Bicondylar tibial plateau fracture osteosynthesis with double-plate fixation: Similar complication rates and clinical results but improved radiographic outcomes with dual compared to single approach.

INTRODUCTION: Associating posteromedial and anterolateral approaches should improve fracture line visualization and optimize bicondylar tibial plateau fracture reduction compared to a single midline approach. The present study aimed to compare postoperative complications rates and functional and radiographic results after double-plate fixation via either a single or a dual approach. The study hypothesis was that double-plate fixation using a dual approach provides equivalent complications rates with improved radiographic results compared to a single approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective 2-center study compared bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated by double-plate fixation on a single versus a dual approach between January 2016 and December 2020. Comparison focused on major complications requiring surgical revision, radiographic measurements of medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA); change from their respective baseline values of 87° and 83° (deltaMPTA and deltaPPTA), and functional results on KOOS, SF12 and EQ5D-3L self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 2 of the 20 single approach group patients (10%) [1 surgical site infection (SSI) (5%), and 1 skin complication (5%)], and in 3 of the 39 dual approach group patients (7.69%) (p=0.763), at an average 29 months' follow-up. In the sagittal plane, deltaPPTA was significantly lower with dual than single approach (respectively, 4.67° versus 7.43°; p=0.0104). There were no significant intergroup differences in deltaMPTA or functional results at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests an absence of significant difference in major complications, between single and dual approach for double-plate osteosynthesis of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Using a dual approach enabled improved anatomic restoration in the sagittal plane, without significant differences observed in the frontal plane or functional scores at an average 29months' follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.