Associations of gut microbiome with endogenous estrogen levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: The gut microbiome is a potentially important contributor to endogenous estrogen levels after menopause. In healthy postmenopausal women, we examined associations of fecal microbiome composition with levels of urinary estrogens, their metabolites, and relevant metabolic pathway ratios implicated in breast cancer risk. METHODS: Eligible postmenopausal women (n = 164) had a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m2 and no history of hormone use (previous 6 months) or cancer/metabolic disorders. Estrogens were quantified in spot urine samples with liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (corrected for creatinine). Bacterial DNA was isolated from fecal samples and the V1-V2 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We examined associations of gut microbiome's indices of within-sample (alpha) diversity (i.e., Shannon, Chao1, and Inverse Simpson), phylogenetic diversity, and the ratio of the two main phyla (Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes; F/B ratio) with individual estrogens and metabolic ratios, adjusted for age and BMI. RESULTS: In this sample of 164 healthy postmenopausal women, the mean age was 62.9 years (range 47.0-86.0). We found significant inverse associations of observed species with 4-pathway:total estrogens (p = 0.04) and 4-pathway:2-pathway (p = 0.01). Shannon index was positively associated with 2-catechols: methylated 2-catechols (p = 0.04). Chao1 was inversely associated with E1:total estrogens (p = 0.04), and 4-pathway:2-pathway (p = 0.02) and positively associated with 2-pathway:parent estrogens (p = 0.01). Phylogenetic diversity was inversely associated with 4-pathway:total estrogens (p = 0.02), 4-pathway:parent estrogens (p = 0.03), 4-pathway:2-pathway (p = 0.01), and 4-pathway:16-pathway (p = 0.03) and positively associated with 2-pathway:parent estrogens (p = 0.01). F/B ratio was not associated with any of the estrogen measures. CONCLUSION: Microbial diversity was associated with several estrogen metabolism ratios implicated in breast cancer risk. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings in a larger and more representative sample of postmenopausal women, particularly with enrichment of minority participants.

Effectiveness of Monovalent and Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing COVID-19-Associated Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters Among Children Aged 6 Months-5 Years - VISION Network, United States, July 2022-June 2023.

On June 19, 2022, the original monovalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were approved as a primary series for children aged 6 months-4 years (Pfizer-BioNTech) and 6 months-5 years (Moderna) based on safety, immunobridging, and limited efficacy data from clinical trials. On December 9, 2022, CDC expanded recommendations for use of updated bivalent vaccines to children aged ≥6 months. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) encounters was evaluated within the VISION Network during July 4, 2022-June 17, 2023, among children with COVID-19-like illness aged 6 months-5 years. Among children aged 6 months-5 years who received molecular SARS-CoV-2 testing during August 1, 2022-June 17, 2023, VE of 2 monovalent Moderna doses against ED/UC encounters was 29% (95% CI = 12%-42%) ≥14 days after dose 2 (median = 100 days after dose 2; IQR = 63-155 days). Among children aged 6 months-4 years with a COVID-19-like illness who received molecular testing during September 19, 2022-June 17, 2023, VE of 3 monovalent Pfizer-BioNTech doses was 43% (95% CI = 17%-61%) ≥14 days after dose 3 (median = 75 days after dose 3; IQR = 40-139 days). Effectiveness of ≥1 bivalent dose, comparing children with at least a complete primary series and ≥1 bivalent dose to unvaccinated children, irrespective of vaccine manufacturer, was 80% (95% CI = 42%-96%) among children aged 6 months-5 years a median of 58 days (IQR = 32-83 days) after the dose. All children should stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccines, including initiation of COVID-19 vaccination immediately when they are eligible.

Clinical and descriptive characteristics associated with high-grade meningioma in a large clinical series.

PURPOSE: We studied 571 patients with intracranial meningioma for clinical characteristics and tumor location associated with high grade meningioma (WHO II/III). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were participants in a multicentre epidemiologic study of risk factors for primary brain tumors including meningioma recruited from September 2005 to November 2019. We included patients 18 or older with a recent diagnosis of a primary intracranial meningioma of any subtype (ICD9/10: 9530-0, 9531-0, 9532-0, 9537-0, 9533-0, 9534-0, 9530-0, 9538-1, 9538-3) who were enrolled at neuro-oncology and neuro-surgery clinics in the southeastern U.S. RESULTS: The median patient age was 58 years (IQR: 48-68) and the majority of patients were female (n = 415; 72.7%) and Caucasian (n = 516; 90.4%). Most patients were symptomatic (n = 460; 80.6%) and their tumours more commonly occurred in a non-skull base location (n = 298; 52.2%). A total of 86 patients (15.0%) had a WHO grade II/III meningioma. Compared to patients with WHO grade I tumours, patients with WHO II/III meningiomas were over 3-times more likely to be male (odds ratio (OR): 3.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98, 5.35) adjusting for age, race, symptomatic presentation, and skull-based location. Moreover, a WHO grade II/III meningioma was substantially less likely to be observed in asymptomatic patients (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.42), and in patients with a skull-based tumour (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.66), adjusting for other factors. Male gender, symptomatic tumour, and a non-skull base location were independently associated with WHO grade II/III meningioma. CONCLUSION: These findings may shed additional light on the underlying pathogenesis of meningioma.

Associations of established breast cancer risk factors with urinary estrogens in postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: Circulating estrogens are an established risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer (BCa). We describe the distribution of urinary estrogens, their metabolites, and relevant metabolic pathway ratios among healthy postmenopausal women and examine associations of several known BCa factors with these estrogen measures. METHODS: Eligible postmenopausal women (n = 167) had no history of hormone use (previous 6 months) and cancer/metabolic disorders and had a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m2. Estrogens were quantified in spot urine samples with liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and corrected for creatinine. We assessed overall distributions of estrogens and associations of age, BMI, race/ethnicity, parity/age at first birth, age at menarche, alcohol, and smoking with log-transformed estrogen measures using multivariate regression. RESULTS: BMI was positively associated with estrone (ß per unit = 0.04, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.00; 0.07), combined parent estrogens (ß = 0.04, 95% CI 0.01; 0.07), and E2:total estrogens (ß = 0.04, 95% CI 0.02; 0.06), and inversely associated with 4-MeOE1 (ß = - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.33; - 0.02), E3:parent estrogens (ß = - 0.04, 95% CI - 0.07; - 0.00), and 16-pathway:parent (ß = - 0.04, 95% CI - 0.07; - 0.01). Being African American vs. white was associated with higher levels of 4-MeOE1 (ß = 3.41, 95% CI 0.74; 6.08), 17-epiE3 (ß = 1.19, 95% CI 0.07; 2.31), 2-pathway:parent (ß = 0.54, 95% CI 0.04; 1.04), and lower levels of E2:total estrogens (ß = - 0.48, 95% CI - 0.83; - 0.13). Having < 7 alcohol drinks/week vs. none was associated with higher levels of 16-ketoE2 (ß = 1.32, 95% CI 0.36; 2.27), 16-epiE3 (ß = 1.02, 95% CI 0.24; 1.79), and 17-epiE3 (ß = 0.55, 95% CI 0.02; 1.08). Smoking was positively associated with E3:parent (ß = 0.29, 95% CI 0.01; 0.57), 16-pathway:parent (ß = 0.25, 95% CI 0.01; 0.49), and inversely associated with estradiol (ß = - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.93; - 0.10). As compared to nulliparous, parous women with age at first birth ≥ 25 years had lower levels of estrone, combined parent estrogens, 2-OHE1, and 2-OHE2. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that BMI, race/ethnicity, and some reproductive and lifestyle factors may contribute to postmenopausal BCa through their effects on circulating estrogens.

Gut microbiome, body weight, and mammographic breast density in healthy postmenopausal women.

PURPOSE: We examined gut microbiome (GM) profiles in relation to mammographic breast density (BD) and body mass index (BMI) in healthy postmenopausal women. METHODS: Eligible women were postmenopausal, had a BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2, and had not recently taken oral/IV antibiotics. All women provided a fecal sample and information on breast cancer risk factors. Mammographic BD was classified with the American College of Radiology's BI-RADS BD classification system. Bacterial DNA was isolated from fecal samples and the V1-V2 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We examined associations of GM with indices of within-sample (alpha) diversity and the ratio of the two main phyla (Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes; F/B ratio) with BD and BMI. RESULTS: Among 69 women with BD data, 39 had low BD (BI-RADS I/II) and 30 had high BD (BI-RADS III/IV). BMI was inversely associated with BD (mean BMI = 23.8 and 28.0 in women with high and low BD, respectively, p = 1.07 × 10-5). Similar levels of GM diversity were found across weight groups according to Shannon (p = 0.83); Inverse Simpson (p = 0.97); and Chao1 (p = 0.31) indices. F/B ratio and microbiota diversity were suggestively greater in women with high vs. low BD (p = 0.35, 0.14, 0.15, and 0.17 for F/B ratio, Shannon, Inverse Simpson and Chao1, respectively). CONCLUSION: Suggestive differences observed in women with high and low BD with respect to GM alpha diversity and prevalence of specific GM taxa need to be confirmed in larger studies.

Concordance of cancer related concerns among advanced cancer patient-spouse caregiver dyads.

Purpose/Objectives: To describe advanced cancer patient-spouse caregiver couples' cancer-related concerns, determine dyadic concordance of concerns, and predict concordance based on demographic characteristics.Design/Research Approach: Secondary analysis of cross-sectional self-report data.Sample/Participants: 88 advanced cancer patients and spouse self-identified caregivers.Methods/Methodological Approach: Participants individually completed questionnaires, including demographics and the Cancer Inventory of Problem Situations. Data are described and concordances were calculated using Kappa scores. Generalized Linear Modeling was used to predict concordances using demographic characteristics.Findings: The top patient concern was lack of energy, while the top spouse caregiver concern was worry about cancer. Couples generally had low concordance about concerns. Demographic characteristics did not significantly predict concordance.Conclusions/Interpretation: Low inter- and intra-dyadic congruence may suggest little communication within couples regarding cancer-related concerns.Implications for Psychosocial Providers or Policy: Healthcare providers should reinforce the importance of communication among patients and spouse caregivers to improve concordance and potentially reduce conflict.

Cannabis use and patient-reported outcomes among patients at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer report increasing rates of cannabis use, often to manage symptoms and toxicities. The efficacy and safety of cannabis, however, for some use cases remains unclear. To better understand characteristics of patients with cancer who report using cannabis, we examined data from a cannabis use survey of among patients with cancer seen at a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center. METHODS: In late 2021, patients with cancer (N = 1608) treated between July 2017 and December 2019 provided cannabis use data. Additional data were obtained from medical records data and routine patient-reported outcomes collected for clinical purposes. Univariable analyses and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify correlates of cannabis use at different stages in the cancer care trajectory. RESULTS: Rates of self-reported cannabis use by patients with cancer were 59% before cancer diagnosis and 47% after diagnosis. Longitudinal rates of cannabis use were 29% for no cannabis use, 23% before diagnosis, 12% after diagnosis, and 35% for both before and after diagnosis. Demographic factors associated with cannabis use included age, sex, race, and educational achievement. Tobacco use and binge drinking were associated with higher odds of cannabis use. Cannabis use was also associated with greater self-reported interference with physical functioning due to pain and interference with social functioning due to health problems. CONCLUSIONS: We found high rates of cannabis use among patients with cancer, both before and after their cancer diagnosis. Future studies should further investigate psychosocial factors associated with cannabis use among patients with cancer as well as psychosocial outcomes among patients with cancer using cannabis.

Patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: There has been limited study regarding patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. To address this gap, this study assesses the determinants and prevalence of patient-provider communication about the use of medical cannabis for cancer symptoms at a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. METHODS: Individuals who completed cancer treatment from July 2017 to December 2019 were invited to participate in a survey regarding medical cannabis. An electronic survey was administered in English and Spanish from August to November 2021 and completed by 1592 individuals (response rate = 17.6%). RESULTS: About one-third (33.5%) of participants reported discussing medical cannabis for cancer symptom management with a health-care provider. Controlling for other factors, individuals with malnutrition and/or cachexia had higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 2.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50 to 3.53) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without malnutrition and/or cachexia. Similarly, individuals with nausea had higher odds (OR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.44 to 2.61) of reporting patient-provider discussions compared with individuals without nausea. A smaller percentage (15.6%) of participants reported receiving a recommendation for medical cannabis for cancer symptom management. Among individuals who reported using cannabis, a little over one-third (36.1%) reported not receiving instructions from anyone on how to use cannabis or determine how much to take. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study suggests that patient-provider communication about medical cannabis for cancer symptom management is limited. As interest and use of medical cannabis continues to grow among cancer patients, there is a need to ensure patients have access to high quality patient-provider communication.

Concurrent substance use among cancer patients with and without a history of cannabis use since cancer diagnosis at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center in Florida.

BACKGROUND: Although substance use may have adverse impacts on cancer outcomes, little is known regarding patterns of concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients. Our objective was to examine predictors of concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients since their cancer diagnosis and explore perceptions of cannabis among these patients. METHODS: Patients treated at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center were invited to participate in an electronic survey regarding medical cannabis from August to November 2021. Survey data were linked to internal data resources including electronic health records and patient intake forms to obtain history of substance use (defined as within at least 3 months of cancer diagnosis) of cigarettes, injection drugs, high levels of alcohol, or clinically unsupervised prescription drugs (total n = 1094). Concurrent substance users were defined as those with any reported substance use and cannabis use at the time of cancer diagnosis. We used descriptive statistics (χ2 or exact tests) to compare groups and estimated adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify predictors of substance use among users and nonusers of cannabis. RESULTS: Approximately 45% (n = 489) of the sample reported cannabis use since their cancer diagnosis. Of patients who reported using cannabis, 20% self-reported concurrent polysubstance use, while 8% of cannabis nonusers reported substance use (P < .001). Among patients who use cannabis, those who reported 2 or more self-reported treatment-related symptoms (eg, pain, fatigue) were more likely to have self-reported concurrent substance use (AOR = 3.15, 95% CI = 1.07 to 9.27) compared with those without any symptoms. Among nonusers, those with lower educational background were more likely to have a history of concurrent substance use (AOR = 3.74, 95% CI = 1.57 to 8.92). Patients who use cannabis with concurrent substance use were more likely to report improved sleep (P = .04), increased appetite (P = .03), and treatment of additional medical conditions (P = .04) as perceived benefits of cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: High symptom burden may be associated with concurrent substance use with cannabis among cancer patients.

LC-HRMS of derivatized urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women.

In order to undertake an epidemiologic study relating levels of parent estrogens (estrone and estradiol) and estrogen metabolites (EMs) to other breast cancer risk factors, we have optimized methods for EM quantification with ultra high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS). A two-step approach was adopted; the first step comprised method development and evaluation of the method performance. The second step consisted of applying this method to quantify estrogens in postmenopausal women and determine if the observed patterns are consistent with the existing literature and prior knowledge of estrogen metabolism. First, 1-methylimidazole-2-sulfonyl chloride (MIS) was used to derivatize endogenous estrogens and estrogen metabolites in urine from study participants. Since C18 reversed phase columns have not been able to separate all the structurally related EMs, we used a C18-pentafluorophenyl (PFP) column. The parent estrogens and EMs were baseline resolved with distinct retention times on this C18-PFP column using a 30 min gradient. This method was used to quantify the parent estrogens and 13 EMs in urine samples collected in an initial pilot study involving males as well as pre- and peri-menopausal females to assess a range of EM levels in urine samples and enable comparison to the previous literature for assay evaluation. Detection limits ranged from 1 - 20 pg/mL depending on the EM. We evaluated matrix effects and interference as well as the intra- and inter-batch reproducibility including hydrolysis, extraction, derivatization and LC-MS analysis using charcoal-stripped human urine as a matrix. Methods were then applied to the measurement of estrogens in urine samples from 169 postmenopausal women enrolled in an epidemiological study to examine relationships between breast cancer risk, the intestinal microbiome, and urinary EMs. The results from our cohort are comparable to previous reports on urinary EMs in postmenopausal women and enabled thorough evaluation of the method.

Medical Cannabis Use in Glioma Patients Treated at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Florida.

Background: Glioma is a devastating primary tumor of the central nervous system with difficult-to-manage symptoms. Cannabis products have been postulated to potentially benefit glioma patients. Recent state legalization allowed investigators an opportunity to study glioma patients' adoption of medical marijuana (MM). Objective: Our goals were to: (1) determine the prevalence of marijuana use, both through physician recommendation and self-medication, and (2) evaluate its perceived risks and benefits in glioma patients. Design: Self-report data were collected and descriptive analyses were conducted. Setting/Subjects: Participants were adult, English-speaking patients undergoing treatment for primary non-recurrent malignant glioma in neuro-oncology clinics at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Measurements: The survey on MM was adapted from previous research and included questions on knowledge and attitudes toward MM; use, frequency, type, and sourcing of MM; and reasons for use of MM and perceived symptom relief among users. Results: A total of 73 patients were surveyed. The majority of participants were aware that MM was legal in the state, and most reported learning of this through the media. Over 70% of participants reported having considered using MM, and a third reported using marijuana products after their diagnosis. Most received recommendations from friends/family rather than a medical provider, and only half of the users had obtained a physician's recommendation. Users generally reported benefits. Conclusions: With the increasing national conversation that accompanies legalization, glioma patients are pursuing marijuana for the treatment for their symptoms. More research and education is needed to bring health care providers into the conversation.