The effect of HIV and mpox co-infection on clinical outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Co-infection with HIV and mpox is a significant issue for public health because of the potential combined impact on clinical outcomes. However, the existing literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis of the available evidence. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to provide insight into the impact of HIV and mpox co-infection on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We systematically searched major electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science) for pertinent studies published up to June 2023. Included were studies that described the clinical outcomes of people who had both mpox and HIV. We performed the analysis using OpenMeta and STATA 17 software. RESULTS: With an overall number of participants of 35 207, 21 studies that met the inclusion criteria were considered. The greatest number of the studies (n = 10) were cohort designs, with three being cross-sectional and eight being case series studies. The meta-analysis found that people who had both HIV and mpox had a higher hospitalization rate than those who only had mpox (odds ratio [OR] 1.848; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.918-3.719, p = 0.085, I2 = 60.19%, p = 0.020). Furthermore, co-infected patients had higher mortality rates than those who did not have HIV co-infection (OR 3.887; 95% CI 2.272-6.650, p < 0.001). Meta-regression analysis showed that CD4 levels can significantly predict the risk of hospitalization (p = 0.016) and death (p = 0.031). DISCUSSION: HIV causes immunosuppression, making it difficult for the body to mount an effective immune response against pathogens such as mpox. Individuals who are co-infected are at a higher risk of severe disease and death, according to our findings. Although hospitalization rates did not differ significantly between the two groups, it is critical to prioritize interventions and improve management strategies tailored specifically for people living with HIV. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides substantial evidence that HIV and mpox co-infection has a negative impact on clinical outcomes. Co-infected individuals had higher hospitalization and significantly higher mortality rates. These findings highlight the significance of early diagnosis, prompt treatment initiation, and effective management strategies for people living with HIV and mpox.

Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic polypectomy is an excellent tool for colon cancer prevention. With the innovation of novel resection techniques, the best method is still being investigated. Hence, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) versus hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for colorectal polyp resection. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL until July 16, 2022. We pooled dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding CI. This review's protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022347496. RESULTS: We included 18 randomized controlled trials with a total of 4317 patients and 7509 polyps. Pooled RR favored HSP regarding the complete resection rate (RR: 0.96 with 95% CI: 0.95, 1, P = 0.03) and local recurrence incidence (RR: 5.74 with 95% CI: 1.27, 25.8, P = 0.02). Pooled RR favored CSP regarding the colonoscopy time (mean difference: -6.50 with 95% CI: -7.55, -5.44, P = 0.00001) and polypectomy time (mean difference: -57.36 with 95% CI: -81.74, -32.98, P = 0.00001). There was no difference regarding the incidence of immediate bleeding ( P = 0.06) and perforation ( P = 0.39); however, HSP was associated with more incidence of delayed bleeding ( P = 0.01), abdominal pain ( P = 0.007), and postresection syndrome ( P = 0.02). DISCUSSION: HSP is associated with a higher complete resection and lower recurrence rates; however, HSP is also associated with a higher incidence of adverse events. Therefore, improving the complete resection rate with CSP still warrants more innovation, giving the technique safety and shorter procedure duration.

The efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: an updated systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Tenecteplase (TNK) is a promising candidate to replace alteplase as the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, the optimal dosage is still to be investigated. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TNK versus alteplase and to investigate the optimal TNK dosage. A systematic review, pairwise, and network meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and PubMed until July 26th, 2022. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We registered our protocol in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022352038. Nine RCTs with a total of 3,707 patients were included. TNK significantly led to complete recanalization (RR: 1.27 with 95% CI [1.02, 1.57], P = 0.03); however, we found no difference regarding early neurological improvement (RR: 1.07 with 95% CI [0.94, 1.21], P = 0.33) and excellent neurological recovery (RR: 1.03 with 95% CI [0.96, 1.10], P = 0.42). Also, TNK was similar to alteplase regarding mortality (RR: 0.99 with 95% CI [0.82, 1.18], P = 0.88), intracranial haemorrhage (RR: 1.00 with 95% CI [0.85, 1.18], P = 0.99), and parenchymal hematoma (RR: 1.13 with 95% CI [0.83, 1.54], P = 0.44). TNK in the dose of 0.25 mg is a viable candidate to displace alteplase as the standard of care in patients with an AIS within 4.5 h of presentation due to its better rate of early neurological recovery and non-inferiority in terms of safety outcomes. However, the evidence regarding TNK's role in AIS presenting after 4.5 h from symptoms onset, wake-up stroke, and minor stroke/TIA is still lacking, necessitating further double-blinded pragmatic RCTs in this regard.

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of different treatments in reducing amniocentesis-associated pain and anxiety.

OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis compared different methods to determine which is most efficient at lowering pain and anxiety in women undergoing amniocentesis. METHOD: We looked through all published randomized controlled trials in the databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EM base. Anxiety and pain were the predominant results. We used the R software version 4.2.1 to analyze the data. RESULTS: We included a total of 20 studies, with sample sizes ranging from 60 to 570. Virtual reality was the most effective strategy for lowering pain during AC [MD = -1.30, 95% CI (-2.11, -0.49)]. In addition, paracetamol use was the most successful approach for lowering pain following AC [MD = -1.68, 95% CI (-1.99, -1.37)]. The use of H7 acupressure, however, was the strategy that significantly reduced anxiety following AC [SMD = -15.46, 95% CI (-17.77, -13.15)]. CONCLUSION: The most effective method for reducing pain is the combination of virtual reality with paracetamol. Whereas, the most effective way to reduce anxiety is to combine an ice gel pack with H7 acupressure before applying AC.

Olokizumab's Effectiveness and Safety in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: In the development of rheumatoid arthritis, the cytokine interleukin-6 plays a role. An interleukin-6 cytokine-specific monoclonal antibody called olokizumab directly targets this cytokine. OKZ effectiveness and safety are being evaluated through this meta-analysis. METHOD: I looked up every published randomized controlled study on Clinicaltrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and PubMed. I conducted the study using both the Mantel-Haenszel and inverse variance approaches. I evaluated bias in the included studies using the risk of bias tool 2. RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, five trials totalling 2227 participants, were examined. In contrast to the placebo group, the olokizumab group had a significantly higher incidence of American College of Rheumatology 20; RR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.69, 1.99], P < 0.00001. Regarding Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index improvement, olokizumab significantly outperformed the placebo group; MD = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.32, -0.24], P < 0.00001. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was significantly higher in the olokizumab group than in the placebo group; RR = 1.10, 95% CI [1.04, 1.17], P = 0.0006. Furthermore, the incidence of treatment-emergent serious adverse events did not differ significantly between the olokizumab group and the placebo group; RR = 0.85, 95% CI [0.60, 1.20], P = 0.35. CONCLUSION: In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, olokizumab combined methotrexate is well tolerated and more effective than placebo plus methotrexate.

The efficacy of oxytocin gel in postmenopausal women with vaginal atrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common and disturbing issue in the postmenopausal period. Unlike vasomotor symptoms, it has a progressive trend. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxytocin gel versus placebo gel in postmenopausal women with GSM. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases on January 18, 2023. Keywords such as "oxytocin," "intravaginal," "vaginal," "atrophic," and "atrophy" were used. We used Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4 in our analysis. We used the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes; both were presented with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and were calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance statistical method. Cochrane's Q test and the I2 statistic were used as measures of statistical inconsistency and heterogeneity. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs was used for the quality assessment of the included studies. RESULTS: Seven studies with 631 patients were included. Regarding the maturation index, there was a statistically insignificant increase in the oxytocin arm (MD = 12.34, 95% CI (-12.52-37.19), P = 0.33). Clinically assessed vaginal atrophy showed a statistically significant reduction in the oxytocin group (RR = 0.32, 95% CI (0.23 - 0.10), P < 0.00001). For dyspareunia, vaginal pH, and histological evaluation of vaginal atrophy, there was a statistically insignificant difference between the two groups (RR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.82-1.27), P = 0.84), (MD = -0.74, 95% CI (-1.58-0.10), P = 0.08), and (MD = -0.38, 95% CI (-0.82-0.06), P = 0.09), respectively. There was no significant difference in the safety profile between the two groups as measured by endometrial thickness (MD = 0.00, 95% CI (-0.23-0.23), P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Although oxytocin has been proposed as a viable alternative to estrogen in the treatment of GSM, our findings show the opposite. Larger, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm or refute our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42022334357.

Study of aqueous humour inflammatory mediators' levels in a cohort of Egyptian patients with diabetic macular oedema.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to study aqueous humour inflammatory mediators' levels in a cohort of Egyptian patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). METHODS: This was a case-control prospective study conducted on 2 groups: 25 eyes of 22 (11 females) patients seeking treatment for DMO as patients group, and 10 eyes of 10 (4 females) cataract patients as a control group. Aqueous humour was aspirated before intravitreal injection (patients' group) or cataract surgery (control group). Inflammatory mediators in aqueous humour were measured using a multiplex bead immunoassay kit of 27 pre-mixed cytokines. RESULTS: Eotaxin, interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) and interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) were found significantly higher in patients' group compared to control group (p = 0.043, 0.037, 0.001, 0.015 respectively). On the contrary, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were found significantly higher in control group than patients' group (p = 0.003, 0.019 respectively). Basic fibroblast growth factor (Basic-FGF/FGF-2) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) were found higher (but not statistically significant) in controls (p = 0.100 and 0.070 respectively). Additionally, a negative and significant correlation was found between Eotaxin level in aqueous humour and central macular thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Some mediators might be implicated in the pathogenesis of DMO either augmenting or suppressing role. Eotaxin, IP-10, MCP-1 and IL-8 might have a role in cases not responding to standard anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. IL-1ra might have a protective role; therefore, the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of IL-1ra homologue needs to be studied in future clinical trials.

Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour.

The Manipal Cervical Scoring System is an accurate and objective sonographic score that predicts the outcome of induced labour. The aim of the current study was to compare the performance of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System against the Bishop Score. A prospective study was conducted on 105 women underwent labour induction in Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Both scores were assessed pre-induction. Successful induction occurred in 78.09% of the cases. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was of 0.940 (95% CI = 0.876 to 0.977; p value <.0001) for the Manipal Score and 0.863 (95% CI = 0.783-0.923; p value <.0001) for the Bishop Score. The Manipal Score >5 had a sensitivity of 91.5% and a specificity of 91.3%. While the Bishop score >4 had a sensitivity of 98.8% and specificity of 69.6% to predict the outcome of induced labour. The Manipal Cervical Scoring system is a better objective tool to predict the outcome of labour induction compared to the Bishop Score. However, other female and fetal characteristics, including body mass index (BMI) at gestation, gestational weight gain, occiput position and parity should be taken into consideration when performing labour induction. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? The ultimate fate of 20% of women having an induction of labour (IOL) is a Caesarean delivery. Thus, predicting the possible response to IOL before starting induction could guide clinicians to determine the efficacy of starting and/or continuing the induction process and in counselling women regarding the possible response to IOL. The main predictor for IOL outcome is based on the pre-induction cervical status which has been traditionally assessed by the Bishop Score. However, the Bishop Score remains subjective, thereby, associated with high rates of bias and several studies have demonstrated its poor predictive value for the outcome of induction. What do the results of this study add? Proposed use of ultrasound parameters that are equivalent to Bishop Score will be objective, reliable and reproducible method. It allows for patient re-evaluation by other obstetricians without the need for re-examination (thus decreasing exposing the patient to pain and anxiety). What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? According to WHO and FIGO, oral misoprostol (25 µg, 2-hourly) is recommended for induction of labour. This helps to decrease the discomfort of repeated vaginal examination and increases the women satisfaction with labour process, especially in women at higher risk of infection. Thus evaluating cervical status using an ultrasound cervical scoring system can similarly increase women's satisfaction with labour process. Our goal in the upcoming trial is to perform RCT comparing ultrasound versus Bishop in women undergoing IOL using oral misopristol regarding measures of satisfaction during labour in the parturient women.

Laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy in high inguinal undescended testes, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Traditional open orchiopexy remains the standard treatment for palpable undescended testicles (UDT). However, laparoscopic orchiopexy has recently gained attention as an alternative approach. AIM AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open orchiopexy for high-inguinal undescended testes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized comparative study was conducted, involving 208 children with high inguinal undescended testes. The patients were divided into two groups: group A (104 patients) underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy and group B (104 patients) underwent open orchiopexy. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the final testicular position between the two groups. The follow-up after 1 year showed that 100% of patients in group A had a lower testicular position, compared to 72.6% in group B. Laparoscopic orchiopexy demonstrated better outcomes in terms of achieving a lower testicular position. CONCLUSION: Both Laparoscopic and Open Orchiopexy are safe and effective for the treatment of high inguinal undescended testes. However, Laparoscopic Orchiopexy was superior to Open Orchiopexy because it was associated with better outcomes with regard to the final testicular position at the bottom of the scrotum or at a lower level below the mid-scrotal point.

The effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review to examine the efficacy of intensive blood pressure lowering on the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE for all relevant randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. We used the risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval as our effect sizes. Results: Four studies, comprising 20,747 patients, were included. Intensive blood pressure lowering was linked with a diminished LVH incidence (RR: 0.66, 95% CI [0.56-0.77]). We also found that intensive blood pressure lowering increased the risk of LVH regression in patients with baseline LVH (RR: 1.21, 95% CI [1.11-1.32]). Finally, intensive blood pressure lowering was linked with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (HR: 0.71, 95% CI [0.60-0.85]). No significant heterogeneity was seen in either outcome. Conclusion: Our study suggests that intensive blood pressure lowering effectively reduces the risk of LVH and cardiovascular disease. An interactive version of our analysis can be accessed here: https://databoard.shinyapps.io/lvh_hypertophy/.

The efficacy and safety of pre-hospital plasma in patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Plasma is a critical element in hemostatic resuscitation post-injury, and its prompt administration within the prehospital setting may reduce the complications resulting from hemorrhage and shock. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of prehospital plasma infusion in patients susceptible to hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: We conducted our study by aggregating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 29, 2023. Quality assessment was implemented using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Our study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under ID: CRD42023397325. RESULTS: Three RCTs with 760 individuals were included. There was no difference between plasma infusion and standard care groups in 24-h mortality (P = 0.11), 30-day mortality (P = 0.12), and multiple organ failure incidences (P = 0.20). Plasma infusion was significantly better in the total 24-h volume of PRBC units (P = 0.03) and INR on arrival (P = 0.009). For all other secondary outcomes evaluated (total 24-h volume of packed FFP units, total 24-h volume of platelets units, massive transfusion, vasopressor need during the first 24 h, any adverse event, acute lung injury, transfusion reaction, and sepsis), no significant differences were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Plasma infusion in trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock does not significantly affect mortality or the incidence of multiple organ failure. However, it may lead to reduced packed red blood cell transfusions and increased INR at hospital arrival.

The efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin epicardial fat injection to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is prevalent in about 30% to 60% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, leading to worse outcomes. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX) epicardial injection has been proposed to prevent POAF by impairing cholinergic signaling. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials, which were retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through November 23, 2022. RevMan version 5.4 was used to pool dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD) presented with the corresponding confidence interval (CI). Results: Three randomized controlled trials with 509 patients (308 in the BTX group and 205 in the placebo group) were included in the analysis. There was no difference between BTX and placebo regarding POAF incidence (RR 0.81 with 95% CI [0.65, 1.00], P = 0.05), postoperative hospital length of stay in days (MD -0.03 with 95% CI [-0.54, 0.49], P = 0.91), all-cause mortality (RR 1.64 with 95% CI [0.22, 12.17], P = 0.63), any adverse event (RR 1.03 with 95% CI [0.94, 1.12], P = 0.51), or any serious adverse event (RR 0.89 with 95% CI [0.68, 1.15], P = 0.36). Conclusion: There was no difference between the epicardial fat injection of BTX versus placebo for preventing POAF.

Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators for heart failure: a network meta-analysis and subgroup analyses of reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators have been investigated for heart failure (HF) in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, its place in the management guidelines of either HFrEF or HfpEF is still inconclusive. METHODS: We conducted a network meta-analysis synthesizing RCTs investigating sGC for HF management, which were retrieved by systematically searching five databases until January 24th, 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratio (RR) along with confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Eight RCTs with a total of 7307 patients were included. Vericiguat 10 mg significantly reduced the composite cardiovascular (CVS) mortality and HF hospitalization in HF (RR: 0.88, 95% CI [0.79; 0.98]) and in HFrEF (RR: 0.87, 95% CI [0.78; 0.97]); however, it was not effective in HFpEF (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.15; 3.05]). Also, vericiguat 10 mg showed no difference compared to placebo regarding the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.84; 1.10]), any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 0.94, 95% CI [0.83; 1.07]), any serious AEs (RR: 0.91, 95% CI [0.81; 1.01]), and any AEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 1.14, 95% CI [0.92; 1.40]). CONCLUSION: Vericiguat 10 mg was effective in reducing the composite CVS mortality and HF hospitalization, with an acceptable safety profile. This was only observed in HFrEF patients, but not in HFpEF patients. However, our data regarding other agents (riociguat and praliciguat) and HFpEF can be underpowered, warranting further RCTs to clarify vericiguat 10 mg place in HFrEF management guidelines and to investigate sGC stimulators for HFpEF in large-scale trials.

Intensive Blood Pressure Control After Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Optimal clinical outcome with successful recanalization from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) requires optimal blood pressure (BP) management. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intensive BP target (< 140 mm Hg) versus the standard BP target (< 180 mm Hg) after EVT for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until September 7th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023463206. RESULTS: We included four RCTs with 1559 patients. There was no difference between intensive BP and standard BP targets regarding the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) change after 24 h [MD: 0.44 with 95% CI (0.0, 0.87), P = 0.05]. However, the intensive BP target was significantly associated with a decreased risk of excellent neurological recovery (mRS ≤ 1) [RR: 0.87 with 95% CI (0.76, 0.99), P = 0.03], functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) [RR: 0.81 with 95% CI (0.73, 0.90), P = 0.0001] and independent ambulation (mRS ≤ 3) [RR: 0.85 with 95% CI (0.79, 0.92), P < 0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: An intensive BP target after EVT is associated with worse neurological recovery and significantly decreased rates of functional independence and independent ambulation compared to the standard BP target. Therefore, the intensive BP target should be avoided after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

Efficacy of orlistat in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Objective: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a significant contributor to chronic liver disease worldwide. Orlistat blocks intestinal fat absorption, leading to decreased liver fat content. Therefore, it is a viable option for NAFLD management. Methods: We performed a systematic review and metaanalysis using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used mean difference (MD) to pool continuous outcomes presented with the corresponding confidence interval (CI). Results: We included four RCTs with a total of 379 patients. Orlistat was effective in reducing liver fat content (MD: -5.02, 95% CI [-7.23, -2.82], P = 0.00001), alanine transferase (MD: -10.03, 95% CI [-17.80, -2.26], P = 0.01), aspartate transferase (MD: -4.29, 95% CI [-7.59, -0.99], P = 0.01), waist circumference (MD: -3.18, 95% CI [-4.25, -2.10], P = 0.00001), body mass index (MD: -1.03, 95% CI [-1.34, -0.73], P = 0.00001), total cholesterol (MD: -3.75, 95% CI [-4.02, -3.49], P = 0.00001), and low-density lipoprotein (MD: -3.83, 95% CI [-4.05, -3.61], P = 0.00001). However, orlistat was associated with increased serum triglycerides (MD: 7.46, 95% CI [6.48, 8.44], P = 0. 00001). Conclusion: Orlistat is a viable option for NAFLD management; however, it increases triglyceride levels. Larger RCTs are required.

Safety and immunogenicity of Vi-diphtheria toxoid typhoid conjugate vaccine among children below 2 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The Vi-diphtheria toxoid typhoid conjugate vaccine (Vi-DT) has shown promising results in preventing typhoid fever in children under 2 years of age. However, a thorough assessment of its safety and immunogenicity is required to inform vaccination strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety and immunogenicity of Vi-DT in children below 2 years. Methods: We systematically searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, for relevant studies published up to September 2023. We included studies reporting on the safety and immunogenicity outcomes of Vi-DT compared to the control or Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugated vaccine (Vi-TT) in children below 2 years. We applied a random-effects model for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. We expressed the results as risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results: In this analysis, five studies were selected, encompassing 1,292 children under 2 years who received the Vi-DT vaccine. No significant difference in immediate reactions was observed within 30 min post-vaccination between Vi-DT and control groups (RR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.19, 5.26]), nor between Vi-DT and Vi-TT groups. For solicited adverse events within 4 weeks, the VI-DT group showed no significant increase in adverse events compared to control (RR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.78, 1.12]) or Vi-TT (RR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.69, 1.07]). Similarly, within 7 days post-vaccination, risk ratios indicated no significant differences in adverse events between the groups. The 4-week seroconversion rate was significantly higher in the Vi-DT group compared to the control (RR: 1.99 [95% CI: 1.07, 3.69]), but no difference was found between Vi-DT and Vi-TT. Adverse events associated with typhoid conjugate vaccines were predominantly non-serious, including fever and injection site reactions. Serious adverse events were rare but included conditions like pneumonia and gastroenteritis. Conclusion: This meta-analysis highlights Vi-DT safety and immunogenicity in six to 24-month-old children. The findings support the use of this Vi-DT to expand typhoid vaccination in endemic regions, in line with WHO's strategy.

Effectiveness and safety of baricitinib in patients with alopecia areata: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Since there is now no medication available that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune condition that has a detrimental impact on individuals. Recent clinical trials using baricitinib demonstrated that it may be effective in treating AA. This meta-analysis was done to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of baricitinib in comparison to placebo. METHODS: Author looked through Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, for all published, randomized, clinical trials. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 1282 participants from two citations (reporting three stand-alone studies). In term of SALT score, baricitinib significantly outperformed placebo; MD = -34.07, 95% CI [-37.90, -30.23], p < .00001. Additionally, the proportion of patients in the baricitinib group that attained SALT ≤ 20 was significantly higher than in the placebo group; RR = 6.41, 95% CI [4.57, 8.98], p < .00001. The results of the safety analysis revealed no significant differences between the baricitinib and placebo groups for any of the outcomes with the exception of acne, which was significantly higher in the placebo group when compared to the baricitinib group (RR= 4.79, 95% CI [2.38, 9.66], p .0001). CONCLUSION: When compared to placebo, baricitinib is an effective and well-tolerated medication for the treatment of AA.

Meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in psoriatic arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: A persistent immune-mediated inflammatory disorder called psoriatic arthritis affects about 25% of persons with psoriasis. Bimekizumab, a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody, is a novel therapeutic approach that inhibits homodimers and heterodimers of IL-17A and IL-17F by binding to comparable locations in these molecules. Bimekizumab was the subject of a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy and safety in psoriatic arthritis patients. METHODS: All randomized clinical trials were looked up on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The Systematic Review Accelerator tool was used to screen them, and RevMan was used to analyze them. The Mean Difference (MD) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to examine continuous data, whereas the Risk Ratio (RR) and 95% CI were used to evaluate dichotomous data. RESULTS: A total of 1364 participants from 4 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The number of participants who met the American College of Rheumatology 50 threshold was significantly higher in the bimekizumab group compared to the placebo group [RR = 4.94, 95% CI (3.73, 6.55), p < .00001]. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100 was achieved by significantly more people in the bimekizumab group than in the placebo group [RR = 11.45, 95% CI (6.67, 19.67), p < .00001]. There was no significant difference between the bimekizumab group and the placebo group in terms of treatment-emergent adverse events [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (0.97, 1.21), p = .15]. CONCLUSION: In comparison to a placebo, bimekizumab treatment significantly improved joint and skin efficacy outcomes. Also, its safety results were acceptable.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: SLE is an autoimmune disease marked by broad immunological dysregulation and multi-system inflammation. Baricitinib is one of the novel treatments for SLE. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and effectiveness in treating SLE. METHOD: We looked for all published randomized controlled trials in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and included all RCTs comparing baricitinib and placebo in the treatment of SLE. Review Manager 5.4 program was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Three trials with a total of 1849 individuals were included. Participants in the baricitinib group were significantly more likely to attain SRI-4 response than those in the placebo group [RR = 1.11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P = 0.01]. Additionally, baricitinib performed better than the placebo in terms of reduction of ≥ 4 points from baseline in SLEDAI-2 K score [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (1.04, 1.22), P = 0.004]. In terms of SLEDAI-2 K remission of arthritis or rash, baricitinib was also superior to placebo [RR = 1.08, 95% CI (1.00, 1.17), P = 0.04]. Treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ significantly [RR = 1.01, 95% CI (0.97, 1.05), P = 0.61]. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib is potentially safe and effective in the treatment of SLE. It has successfully met the study's primary endpoint and some secondary endpoints highlighting its potential to improve the outcomes of SLE. Despite achieving an SRI-4 response, glucocorticoids sparing and some other secondary outcomes weren't reached by baricitinib.

The effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on the cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antihypertensive drugs are one of the most effective strategies to prevent disability and mortality; however, there have been contradictory findings about the best dosing time for antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS: We synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from the Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until 13 October 2022. The risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022368612. RESULTS: Five RCTs with 59 200 participants were included. Bedtime dosing was significantly associated with less incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.70-0.91), P = 0.0007] compared with morning dosing; however, there was no statistically significant difference between bedtime and morning dosing, regarding all-cause mortality [RR: 0.77 with 95% CI (0.51-1.16), P = 0.21], cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.65 with 95% CI (0.35-1.21), P = 0.17], major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56-1.10), P = 0.16], heart failure [RR: 0.68 with 95% CI (0.42-1.09), P = 0.11], cerebrovascular accidents [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.53-1.22), P = 0.30], coronary revascularization [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.50-1.24), P = 0.30}, and angina [RR: 0.91 with 95% CI (0.55-1.50), P = 0.70]. CONCLUSION: Evidence about the comparative efficacy of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensives is still uncertain. However, bedtime dosing significantly reduced MI, which warrants more robust RCTs to validate.