Post-hoc analysis of pegloticase pivotal trials in chronic refractory gout: relationship between fluctuations in plasma urate levels and acute flares.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with gout flares in subjects treated with pegloticase. METHODS: Gout flares from two randomised controlled trials comparing pegloticase (8 mg every 2 weeks [q2] or monthly [q4]) versus placebo were analysed. Responders had persistent urate lowering (<6mg/dL) whereas, non-responders had transient urate lowering during the 6-month RCTs. Gout flares (self-reported) were defined as acute joint pain and swelling requiring treatment. Gout flare prophylaxis (colchicine, 0.6 mg once or twice daily, or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was initiated 1 week before the first infusion and continued throughout the study. Plasma urate at the time of flare and the change in urate preceding a flare were analysed. RESULTS: Mean flare rates increased with pegloticase versus placebo during the first 3 months followed by marked reductions during months 4-6. The increase in flares with pegloticase during the first 3 months was most evident (p=0.0006) and the decrease during the second 3 months was least marked (p=0.0006) in subjects receiving monthly pegloticase. Fluctuation in urate levels was highest in monthly responders (p=0.002) and was associated with flare occurrence. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated the only variables significantly associated with flares were treatment group and absolute change in plasma urate before flares. CONCLUSIONS: Pegloticase treatment increased flares during the first 3 months of treatment in all groups when plasma urate was significantly lowered and was followed by a decline in months 4-6 in patients maintaining a low plasma urate. Flares associated with pegloticase treatment were associated with decreases and fluctuations in plasma urate levels.

The Art of Observation and the Observation of Art: Zadig in the Twenty-first Century.

Astute observation is a fundamental component of the art of medicine. Yet most schools and residencies offer little formal teaching of this skill, with some outsourcing the entire subject matter to art museums and instructors. Curiously, it was nineteenth century medicine that may have provided the conceptual framework for what is now known as Visual Thinking Strategy, the technique used by many art-based programs in order to teach observation. We suggest that the time is ripe for medicine to regain ownership of the teaching of this skill, not only because it may enhance clinical care but also because only the eyes of a skilled physician can best interpret crucial medical details. To this end, we shall revisit both the method of Zadig, which William Osler practiced and taught to his students, and its application to the observation of art first pioneered by the Italian physician Giovanni Morelli. As an example of this skill, we shall use focused observation to decode a fifteenth century portrait that hangs at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, thus turning a seemingly non-descript Renaissance painting into a treasure trove of personal, social, and medical information.

The role of TNF inhibitors in psoriatic disease.

In contrast to many other diseases, modern psoriasis therapy has a fairly brief history. Until about 15 years ago, clinicians and their patients had few options, with limited ability to rein in the disease process.The success of antifolate methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) led to clinical evaluation and adoption of the agent, a principal form of treatment for psoriasis, which, like RA, has its origin based in inflammation. The introduction of tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors marked the beginning of the biologic era of psoriasis therapy. Also borrowed from the field of rheumatology, biologic therapy has evolved from improved understanding of the molecular basis of the disease process. An increased recognition of comorbid conditions that often accompany psoriasis, particularly psoriatic arthritis, can complicate clinical management. Dermatologists and other clinicians who treat psoriasis continue to benefit from insights gained in the field of rheumatology.

ANCA associated vasculitis (AAV): a review for internists.

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) compromise a rare group of necrotizing small to medium vessel vasculitides that constitute three distinct disorders: granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) (formerly known as Wegener's granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) (formerly known as Churg-Strauss syndrome). AAV is characterized by the usual presence of circulating autoantibodies to the neutrophil proteins leukocyte proteinase 3 (PR3-ANCA) or myeloperoxidase (MPO-ANCA). These antibodies can activate neutrophils and the complement system resulting in vessel wall inflammation and damage. The clinical presentation of AAV varies from non-severe (non-life threatening) to severe often with potentially life-threatening multi-organ involvement. Early recognition and diagnosis are crucial. In the past two decades, advances in understanding the pathophysiology of AAV have led to development of new treatments and resulted in significant improvement in general outcomes and survival rates. This narrative review will focus on GPA and MPA. We will highlight clinical manifestations, diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment strategies in patients with AAV.

Synovial fluid analysis: Relevance for daily clinical practice.

Synovial fluid analysis can provide a prompt and definite diagnosis of crystal-induced arthritis, the most common acute inflammatory arthritis and a cause of chronic arthritis that may mimic rheumatoid, psoriatic, or peripheral spondyloarthritis. In many patients the diagnosis of gout or calcium pyrophosphate arthritis cannot be made with certainty without synovial fluid analysis. Additional information from fluid analysis can assist the clinician in honing the differential diagnosis of non-crystalline arthritis.

Management and Cure of Gouty Arthritis.

Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in the United States. Gouty arthritis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is the result of chronic hyperuricemia. Gout is effectively managed and potentially cured by decreasing the overall urate burden with serum urate-lowering therapy. When serum urate is maintained at less than 6.0 mg/dL, urate deposition is resolved, and gout can be cured. Unfortunately, because of less than optimal physician monitoring and dose escalation, many patients do not achieve these urate levels.

Management and Cure of Gouty Arthritis.

Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in the United States. Gouty arthritis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is caused by hyperuricemia. Gout is effectively managed and potentially cured by decreasing the overall urate burden with serum urate-lowering therapy. When serum urate is maintained at less than 6.0 mg/dL urate deposition is resolved and gout can be cured. Unfortunately, owing to a lack of physician monitoring and dose escalation the majority of patients do not achieve these urate levels.

Therapeutic approaches in the treatment of gout.

Gout is a disease in which the metabolic condition hyperuricemia leads to the formation of monosodium urate crystals, which provoke acute and chronic inflammatory responses through activation of the innate immune system. Recent advances in our knowledge of gout pathogenesis have emphasized the role of the kidneys in urate handling, the evolutionary loss of uricase as a necessary precondition for hyperuricemia, and the central role of IL-1ß in the pathogenesis of gouty inflammation. These, and other advances, have shaped our current strategies for managing gout. Here, we review the most current, evidence-based gout management approaches, including treating acute flares, addressing gout through the long-term regulation of serum urate, and prophylaxis against gouty flares during urate lowering.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Effect of Gout on Mortality Among Patients with a History of Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is associated with increased prevalence of gout. However, evidence of the effect of gout on long-term kidney transplantation outcomes is mixed. This study examined mortality risk among patients with a history of kidney transplantation with vs. without gout. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted using Medicare Fee-for-Service administrative claims of patients with a history of kidney transplantation. Cox proportional hazards models determined the effect of gout on all-cause mortality, controlling for confounders, including comorbid mortality risk, via the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Because the relationships between gout and components of the Charlson Comorbidity Index are also debated, 3 different model assumptions were used: 1) gout shares a common cause with these comorbidities, 2) gout is upstream of these comorbidities, 3) the effect of gout on mortality is modified by these comorbidities. RESULTS Gout increased the risk of all-cause mortality in the unadjusted model (hazard ratio: 1.44, 95% CI 1.27-1.63) and after adjustment for demographics and transplant vintage (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32). Gout was not a significant risk after adjustment for baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% CI 0.90-1.17). Gout was associated with greater mortality among patients without baseline comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index=0; hazard ratio: 3.48, 95% CI 1.27-9.57) in the stratified model. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a history of kidney transplantation, gout did not have an independent effect on all-cause mortality. However, gout was a predictor of mortality among patients with no comorbidities, suggesting that gout is an early warning sign of poor health in kidney transplantation patients.

Immunosuppressant Use and Gout in the Prevalent Solid Organ Transplantation Population.

INTRODUCTION: Gout is a common comorbidity among solid organ transplantation patients and is usually attributed to the use of cyclosporine. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of gout among solid organ transplantation patients to determine the prevalence in the tacrolimus era. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: To what degree is cyclosporine still used among prevalent solid organ transplantation patients? How prevalent is gout in the solid organ transplantation population not being treated by cyclosporine? METHODS: Immunosuppressant regimens and gout prevalence among prevalent solid organ transplantation patients were assessed using retrospective claims data for a representative sample of commercially insured patients. For comparison to the prevalent solid organ transplantation population, immunosuppressant use at time of transplantation was compiled from published reports. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, the use of cyclosporine declined while use of tacrolimus increased, with greater cyclosporine use among prevalent versus incident solid organ transplantation patients. The prevalence of gout was 18.3%, 9.3%, and 9.1% for solid organ transplantation patients on cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and neither, respectively. Among all solid organ transplantation patients with gout, 66.6% and 21.5% were on tacrolimus versus cyclosporine. The prevalence of gout among noncyclosporine solid organ transplantation patients was significantly higher than in the general population without solid organ transplantation. DISCUSSION: Despite declining cyclosporine use, gout prevalence remains high, with the majority of patients with gout receiving tacrolimus rather than cyclosporine. In summary, gout remains a frequent comorbidity of solid organ transplantation.

Gout Severity in Recipients of Kidney Transplant.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis of medical chart data was performed to compare severity and treatment of gout in patients with or without a history of kidney transplantation (KT). METHODS: Via an online survey, a panel of board-certified US nephrologists (N = 104) provided the following deidentified chart data for their 3 most recent patients with gout: age, sex, serum uric acid, numbers of swollen or tender joints, visible tophi, gout flare events (prior 12 months), gout drug treatment history, and KT history. The presence of "severe, uncontrolled gout" was defined as: serum uric acid ≥ 7.0 mg/dL, ≥1 tophi and ≥2 flares in the last 12 months, and history of xanthine oxidase inhibitor treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 312 (8.0%) gout patients had a history of KT. Univariate analysis found that patients with gout and history of kidney transplants had: greater prevalence of severe uncontrolled gout (27% vs 8%, P = .007) and tophi (36% vs 17%, P = .030), and higher rates of failure or physician perceived contraindication to allopurinol (44% vs 23%, P = .028). CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that gout in patients with history of KT is more severe and poses greater challenges to pharmacologic management. Although gout has been linked to worse outcomes among kidney recipients in the literature, there are presently no publications on gout severity among patients with KT in comparison to other patients with gout. Further investigation of disease severity and appropriate, effective treatment options in recipients of kidney transplant with a diagnosis of gout, especially prior to the transplant, is warranted.

Prevalence of Gout in the Surviving United States Solid Organ Transplantation Population.

PURPOSE: Although incidence and survival are frequent topics within the solid organ transplantation (SOT) literature, the size of the surviving SOT population is not well known. Existing studies of gout in patients with SOT have focused on the incident SOT population. This analysis was performed to characterize the prevalent SOT population and the prevalence of gout within it. METHODS: This study includes the 2017 United States (US) population size of recipients of kidney, heart, liver, and lung transplants that was estimated by combining primary transplant recipient cohort sizes (1988-2017) with previously published survival rates for each annual cohort's time since transplantation (0-29 years). Gout among prevalent patients with SOT was assessed using Medicare and commercial claims. RESULTS: A total of 637,231 US patients received a primary kidney (393,953), liver (142,186), heart (66,637), or lung (34,455) transplant between 1988 and 2017. An estimated 356,000 (55.8%) recipients were alive in 2017 (233,000 kidney; 78,700 liver; 29,300 heart; 14,700 lung). Gout was identified in 11% of prevalent patients with SOT in 2016. Higher rates of gout were seen in recipients of kidney (13.1%) and heart (12.7%) compared to recipients of liver (6.7%) and lung (5.6%) (P < .0001 in both datasets). Active diagnosed gout prevalence in the US population without a SOT history was 1.1% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Hundreds of thousands of US patients are living with a transplanted organ today and these numbers are likely to increase. In patients with SOT, gout is a frequent comorbidity of which physicians should be aware. This study suggests a markedly higher rate of gout among transplant recipients compared to the general US population.

Clinical manifestations of hyperuricemia and gout.

Biologically significant hyperuricemia occurs when serum urate levels exceed urate solubility, ie, at approximately 6.8 mg/dL. At serum urate levels above this threshold, manifestations of chronic crystal deposition, including gouty arthritis, may occur, although asymptomatic hyperuricemia often persists for many years without progression. Intercritical asymptomatic periods follow the resolution of acute gout flares, but crystals remain in the joint during these intervals and further deposition may continue silently. Ultimately this may lead to persistent attacks, chronic pain, and, in some patients, joint damage.