Breast reconstruction with immediate autologous free tissue transfer in a peri-operative COVID-19 positive patient: A case report illustrating feasibility of aftercare.

Globally, there has been a measured response to rationalise elective operating during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In terms of breast cancer care, this has led to a restricted provision of reconstruction with autologous free tissue transfer. A primary concern is the risk of mortality in elective surgery patients who develop COVID-19. The aim of this report is to describe the observed physiological impact of the virus on our patient, and to address how outpatient care after autologous free tissue transfer can be delivered to COVID-19 positive patients. In March 2020, we performed a bilateral breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap and a superficial inferior epigastric perforator flap. The patient became symptomatic on day three post-operatively, tested positive for COVID-19 and was discharged home. Drain and dressing management was continued through the use of telemedicine. Two weeks following the operation, a breast seroma formed that was drained semi-electively in the COVID-19 positive area of the Emergency Department. The patient visited the dressing clinic twice in total and healed after three weeks. Despite undergoing complex surgery and having pre-operative chemotherapy, our patient suffered a mild form of the virus limited to upper respiratory symptoms. Physiologically we did not see any significant difference to that of the normal post-operative course. This case demonstrates the possibility of managing autologous breast reconstruction patients using telemedicine. Although COVID-19 can complicate, or even be fatal, in the perioperative course, our patient thankfully suffered no discernable negative outcome from her infection.

Immediate unilateral breast reconstruction and contralateral breast augmentation with bilateral free deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.

A 42-year-old woman was referred for consideration of left-sided mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. She previously had a bilateral breast augmentation using silicone implants. She desired to maintain her breast size and natural appearance. Owing to the availability of sufficient abdominal tissue, the option of an immediate unilateral breast reconstruction and contralateral augmentation with a differentially split deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps was offered to the patient. The patient had a successful reconstructive and contralateral symmetrising procedure with an uneventful postoperative recovery. She was satisfied with her breast size, which was achieved without the use of implants. In selected patients the free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap provides an appropriate option for unilateral breast reconstruction and contralateral breast augmentation. It has numerous advantages including making use of available excess abdominal tissue and avoiding implant related complications.

Basal cell carcinomata: Risk factors for incomplete excision and results of re-excision.

INTRODUCTION: Re-excision of incompletely excised basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be unsatisfactory in the absence of residual tumours. Recommended guidelines do suggest re-excision as a treatment modality; however, its value has been questioned due to low or variable residual tumour presence. We analysed the incomplete excision and re-excision rates and the presence of residual tumours over an 18-month period in a single unit. METHOD: Using pathology results and case notes, 2586 primary excisions of BCCs in 1717 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The incomplete excision rate was reported to be 7.1% (184/2586). Excision of a lesion by multiple excision lesion procedure was associated with a higher rate of incomplete excision when compared to single lesion excision procedure (61.5% vs. 38.5%). Of the incompletely excised BCCs, 33.6% (62/184) were re-excised, of which 62.9% (39/62) had residual tumours. Although the figures are small, most anatomical sites examined had a residual tumour presence >50%. CONCLUSION: After evaluating each patient individually, considering the high residual tumour rate, re-excision of an incompletely excised BCC would be a worthwhile procedure.

The use of a frailty scoring system for burns in the elderly.

INTRODUCTION: Burn in the elderly has a high mortality. Scoring systems incorporating age, and/or co-morbidities have been developed to assist in predicting outcomes in this high risk group. Life expectancy has increased in the general population and within the elderly age group medical co morbidity, physiological response to injury and socioeconomic factors give rise to the concept of biological versus chronological age. For a given age, baseline pre morbid state can vary. It is more valid to consider biological rather than chronological age when calculating risk. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA) clinical frailty scale, incorporating fitness, co-morbidities and level of dependence was used to analyse our elderly burn patients admitted to Burns ITU, their surgical management and one-year survival. METHOD: Data from patients with burns greater than 10% and aged over 65 years managed on the Burns ITU between 2005 and 2009 were obtained. A frailty score (1-7) was assigned to each patient based on the records of their admission assessment. 42 patients met the study criteria for analysis. 18 (42.9%) patients, with mean age 74.9 years (range 65-95 years) survived (S) their ITU stay and of these, 83.3% survived at 1 year. 24 (57.2%) patients, mean age 78.4 years (range 66-95 years) died (D) whilst on ITU. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to age, percentage burn (30% TBSA range 10-85%) (P>0.05 using T Test) or inhalational injury (p>0.05 using Z test). Using Mann-Whitney U test analysis, the frailty score between the two groups showed a significant difference at p=0.0001 (Mann-Whitney U test=78), median=3 (S) and median=5 (D). This suggests patients with better pre-morbid capacity, as evaluated by the frailty scoring system, were more likely to survive their burn insult and treatment. Significantly, more patients in the group that survived underwent surgical debridement (Mann-Whitney U test=111, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Frailty scoring system appears to be a useful adjunct in predicting outcome in burns requiring admission to HDU/ITU in the senior population. The frailty score may predict which patients will benefit from surgery which also continues to be an important determinant of outcome in these patients.

The 'double headed slug flap': a simple technique to reconstruct large helical rim defects.

Reconstructing partial defects of the ear can be challenging, balancing the creation of the details of the ear with scarring, morbidity and number of surgical stages. Common causes of ear defects are human bites, tumour excision and burn injuries. Reconstructing defects of the ear with tube pedicled flaps and other local flaps requires an accurate measurement of size of the defect with little room for error, particularly under estimation. We present a simple method of reconstruction for partial defects of the ear using a two-stage technique with post auricular transposition flaps. This allows for under or over estimation of size defects permitting accurate tissue usage giving good aesthetic outcomes.