Incidence of endodontic therapy after complete or partial coverage glass-ceramic restorations with a follow-up time of over 30 years: A prospective clinical study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term clinical data are lacking on the comparison of the incidence of endodontic therapy in adhesively luted complete and partial coverage glass-ceramic restorations, as well as on the effect of technique and clinical variables. PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to assess the long-term incidence of teeth requiring endodontic therapy after receiving either complete or partial coverage glass-ceramic restorations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants requiring single anterior complete, posterior complete, or posterior partial (inlay or onlay) coverage restoration, or a combination of these on a vital tooth were recruited from a clinical private practice. Only the participants who chose glass-ceramic partial and complete coverage restorations without the need of endodontic therapy were included in the study. The overall clinical performance of these glass-ceramic restorations was assessed by clinical factors determined at recall. The effect of various clinical parameters (type of restoration, dental arch, tooth position in the dental arch, age and sex of participant, and ceramic thickness) was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier survival curves to account for attrition bias and other reasons for failure. The statistical significance of differences between parameters was determined by using the log rank test (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 1800 participants requiring 4511 glass-ceramic anterior and posterior restorations were evaluated. The mean age of the participants at the time of restoration placement was 62 (range 20 to 99 years, 710 men and 1090 women). Of 4511 restorations, 1476 were anterior complete coverage, 2119 posterior complete coverage, and 916 posterior partial coverage. Endodontic therapy after restoration placement was needed for 76 restorations (10 anterior complete, 50 posterior complete, and 16 posterior partial). The total time at risk was 50 436 years providing an estimated need for endodontic therapy risk of 0.15% per year. The estimated 35-year cumulative survival was 97.36%. The majority of endodontic treatments (67%, 52/76) occurred in the first 5 years. The estimated cumulative survival of anterior complete coverage, posterior complete coverage, posterior partial inlay, and posterior partial onlay restorations was 98.89% (n=1476, 10 endodontic treatments), 96.38% (n=2119, 50 endodontic treatments), 96.78% (n=553, 11 endodontic treatments), and 98.53% (n=363, 5 endodontic treatments), respectively. Statistically significant differences occurred between anterior complete coverage, posterior complete coverage, and posterior partial coverage inlay restorations, with a higher incidence in posterior complete coverage and posterior partial inlay restorations (P<.05). First molars had the highest rate of endodontic therapy after restoration in both arches. Age and restoration thickness were significant factors, recording statistically higher number of endodontic treatments in participants >52 years and restorations with all surfaces ≥1 mm (P<.05). Other clinical variables, dental arch and sex of the participants, were not significantly related to endodontic treatments (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical performance of 4511 units over 30 years in service was excellent, with the estimated cumulative survival of 97.36%. Posterior complete coverage and posterior partial inlay restorations had a significantly higher need for endodontic therapy than anterior complete coverage restorations. Their overall clinical performance relative to endodontic treatment was excellent with a cumulative survival of 96.38% and 96.78% over 30 years. There was no difference in the endodontic treatment rate between posterior complete and partial coverage restorations. Thickness of the restoration affected the endodontic treatment rate, with ≥1 mm resulting in higher incidence. The age of the participants influenced the endodontic treatment rate, with higher incidence in the >52-year age group. Other confounding clinical variables did not have a significant effect on the endodontic treatment rate.

Comparison of 16.9-year survival of pressed acid etched e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic complete and partial coverage restorations in posterior teeth: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and thickness of ceramic material.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term clinical data are lacking on the comparison of the survival of adhesively luted pressed e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic complete and partial coverage restorations in posterior dentitions and the effect that different technical and clinical variables have on their survival. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to examine and compare the 16.9-year survival of posterior pressed e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic complete and partial coverage restorations and associated clinical parameters on the outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients requiring either single-unit posterior defect-specific partial coverage or complete coverage restorations were recruited in a clinical private practice. The participants were offered the options of direct restorations, partial coverage cast gold, or glass-ceramic (lithium disilicate) restorations. Those requiring complete coverage restorations were given the options of complete cast gold, metal-ceramic, or glass-ceramic restorations. Only participants who chose glass-ceramic partial and complete coverage restorations were included in the study. The overall survival of the glass-ceramic restorations was assessed by the clinical factors determined at recall. The effect of various clinical parameters (type of restoration, dental arch, tooth position in the dental arch, age and sex of participant, and ceramic thickness) was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier survival curves to account for attrition bias and other reasons for failure. The statistical significance of differences between parameters was determined using the log rank test (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 738 participants requiring 2392 lithium disilicate restorations in posterior teeth were evaluated. The mean age of the participants at the time of restoration placement was 62 (range: 20-99 years, 302 men and 436 women). Of 2392 units, 1782 were complete and 610 were partial coverage restorations. A total of 22 failures (bulk fracture or large chip) requiring replacement were recorded with the average time to failure 3.5 (0.02-7.9) years. The total time at risk computed for these units was 13227.9 years, providing an estimated failure risk of 0.17% per year. The 16.9-year estimated cumulative survival was 96.49%. The estimated cumulative survival of posterior complete (n=1782) and posterior partial coverage restorations (n=610) was 96.75% at 10.5 years and 95.27% at 16.9 years (P<.05). Of the 22, 16 failures were recorded for the complete coverage restorations. The total time at risk for these restorations was 10144.5 years, providing an estimated risk of 0.16 per year. The other 6 failures recorded occurred for the partial coverage restorations. The total time at risk for these restorations was 3083.5 years, providing an estimated risk of 0.19% per year. No statistically significant difference was found in the survival of posterior complete and partial coverage restorations among men and women, different age groups, or posterior tooth position in the dental arch (P>.05). The thickness of the restoration also had no influence on the survival of glass-ceramic posterior restorations (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pressed e.max lithium disilicate complete and partial coverage restorations showed high survival rates in posterior teeth over a 16.9-year period, with an overall failure rate of 0.17% per year. Risk of failure at any age was low for both men and women. No statistically significant difference was found in the survival of complete and partial coverage restorations, and none of the confounding variables, including the thickness of the restoration, appeared to have a significant effect on survival.

10.9-year survival of pressed acid etched monolithic e.max lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and the type of partial coverage restoration (inlay or onlay).

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term clinical data on the survival of pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic when used with partial coverage restorations and the effect that different technical and clinical variables have on survival are sparse. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the 10.9-year survival of pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations and associated clinical parameters on outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Individuals requiring single unit defect-specific partial coverage restorations in any area of the mouth were recruited in a clinical private practice. Participants were offered the options of partial coverage cast gold or glass-ceramic (lithium disilicate) restorations. Only participants that chose glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations were included in the study. The overall survival of the glass-ceramic restorations was assessed by the clinical factors (participant's age, sex, dental arch, tooth position in dental arch, type of partial coverage restoration, and ceramic thickness) determined at recall. The effect of this clinical parameters was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier survival curves accounting for attrition bias and other reasons for failure. The statistical significance of differences between parameters was determined by using the log rank test (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 304 participants requiring 556 lithium disilicate restorations were evaluated. The mean age for the participant at the time of restoration placement was 62 with a range of 20 to 99 years, 120 were men and 184 were women. A total of 6 failures (bulk fracture or large chip) requiring replacement were recorded with the average time to failure of 2.4 (0.8-9.2) years. The total time at risk computed for these units was 1978.9 years providing an estimated failure risk of 0.3% per year. The 10-year estimated cumulative survival was 95.6%. The estimated cumulative survival of inlays (n=246) and onlays (n=305) were 93.9% and 98.3%, at 9.9 and 9.8 years, respectively (P<.05). Of the 6, there were 3 failures recorded for the partial coverage inlay restorations. The total time at risk for these inlays was 786.79 years providing an estimated risk of 0.38% per year. The other 3 failures recorded occurred for the partial coverage onlay restorations. The total time at risk for the onlays was 1032.17 years providing an estimated risk of 0.29% per year. The failures occurred in the molar region only. There were no failures recorded for the anterior partial coverage inlays (n=5). The total time at risk computed for the anterior units was 21.55 years providing an estimated risk of 0% per year. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of partial coverage restorations among men and women, different age groups, or position in the dental arch. The thickness of the restoration had no influence on the survival of glass-ceramic partial coverage restorations. CONCLUSIONS: Pressed lithium disilicate defect-specific partial coverage restorations reported high survival rate over the 10.9-year period with an overall failure rate of 0.3% per year and limited to the molar teeth. Risk of failure at any age was minimal for both men and women.

Ten-year survival of pressed, acid-etched e.max lithium disilicate monolithic and bilayered complete-coverage restorations: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position and age.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Long-term clinical data on the survival of pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations and the effect that different technical and clinical variables have on survival are lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to examine the 10-year survival of pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations and the relationship between clinical parameters on outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five hundred and fifty-six patients, ranging in age from 17 to 97 years, from a private clinical practice were enrolled. All participants required single-tooth replacement or repair in any area of the mouth, including single crowns, 3-unit fixed partial dentures, cantilevered anterior restorations, and foundation restorations. Together, the longevity of 1960 complete-coverage restorations was studied. Participants were offered the options of gold, conventional metal-ceramic, or lithium disilicate restoration. Participants who chose glass-ceramic restorations were included in the study. The overall survival of the glass-ceramic restorations was assessed by using clinical factors determined at recall, and the effect of various clinical parameters was evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier survival curves to account for attrition bias and other reasons for failure. The statistical significance of differences between parameters was determined using the log-rank test (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 556 patients electing lithium disilicate restorations were evaluated. The mean age of patients at the time of restoration placement was 62 years, with a range of 17 to 97 years. Men comprised 39.5% of the patients, and women, 60.5%. Many patients required more than one restoration. Seven failures (bulk fracture or large chip requiring replacement) were recorded for the 1960 complete-coverage lithium disilicate restorations, with the average time of failure being 4.2 years. The total time at risk computed for the units was 5113 years, providing an estimated failure risk of 0.14% per year. The 10-year estimated cumulative survival was 99.6% (95% confidence : 99.4-99.8).The estimated cumulative survival rate of 1410 monolithic and 550 bilayered e.max complete-coverage restorations was 96.5% and 100%, respectively, at 10.4 and 7.9 years (P<.05). Seven failures were recorded for the monolithic complete-coverage restoration units placed. The total time at risk for these monolithic units was 3380 years, providing an estimated risk of 0.2% per year. Failures were primarily in molar teeth (5 of 7) and occurred in both arches (3/2). No failures were recorded for the bilayered complete-coverage restorations. The total time at risk computed for the bilayered units was 1733 years, providing an estimated risk of 0% per year. CONCLUSIONS: Pressed lithium disilicate restorations in this study survived successfully over the 10.4-year period studied with an overall failure rate below 0.2% per year and were primarily confined to molar teeth. The risk of failure at any age was minimal for both men and women.

Margin failures in brittle dome structures: relevance to failure of dental crowns.

Margin cracks in loaded brittle dome structures are investigated. Dome structures consisting of glass shells filled with polymer resin, simulating the essential features of brittle crowns on tooth dentin, provide model test specimens. Disk indenters of diminishing elastic modulus are used to apply axisymmetric loading to the apex of the domes. Previous studies using hard indenters have focused on fractures initiating in the near-contact region of such specimens, including radial cracks at the glass undersurface directly below the contact axis. Here, we focus on fractures initiating at the remote support margins. Margin cracks can become dominant when loading forces are distributed over broad contact areas, as in biting on soft matter, here simulated by balsa wood disks. Cracks preinitiated at the dome edges during the specimen preparation propagate under load around the dome side into segmented, semilunar configurations reminiscent of some all-ceramic crown failures. Finite element analysis is used to determine the basic stress states within the dome structures, and to confirm a shift in maximum tensile stress from the near-contact area to the dome sides with more compliant indenters.

Prosthodontic management of ridge deficiencies.

The treatment goals in prosthodontics and dental laboratory technology are to provide patients with long-term predictable and esthetic outcomes. The periodontal tissues define the framework that will maintain ridge height, thickness, color, texture, and gingival-tooth frame. The loss of teeth, residual ridge resorption and the loss of gingival tissues continue to affect long-term and esthetic treatment outcomes. Prosthodontic treatment requires consideration of the potential negative tissue effect that time and normal biologic change might have on the completed prosthetic design. This article describes alternative restorative solutions for clinical conditions that have traditionally been managed by surgery, removable prosthodontics, or esthetically compromised fixed restorations. Different clinical conditions for tooth-retained and implant-retained fixed partial dentures as well as the laboratory technology describing construction of these different restorations will be discussed.

Survival of glass-ceramic materials and involved clinical risk: variables affecting long-term survival.

The fundamental objective of dental treatment is the continued health and longevity of the dentition. While advances in material formulations and clinical techniques promise to benefit patient care, various confounding variables (i.e., acid etching, preparation design, patient gender) affect the outcome of a dental restoration. These factors can be difficult to simulate in a laboratory setting that accurately depicts the clinical environment. As an alternative, this article presents a synopsis of the authors' prospective clinical study of all-ceramic restorations and explains the relationship of several variables to their long-term survival.

Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 20 years: Part IV. The effects of combinations of variables.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown the relationship of individual clinical variables to the survival of Dicor (Corning Glass Works) restorations. The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effect of combinations of these variables on the intraoral survival of Dicor restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dicor glass-ceramic restorations (n=1,444) were placed in 417 adult patients. Failure was defined as a restoration that required remake because of material fracture. The survival of restorations with different combinations of variables that were each individually associated with survival was described using Kaplan-Meier survivor functions. The statistical significance of differences in survival between different combinations of specific predictor variables was examined using the proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that significantly worse survival rates were found for restorations that included combinations of molar teeth, a dentin core, and a glass-ionomer luting agent; molar teeth, a dentin core, and a resin luting agent; and single-rooted teeth, a dentin core, and a glass-ionomer luting agent than for any other combinations tested. The Cox proportional hazards model described a hazard ratio of 3.37 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23 to 5.08) for molar teeth (versus single-rooted teeth), 2.65 (95% CI: 1.44 to 4.87) for dentin core (versus gold core), 2.35 (95% CI: 1.58 to 3.51) for men (versus women), and 1.72 (95% CI: 1.13 to 2.60) for glass-ionomer luting agent (versus resin) after adjusting for the other variables in the model. CONCLUSION: Factors beyond individual restoration design impact the survival of Dicor glass-ceramic. These include sex, tooth position, and restorations luted to gold core foundation bases.

Team approach between prosthodontics and dental technology.

A collaborative relationship between prosthodontists and dental technicians can greatly improve the esthetic and functional results of restorations. When each discipline takes the time to understand the strengths and challenges of the other, together they can formulate a treatment plan that will culminate in a successful result. The diagnostic waxup gives the dental team a three-dimensional illustration of the problem and allows the patient to view the problem and discuss solutions. Intraoral records taken by the prosthodontist are used with the technician's centric relation jigs to properly mount the casts. When the prosthodontist and technician agree on materials to be used in the fabrication of the provisional prosthesis and master dies, more accurate and functional results are achieved. Of special interest are the tooth preparations: The shape of the margins can enable the dental technician to easily create an accurate restoration. A treatment waxup allows full communication of information about the restoration between the prosthodontist, dental technician, and patient, ensuring that all three parties are satisfied with the look and function before the definitive restoration is made. The type of material and the color properties for the definitive restoration are of utmost importance, and the combined skills and experience of the prosthodontist and dental technician can create an excellent result. This article defines specific points in the restorative process when a collaborative effort between the prosthodontist and the dental technician dramatically improve the end result.

Damage accumulation and fatigue life of particle-abraded ceramics.

PURPOSE: This investigation compared initial and fatigue strengths of particle-abraded ceramics to those of as-polished alumina and zirconia ceramics in crown-like layer structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alumina or zirconia plates bonded to polycarbonate substrates were subjected to single-cycle and multi-cycle contact (fatigue) loading. Cementation surfaces of the ceramic were damaged by controlled particle abrasion, indentation with a sharp diamond at low load, or a blunt indenter at high load. The stresses needed to initiate radial fractures were evaluated. RESULTS: The strengths of specimens were lowered by fatigue loading. After the equivalent of 1 year of occlusal contacts, the strengths of undamaged specimens degraded to approximately half of their single-cycle values. In particle-abraded specimens, an additional 20% to 30% drop in strength occurred after several hundred load cycles. Particle abrasion damage was approximately equivalent to damage from sharp indentation at low load or blunt indentation at high load. CONCLUSION: Damage from particle abrasion, not necessarily immediately apparent, compromised the fatigue strength of zirconia and alumina ceramics in crown-like structures. In fatigue, small flaws introduced by particle abrasion can outweigh any countervailing strengthening effect from compression associated with surface damage or, in the case of zirconia, with phase transformation.