Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients: results of the SpideRX arm of the carotid revascularization with ev3 arterial technology evolution trial.

PURPOSE: A prospective nonrandomized multicenter registry of 160 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted during the 3-month period from March to May 2005. METHODS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was performed with the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) as part of an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The primary end-point of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after CAS was observed in nine patients (5.6%), including death in four patients (2.5%), nonfatal stroke in five patients (3.1%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in one patient (0.6%). A secondary end-point of technical success (defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 156 of 160 patients (97.5%). The only independent predictor of death or stroke at 30 days was baseline stenosis severity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CAS with distal embolic protection using the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System is a reasonable alternative for revascularization of some high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis.

Unprotected left main disease managed with drug-eluting stents: long-term outcome of 100 patients with increased surgical risk.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine long-term clinical outcomes in high surgical risk patients (pts) with unprotected left main (ULM) disease who were managed with drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of unprotected left main (ULM) stenting with DES remains uncertain. METHODS: From June 2003 to December 2005, 100 pts with increased surgical risk underwent ULM stenting with DES. Patient risk was estimated by EuroSCORE. Disease was confined to the ostium/main stem in Group A (31 pts) and involved the bifurcation in Group B (69 pts). Study endpoints were MI, TVR, and death. RESULTS: Mean age was 68 +/- 1 years, EF 52 +/- 1%. Mean EuroSCORE was 5.2 +/- 0.4, and 41% pts had a EuroSCORE of >6. In Group A, 87% of lesions were directly stented. In Group B, 61% of pts received one stent and 39% received two stents. Primary success was 95%. Follow-up data (mean 28 +/- 1 months) were obtained in all patients. Restenosis occurred at the proximal stent margin in 5/9 pts. There were 12 cardiac deaths (88% cardiac survival) and 9 noncardiac deaths (79% total survival). In Group B, 5 pts died suddenly: 3 within the first week and 2 additional pts after 1 year. Sudden death did not occur in Group A. All cause event-free survival was 65% in Group A and 67% in Group B. CONCLUSION: A substantial number of late adverse events occurred in both ostial and bifurcation groups with equal frequency. Until definitive data from randomized trials are available, ULM stenting should be performed only in patients with prohibitive surgical risk.

Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Compared with bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents reduce restenosis in noncomplex lesions. The utility of drug-eluting stents has not been evaluated in more difficult stenoses. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of the polymer-based, slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent in a patient population with more complex lesions than previously studied. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 2003 to March 2004 at 66 academic and community-based institutions with 1156 patients who underwent stent implantation in a single coronary artery stenosis (vessel diameter, 2.25-4.0 mm; lesion length, 10-46 mm), including 664 patients (57.4%) with complex or previously unstudied lesions (requiring 2.25-mm, 4.0-mm, and/or multiple stents) and 9-month clinical and angiographic follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 or more bare metal stents (n = 579) or identical-appearing paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 577). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well matched. Diabetes was present in 31% of patients. The mean (SD) reference vessel diameter was 2.69 (0.57) mm, the reference lesion length was 17.2 (9.2) mm, and 78% of lesions were type B2/C. A mean (SD) of 1.38 (0.58) stents (total mean [SD] length, 28.4 [13.1] mm) were implanted per lesion; 33% of lesions required multiple stents. Stents that were 2.25 mm and 4.0 mm in diameter were used in 18% and 17% of lesions, respectively. Compared with bare metal stents, paclitaxel-eluting stents reduced the 9-month rate of target lesion revascularization from 15.7% to 8.6% (P<.001) and target vessel revascularization from 17.3% to 12.1% (P = .02). Similar rates were observed for cardiac death or myocardial infarction (5.5% for bare metal stent group vs 5.7% for paclitaxel-eluting stent group) and stent thrombosis (0.7% in both groups). Angiographic restenosis was reduced from 33.9% to 18.9% in the entire study cohort (P<.001), including among patients receiving 2.25-mm stents (49.4% vs 31.2%; P = .01), 4.0-mm stents (14.4% vs 3.5%; P = .02), and multiple stents (57.8% vs 27.2%; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with a bare metal stent, implantation of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in a patient population with complex lesions effectively reduces clinical and angiographic restenosis.

A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo lesions in coronary arteries: final results of the ZoMaxx II trial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZoMaxx™) with a paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent (Taxus™ Express(2)™) in patients with angina pectoris and a single native coronary artery lesion between 10-28 mm in length and 2.5-3.75mm in diameter. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 75 international institutions between June 2005 and November 2006. RESULTS: 1099 (1672 originally planned) patients received 557 ZoMaxx and 542 Taxus stents: cohorts were well-matched for diabetes (27% vs. 27%), reference vessel diameter (2.73 ± 0.46mm vs. 2.74 ± 0.45mm) and lesion length (14.8 ± 6.7mm vs. 14.3 ± 6.4mm). Nine month clinical and angiographic follow-up was available in 1052/1099 (96%) and 649/836 (78%) patients, respectively. The safety profiles for the two stents (myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and/or target vessel revascularization (TVR)) were similar (ZoMaxx 8.7% vs. Taxus 6.9%, p=NS). The primary endpoint of 9-month TVR occurred more frequently after treatment with ZoMaxx (6.8%) as compared with Taxus (4.2%), therefore the primary clinical endpoint was not met. However, the 9-month in-segment late lumen loss for ZoMaxx (0.29 ± 0.47mm) and Taxus (0.22 ± 0.41mm, p=NS) were similar, thus satisfying the primary angiographic endpoint. Secondary endpoints of the rates of in-segment and in-stent binary restenosis were also similar (5.9% vs. 5.8%, 7.8% vs. 7.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: At 9months, the ZoMaxx stent failed to achieve the primary endpoint of non-inferiority in TVR to the Taxus stent, but safety endpoints were equal between the two stent systems.

Chronic arterial responses to overlapping paclitaxel-eluting stents: insights from serial intravascular ultrasound analyses in the TAXUS-V and -VI trials.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to use intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to investigate chronic arterial responses at the site of and adjacent to overlapping paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stents (PES) compared with overlapping bare-metal stents (BMS). BACKGROUND: Increased paclitaxel dose in the PES-overlap region might be associated with arterial toxicity expressed as excessive expansive remodeling, incomplete stent apposition, or aneurysm formation. METHODS: In the TAXUS-V and -VI trials, 51 patients with overlapping stents (27 PES and 24 BMS) were imaged with serial IVUS immediately after procedure and at 9 months. The IVUS measurements included intimal hyperplasia (IH), peri-stent plaque plus media (P&M), and external elastic membrane (EEM) areas. Vascular responses were assessed at the proximal and distal single stent strut regions and the central overlap region. RESULTS: Compared with BMS, all 3 PES stent regions showed: 1) significantly decreased IH (proximal: 0.97 +/- 1.06 mm(2) vs. 3.12 +/- 2.40 mm(2), overlap: 0.74 +/- 0.91 mm(2) vs. 3.23 +/- 1.75 mm(2), distal: 0.88 +/- 0.85 mm(2) vs. 2.69 +/- 1.49 mm(2), all p < 0.05); and 2) increased P&M and EEM areas (Delta P&M, proximal: 0.96 +/- 1.36 mm(2) vs. -0.02 +/- 1.48 mm(2), overlap: 1.56 +/- 1.88 mm(2) vs. 0.29 +/- 1.82 mm(2), distal: 1.03 +/- 1.81 mm(2) vs. 0.11 +/- 0.89 mm(2), all p < 0.05). The IH and changes in EEM and P&M areas were not significantly different in both the BMS and PES groups comparing the single stent strut and overlap regions. Incomplete stent apposition did not occur at the site of overlapping PES in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Nine months after stent implantation, neointimal tissue growth was reduced and expansive remodeling was greater with PES compared with BMS--effects that were not exaggerated at the overlap region of PES.

Impact of mild or moderate renal insufficiency on the intravascular ultrasonic analysis of chronic vascular response to paclitaxel-eluting and bare-metal stents (from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials).

The presence of even mild renal insufficiency is usually associated with an increased rate of cardiovascular events after coronary stenting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mild to moderate renal insufficiency on the chronic vascular responses to the implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES; Taxus) and bare-metal stents (BMS). In the TAXUS IV, TAXUS V, and TAXUS VI trials, patients with serum creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl were excluded. In the present analysis, 816 patients with serum creatinine levels or=80 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). For all levels of Ccr, patients with PES compared with those with BMS had less intimal hyperplasia area (group 1: 0.97 +/- 0.98 vs 2.94 +/- 1.89; group 2: 0.94 +/- 0.86 vs 2.30 +/- 1.21; group 3: 0.99 +/- 1.02 vs 2.53 +/- 1.29; group 4: 0.87 +/- 0.95 vs 2.12 +/- 1.29 mm(2), all p values <0.0001) and greater increases in peristent plaque and media area (group 1: 0.90 +/- 0.98 vs -0.02 +/- 0.98 mm(2), p = 0.03; group 2: 0.57 +/- 1.43 vs 0.20 +/- 1.14 mm(2), p = 0.11; group 3: 1.20 +/- 1.95 vs 0.02 +/- 1.17, p <0.0001; group 4: 0.35 +/- 1.44 vs -0.19 +/- 1.08 mm(2), p = 0.08). Neointimal growth and vessel remodeling were not affected by variations in Ccr after either BMS or PES implantation over the range studied. The incidence of incomplete stent apposition at follow-up was lowest in patients with the greatest renal impairment after BMS and PES implantation. In conclusion, neointimal proliferation was less prominent and expansive vessel remodeling was more prominent after PES than BMS implantation, independent of the severity of renal dysfunction.

Impact of routine angiographic follow-up on the clinical benefits of paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the TAXUS-IV trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of angiographic follow-up on revascularization rates in the TAXUS-IV trial and to determine whether the relative benefit of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare metal stent implantation was modified by angiographic follow-up. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), virtually all of these studies have incorporated angiographic follow-up. METHODS: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 percutaneous coronary intervention patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) (n = 662) or identical-appearing BMS (n = 652). Clinical outcomes were compared, stratified by assignment to angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. RESULTS: Compared with clinical follow-up alone, angiographic follow-up patients had a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.46; p = 0.04), with similar relative increases in PES and BMS patients. Because PES reduced TVR by approximately 60% regardless of type of follow-up, assignment to angiographic follow-up tended to overestimate the absolute benefit of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. In contrast, assessment of end points immediately before the time of follow-up angiography led to substantial underestimation of the absolute benefit of PES implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of mandatory angiographic follow-up increases rates of TVR among patients receiving both BMS and PES and overestimates the absolute clinical benefits of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. Nonetheless, PES substantially reduces TVR regardless of assignment to mandatory angiographic follow-up or not. Future studies designed to determine the true clinical benefits of DES should either forgo routine angiographic follow-up or separate the time of repeat angiography from the primary clinical end point by as long as possible.

A randomized, controlled trial of saphenous vein graft intervention with a filter-based distal embolic protection device: TRAP trial.

The purpose of this prospective, multicenter trial was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the TRAP Vascular Filtration System (VFS) to reduce embolic complications during stenting of diseased saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). Patients with SVG lesions were randomly assigned to undergo stenting with or without the TRAP device. The trial was designed to enroll 752 randomized patients. However, the sponsor terminated the study after a total of 467 patients (358 randomized) were enrolled because of poor recruitment once another distal protection device was approved for clinical use. The primary study endpoint, major adverse cardiac events at 30 days, occurred in 17.3% of control patients and 12.7% of patients treated with the TRAP device (P = 0.24). There was a trend toward a lower incidence of myocardial infarction in the TRAP group compared with the control group (16.2% vs 10.5%, P = 0.12). This difference was predominantly due to a lower incidence of moderate-large infarction (CKMB >5x) in the TRAP group. Use of the TRAP VFS during SVG intervention was safe and was associated with a trend toward a lower incidence of adverse events, however, due to low enrollment the study lacked sufficient power to detect a significant benefit with the device.

Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), short-term clopidogrel therapy in addition to aspirin leads to greater protection from thrombotic complications than aspirin alone. However, the optimal duration of combination oral antiplatelet therapy is unknown. Also, although current clinical data suggest a benefit for beginning therapy with a clopidogrel loading dose prior to PCI, the practical application of this therapy has not been prospectively studied. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefit of long-term (12-month) treatment with clopidogrel after PCI and to determine the benefit of initiating clopidogrel with a preprocedure loading dose, both in addition to aspirin therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted among 2116 patients who were to undergo elective PCI or were deemed at high likelihood of undergoing PCI, enrolled at 99 centers in North America from June 1999 through April 2001. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 1053) or placebo (n = 1063) 3 to 24 hours before PCI. Thereafter, all patients received clopidogrel, 75 mg/d, through day 28. From day 29 through 12 months, patients in the loading-dose group received clopidogrel, 75 mg/d, and those in the control group received placebo. Both groups received aspirin throughout the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year incidence of the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the intent-to-treat population; 28-day incidence of the composite of death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization in the per-protocol population. RESULTS: At 1 year, long-term clopidogrel therapy was associated with a 26.9% relative reduction in the combined risk of death, MI, or stroke (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9%-44.4%; P =.02; absolute reduction, 3%). Clopidogrel pretreatment did not significantly reduce the combined risk of death, MI, or urgent target vessel revascularization at 28 days (reduction, 18.5%; 95% CI, -14.2% to 41.8%; P =.23). However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, patients who received clopidogrel at least 6 hours before PCI experienced a relative risk reduction of 38.6% (95% CI, -1.6% to 62.9%; P =.051) for this end point compared with no reduction with treatment less than 6 hours before PCI. Risk of major bleeding at 1 year increased, but not significantly (8.8% with clopidogrel vs 6.7% with placebo; P =.07). CONCLUSIONS: Following PCI, long-term (1-year) clopidogrel therapy significantly reduced the risk of adverse ischemic events. A loading dose of clopidogrel given at least 3 hours before the procedure did not reduce events at 28 days, but subgroup analyses suggest that longer intervals between the loading dose and PCI may reduce events.