Investigation of the Subcellular Localization-Dependent Anti- or Pro-Tumor Functions of Maspin in Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Line.

BACKGROUND: Mammary serine protease inhibitor (maspin) is well known as a tumor suppressor gene in several types of cancers and its nuclear localization is essential for its tumor-suppressive function. We previously reported that the cytoplasmic-only localization of maspin is significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). To clarify whether maspin in LUAD acts as a tumor promoter or suppressor, we examined the subcellular localization-dependent biological functions of maspin in human LUAD cell lines. METHODS: The expression levels and subcellular localization of maspin were investigated by performing immunoblotting and immunofluorescence in human LUAD cell lines (PC-9, A549, NCI-H23, RERF-LC-KJ) and human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS-2B). We then established stable cell lines overexpressing maspin (A549-maspin and RERF-LC-KJ-maspin) and investigated their subcellular localization. Cell invasion assays of these cell lines were performed to examine their invasiveness. Moreover, the mRNA expression levels between epithelial cell markers (E-cadherin) and mesenchymal cell markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) were compared. RESULTS: The expression of maspin in PC-9 cells was comparable to that in BEAS-2B cells, whereas its expression in A549, NCI-H23, and RERF-LC-KJ cells was decreased. The cell invasion capability of A549-maspin cells showing pancellular expression was significantly decreased compared with that of A549-control cells. By contrast, the cell invasion capability of RERF-LC-KJ-maspin cells showing cytoplasmic-only expression was significantly increased compared with that of RERF-LC-KJ-control cells. The mRNA expression levels of N-cadherin, but not E-cadherin and vimentin, in A549-maspin cells was significantly downregulated compared with that in A549-control cells. No significant differences in these markers were observed between RERF-LC-KJ-maspin and RERF-LC-KJ-control cells. CONCLUSION: The invasive capability of LUAD cells is regulated by the intracellular localization of maspin. Clarification of the molecular mechanism underlying the subcellular localization-dependent function of maspin will promote a deeper understanding of LUAD development and progression.

Possible Relationship Between MYBL1 Alterations and Specific Primary Sites in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological and Molecular Study of 36 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a relatively rare malignant neoplasm that occurs in salivary glands and various other organs. Recent studies have revealed that a significant proportion of ACCs harbor gene alterations involving MYB or MYBL1 (mostly fusions with NFIB) in a mutually-exclusive manner. However, its clinical significance remains to be well-established. METHODS: We investigated clinicopathological and molecular features of 36 ACCs with special emphasis on the significance of MYBL1 alterations. Reverse-transcription polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) were performed to detect MYB/MYBL1-NFIB fusions and MYBL1 alterations, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate MYB expression in the tumors. The results were correlated with clinicopathological profiles of the patients. RESULTS: RT-PCR revealed MYB-NFIB and MYBL1-NFIB fusions in 10 (27.8%) and 7 (19.4%) ACCs, respectively, in a mutually-exclusive manner. FISH for MYBL1 rearrangements was successfully performed in 11 cases, and the results were concordant with those of RT-PCR. Immunohistochemically, strong MYB expression was observed in 23 (63.9%) tumors, none of which showed MYBL1 alterations. Clinicopathologically, a trend of a better disease-specific survival was noted in patients with MYBL1 alterations than in those with MYB-NFIB fusions and/or strong MYB expression; however, the difference was not significant. Interestingly, we found tumors with MYBL1 alterations significantly frequently occurred in the mandibular regions (P = 0.012). Moreover, literature review revealed a similar tendency in a previous study. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there are some biological or etiological differences between ACCs with MYB and MYBL1 alterations. Moreover, the frequent occurrence of MYBL1-associated ACC in the mandibular regions suggests that MYB immunohistochemistry is less useful in diagnosing ACCs arising in these regions. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings.

Detection of Disease-specific Fusion Genes of Soft Tissue Tumors Using Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissues; Its Diagnostic Usefulness and Factors Affecting the Detection Rates.

BACKGROUND: Recent rapid advances in molecular biology have led the discovery of disease-specific novel fusion genes in a variety of soft tissue tumors. In this study, we attempted to detect these fusion genes using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues and investigated their clinical utility and factors that affect the results of examination. METHODS: Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the detection of tumor-specific fusion genes was performed using 41 FFPE tumor samples obtained from 37 patients representing nine histological types of soft tissue tumors that were diagnosed from 2006 to 2017 in our laboratory. RESULTS: Fusion genes in 19 (51.3%) out of 37 cases were detected successfully. Relatively high detection rates were observed in synovial sarcomas (100%, 4/4) and alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (75%, 3/4). The detection rates of fusion genes were inversely correlated with the storage period of FFPE blocks. Decalcification by Plank-Rychlo solution significantly affected detection rates of the internal control gene (P = 0.0038). In contrast, there was no significant difference in detection rates between primary and metastatic lesion, or biopsy and resection material, or presence and absence of treatment history. CONCLUSION: In certain histological types, detection of disease-specific fusion genes of soft tissue tumors using FFPE tissues showed high sensitivity and thus had diagnostic utility. However, due to the diversity of fusion patterns and the low-quality of nucleic acid, the detection rate as a whole was sluggish and required further improvement. For factors affecting the detection results, our results suggested that it was impossible to detect fusion genes by decalcified FFPE tissues, but it may be not necessary to consider factors such as the type of specimen (biopsy or resection) and treatment history of the patients when selecting the FFPE tissues.