Prognostic impact of severe neutropenia in colorectal cancer patients treated with TAS-102 and bevacizumab, addressing immortal-time bias.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported an association between severe neutropenia and long-term survival in patients treated with trifluridine-tipiracil (TAS-102). Because some of these studies failed to address immortality time bias, however, their findings should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, the association between severe neutropenia and survival in patients receiving TAS-102 in combination with bevacizumab (Bmab) remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with colorectal cancer who received Bmab + TAS-102. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who developed grade ≥ 3 neutropenia during the treatment period and those who did not. To account for immortal time bias, we used two approaches, time-varying Cox regression and landmark analysis. RESULTS: Median OS was 15.3 months [95% CI: 14.1-NA] in patients with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and 10.0 months [95% CI: 8.1-NA] in those without. In time-varying Cox regression, onset grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly related to longer survival after adjustment for age and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score. Additionally, 30-, 60-, 90-, and 120-day landmark analysis showed that grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was associated with longer survival after adjustment for age and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score, with respective HRs of 0.30 [0.10-0.90], 0.65 [0.30-1.42], 0.39 [0.17-0.90], and 0.41 [0.18-0.95]. CONCLUSION: We identified an association between long-term survival and the development of severe neutropenia during the early cycle of Bmab + TAS-102 using an approach that addressed immortality time bias.

Efficacy and safety of 5HT3RA, DEX, and NK1RA for the prevention of FOLFIRINOX-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX), a standard chemotherapy regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), is expected to be associated with a higher risk of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Herein, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a three-drug combination of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists (5HT3RA), dexamethasone (DEX), and neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists (NK1RA) for the prevention of CINV during mFFX therapy. METHODS: This study enrolled patients with APC who received mFFX as initial therapy with a combination of 5HT3RA, DEX, and NK1RA as antiemetic prophylaxis. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate during cycle 1, which was defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use during the overall period (0-120 h). Safety was also evaluated with a focus on hyperglycemia, which is a concern in patients with APC. RESULTS: Seventy patients were eligible for this retrospective analysis. The CR rate during the overall period was 51.4%. Significant nausea, defined as grade 2 or higher, peaked to 77.1% on days 4-5, but remained above 65% until day 7. Hyperglycemia occurred in 37.1% of patients, and 34.3% were grade 3 hyperglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: CINV induced by mFFX was poorly controlled even with prophylactic antiemetic therapy using 5HT3RA, DEX, and NK1RA, and was found to persist beyond 5 days. Enhanced antiemetic measures for mFFX are desirable. However, in patients with diabetes mellitus complications, sparing of steroids and glycemic control should be considered.

Comparison of single trough-based area under the concentration-time curve versus trough concentration for the incidence of vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: While the revised 2020 consensus guideline recommends the use of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-guided vancomycin monitoring, collecting multiple vancomycin serum samples to calculate the AUC may cause clinical complications. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate whether AUC-guided vancomycin monitoring, in which AUC was calculated based on a single trough concentration, is a better predictor of nephrotoxicity than trough-guided monitoring in patients receiving vancomycin therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted at the 614-bed Gifu University Hospital in Japan. Patients who received intravenous vancomycin for a documented or suspected infection and had their serum vancomycin trough concentration monitored between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2020 were enrolled in the present study. RESULTS: Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that AUC (>600 µg•h/mL) was a significant risk factor for the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), while trough concentration (≥15 µg/mL) was not. Moreover, the AUC (>600 µg•h/mL) showed higher specificity and similar sensitivity to the trough concentration (≥15 µg/mL). Kaplan-Meier plots of the cumulative incidence of the AKI-free rate in patients indicated that the onset of AKI was significantly longer in patients with AUC ≤600 µg•h/mL than in patients with AUC >600 µg•h/mL (HR, 16.1; 95% CI, 6.3-41.2; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AUC based on a single trough concentration was a better predictor of nephrotoxicity than trough concentration.

Emetogenicity and Risk Factors of Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Receiving Trifluridine/Tipiracil and Bevacizumab Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Although combination chemotherapy with trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and bevacizumab (BEV) is highly effective for metastatic unresectable colorectal cancer (mCRC), this combination chemotherapy often induces nausea and vomiting. To identify risk factors for nausea and vomiting, we investigated the occurrence of nausea and vomiting in mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 and BEV. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study patients with mCRC received TAS-102 and BEV between March 2016 and December 2021. The status of nausea, vomiting, and antiemetic measures in each course were investigated, and factors involved in the occurrence of nausea and vomiting were analysed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Data from 57 patients were analysed. The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting during the overall period were 57.9% and 17.5%, respectively. Nausea and vomiting were frequent not only in the early courses but also after the sixth course. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the experience of nausea and vomiting in previous treatment with other agents was significantly associated with nausea and vomiting with TAS-102 and BEV. CONCLUSION: The experience of nausea and vomiting in previous treatment was associated with increased risk for nausea and vomiting in mCRC patients treated with TAS-102 and BEV.

Pharmaceutical stability of colloidal saccharated iron oxide injection in normal saline.

BACKGROUND: Colloidal saccharated iron oxide injection is used for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with a poor oral intake. Because of the poor stability of the colloid particle, there have been concerns regarding its compatibility with various injections in clinical practice. To assess the stability of colloidal saccharated iron oxide in normal saline as a diluent, pharmaceutical stability analyses were conducted using various concentrations of glucose and sodium chloride (NaCl). METHODS: Colloidal saccharated iron oxide injection was diluted in three different diluents (5% glucose solution, normal saline, and 10% NaCl solution), and its appearance, colloid particle diameter, and pH were assessed. Free iron ions, which cause adverse effects, such as nausea and vomiting, were separated from the colloid particle using a dialysis membrane for 24 h, and their concentration was determined. RESULTS: No difference in the appearance, colloid diameter, and free iron ion fraction was observed after dilution in 5% glucose solution and normal saline. Conversely, an increased colloid aggregation and iron ion release were observed after dilution in 10% NaCl solution. Although iron colloid is unstable in acidic conditions (pH 4.0-6.0), normal diluents such as 5% glucose and normal saline did not cause colloid destabilization by pH change (pH > 8.0). CONCLUSION: Normal saline may be used as a diluent of colloidal saccharated iron oxide injection as well as glucose solution, which is recommended by the pharmaceutical company. Therefore, normal saline can be used as a diluent of colloidal saccharated iron oxide injection in patients with an underlying disease, such as diabetes mellitus, who are difficult to use glucose solution as a diluent.