Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Moral Distress Among Nurses and Physicians in Spanish ICUs.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on moral distress (MD) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) (physicians and nurses) in Spanish ICUs. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, prospective study. SETTING: ICUs in Spain. PARTICIPANTS: HCPs currently working in Spanish ICUs. INTERVENTIONS: Data were collected via electronic survey with the use of a 50-item questionnaire in two different periods: prepandemic (October-December 2019) and during the second wave of COVID-19 (September-November 2020). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the prepandemic and pandemic periods, 1,065 (57.1% nurses) and 1,115 (58.5% nurses) HCPs completed the questionnaire, respectively. Higher MD levels were reported during COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among ICU nurses, when compared with the prepandemic period. Before COVID-19, physicians reported significantly higher levels of MD than ICU nurses (80.0 [interquartile range {IQR}, 40.0-135.0] vs 61.0 [IQR, 35.0-133.0]; p = 0.026). These differences disappeared during the pandemic period (81.0 [IQR, 39.0-138.5] vs 74.0 [IQR, 41.0-143.0]; p = 0.837). During the pandemic, younger and less experienced HCPs working in hospital areas that were converted in ICU or in ICUs with multiple occupancy rooms reported higher MD levels. In addition, HCPs who were off work for psychologic burden reported higher MD levels (108.0 [IQR, 66.0-139.0] vs 76.0 [IQR, 40.0-141.0]; p < 0.05). In the prepandemic period, patient-level root causes were the most morally distressing for nurses, whereas physicians reported higher MD on system-level root causes. During the pandemic, both groups reported higher MD on system-level root causes. During COVID-19, significantly more HCPs considered leaving their job due to MD. CONCLUSIONS: MD has increased among ICU HCPs in Spain during COVID-19 pandemic. Physicians reported higher MD levels than nurses in the prepandemic period, whereas both HCPs groups reported similar MD levels in the pandemic period. Strategies are needed and should be implemented to mitigate MD among HCPs.

Measuring family-centred care practices in adult intensive care units: The EMPATHIC-F questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Engaging relatives in the care of critically ill patients is associated with better outcomes. It is crucial to empower relatives to provide feedback. Valid satisfaction instruments are essential to identify best practices and areas for improvement. AIM: The aim of the study was to adapt the Spanish version of the EMpowerment of PArents in The Intensive Care-30 (EMPATHIC-30) questionnaire in adult intensive care units (ICUs) and psychometrically test the EMpowerment of PAtients in The Intensive Care-Family (EMPATHIC-F) questionnaire to measure family satisfaction. DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional, prospective study conducted in two adult ICUs. Participants were relatives of patients who were discharged alive from the ICUs with an ICU length-of-stay >24 hours. The EMPATHIC-F questionnaire is divided into five domains that are related to the family-centred care principles. Responses are provided on a 6-point ordinal Likert scale, a score of >5 is considered acceptable. RESULTS: Patients' relatives confirmed the adaptation of the instrument. A total of 262 relatives responded to the EMPATHIC-F questionnaire (97% response rate). The empirical structure of the instrument was established by confirmatory factor analysis confirming 30 statements within five theoretically conceptualized domains: information, care and treatment, family participation, organization, and professional attitude. On item level, two statements scored a mean below 5.0. Cronbach's α at the domain level was between .64 and .75. Congruent validity was adequate between the five domains and four general satisfaction items (r's .26-.54). The non-differential validity was confirmed with no significant effect size between three patients' demographic characteristics and the domains. CONCLUSIONS: The EMPATHIC-F questionnaire is a reliable and valid quality performance indicator to measure the perceptions of family members in adult ICU settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The EMPATHIC-F questionnaire can be used to benchmark and provides a framework for standardized quality improvement towards the development of a family-centred care philosophy within adult ICUs.

Shifting trends in modes of death in the Intensive Care Unit.

PURPOSE: To describe the way patients die in a Spanish ICU, and how the modes of death have changed in the last 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational study evaluating all patients who died in a Spanish tertiary ICU over a 10-year period. Modes of death were classified as death despite maximal support (D-MS), brain death (BD), and death following life-sustaining treatment limitation (D-LSTL). RESULTS: Amongst 9264 ICU admissions, 1553 (16.8%) deaths were recorded. The ICU mortality rate declined (1.7%/year, 95% CI 1.4-2.0; p = 0.021) while ICU admissions increased (3.5%/year, 95% CI 3.3-3.7; p < 0.001). More than half of the patients (888, 57.2%) died D-MS, 389 (25.0%) died after a shared decision of D-LSTL and 276 (17.8%) died due to BD. Modes of death have changed significantly over the past decade. D-LSTL increased by 15.1%/year (95% CI 14.4-15.8; p < 0.001) and D-MS at the end-of-life decreased by 7.1%/year (95% CI 6.6-7.6; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients diagnosed with BD remained stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life practices and modes of death in our ICU have steadily changed. The proportion of patients who died in ICU following limitation of life-prolonging therapies substantially increased, whereas death after maximal support occurred significantly less frequently.