Family Quality of Life in Children with Severe or Profound Disability: Home Versus Residential Care.

BACKGROUND: Most children with severe and profound intellectual disability (SPID) are cared for in their homes, according to current recommendations. Yet, their families face marked emotional, health, and economic challenges. AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine family quality of life (FQOL) along with psychological and health factors among families who raise children with SPID at home versus those residing in residential care. METHODS: Sixty caregivers of children aged 2 to 18 years (M = 8.81, SD = 4.62) with SPID (developmental quotient/intellectual quotient <35), living at home (38 caregivers-"home group") or in residential care (22 caregivers-"residential group"), completed the FQOL Survey, Beck Depression Inventory, Parental Stress Index, Shame and Guilt Scale, and Health and Demographic questionnaires. RESULTS: FQOL for most domains and dimensions was rated better among families whose child resides in residential care compared with families who raise their child at home. Similarly, parental stress relating to the child was worse among families who raise their children at home. No significant differences between the 2 groups were noted on other psychological or health measures. CONCLUSION: Family and individual needs for those raising a child with SPID at home should be addressed when planning policy and interventions.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in children with ADHD: A randomized, sham-controlled pilot study.

BACKGROUND: ADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder with a pediatric prevalence of 5.2%.While medication treatment for ADHD is effective, it does not address all symptoms and a small but notable subgroup does not respond to medications. Adverse effects limit its use and some parents and participants resist use of medication. Thus, limitations of medication treatment for ADHD motivate searching for other therapeutic options. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been suggested as a treatment for children with ADHD, with mixed results to date. Protocol variables employed, including combined use of cognitive training (CT) and scheduling of sessions, may explain diverse findings to date. The aim of this study was to examine safety, feasibility and efficacy of tDCS combined with CT provided three-times-per week for one-month to treat children with ADHD. METHODS: In a double blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study, 25 children with ADHD were randomized to receive 12 sessions of either anodal tDCS or sham-tDCS for 20 min combined with CT three-times-per-week for four weeks. The tDCS anode was over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathode over vertex. Assessments were obtained prior to, after 6 sessions, 12 sessions and one-month after intervention. RESULTS: No significant post-intervention differences were found between those receiving tDCS or sham-tDCS. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement on questionnaire measures of ADHD and executive function with mixed results seen on computerized performance measures. Overall, adverse effects were mild with no significant difference between groups. However, three children, all from the tDCS group, experienced headaches with two requiring temporary cessation and one requiring removal from the study. CONCLUSIONS: Anodal tDCS to the DLPFC using the above protocol in children with ADHD did not demonstrate additional treatment benefits beyond that of CT.