bypass surgery, early time period of surgery (1993-1997) and redo-cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac surgery provides long-term survival benefit in all subsets of LV function, including advanced LV dysfunction.

Pulmonary endarterectomy is effective and safe in patients with haemoglobinopathies and abnormal red blood cells: the Papworth experience.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with haemoglobinopathies and congenital haemolytic anaemia constitute a unique population more predisposed to developing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Although pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is accepted as the best treatment for CTEPH, PEA in these patients poses significant practical challenges. Apart from a few case reports, the results of PEA in this patient population have not been previously reported. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of PEA in this patient population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis, from our dedicated CTEPH database, of all patients who underwent PEA surgery and had abnormal haemoglobin or congenital haemolytic anaemia. We reviewed diagnosis, exchange transfusions on cardiopulmonary bypass, preoperative and postoperative pulmonary haemodynamic and functional data and outcomes for this group. Paired data analysis was performed by Student's t-test; P < 0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Between the start of our PEA programme in 1997 and April 2015, we performed PEA in 19 patients with haemoglobinopathy or congenital haemolytic anaemia. The mean age was 52 ± 15 years. There were 9 patients with sickle cell trait, 2 with coexisting alpha+ thalassaemia trait, 2 patients with HbSC disease, 2 patients with beta-thalassaemia major, 3 patients with hereditary spherocytosis, 2 patients with stomatocytosis (one with the cryohydrocytosis subtype) and 1 patient with HbC trait. In the 9 HbAS patients, the mean HbS% was 31.9 ± 6%, and in the HbSC patients, the mean HbS% was 46.5 ± 1.3% preoperatively. To reduce this HbS to ≤20%, for safe PEA with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, we used exchange blood transfusion. Immediately postoperatively, there was a significant improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance (938 ± 462 to 260 ± 167 dyne s cm(-5); P < 0.0001). One patient died 81 days following surgery; 18 patients are alive at a median follow-up of 3.4 ± 3 years. Six months postoperatively, the patients showed significant improvement in New York Heart Association status (P < 0.0001), and in 6-min walk distance from 251 ± 111 to 399 ± 69 m (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results of PEA in this complex patient group were satisfactory. Expert haematological advice is important and exchange blood transfusions may be necessary. The presence of abnormal haemoglobin does not contra-indicate PEA surgery.

Surgical Strategy for Lung Transplantation in Adults With Small Chests: Lobar Transplant Versus a Pediatric Donor.

BACKGROUND: Adult lung transplant recipients with small chests have traditionally received lungs from pediatric donors, placing an additional strain on the already restricted pediatric donor pool. Performing lobar lung transplantation (LLT) can circumvent issues with donor-recipient size mismatch; however, LLT imparts additional risks. Here, we review our experience using LLT and standard lung transplantation using a pediatric donor (PDLT) for adults with small chests. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with end-stage lung disease and a height of 65 inches or less who underwent LLT (n = 15) or PDLT (n = 15) between 2006 and 2012 at our institution, a high-volume lung transplant center. RESULTS: Lobar lung transplantation recipients were older (54 ± 10 vs 48 ± 8 years) and had higher pulmonary pressure (57 ± 11 vs 52 ± 27 mmHg) and higher lung allocation scores (70 ± 9 vs 51 ± 8) than PDLT recipients (all P < 0.05). Mean waiting time was 62 days for PDLT and 9 days for LLT. Postoperatively, the incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction and the incidence of acute renal insufficiency were higher, and the mean intensive care unit stay was longer in the LLT group, but the incidence of bronchial anastomotic complications was higher in the PDLT group because of significant size discrepancy in the main bronchus (P < 0.05). Interestingly, long-term functional outcomes and survival rates were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both LLT and PDLT are viable surgical options for adult patients with small chests. Because of the potential impact on posttransplant outcomes, the technical complexity of transplantation, decisions regarding the best surgical approach should be made by experienced surgeons.