Conventional radiography in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Joint recommendations from the French societies for rheumatology, radiology and paediatric rheumatology.

BACKGROUND: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) can cause structural damage. However, data on conventional radiography (CR) in JIA are scant. OBJECTIVE: To provide pragmatic guidelines on CR in each non-systemic JIA subtype. METHODS: A multidisciplinary task force of 16 French experts (rheumatologists, paediatricians, radiologists and one patient representative) formulated research questions on CR assessments in each non-systemic JIA subtype. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies providing detailed information on structural joint damage. Recommendations, based on the evidence found, were evaluated using two Delphi rounds and a review by an independent committee. RESULTS: 74 original articles were included. The task force developed four principles and 31 recommendations with grades ranging from B to D. The experts felt strongly that patients should be selected for CR based on the risk of structural damage, with routine CR of the hands and feet in rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA but not in oligoarticular non-extensive JIA. CONCLUSION: These first pragmatic recommendations on CR in JIA rely chiefly on expert opinion, given the dearth of scientific evidence. CR deserves to be viewed as a valuable tool in many situations in patients with JIA. KEY POINTS: • CR is a valuable imaging technique in selected indications. • CR is routinely recommended for peripheral joints, when damage risk is high. • CR is recommended according to the damage risk, depending on JIA subtype. • CR is not the first-line technique for imaging of the axial skeleton.

Assessment of major salivary gland size in primary Sjögren's syndrome: Comparison between clinical examination and ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVE: Parotidomegaly is a criterion of the EULAR Primary Sjögren Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI). The cut-off value was set at 3 cm in length for the parotid gland, 2 cm for the submandibular glands. However, clinical appreciation of salivary glands size remains hazardous. The objective is to evaluate inter-observer reproducibility of parotid gland measurement by palpation, and to secondary evaluate its reliability compared to US assessment. METHODS: Outpatients with primary Sjögren Syndrome (pSS) or with a diagnostic suspicion, in a single reference centre, were included. They underwent clinical examination by two independent investigators (VDP and DC), evaluating: parotid gland swelling, parotid gland size (direct measurement with a decameter under the mandibular angle), and pain. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to determine inter-observer concordance for parotid gland swelling, and intraclass correlation coefficient to determine inter-observer agreement of gland size measurement. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (33 women, 1 man) were included. Clinical data were complete for 33 patients. Inter-observer concordance Kappa coefficient was 0.90 [0.76-1.00] for detection of parotidomegaly over 66 parotid glands. It was of 0.60 [0.42-0.73] for gland length measurement. For one observer, the median cut-off for defining parotidomegaly was 4.15 cm; for the second observer, it was of 4.92 cm. For submandibular glands palpation, no correlation was found between investigators. A significant association between clinical parotidomegaly and a larger echographic surface was found. CONCLUSION: Clinical measurement of parotidomegaly was concordant between two observers on a binary mode (presence/absence). However, concordance on direct measurement was weak. US could be a complementary examination.