Comparison of animal and human blood for in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity testing of biomaterials.

BACKGROUND: To determine suitable alternatives to human blood for in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity testing of biomaterials, four different animal blood sources (ovine, bovine, and porcine blood from live donors, and abattoir porcine blood) were compared to fresh human blood. METHODS: To account for blood coagulability differences between individual donors and species, each blood pool was heparinized to a donor-specific concentration immediately before testing in a dynamic flow loop system. The target heparin level was established using a static thrombosis pre-test. For dynamic testing, whole blood was recirculated at room temperature for 1 h at 200 ml/min through a flow loop containing a single test material. Four materials with varying thrombotic potentials were investigated: latex (positive control), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (negative control), silicone (intermediate thrombotic potential), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) (historically thromboresistant). Thrombus weight and surface area coverage on the test materials were quantified, along with platelet count reduction in the blood. RESULTS: While donor-specific heparin levels varied substantially from 0.6 U/ml to 7.0 U/ml among the different blood sources, each source was able to differentiate between the thrombogenic latex and the thromboresistant PTFE and HDPE materials (p < 0.05). However, only donor ovine and bovine blood were sensitive enough to differentiate an increased response for the intermediate thrombotic silicone material compared to PTFE and HDPE. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that multiple animal blood sources (particularly donor ovine and bovine blood) may be suitable alternatives to fresh human blood for dynamic thrombogenicity testing when appropriate control materials and donor-specific anticoagulation levels are used.

The effect of blood viscosity on shear-induced hemolysis using a magnetically levitated shearing device.

INTRODUCTION: Blood contacting medical devices, including rotary blood pumps, can cause shear-induced blood damage that may lead to adverse effects in patients. Due in part to an inadequate understanding of how cell-scale fluid mechanics impact red blood cell membrane deformation and damage, there is currently not a uniformly accepted engineering model for predicting blood damage caused by complex flow fields within ventricular assist devices (VADs). METHODS: We empirically investigated hemolysis in a magnetically levitated axial Couette flow device typical of a rotary VAD. The device is able to accurately control the shear rate and exposure time experienced by blood and to minimize the effects of other uncharacterized stresses. Using this device, we explored the effects of both hematocrit and plasma viscosity on shear-induced hemolysis to characterize blood damage based on the viscosity-independent shear rate, rather than on shear stress. RESULTS: Over a shear rate range of 20 000 - 80 000 1/s, the Index of Hemolysis (IH) was found to be dependent upon and well-predicted by the shear rate alone. IH was independent of hematocrit, bulk viscosity, or the suspension media viscosity and less correlated to shear stress (MSE = 0.46-0.75) than to shear rate (MSE = 0.06-0.09). CONCLUSION: This study recommends that future investigations of shear-induced blood damage report findings with respect to the viscosity-neutral term of shear rate, in addition to the bulk whole blood viscosity measured at an appropriate shear rate relevant to the flow conditions of the device.

A Reusable, Compliant, Small Volume Blood Reservoir for In Vitro Hemolysis Testing.

Bench-top in vitro hemolysis testing is a fundamental tool during the design and regulatory safety evaluation of blood-contacting medical devices. While multiple published experimental protocols exist, descriptions of the test loop reservoir remain ambiguous. A critical fixture within the circuit, there is no readily available blood reservoir that ensures thorough mixing and complete air evacuation: two major factors which can affect results. As part of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Critical Path Initiative, we developed a three-piece reservoir consisting of a 3D-printed base, a plastic clamp set, and a medical-grade blood bag. This simple, reusable, and cost-effective design was used successfully in the hemolysis assessment of FDA benchmark nozzles and prototype rotary blood pumps, and may be useful as an integral component to any in vitro blood circulation loop.

Multilaboratory study of flow-induced hemolysis using the FDA benchmark nozzle model.

Multilaboratory in vitro blood damage testing was performed on a simple nozzle model to determine how different flow parameters and blood properties affect device-induced hemolysis and to generate data for comparison with computational fluid dynamics-based predictions of blood damage as part of an FDA initiative for assessing medical device safety. Three independent laboratories evaluated hemolysis as a function of nozzle entrance geometry, flow rate, and blood properties. Bovine blood anticoagulated with acid citrate dextrose solution (2-80 h post-draw) was recirculated through nozzle-containing and paired nozzle-free control loops for 2 h. Controlled parameters included hematocrit (36 ± 1.5%), temperature (25 °C), blood volume, flow rate, and pressure. Three nozzle test conditions were evaluated (n = 26-36 trials each): (i) sudden contraction at the entrance with a blood flow rate of 5 L/min, (ii) gradual cone at the entrance with a 6-L/min blood flow rate, and (iii) sudden-contraction inlet at 6 L/min. The blood damage caused only by the nozzle model was calculated by subtracting the hemolysis generated by the paired control loop test. Despite high intralaboratory variability, significant differences among the three test conditions were observed, with the sharp nozzle entrance causing the most hemolysis. Modified index of hemolysis (MIHnozzle ) values were 0.292 ± 0.249, 0.021 ± 0.128, and 1.239 ± 0.667 for conditions i-iii, respectively. Porcine blood generated hemolysis results similar to those obtained with bovine blood. Although the interlaboratory hemolysis results are only applicable for the specific blood parameters and nozzle model used here, these empirical data may help to advance computational fluid dynamics models for predicting blood damage.

Verification Benchmarks to Assess the Implementation of Computational Fluid Dynamics Based Hemolysis Prediction Models.

As part of an ongoing effort to develop verification and validation (V&V) standards for using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in the evaluation of medical devices, we have developed idealized flow-based verification benchmarks to assess the implementation of commonly cited power-law based hemolysis models in CFD. Verification process ensures that all governing equations are solved correctly and the model is free of user and numerical errors. To perform verification for power-law based hemolysis modeling, analytical solutions for the Eulerian power-law blood damage model (which estimates hemolysis index (HI) as a function of shear stress and exposure time) were obtained for Couette and inclined Couette flow models, and for Newtonian and non-Newtonian pipe flow models. Subsequently, CFD simulations of fluid flow and HI were performed using Eulerian and three different Lagrangian-based hemolysis models and compared with the analytical solutions. For all the geometries, the blood damage results from the Eulerian-based CFD simulations matched the Eulerian analytical solutions within ∼1%, which indicates successful implementation of the Eulerian hemolysis model. Agreement between the Lagrangian and Eulerian models depended upon the choice of the hemolysis power-law constants. For the commonly used values of power-law constants (α = 1.9-2.42 and ß = 0.65-0.80), in the absence of flow acceleration, most of the Lagrangian models matched the Eulerian results within 5%. In the presence of flow acceleration (inclined Couette flow), moderate differences (∼10%) were observed between the Lagrangian and Eulerian models. This difference increased to greater than 100% as the beta exponent decreased. These simplified flow problems can be used as standard benchmarks for verifying the implementation of blood damage predictive models in commercial and open-source CFD codes. The current study only used power-law model as an illustrative example to emphasize the need for model verification. Similar verification problems could be developed for other types of hemolysis models (such as strain-based and energy dissipation-based methods). However, since the current study did not include experimental validation, the results from the verified models do not guarantee accurate hemolysis predictions. This verification step must be followed by experimental validation before the hemolysis models can be used for actual device safety evaluations.

In vitro shear stress-induced platelet activation: sensitivity of human and bovine blood.

As platelet activation plays a critical role in physiological hemostasis and pathological thrombosis, it is important in the overall hemocompatibility evaluation of new medical devices and biomaterials to assess their effects on platelet function. However, there are currently no widely accepted in vitro test methods to perform this assessment. In an effort to develop effective platelet tests for potential use in medical device evaluation, this study compared the sensitivity of platelet responses to shear stress stimulation of human and bovine blood using multiple platelet activation markers. Fresh whole blood samples anticoagulated with heparin or anticoagulant citrate dextrose, solution A (ACDA) were exposed to shear stresses up to 40 Pa for 2 min using a cone-and-plate rheometer model. Platelet activation was characterized by platelet counts, platelet surface P-selectin expression, and serotonin release into blood plasma. The results indicated that exposure to shear stresses above 20 Pa caused significant changes in all three of the platelet markers for human blood and that the changes were usually greater with ACDA anticoagulation than with heparin. In contrast, for bovine blood, the markers did not change with shear stress stimulation except for plasma serotonin in heparin anticoagulated blood. The differences observed between human and bovine platelet responses suggest that the value of using bovine blood for in vitro platelet testing to evaluate devices may be limited.

In Vitro Thrombogenicity Testing of Biomaterials in a Dynamic Flow Loop: Effects of Length and Quantity of Test Samples.

The results of in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity testing of biomaterials and medical devices can be significantly impacted by test conditions. To develop and standardize a robust dynamic in vitro thrombogenicity tool, the key test parameters need to be appropriately evaluated and optimized. We used a flow loop test system previously developed in our laboratory to investigate the effects of sample length and the number of samples per test loop on the thrombogenicity results. Porcine blood heparinized to a donor-specific target concentration was recirculated at room temperature through polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing loops containing test materials for 1 h at 200 mL/min. Four test materials (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), latex, PVC, and silicone) with various thrombotic potentials in two sample lengths (12 and 18 cm) were examined. For the 12-cm long materials, two different test configurations (one and two samples per loop) were compared. Thrombogenicity was assessed through percent thrombus surface coverage, thrombus weight, and platelet count reduction in the blood. The test system was able to effectively differentiate the thrombogenicity profile of the materials (latex > silicone > PVC ≥ PTFE) at all test configurations. Increasing test sample length by 50% did not significantly impact the test results as both 12 and 18 cm sample lengths were shown to equally differentiate thrombotic potentials between the materials. The addition of a second test sample to each loop did not increase the test sensitivity and may produce confounding results, and thus a single test sample per loop is recommended.

Effect of Temperature on Thrombogenicity Testing of Biomaterials in an In Vitro Dynamic Flow Loop System.

To develop and standardize a reliable in vitro dynamic thrombogenicity test protocol, the key test parameters that could impact thrombus formation need to be investigated and understood. In this study, we evaluated the effect of temperature on the thrombogenic responses (thrombus surface coverage, thrombus weight, and platelet count reduction) of various materials using an in vitro blood flow loop test system. Whole blood from live sheep and cow donors was used to assess four materials with varying thrombogenic potentials: negative-control polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), positive-control latex, silicone, and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Blood, heparinized to a donor-specific concentration, was recirculated through a polyvinyl chloride tubing loop containing the test material at room temperature (22-24°C) for 1 hour, or at 37°C for 1 or 2 hours. The flow loop system could effectively differentiate a thrombogenic material (latex) from the other materials for both test temperatures and blood species ( p < 0.05). However, compared with 37°C, testing at room temperature appeared to have slightly better sensitivity in differentiating silicone (intermediate thrombogenic potential) from the relatively thromboresistant materials (PTFE and HDPE, p < 0.05). These data suggest that testing at room temperature may be a viable option for dynamic thrombogenicity assessment of biomaterials and medical devices.

Results of the Interlaboratory Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the FDA Benchmark Blood Pump.

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is widely used to simulate blood-contacting medical devices. To be relied upon to inform high-risk decision making, however, model credibility should be demonstrated through validation. To provide robust data sets for validation, researchers at the FDA and collaborators developed two benchmark medical device flow models: a nozzle and a centrifugal blood pump. Experimental measurements of the flow fields and hemolysis were acquired using each model. Concurrently, separate open interlaboratory CFD studies were performed in which participants from around the world, who were blinded to the measurements, submitted CFD predictions of each benchmark model. In this study, we report the results of the interlaboratory CFD study of the FDA benchmark blood pump. We analyze the results of 24 CFD submissions using a wide range of different flow solvers, methods, and modeling parameters. To assess the accuracy of the CFD predictions, we compare the results with experimental measurements of three quantities of interest (pressure head, velocity field, and hemolysis) at different pump operating conditions. We also investigate the influence of different CFD methods and modeling choices used by the participants. Our analyses reveal that, while a number of CFD submissions accurately predicted the pump performance for individual cases, no single participant was able to accurately predict all quantities of interest across all conditions. Several participants accurately predicted the pressure head at all conditions and the velocity field in all but one or two cases. Only one of the eight participants who submitted hemolysis results accurately predicted absolute plasma free hemoglobin levels at a majority of the conditions, though most participants were successful at predicting relative hemolysis levels between conditions. Overall, this study highlights the need to validate CFD modeling of rotary blood pumps across the entire range of operating conditions and for all quantities of interest, as some operating conditions and regions (e.g., the pump diffuser) are more challenging to accurately predict than others. All quantities of interest should be validated because, as shown here, it is possible to accurately predict hemolysis despite having relatively inaccurate predictions of the flow field.

Comparison of two platelet activation markers using flow cytometry after in vitro shear stress exposure of whole human blood.

Platelet activation is the initiating step to thromboembolic complications in blood-contacting medical devices. Currently, there are no widely accepted testing protocols or relevant metrics to assess platelet activation during the in vitro evaluation of new medical devices. In this article, two commonly used platelet activation marker antibodies, CD62P (platelet surface P-selectin) and PAC1 (activated GP IIb/IIIa), were evaluated using flow cytometry. Anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution A (ACDA) and heparin anticoagulated human blood from healthy donors were separately exposed to shear stresses of 0, 10, 15, and 20 Pa for 120 s using a cone-plate rheometer model, and immediately mixed with the platelet marker antibodies for analysis. To monitor for changes in platelet reactivity between donors and over time, blood samples were also evaluated after exposure to 0, 2, and 20 µM of adenosine diphosphate (ADP). Following ADP stimulation, the percentage of both CD62P and PAC1 positive platelets increased in a dose dependent fashion, even 8 h after the blood was collected. After shear stress stimulation, both CD62P and PAC1 positive platelets increased significantly at shear stress levels of 15 and 20 Pa when ACDA was used as the anticoagulant. However, for heparinized blood, the PAC1 positive platelets decreased with increasing shear stress, while the CD62P positive platelets increased. Besides the anticoagulant effect, the platelet staining buffer also impacted PAC1 response, but had little effect on CD62P positive platelets. These data suggest that CD62P is a more reliable marker compared with PAC1 for measuring shear-dependent platelet activation and it has the potential for use during in vitro medical device testing.

Multilaboratory particle image velocimetry analysis of the FDA benchmark nozzle model to support validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations.

This study is part of a FDA-sponsored project to evaluate the use and limitations of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) in assessing blood flow parameters related to medical device safety. In an interlaboratory study, fluid velocities and pressures were measured in a nozzle model to provide experimental validation for a companion round-robin CFD study. The simple benchmark nozzle model, which mimicked the flow fields in several medical devices, consisted of a gradual flow constriction, a narrow throat region, and a sudden expansion region where a fluid jet exited the center of the nozzle with recirculation zones near the model walls. Measurements of mean velocity and turbulent flow quantities were made in the benchmark device at three independent laboratories using particle image velocimetry (PIV). Flow measurements were performed over a range of nozzle throat Reynolds numbers (Re(throat)) from 500 to 6500, covering the laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow regimes. A standard operating procedure was developed for performing experiments under controlled temperature and flow conditions and for minimizing systematic errors during PIV image acquisition and processing. For laminar (Re(throat)=500) and turbulent flow conditions (Re(throat)≥3500), the velocities measured by the three laboratories were similar with an interlaboratory uncertainty of ∼10% at most of the locations. However, for the transitional flow case (Re(throat)=2000), the uncertainty in the size and the velocity of the jet at the nozzle exit increased to ∼60% and was very sensitive to the flow conditions. An error analysis showed that by minimizing the variability in the experimental parameters such as flow rate and fluid viscosity to less than 5% and by matching the inlet turbulence level between the laboratories, the uncertainties in the velocities of the transitional flow case could be reduced to ∼15%. The experimental procedure and flow results from this interlaboratory study (available at http://fdacfd.nci.nih.gov) will be useful in validating CFD simulations of the benchmark nozzle model and in performing PIV studies on other medical device models.

Preclinical Device Thrombogenicity Assessments: Key Messages From the 2018 FDA, Industry, and Academia Forum.

Device-related thrombosis and thromboembolic complications remain a major clinical concern and often impact patient morbidity and mortality. Thus, improved preclinical thrombogenicity assessment methods that better predict clinical outcomes and enhance patient safety are needed. However, there are several challenges and limitations associated with developing and performing preclinical thrombogenicity assessments on the bench and in animals (e.g., the clinical relevance of most in vitro tests has not been established, animal studies may not accurately predict clinical thrombotic events). To facilitate a discussion on how to overcome some of these challenges and to promote collaboration between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), industry, and academia for the development of more reliable test methods, a scientific forum was organized by FDA and held in Washington, DC, on June 15, 2018 at the ASAIO 64th Annual Conference. Three subject matter experts from the medical device industry and FDA presented their perspectives at this forum, and several audience experts provided input during the open dialogue session. This article summarizes the key messages from the forum regarding the current status and challenges of preclinical thrombogenicity testing, important areas of needed research, and mechanisms for working with FDA to further improve thrombogenicity evaluations of medical devices.

Platelet and leukocyte count assay for thrombogenicity screening of biomaterials and medical devices: Evaluation and improvement of ASTM F2888 test standard.

An appropriate preclinical thrombogenicity evaluation of a blood-contacting device is important to reduce thrombosis and thromboembolism risks to patients. The in vitro platelet and leukocyte count assay, as described in the ASTM F2888 test standard, aims to assess thrombogenic potentials of blood-contacting materials. The goals of this study were to evaluate whether this standardized test method can effectively differentiate materials with different thrombogenic potentials and to investigate the impact of anticoagulation conditions on test sensitivity. Using human blood with various anticoagulation conditions, we performed the platelet and leukocyte count assays on four biomaterials and three positive control materials. We found that the use of sodium citrate anticoagulation as stipulated in the 2013 version of the ASTM F2888 standard cannot differentiate materials with different thrombogenic potentials. The modification to use low-concentration heparin, either with recalcified citrated blood or with direct heparinization, substantially improved the test sensitivity and enabled the assay to distinguish platelet count reduction between the positive controls and commonly used biomaterials. Leukocyte count was shown to be a much less sensitive indicator than platelet count for thrombogenicity evaluations of biomaterials. The findings from this study have been incorporated in the recent 2019 version of the ASTM F2888 standard.

An In Vitro Blood Flow Loop System for Evaluating the Thrombogenicity of Medical Devices and Biomaterials.

A reliable in vitro dynamic test method to evaluate device thrombogenicity is very important for the improvement of the design and safety of blood-contacting medical devices, while reducing the use of animal studies. In this study, a recirculating flow loop system was developed for thrombogenicity testing, using donor sheep blood anticoagulated with Anticoagulant Citrate Dextrose Solution A (ACDA) and used within 24-36 hr postdraw. Immediately before testing, the blood was recalcified and heparinized to a donor-specific target concentration. The heparinization level was based on a static pretest, in which latex tubes were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in blood with a series of heparin concentrations and evaluated for thrombus deposition. For dynamic testing, blood was recirculated at room temperature through a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing loop containing a test material for 1 hr at 200 ml/min using a roller pump. Nine materials were investigated: a negative control (polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]), a positive control (latex), and seven commonly used biomaterials including PVC, two silicones with different formulations (Q-Sil and V-Sil), nylon, polyurethane (PU), high-density polyethylene (HDPE), and polyether block amide (PEBAX). The results showed that latex was significantly more thrombogenic than all the other materials (p < 0.05), PVC and Q-Sil exhibited intermediate thrombogenicity with significantly more thrombus surface coverage and thrombus weight than PTFE (p < 0.05), whereas PTFE and the rest of the biomaterials had little to no thrombus deposition. In summary, the test loop system was able to effectively differentiate materials with different thrombogenic potentials.

Predicting Plasma Free Hemoglobin Levels in Patients Due to Medical Device-Related Hemolysis.

Blood passage through medical devices can cause hemolysis and increased levels of plasma free hemoglobin (pfH) that may lead to adverse effects such as vasoconstriction and renal tubule injury. Although the hemolytic potential of devices is typically characterized in vitro using animal blood, the results can be impacted by various blood parameters, such as donor species. Moreover, it is unclear how to relate measured in vitro hemolysis levels to clinical performance because pfH accumulation in vivo depends on both hemolysis rate and availability of plasma haptoglobin (Hpt) that can bind and safely eliminate pfH. To help to address these uncertainties, we developed a biokinetic model linking in vivo hemolysis rates to time-dependent pfH and Hpt concentrations. The model was initially parameterized using studies that characterized baseline levels and evolution of pfH and Hpt after introduction of excess pfH in humans. With the biokinetic parameters specified, the model was applied to predict hemolysis rates in three patient groups undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. The congruity of the model with these clinical data suggests that it can infer in vivo hemolysis rates and provide insight into pfH levels that may cause concern. The model was subsequently used to evaluate acceptance threshold hemolysis values proposed in the literature for chronic circulatory assist blood pumps and to assess the impact of patient weight on pfH accumulation using simple scaling arguments, which suggested that identical hemolysis index values may increase pfH levels nearly threefold in 10 kg pediatric patients compared with 80 kg adults.

A CFD-based Kriging surrogate modeling approach for predicting device-specific hemolysis power law coefficients in blood-contacting medical devices.

Most stress-based hemolysis models used in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are based on an empirical power law correlation between hemolysis generation and the flow-induced stress and exposure time. Empirical model coefficients are typically determined by fitting global hemolysis measurements in simplified blood shearing devices under uniform shear conditions and with well-defined exposure times. CFD simulations using these idealized global empirical coefficients are then performed to predict hemolysis in a medical device with complex hemodynamics. The applicability, however, of this traditional approach of using idealized coefficients for a real device with varying exposure times and non-uniform shear is currently unknown. In this study, we propose a new approach for determining device- and species-specific hemolysis power law coefficients (C, a, and b). The approach consists of calculating multiple hemolysis solutions using different sets of coefficients to map the hemolysis response field in three-dimensional (C, a, b) parameter space. The resultant response field is then compared with experimental data in the same device to determine the coefficients that when incorporated into the locally defined power law model yield correct global hemolysis predictions. We first develop the generalized approach by deriving analytical solutions for simple uniform and non-uniform shear flows (planar Couette flow and circular Poiseuille flow, respectively) that allow us to continuously map the hemolysis solution in (C, a, b) parameter space. We then extend our approach to more practical cases relevant to blood-contacting medical devices by replacing the requirement for an analytical solution in our generalized approach with CFD and Kriging surrogate modeling. Finally, we apply our verified CFD-based Kriging surrogate modeling approach to predict the device- and species-specific power law coefficients for developing laminar flow in a small capillary tube. We show that the resultant coefficients are much different than traditional idealized coefficients obtained from simplified uniform shear experiments and that using such idealized coefficients yields a highly inaccurate prediction of hemolysis that is in error by more than 2000% compared to experiments. Our approach and surrogate modeling framework may be applied to more complex medical devices and readily extended to determine empirical coefficients for other continuum-based models of hemolysis and other forms of flow-induced blood damage (e.g., platelet activation and thrombosis).

Decreased hemodialysis circuit pressures indicating postpump tubing kinks: a retrospective investigation of hemolysis in five patients.

The source of hemolysis during hemodialysis must be quickly identified to avoid life-threatening complications. At a single clinic, over a 10-day period in which 550 treatments were performed, 5 case-patients were retrospectively identified for experiencing acute hemolysis (4 deaths) from an unknown origin. The investigation focused on the postpump arterial tubing as the pressure was not monitored in this region, and the segment was shorter than required and could kink if overly stressed at bend points (i.e., tubing support clips, dialyzer inlet). To determine whether the circuit pressures indicated kinked tubing, a relative comparison between each case-patient's recorded arterial (prepump) and venous circuit pressures throughout their adverse event treatment and their immediately preceding treatment was conducted. Treatment pressure-time traces showed that sustained, significant decreases (>25 mmHg) in both of the circuit pressures occurred only on the hemolytic event dates. While direct observations of kinked tubing were not reported, the circuit pressure decreases could only be explained by severe postpump tube kinking causing a decrease in the blood flow rate. While postpump obstructions and hemolysis can occur without causing noticeable changes to the prepump arterial and venous blood line pressures (due to the highly occlusive setting of the roller blood pump), recognizing sudden and/or sustained decreases in the circuit pressures during treatment may help to prevent adverse patient events. This analysis reinforces the importance of regularly checking the blood tubing set for kinks and for monitoring the circuit pressures for atypical trends within and between treatments.

Renal Toxicodynamic Effects of Extracellular Hemoglobin After Acute Exposure.

Plasma hemoglobin (Hb) is elevated in some hematologic disease states, during exposures to certain toxicants, and with the use of some medical devices. Exposure to free Hb can precipitate oxidative reactions within tissues and alter the normal physiological function of critical organ systems. As kidney structures can be highly sensitive to Hb exposures, we evaluated the acute dose dependent renal toxicologic response to purified Hb isolated from RBCs. Male Hartley guinea pigs (n = 5 per group) were dosed with 0.9% saline (2 ml), 15, 75, 150, or 300 mg of purified Hb, infused over a 2-h period. The primary endpoints of this study were to define toxicokinetic parameters after increasing doses of purified Hb, identify clinically recognized and experimental markers of acute kidney injury (AKI), and determine relevant toxicological parameters and potential causes of renal toxicity in this model. Experimental findings demonstrated a dose dependent increase in Cmax after a 2-h infusion, which correlated with an elevation in serum creatinine, renal Kim-1 mRNA expression and increased urinary Kim-1. Renal NGAL mRNA expression and urinary NGAL excretion were also increased in several groups, but these parameters did not correlate with exposure. Iron increased in the renal cortex as Hb exposure increased and its deposition colocalized with 4-hydroxy-nonenal and 8-Oxo-2-deoxyguanosine immune reactivity, suggesting oxidative stressors may contribute to AKI in animals exposed to Hb. The results presented here suggest that Cmax may effectively predict the risk of AKI in normal healthy animals exposed to Hb.

Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).

PURPOSE: A credible computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model can play a meaningful role in evaluating the safety and performance of medical devices. A key step towards establishing model credibility is to first validate CFD models with benchmark experimental datasets to minimize model-form errors before applying the credibility assessment process to more complex medical devices. However, validation studies to establish benchmark datasets can be cost prohibitive and difficult to perform. The goal of this initiative sponsored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is to generate validation data for a simplified centrifugal pump that mimics blood flow characteristics commonly observed in ventricular assist devices. METHODS: The centrifugal blood pump model was made from clear acrylic and included an impeller, with four equally spaced, straight blades, supported by mechanical bearings. Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) measurements were performed at several locations throughout the pump by three independent laboratories. A standard protocol was developed for the experiments to ensure that the flow conditions were comparable and to minimize systematic errors during PIV image acquisition and processing. Velocity fields were extracted at the pump entrance, blade passage area, back gap region, and at the outlet diffuser regions. A Newtonian blood analog fluid composed of sodium iodide, glycerin, and water was used as the working fluid. Velocity measurements were made for six different pump flow conditions, with the blood-equivalent flow rate ranging between 2.5 and 7 L/min for pump speeds of 2500 and 3500 rpm. RESULTS: Mean intra- and inter-laboratory variabilities in velocity were ~ 10% at the majority of the measurement locations inside the pump. However, the inter-laboratory variability increased to more than ~ 30% in the exit diffuser region. The variability between the three laboratories for the peak velocity magnitude in the diffuser region ranged from 5 to 25%. The bulk velocity field near the impeller changed proportionally with the rotational speed but was relatively unaffected by the pump flow rate. In contrast, flow in the exit diffuser region was sensitive to both the flow rate and the rotational speed. Specifically, at 3500 rpm, the exit jet tilted toward the inner wall of the diffuser at a flow rate of 2.5 L/min, but the jet tilted towards the outer wall when the flow rate was 7 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-laboratory experimental mean velocity data (and the corresponding variance) were obtained for the FDA pump model and are available for download at https://nciphub.org/wiki/FDA_CFD . Experimental datasets from the inter-laboratory characterization of benchmark flow models, including the blood pump model presented herein and our previous nozzle model, can be used for validating future CFD studies and to collaboratively develop guidelines on best practices for verification, validation, uncertainty quantification, and credibility assessment of CFD simulations in the evaluation of medical devices (e.g. ASME V&V 40 standards working group).