Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 160, 2018 02 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29415662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent associations between smoking status and prostate cancer (PC) could be due to exposure assessment error. Reconstructing smoking behaviors over the life course could reduce exposure assessment error. METHODS: As part of a case-control study, we identified 402 incident and histologically confirmed PC cases that were matched by age (±5 years) to 805 population controls. Through direct interview, we obtained information about: age at smoking onset, intensity and frequency of cigarette smoking at different life stages, and smoking cessation age. Smoking status at interview and average smoking index over the lifetime (packs/year) were estimated. Life course smoking patterns were obtained applying the k-means+ method for longitudinal data to the smoking index (pack/year) for each life stage. RESULTS: Two life-course smoking patterns were identified among ever smokers: "pattern A" characterized by males who reported low and constant smoking intensity (87.8%), and "pattern B" (12.2%) males with an initial period of low intensity, followed by an increase during the second period. Compared to never smokers, pattern B was associated with higher poorly differentiated PC, (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.21-4.38). No association was observed with average smoking index. CONCLUSION: Life course smoking patterns seem to capture the smoking variability during life course and reduce the likelihood of reverse causation. Using this assessment strategy our findings support the potential role of tobacco smoking in PC, particularly poorly differentiated PC. Prospective studies with comprehensive smoking history during the lifetime are needed to confirm these findings.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 42(3): 487-93, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27286111

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Indwelling double J ureteral stents are used routinely in the resolution of ureteral obstruction caused by different etiologies. Evaluation of urinary symptoms related to double-J stent, indicate that these affect 73-90% of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study, to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin, oxybutinin and combination therapy in improving the urinary symptoms. METHODS: Patients who underwent ureteral stent placement after ureterolithotripsy (total 51), were randomized into three groups: Group I: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg. Once per day(17 patients), Group II: Oxybutinin 5 mg. once per day (17 patients), Group III: Tamsulosin+ oxybutynin once per day (17 patients). All the groups received the drugs for three weeks and completed a Spanish validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at day 7 and 21. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA showed mean urinary symptom index score was 22.3 vs. 15.5 in group three (p<0.001) at day 7 and 21 respectively. The mean work performance index was 6.6 vs 8.1 (p=0.049) favoring tamsulosin group, the mean sexual score was 0.5 vs 1.5 (p=0.03). Among additional problems the mean was 7.2 vs 6.2 (p=0.03). No significant difference was noted among pain and general health index. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with tamsulosin and oxybutynin improved irritative symptoms and work performance as well as sexual matters. Combination therapy should be considered for patients who complained of stent related symptoms.


Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Ácidos Mandélicos/uso terapêutico , Stents/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/prevenção & controle , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Método Simples-Cego , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tansulosina , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral/complicações , Obstrução Ureteral/terapia , Ureteroscopia
3.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 40: 95-101, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706364

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the association between a history of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and the risk for prostate cancer (PC) among Mexican males. METHODS: PC incident cases (n=402) that were identified at six public hospitals in Mexico City were matched by age (±5 years) with 805 population controls with no history of PC. By face-to-face interview, we obtained information about sexual history, previous STDs, sociodemographic characteristics, and familial history of PC. An unconditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the risk for PC. RESULTS: A total of 16.6% of men reported having had at least one previous STD, and the most frequently reported STD was gonorrhea (10.5%). After adjusting by PC familial history, the history of STD was associated with a two-fold greater risk of PC: odds ratio (OR)=2.67; 95% confidence interval (95% CI=1.91-3.73). When each STD was evaluated separately, only gonorrhea was associated with a significant increase in PC risk (OR=3.04; 95% CI=1.99-4.64). These associations were similar when we stratified by low-risk PC (Gleason <7) and high-risk PC (Gleason ≥7). CONCLUSION: These results confirm that STDs, and particularly gonorrhea, may play an etiological role in PC among Mexican males, which is consistent with a previous report from a multiethnic cohort.


Assuntos
Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/patogenicidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Gonorreia/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 46(4): 687-90, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24061764

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin and alfuzosin in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: Ninety men with AUR due to BPH underwent urinary catheterization and were randomly assigned to treatment groups with tamsulosin 0.4 mg (37 patients), alfuzosin 10 mg (34 patients), and placebo (19 patients). After 4 days of the drug treatment, the catheters were removed, and the patients underwent trial without catheter (TWOC). A TWOC was considered successful if the patient had a voided volume >100 ml and post-void residual urine <200 ml. RESULTS: TWOC was successful in 16 patients (43.2 %) in the tamsulosin group, 12 patients (35.2 %) in the alfuzosin group, and 5 patients (26.3 %) in the placebo group. Logistic regression analysis showed that both drugs were equally effective and that the type of alpha-blocker was not a predictive factor for TWOC success (OR 1.137, 95 % CI 0.639-2.022) (p = 0.662). CONCLUSION: Even though there were no statistically significant differences when comparing the three groups, tamsulosin showed a tendency to be more effective in a successful catheter removal. The lack of objective criteria in the definition of successful micturition leads us to believe that the effectiveness of both drugs reported in the literature is overestimated.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos alfa 1/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Retenção Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Remoção de Dispositivo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Tansulosina , Cateterismo Urinário , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Retenção Urinária/terapia , Micção
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(3): 487-493, tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-785727

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction and objective Indwelling double J ureteral stents are used routinely in the resolution of ureteral obstruction caused by different etiologies. Evaluation of urinary symptoms related to double-J stent, indicate that these affect 73-90% of patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study, to evaluate the efficacy of tamsulosin, oxybutinin and combination therapy in improving the urinary symptoms. Methods Patients who underwent ureteral stent placement after ureterolithotripsy (total 51), were randomized into three groups: Group I: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg. once per day(17 patients), Group II: Oxybutinin 5 mg. once per day (17 patients), Group III: Tamsulosin+ oxybutynin once per day (17 patients). All the groups received the drugs for three weeks and completed a Spanish validated Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at day 7 and 21. Results Repeated measures ANOVA showed mean urinary symptom index score was 22.3 vs. 15.5 in group three (p<0.001) at day 7 and 21 respectively. The mean work performance index was 6.6 vs 8.1 (p=0.049) favoring tamsulosin group, the mean sexual score was 0.5 vs 1.5 (p=0.03). Among additional problems the mean was 7.2 vs 6.2 (p=0.03). No significant difference was noted among pain and general health index. No side effects were reported. Conclusions Combination therapy with tamsulosin and oxybutynin improved irritative symptoms and work performance as well as sexual matters. Combination therapy should be considered for patients who complained of stent related symptoms.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Stents/efeitos adversos , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/tratamento farmacológico , Agentes Urológicos/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Mandélicos/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Ureter , Obstrução Ureteral , Obstrução Ureteral/complicações , Obstrução Ureteral/terapia , Método Simples-Cego , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Variância , Resultado do Tratamento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/prevenção & controle , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Rev. méd. Hosp. Gen. Méx ; 63(2): 91-97, abr.-jun. 2000. graf, CD-ROM
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-302849

RESUMO

Introducción. La prostatectomía radical retropúbica es un procedimiento terapéutico que ha demostrado ser de mucho beneficio para el manejo de los pacientes con carcinoma de próstata en etapas confinadas al órgano. En nuestro país este método de tratamiento aún no es del dominio de toda la comunidad urológica. Objetivos. Presentar la experiencia de nuestro servicio en el manejo del carcinoma de próstata en etapas confinadas al órgano con este procedimiento quirúrgico. Material y métodos. Se revisaron los expedientes de 72 pacientes sometidos a este procedimiento quirúrgico, de los cuales 53 fueron elegibles para este estudio. En todos los casos se analizó edad, estadio clínico, estadio patológico, suma de Gleason, antígeno prostático específico pre y postoperatorio, complicaciones y supervivencia global, así como supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Resultados. Se encontró una diferencia importante en la estadificación clínica y la patológica; sólo 25 (47 por ciento) pacientes presentaron tumor confinado al órgano y 28 (53 por ciento) mostraron datos de infiltración de los tejidos periprostáticos. La gradación histopatológica tuvo una relación directamente proporcional con el estadio patológico definitivo y con el comportamiento biológico del tumor. El valor sérico del antígeno prostético específico postoperatorio presentó cifras menores de 0.2 ng/mL en los pacientes con control de la enfermedad. El seguimiento promedio de los sujetos fue de 38.1 meses. Se encontró una supervivencia global de 90.5 por ciento. La supervivencia global libre de enfermedad fue de 65 por ciento. Los pacientes con enfermedad confinada al órgano tuvieron una supervivencia libre de enfermedad de 88 por ciento; mientras que en los sujetos con enfermedad localmente avanzada fue solamente de 39 por ciento. Conclusiones. La prostatectomía radical retropúbica demostró ser un procedimiento muy útil para el tratamiento del carcinoma de próstata confinado a la glándula en la población estudiada. Los métodos de diagnóstico actuales aún permiten un alto porcentaje de subestadificación de pacientes con este padecimiento. La supervivencia libre de enfermedad está relacionada directamente con el estadio definitivo del padecimiento.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Carcinoma
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA