RESUMO
Honey is usually classified as "unifloral" or "multifloral", depending on whether a dominating pollen grain, originating from only one particular plant, or no dominant pollen type in the sample is found. Unifloral honeys are usually more expensive and appreciated than multifloral honeys, which highlights the importance of honey authenticity. Melissopalynological analysis is used to identify the botanical origin of honey, counting down the number of pollens grains of a honey sample, and calculating the respective percentages of the nectariferous pollens. In addition, sensory properties are also very important for honey characterization, and electronic senses emerged as useful tools for honey authentication. In this work, a comparison of the results obtained from melissopalynological analysis with those provided by a potentiometric electronic tongue is given, resulting in a 100% match between the two techniques.
RESUMO
Anaplasma species are tick-transmitted pathogens that impact veterinary and human health. Sicily is one of the locations where these pathogens are endemic. Sicily represents a typical Mediterranean ecosystem to study Anaplasma infection and tick habitat suitability. The aims of this study were (i) to characterize by 16S rRNA and species-specific msp4 gene PCR the prevalence and genotypes of A. marginale, A. phagocytophilum, and A. ovis in the most abundant host species in Sicilian provinces and (ii) to correlate differences between hosts and between western and eastern Sicily with the habitat suitability for ticks in these regions. Differences were found in the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. between different hosts and between western and eastern provinces. The differences in Anaplasma prevalence between different hosts may be explained by pathogen host tropism. The differences between western and eastern provinces correlated with the tick habitat suitability in these regions. The analysis of Anaplasma genotypes suggested a higher host and regional specificity for A. phagocytophilum than for A. marginale and A. ovis strains, a finding probably associated with the broader host range of A. phagocytophilum. The presence of identical A. marginale genotypes in the two regions may reflect cattle movement. The results for A. ovis suggested the possibility of some genotypes being host specific. These results provide information potentially useful for the management of tick-borne diseases caused by Anaplasma spp. in Sicily and other Mediterranean regions and may contribute to the development of models to predict the risks for these tick-borne pathogens.
Assuntos
Anaplasma marginale/isolamento & purificação , Anaplasma ovis/isolamento & purificação , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/isolamento & purificação , Carrapatos/microbiologia , Anaplasma marginale/genética , Anaplasma ovis/genética , Anaplasma phagocytophilum/genética , Animais , Animais Domésticos , Animais Selvagens , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Análise por Conglomerados , DNA Bacteriano/química , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Ecossistema , Genótipo , Geografia , Proteínas de Membrana/genética , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Filogenia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Homologia de Sequência , SicíliaRESUMO
Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale are tick-transmitted bacteria that cause anaplasmosis in domestic and wild animals. Recent results show that some domestic and wild animals and ticks are susceptible to both A. ovis and A. marginale, thus supporting the need to differentiate between these species in hosts and ticks diagnosed with Anaplasma infection. However, although anaplasmosis is one of the most common diseases of grazing animals worldwide, rapid and effective tests are not available for the detection of and discrimination between these 2 Anaplasma species. The objective of this research was to develop an easy and reliable method to identify and discriminate between the closely related pathogens A. ovis and A. marginale. A. ovis and A. marginale major surface protein 4 (msp4) gene sequences were retrieved from different geographic strains and aligned to design 2 sets of primers in a region with significant differences between the 2 species, but completely conserved among strains. PCR reactions using these primers were 100% species-specific and detected all strains from each pathogen previously identified with other methods. The 2 sets of primers designed for the specific PCR amplification of A. ovis and A. marginale allow easy-to-detect and discriminate between the 2 pathogens, thus avoiding the time-consuming sequencing or multi-gene amplification procedures. This PCR provides a tool for the detection of A. ovis and A. marginale in ticks and in wildlife and domestic hosts.