RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The duration of untreated depression (DUD) might have a substantial impact on the clinical outcomes; however, there are important knowledge gaps including the effects on disability and potential differences between first-episode and recurrent episodes of depression. METHODS: We recruited 121 outpatients with first episode and recurrent major depression, and conducted prospective clinical assessments over six months. Clinical outcomes included response to antidepressant therapy, remission and changes in disability. RESULTS: Patients with a DUD of six months or shorter were more frequently young, unemployed and had higher levels of physical illnesses than those with a longer DUD (all p<0.05). A shorter DUD was associated with significantly higher odds of response at 12 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.8) and remission at 24 weeks (4.1; 95% CI: 1.6-10.5) after adjusting for relevant confounders. Changes in disability ratings were analyzed with growth curve analysis and showed steeper declines among those with a shorter DUD. The associations of DUD on clinical outcomes were evident both in patients with first-episode and recurrent depression. LIMITATIONS: Naturalistic design. Self-rated assessment of disability. Findings from subgroup analyses should be replicated in larger sample size. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter duration of untreated depression is associated with more favorable outcomes for major depression, including depression-related disability. This association seems to work both at the first and recurrent episodes, which might have direct implications for both primary and secondary prevention.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Tempo para o Tratamento , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Indução de Remissão , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To systematically review evidence of the effects of the duration of untreated depression on the clinical outcomes of patients suffering from Unipolar Major Depression. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence of duration of untreated depression and the effect it has on clinical outcomes in Unipolar Major Depression. Data used to this purpose were obtained from a literature search of the MEDLINE, Psychoinfo and Embase databases. Comparable data extracted from studies were entered and analysed using Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software Version 5.2. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. Only three studies reported comparable data and were consequently used for the meta-analysis. Pooled data indicates the overall positive effect of shorter duration of untreated illness both in a patient's response to treatment (RR 1.70) and remission (RR 1.65). Other studies which were not included in the meta-analysis confirmed the importance of reducing delays in the treatment of depression in order to prevent the risk of worse outcomes and chronicity, in particular in patients presenting with a first episode of depression. Data regarding the association between the duration of untreated episode in recurrent depression and clinical outcomes are less evident. LIMITATIONS: The heterogeneity of the selected studies was cause for limitations with regard to the carrying out of adequate meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence highlighting the importance of a reduced no-treatment interval for patients suffering Unipolar Depression. In particular, there is emphasis on the first episode of depression corresponding to the notion of reducing the duration of untreated illness.